• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Lucasfilm desperately needs new leadership

BlackTron

Gold Member
Why fire her? She did what Disney wanted, burn millions on sending a message.

This was my thinking. For her to get fired, someone at Disney would need to have a problem with the job she is doing. Most likely, she is doing exactly the job she was intended to do.

There is some disparity between shareholder woes and agenda, which is why you have this crusade against the "toxic fans", that is, the problem isn't Star Wars, its the fanbase. But I think the goal was always to push an agenda first and make money second.
 

Konnor

Member
Does Kathleen Kennedy have a video of Walt Disney fucking a horse of something? There's no fucking way she's that fucking incompetent and they still keep her after all these years without her having something big on them
 

diunxx

Member
No.

The prequel trilogy has a mediocre story, though it is engaging enough, the casting of Anakin was wrong, and the dialogue dire, but it has lots to merit it. The cast are otherwise great, and the CGI fantastic for the time.

TLJ is not just boring, but shit in many ways. The story is one boring film long space chase about fuel with a side quest that goes nowhere, and the actors are shit apart from Carrie Fischer, Mark Hamill, and John Boyega.
They have no merits at all, even most of the amazing cast was phoning it in thanks to the awful direction and the incredibly bad script
 

Tams

Gold Member
They have no merits at all, even most of the amazing cast was phoning it in thanks to the awful direction and the incredibly bad script

Wrong.

The prequels captured the 'essence' of Star Wars, refined it even.

Yes, the directing of the actors and the dialogue was dire. But, due to the strength of the world building, the films were still good.

The sequels have no redeeming features bar a few good actors and the storyline of the Stormtrooper going rogue... that was then entirely wasted.
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
I ended up watching the prequel trilogy in its entirety yesterday. It's the first time in 18 years.

Ultimately I'm struck by how much care and effort was put into constructing this story. Lucas clearly researched Ancient Rome to draw from not only the last days of the Republic but also the several hundred years leading up to it. He drew from Shakespeare for the doomed love story between Anakin and Padme. Yes, the politics and trade disputes are a bit dry at times--see House of the Dragon for how to maintain tension and audience engagement during political intrigue--but they succeed in fleshing out the setting and making it feel real and far bigger than the individual characters existing within it, despite those characters' importance and influence on events.

Lucas deliberately crafted all the characters to be deeply flawed and complex, as humans are, which ran the risk of alienating fans who were accustomed to the archetypical Hero's Journey arc of the OT. Obi-Wan is not the right teacher for Anakin at all, and his own ego and insecurity get in the way of raising him well. Anakin's traumatic past as a slave and his lack of mother and father figures leave him damaged, afraid of losing Padme, unable to find approval from Obi-Wan or the Jedi Council. The Jedi are arrogant, complacent, and blind to their shortcomings and hypocrisy. Mace Windu is a mirror image of Palpatine's rationalizations, which cements Anakin's decision to commit to the dark side. This is heavy, mature stuff.

It also fits well overall with the OT. You can nitpick a few things like the Jedi robes or the youngling training, maybe the midichlorians demystifying The Force too much (though, in retrospect it's not a big deal and just demonstrated the level of technology available during the republic and the methods the Jedi used as a mainstream organization), but overall a lot of care is taken to fit it in logically with the original trilogy while still going in a completely different narrative direction.

I can't dislike the prequels anymore.
 

DGrayson

Mod Team and Bat Team
Staff Member
This was my thinking. For her to get fired, someone at Disney would need to have a problem with the job she is doing. Most likely, she is doing exactly the job she was intended to do.

There is some disparity between shareholder woes and agenda, which is why you have this crusade against the "toxic fans", that is, the problem isn't Star Wars, its the fanbase. But I think the goal was always to push an agenda first and make money second.

I'm not sure about this. No large corporation will choose an agenda over money. The only way to reconcile your view would be that perhaps they think catering to diversity now might cost them some money in the short term but will make them more over the long term. But a pure agenda play over profits is just not believable for any major corporation.
 
Last edited:

Saber

Member
I ended up watching the prequel trilogy in its entirety yesterday. It's the first time in 18 years.

Ultimately I'm struck by how much care and effort was put into constructing this story. Lucas clearly researched Ancient Rome to draw from not only the last days of the Republic but also the several hundred years leading up to it. He drew from Shakespeare for the doomed love story between Anakin and Padme. Yes, the politics and trade disputes are a bit dry at times--see House of the Dragon for how to maintain tension and audience engagement during political intrigue--but they succeed in fleshing out the setting and making it feel real and far bigger than the individual characters existing within it, despite those characters' importance and influence on events.

