yo what about them inactives amirite
uhhhh
let's see
hmmm
...
ahhh
You're all playing smart, I see
I get it
Did you know I made the logo for this game
Kawl, remind them that I made the logo
"ohhh hi I am Kawl, Blarg made the logo for this game and I am Kawl"
Ok not the millers. So besides Boo, who does have your attention so far?i disagree
interesting that boo yet again grip-ons to what CzarTim has to say about me. might be more understandable if they were partners, but they're not. these eyes remain open.
boo's partner ultrajay only has one post
so does magnum
on the topic of miller: i agree that even if timeflux proves themselves to have a cop ability thanks to the millers, it doesn't prove who the millers are
and if the millers are the millers b/c their alignment will show up as bad, then I guess that might mean there's a cop with the ability to check an alignment. or somehow the miller's issues is that their name changes to something like "wearemcscummyscum" to any namecop, but my gut says that's too much of a stretch.
what i don't think is the right course of action is to kill off the millers today. i want to see how the timeflux-blargkawl pans out on Day 2, it sounds very exciting. killing the millers right now would take away the opportunity for us to crack open this timeflux conundrum. long live blargkawl.
Yeah, I agree with you there my fiery friend.interesting that boo yet again grip-ons to what CzarTim has to say about me. might be more understandable if they were partners, but they're not. these eyes remain open.
Ok not the millers. So besides Boo, who does have your attention so far?
Hey Launch
Speaking of activity, Gorlak gave a pretty good post regarding his thoughts sometimes back. What do you think about all of that? I don't think you've said too much outside of the Flux/Timeasis
ugh, don't be so anally retentive about my word choice
and I fail to see what's haphazard about it
I refuse to believe that 18 people don't have enough of an opinion at this stage to make a bit of a commitment of this nature, it's not like you're RNGing it
Scummy. Probably in second for me after Coppa and Flame.
I was uneasy initially and said so in my big dump post this morning, Gorlak then specfically calling Splints and I out for 'dominating' discussion has only reinforced my suspicion. I was holding till Launch started up but his initial posts haven't really helped my opinion.
LaunchpadMcQ
Revolver Ocelot gifs. Says that he doesn't see much to comment on, so he isn't. I don't like that kind of comment; will have to refer back to previous games I've participated in and see who the people were that said similar things.
Is it reasonable to be wary of teams I feel are communicating a whole bunch in private and not in the thread? Because I have a gut feeling Gorlak and Launch would be one of those teams.
Who is being self-conscious is Launch.
mcgolak - giving me an empty vibe, mclaunchpad in particular. seems more than willing to glide among the trees, observing but not touching. might be easy for scum to do in a crowded game.
Is it going to take an argument from me to get you posting?
I was uneasy initially and said so in my big dump post this morning, Gorlak then specfically calling Splints and I out for 'dominating' discussion has only reinforced my suspicion. I was holding till Launch started up but his initial posts haven't really helped my opinion.
I've given my opinion on your shenanigans, multiple times if I'm not mistaken. That's about all I've had so far. I will say, though, I have strong gut feelings about multiple players, but again nothing to really act on. I got burned pretty bad last game I played (tl;dr: lots of bad calls on lynches, realized who last scum was too late, terrible gambits), so you can understand me being a bit more cautious this time around.
Also, re:communication outside of thread, Gorlak and I have a steady stream of it, yes, but it's mostly observations of other players I don't feel are fit for discussion in this thread - as is our right. I don't trust anyone else.
Yes, please.
I didn't respond to this.
Gorlak is playing well. His opinions are well-formed outside of the thread and his posts are pretty high quality. I've not had much to say, and what little I have, I have said without reservation. If you want to say something, cabot, come out and say it. Stop trying to get people to form an argument for you.
But yeah, I actually forgot to add to my original comment that pretty much all you've commented on is on my team. There's no point in D1 revolving around a single subject.
It's not enough to stew inside your collective head, Gorlaunch. Mafia is played by communication, not mind-reading.
I mean it's one thing to comment that nobody has said anything important, but are you helping?
What else would you have me comment on? Please be specific; I don't have that much time to comb through posts.
I've squandered my work day on this aggressive karks attacks, but I promise to have a more proactive evening of hunting, friend.
I'm basically on the same page as him for the first half of that post, but I don't share the same sentiments about Splinter/Cabot or the other pair, however Cabot attacking us for attacking him... well, it seems like a Cabot thing to do, so I don't think much of it. I will defend myself if he pushes, though. Mostly, I'm waiting for something to jump out at me - it feels like the more we play mafia here, the more careful and harder to read people become.
