Gunslinger
Member
Best is Django and pulp fiction imo.
I wouldn't say its as good as Pulp Fiction, but its great. The ending is a bit weak but it has one of the best villains in cinema in the past 20 years.
I whole-heartedly agree. I love the entire movie but those scenes in particular are just incredible filmmaking.The opening scene, the restaurant scene, and the bar scene are some of the most tense scenes put to film. Absolutely masterfully crafted.
That is my favorite scene of the film. Gruesome, funny, mixed sympathy and revulsion for both the Nazis and the Basterds. Eli Roth's dramatic entrance followed by the beating. I can't even think of the words to describe the beating, but it was perfect. Definitely weird thing to cheer for, considering how grim it was and the "Bravery" delivery immediately preceding it.I think it is fantastic, but horribly misunderstood by a lot of the audience watching it. When I was in theaters, people were cheering during the baseball bat kill. Seriously, wtf
Not to get into it but the love Django gets puzzles me. It's dwindling, not unexpectedly, but the last 30 minutes or so was such a mess.
That is my favorite scene of the film. Gruesome, funny, mixed sympathy and revulsion for both the Nazis and the Basterds. Eli Roth's dramatic entrance followed by the beating. I can't even think of the words to describe the beating, but it was perfect. Definitely weird thing to cheer for, considering how grim it was and the "Bravery" delivery immediately preceding it.
Bongiorno.
That's a bingo.Its extremely fun, but not as quotable as Pulp Fiction.
The lack of subtlty of the violence was in that scene, without being over the top, was part of what impressed me. The music cuts out the second the beating starts and the violence is not stylized or lingered on overlong. If the camera had instead cut away, I think the revulsion would be diminished. We might be left feeling that we should be cheering with them, as we would saved the ugly reality of what is happening.I'm almost the complete opposite. There are some awesome scenes in IG, but I guess the over-the-top gratuitous violence sort-of distracted from what Tarantino was going for? I donno - it's like, I get that I'm supposed to be disgusted by the Basterds because they're not much better than the Nazis; but there's no subtlety to the violence in IG.
I think back to stuff like Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs and the violence takes place right after the camera cuts away (i.e. needle in the chest or ear getting cut off, respectively). The audience is still "ohhh ewww," but it's the audience's imagination filling in what's not shown. In IG, however there's no subtlety to the violence; QT seems to relish in the shot of a head getting smashed in (I realize it's a film and escapism, but I guess I can't separate from reality completely). And I understand that IG is a completely different genre than the aforementioned films, but even after watching it multiple times I just feel revulsion for the supposed "good guys" and the "bad guys."
I've got the blu-ray in my library, but it's not a film that I find myself watching for enjoyment. Then again, I'm pretty much that way with all war movies; I find them emotionally draining, but perhaps that's what QT was going for (and completely reveling in it)? If that's the case, then I guess he succeeded completely.
Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown, and Inglourious Basterds are interchangeable as his best film(s). Any one of them could be #1, really. All are solid choices.
Anyone saying Django Unchained (seriously, with that 3rd act?) or Kill Bill...pfft.