Lucas deliberately crafted all the characters to be deeply flawed and complex, as humans are, which ran the risk of alienating fans who were accustomed to the archetypical Hero's Journey arc of the OT. Obi-Wan is not the right teacher for Anakin at all, and his own ego and insecurity get in the way of raising him well. Anakin's traumatic past as a slave and his lack of mother and father figures leave him damaged, afraid of losing Padme, unable to find approval from Obi-Wan or the Jedi Council. The Jedi are arrogant, complacent, and blind to their shortcomings and hypocrisy. Mace Windu is a mirror image of Palpatine's rationalizations, which cements Anakin's decision to commit to the dark side. This is heavy, mature stuff.

It also fits well overall with the OT. You can nitpick a few things like the Jedi robes or the youngling training, maybe the midichlorians demystifying The Force too much (though, in retrospect it's not a big deal and just demonstrated the level of technology available during the republic and the methods the Jedi used as a mainstream organization), but overall a lot of care is taken to fit it in logically with the original trilogy while still going in a completely different narrative direction.

I can't dislike the prequels anymore.

Which is why I feel this new generation of people is doomed. To trade such a complex movie to one that favors emotions, clear social intentions from the writters and put a god damn Mary Sue in it...people have basically abandoned all of its left of their standarts.

Maybe people just want to be different for the sake of being different or just want that classic "gotcha" because its a woman in the lead, which is a proved fact that nobody has aversion of a female lead but for gods sake put someone good at it with a good writting.

And I aways liked the prequels(and understand why some people didn't). I wasn't fan of SW until I watched the prequels and find those movies goddamn entertaiment. What I did after that? Watch the old ones with pleasure and became interested in the franchise.
 

Fbh

Gold Member
My honest vote, after I got the rage out temporarily anyway, is honestly just reboot. Hard reboot. Set in the Old Republic. Or so far after OT/ST that those events are ACTUAL legends, not TFA JJ Abrams "I've heard the tales!" ...Of an event that happened less than half a century ago? I dunno, JJ, I've heard tales of 9/11 but I'm not sure it actually fucking happened. Fucking asscocks at Disney. Nevermind. The rage has returned.

But yeah, easiest way to do it would be to go so far in either physical space or time that none of Rey Skywalker's super inclusive for checklists sake, assembly line pseudo intellectual, Marvel one line zinger wacky adventures can have even a passing influence on a side character's background dialogue.

Yup, at this point the only thing that can get me to even remotely care about a new Star Wars TV/Movie project is if it's set hundreds of years before or after the OT with completely new story and characters.

Everything related to the OT is so tainted now that it's really hard to care.
Also IMO the entire rebels vs empire (or first order) thing has been really played out by now, and knowing it ultimately all leads to Rey and Palpatine having their anime showdown doesn't help.
 
Last edited:

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
The scary thing for me, is that these franchises being run into the ground are irreplaceable.

Noone's done a "better" Star Wars since 1976. Noone's done a better Indiana Jones than Raiders in 1981.

Yes, there has been the whole Superhero thing, but they weren't original properties and the signs of fatigue have well and truly set in on that sub-genre.

My question is simple:

What's next?

I can't see tentpole blockbusterr line-ups like we've had for the last few years being around a decade from now, let alone in 40+ years like the time these key Lucasfilm have been around.

Add to that almost every major genre hit feels like its been remade already!

Being honest, this seems terminal to me. Westerns and musicals were once upon a time the event movies that everyone went to see, and they died out too.
 

TheInfamousKira

Reseterror Resettler
The scary thing for me, is that these franchises being run into the ground are irreplaceable.

Noone's done a "better" Star Wars since 1976. Noone's done a better Indiana Jones than Raiders in 1981.

Yes, there has been the whole Superhero thing, but they weren't original properties and the signs of fatigue have well and truly set in on that sub-genre.

My question is simple:

What's next?

I can't see tentpole blockbusterr line-ups like we've had for the last few years being around a decade from now, let alone in 40+ years like the time these key Lucasfilm have been around.

Add to that almost every major genre hit feels like its been remade already!

Being honest, this seems terminal to me. Westerns and musicals were once upon a time the event movies that everyone went to see, and they died out too.

Hollywood is going to remain in stasis for the foreseeable future because of lack of talent. Talented writers, actors, production crew, etc. No one has a vision that they've thought through for more than five minutes, and they'll just respond by continually torching franchises that have a pedigree until it bottoms out and the only shit that anyone notices are the things that have actual skill and heart behind them.