Hell if I know, whatever anyone else is commenting on? Even if you think D1 conversation is pointless, it creates building blocks that we can refer to on subsequent Day phases when we have more information to work with. All of this serves to find scum, as useless as it may seem.
You're not going to have much sway in later days if you take a stance then that you showed no hint of before, too.
I also commented that the Miller/Track claim is probably legit, because it just makes sense - yours is the one that doesn't. I would believe there is a miller role with a semi-important role, a sort of balancing scheme; moreover, a miller should claim early, as team Blarg has.
The problem is you're basing your opinion largely on setup spec and tunneling on it. Is it possible they are lying? Sure of course. And if you think that's the case, feel free to vote. But saying "a moderator would never do this" is just silly given the lack of info here.I still don't really see how Miller balances a Tracker. A tracker is relatively better than a miller, of course, but it's a pretty bad counterweight.
A typical tracker role is already, by design, working on a disadvantage of having a fairly incomplete picture of the situation. They have a pretty wide margin for misinterpreting results (or just not hitting a result at all).
If Town has a Cop who could potentially trip on the Miller, and a Tracker role attached to a Miller, then ..I just hope we also have something really cool that's actually going to help us.
In other words, the Miller/Tracker claim makes no sense.
Ty4on, and to a couple others. It seems like there is a very slow flow of votes towards Coppa and I. Ty4on, you're reasoning is that you're "not sold on us" and "you see others warming to us". What kind of reasoning is that? I'm not changing my vote from an inactive, but that vote is basically a typical "I see votes flowing one way, I'm gonna drop in and no one will care."
If you or anyone else had real reasoning then maybe Coppa and I could try and respond, as it is, the argument is "Coppa seems kinda like he did that one time he was scum, and I am policy voting a miller so I must be scum too."
I think as a pair we've contributed to the discussion so far, but I guess not?
What's your opinion on kitty / hyper?What else would you have me comment on? Please be specific; I don't have that much time to comb through posts.
The problem is you're basing your opinion largely on setup spec and tunneling on it. Is it possible they are lying? Sure of course. And if you think that's the case, feel free to vote. But saying "a moderator would never do this" is just silly given the lack of info here.
Hell if I know, whatever anyone else is commenting on? Even if you think D1 conversation is pointless, it creates building blocks that we can refer to on subsequent Day phases when we have more information to work with. All of this serves to find scum, as useless as it may seem.
You're not going to have much sway in later days if you take a stance then that you showed no hint of before, too.
I still don't really see how Miller balances a Tracker. A tracker is relatively better than a miller, of course, but it's a pretty bad counterweight.
A typical tracker role is already, by design, working on a disadvantage of having a fairly incomplete picture of the situation. They have a pretty wide margin for misinterpreting results (or just not hitting a result at all).
If Town has a Cop who could potentially trip on the Miller, and a Tracker role attached to a Miller, then ..I just hope we also have something really cool that's actually going to help us.
In other words, the Miller/Tracker claim makes no sense.
What's your opinion on kitty / hyper?
WHERES MY LOVER???!!
Nah it ain't that deep, I don't exactly have a hard read on KingKitty's but it's good to have a target early game and Tim's thing on KK works for me to justify the eye watch. Greater good and all that.
As explained above.
Day 1 role claming always rubs me the wrong way, so I am far from happy about this turn of events. I don't buy any of them as of now. Will wait to see how this plays out a bit before placing a vote.
everything is hearsay until there is action. When we start attacking hard on Day 1, it's usually in attempt to get someone to crack. It's why I'm so perturbed by the Day 1 claims, they just run counter to the average Day 1 around here. Then again, this is GAFia, and we all know how crazy our setups get...
So, we have a claimed cop pair and a claimed miller pair, correct? Jeez... Not really comfortable taking the gamble on either of them for right now, especially since making those claims on Day 1 is about the worst scum play one can make. At least wait until Day 2, ya know?
Ok, let me stop you before you go too far up your own butt with the meta talk. You didn't design this game; Burb did. Is Miller/Tracker a possibility? Yes, it is. I don't know what all is going in this game, but obviously, the two roleclaims do not mesh well together. I believe Blarg more on the basis that the Miller/Tracker feels more genuine and elaborate than just a miller or just a role cop. I'm not sold, but it's just what I think.just kidding, you already did
I'm just curious why you went from hating D1 claims to being ok with it (or at least ok enough to let them live). What made you change your heart here? You've taken a neutral stance here, where do you stand on believing them? As people have said, Day 1 is about setting up beliefs and watching people try to argue out of them later. You've set yourself up right in the middle of all this, and I would like to see a stance on this rather than making up your mind "After all this has played out".
There's no change in stance Coppa. I don't like Day 1 claims because they don't do town any good.