It's like anything in the world. Can only go so far up until the guys building the top floor are so high up that they've forgotten the techniques of the guys who planted the foundation and Babel comes crumbling down.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
I'm not sure about this. No large corporation will choose an agenda over money. The only way to reconcile your view would be that perhaps they think catering to diversity now might cost them some money in the short term but will make them more over the long term. But a pure agenda play over profits is just not believable for any major corporation.
With Blackrock and the ESG score it's quite possible to prioritize "the message" over pure profit because the favorable loans offset the money lost. Disney can take a 250 mill hit on TLM to secure 2 billion in loans at a better rate.
 

Darkmakaimura

Can You Imagine What SureAI Is Going To Do With Garfield?
Hayden gets a lot better in Episode 3 and in other films he’s totally fine. In Ep 2, in fairness, the character is supposed to be an awkward, inexperienced adolescent would-be monk/samurai stoic exploring romantic feelings for the first time and stumbling through it all, but Hayden doesn’t quite pull it off convincingly. That’s on George.

You’re right that his physical acting is great though and he and Ewan are legendary for the training they did to pull off the final duel. Only a handful of actors have gone that far for action scenes.

Honestly, it’s a shame that the fandom has targeted actors over the years, like Jake Lloyd, who played his part well and didn’t deserve to have his life ruined.

Daisy is fine too. Not her fault she’s written as a Mary Sue.
I felt bad for the actress who played Rose in the sequel trilogy. I heard she's really nice in real life and in a restaurant when people were talking about Star Wars she introduced herself as the actress and had her picture taken with them. So she seemed to loved the fan base but she unfortunately got a lot of shit and harassment from people who didn't like her character. It's not her fault. Blame it on the freaking writers.
 

0neAnd0nly

Member
You can't repair it. Striking the sequel Trilogy from canon doesn't change the fact that you can't, literally physically cannot get a do over. They had Disney budget, hype from TFA, all three of the OT leads in one place, they had the opportunity to make a cinematic event and on screen reunion with three fantastic personalities who have had thirty plus years for their character to marinade in their minds. With proper writing and editing, Episode VIII could have been THE Star Wars movie to rival ESB in terms of franchise and pop culture impact.

Carrie Fisher is gone. That opportunity was literally murdered in front of our eyes in real time because they decided to try and be super artistic and intellectual with a franchise about alien shooty bang bang. Like, you couldn't have saved this BOLD NEW DIRECTION for one of your smaller and safer projects? Like fucking Sebulba: A Star Wars Story or some shit? It HAD to be the reunion film of three almost archetypal-generating icons of film, who are all old as fuck?

Someone at Disney, be it the CEO, Kennedy, Johnson, Walt fucking Disney's Brain connected to a computer, fucking SOMEONE did this intentionally, knowing that the pieces would never align again. Literally ruined a catharsis that would be appreciated by millions. I don't care if Rian Johnson wrote episode 8 on par with The Illiad, dude is forever on my shit list for fucking his shot to get them all together up.

Fuck.

Walt Disney would never have done that.

Iger and his puppet Chapek and their newly adopted “everything has to be political and have depth for the TikTok generation” is by far the MAJOR lead behind the absolute plummet into unwatchability.

Nothing is fun anymore. Everything is about the corporations moral messaging!
 

DGrayson

Mod Team and Bat Team
Staff Member
With Blackrock and the ESG score it's quite possible to prioritize "the message" over pure profit because the favorable loans offset the money lost. Disney can take a 250 mill hit on TLM to secure 2 billion in loans at a better rate.

But in the end its still profitable somewhere. They save interest on favorable rates loans etc. Ultimately its a money exercise either on a short or long term play or both.
 
Last edited:

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
I felt bad for the actress who played Rose in the sequel trilogy. I heard she's really nice in real life and in a restaurant when people were talking about Star Wars she introduced herself as the actress and had her picture taken with them. So she seemed to loved the fan base but she unfortunately got a lot of shit and harassment from people who didn't like her character. It's not her fault. Blame it on the freaking writers.
Absolutely, she's just doing her job and wasn't out to destroy anything.

Captain Cringe Rian Johnson tried to relive his high school days over some nerd crush he had to further subvert expectations.

ia6myymf81741.png
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
But in the end its still profitable somewhere. They save interest on favorable rates loans etc. Ultimately its a money exercise either on a short or long term play or both.
Well, it's semi-hidden market manipulation, not really a free consumer decision. And at scale, no less.
 

diunxx

Member
Wrong.