I'm not only looking at it from a game design point of view. The way the role was revealed and the insistence on clearing Flux with it is arguably even more nonsense then the Miller/Tracker mix.
To recap:
1) They needlessly revealed the Tracker part of the role, when they only needed to reveal the Miller part. Any amount of prudence would have had them keep the Tracker part secret.
2) They claim they can verify Flux's claim of being a Name Cop, despite admitting that their role name is ambiguous; meaning that we don't get an answer on whether Blarg/Kawl are Town or Scum.
The verification means nothing because if Blawl are scum and Timeflux are Town, it still wouldn't really impact Blawl's position to confirm them. This is like scum asking a Cop to come to their door and present themselves. Do you see how this is fishy?
I remember when I tried the no lynch thing.
Am I not supposed to bring up thoughts? What an odd question
Yes, please.
I didn't respond to this.
Gorlak is playing well. His opinions are well-formed outside of the thread and his posts are pretty high quality. I've not had much to say, and what little I have, I have said without reservation. If you want to say something, cabot, come out and say it. Stop trying to get people to form an argument for you.
Ty4on, and to a couple others. It seems like there is a very slow flow of votes towards Coppa and I. Ty4on, you're reasoning is that you're "not sold on us" and "you see others warming to us". What kind of reasoning is that? I'm not changing my vote from an inactive, but that vote is basically a typical "I see votes flowing one way, I'm gonna drop in and no one will care."
If you or anyone else had real reasoning then maybe Coppa and I could try and respond, as it is, the argument is "Coppa seems kinda like he did that one time he was scum, and I am policy voting a miller so I must be scum too."
I think as a pair we've contributed to the discussion so far, but I guess not?
I was getting scummy vibes from coppa and flame at first too, but I cooled on them a bit. Like my one true love said, they aren't being self-conscious in the way scum is usually...
Because they've posted so much I'm curious if you're suspicious of anything Cabot and Splinter haven't posted. Your suspicion seems to be based on a feeling they're fluffy and posting a lot to steer discussion so I wonder what you'd like to see coming from them.I gave specific insight to my views, if you want to talk, directly ask me.
I don't suspect you for attacking us, I suspect you because your reasoning feels forced. I don't believe you have a sincere suspicion against us based on the points you've made, and there are only a couple of reasons to fake that.I still feel uncomfortable about Cabot and Splinter. They are good players and know it. They were handwaving my arguments with bullshit reasoning - i.e. "that's how we roll" yeah, that's exactly how you not played in MGS, like the game you both were town (hello meta). Anyway this is Day 1, my gut feeling and instincts raise the alarm, but obviously I'm alone in this. Your retaliation only strengthened my doubts. Moving discussion away from circle-jerking the claims, surely only with the best interests of town in mind. It was a coincidence you went for someone who openly expressed his distrusts of you...?
I gave specific insight to my views, if you want to talk, directly ask me.
Apparently El Miracle are also in this game.
I see, the Launchpad Defense. I hate it, but since you aren't the absolute bottom of the activity pile I guess I can afford to "wait and see"I can't speak for Miracle, but I have followed the game despite work. I just don't want to post prematurely, especially since I'm trying a more thorough approach this time. I'd also prefer to consult Miracle first, before voting/accusing someone.
I gave specific insight to my views, if you want to talk, directly ask me.
I never asked for thisI've not paid great attention to Flame and Coppa just yet, simply because they didn't stand out. Reread all their posts just now.
They are fairly active and quickly jumped on both of the claims with a vote (which others did as well). Worringly about this might be the fact that they retracted from their standpoints pretty fast once they experienced headwind on those matters. Withdrawing from your view this early is a sign of insecurity. Still I don't feel this would be anywhere near enough to vote for them.
Kawl mentioned they came out with every detail, to not be distrusted later. This was a poor choice, but at the same time surprisingly lessens my doubts about them. It would be wrong to lynch them today.
Flux I await the second part of your unnecessary gambit soon. For the record: I don't think you actually have a cop role, but somehow still are town. The reactions are out and you don't want us to hazardously decide on a lynch at the last minute? Alternatively Timeaisis could help us on that matter. Maybe you also want to offer some more opinions on anything as you were quite silent.
I don't know what you remember of Mgs but apparently not a lot. Using meta is bad enough, using warped meta is worse
It's nice to think you're so confident in your belief that you would take us down day 1 when there have been half pairs and pairs doing almost nothing in this phase that'll get a pass.
I don't suspect you for attacking us, I suspect you because your reasoning feels forced. I don't believe you have a sincere suspicion against us based on the points you've made, and there are only a couple of reasons to fake that.