The prequels captured the 'essence' of Star Wars, refined it even.

Yes, the directing of the actors and the dialogue was dire. But, due to the strength of the world building, the films were still good.

The sequels have no redeeming features bar a few good actors and the storyline of the Stormtrooper going rogue... that was then entirely wasted.
What "Essence"? they are terrible movies, with terrible scripts and terrible performances.
 

Fbh

Gold Member
Has anyone seen many kids liking the sequel trilogy?

I feel that the ST is the least kid friendly of all SW movies. So much of it is meta commentary (almost 4th wall breaking) that most kids won't understand wtf is going on unless they happen to be hardcore SW fans.

Yeah the prequels had some boring senate hearing scenes, but I remember kids enjoying them.

Maybe I'm wasting my time w/ this question here because online, I hear ST defenders say that everyone in their personal life loves The Last Jedi and that it's only online that they see the hate. It's like we live in completely different realities.

This is completely anecdotal but since my niece and nephew are still young and into toys I've been browsing the toys section during Christmas time for these past few years and I'm always surprised how there's barely anything from Star Wars in there (at least in the stores in my town).

Baby Yoda seems to be the one thing Disney has made with Star Wars that kids seem to have an interest in (And BB8 but I've seen it less in recent years).
Other than that you just see some lightsabers (mostly from OT and prequel characters) and some legos (mostly from OT or prequel stuff)
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
No, she really doesn't. Lol.

I like tlj because I like quality performances and well shot action scenes, strong dialogue and visuals. You dont because... something definitely other than whatever you're posting here, like name typos.
Well shot action sequences? In The Last Jedi? The only real action sequences in that movie are the racing animals riding though the casino, Kylo Ren flailing around Force Luke in a tantrum and the fight with the Praetorian Guard at the end.

The Praetorian Guard fight was pretty good with great visuals. But it had Rey being every bit as masterful a sword fighter as Kylo Ren, making it not believable at all. She didn't have the training nor the experience to be on the level of Kylo Ren, reinforcing the whole Mary Sue thing.

They did try to make it seem at times like she was outclassed by the guards, but they dumbed down Kylo Ren into a weaker fighter to make him not seem superior despite his greater level of experience. It's a striking example of the really bad manifestation of the Rey character overwhelming what could have been a great scene.
 


These flops are just tip of the iceberg. Their park attendance is falling. D+ is losing subscribers. Recent layoffs at ESPN. The ship is sinking and it's now time for the internal blame game. Grab your popcorns!
 

Doom85

Gold Member


These flops are just tip of the iceberg. Their park attendance is falling. D+ is losing subscribers. Recent layoffs at ESPN. The ship is sinking and it's now time for the internal blame game. Grab your popcorns!


Um, 2022 saw a 20+% increase in park attendance over the prior year, and it was well known that the recent 4 million loss of subscribers was due to Disney+ India losing rights to cricket matches.
 

Toons

Member
Well shot action sequences? In The Last Jedi? The only real action sequences in that movie are the racing animals riding though the casino, Kylo Ren flailing around Force Luke in a tantrum and the fight with the Praetorian Guard at the end.

The Praetorian Guard fight was pretty good with great visuals. But it had Rey being every bit as masterful a sword fighter as Kylo Ren, making it not believable at all. She didn't have the training nor the experience to be on the level of Kylo Ren, reinforcing the whole Mary Sue thing.

They did try to make it seem at times like she was outclassed by the guards, but they dumbed down Kylo Ren into a weaker fighter to make him not seem superior despite his greater level of experience. It's a striking example of the really bad manifestation of the Rey character overwhelming what could have been a great scene.

The praetorian fight is not not at the end, its in the midpoint of rhe movie.

And no, kylo ren completely outclassed her in that scene, and the dudes they are fighting aren't force capable anyway so they already have an advantage.

Kylo ren is shown clearly to be a much better fighter in each movie of the trilogy, and rey already new how to fight before she even left her planet.

I dont see the problem here. Her being competent in battle doesn't make her a Mary sue any more than anakin was a Mary sue for outlying battle droids in the PT. She's tough but she gets completely beaten by kylo in every instance except the one where he has a bleeding hole in his stomach.

The dog fights are pretty good in the movie, and the entire final sequence on Crait is great action wise.
 

Toons

Member
Hollywood is going to remain in stasis for the foreseeable future because of lack of talent. Talented writers, actors, production crew, etc. No one has a vision that they've thought through for more than five minutes, and they'll just respond by continually torching franchises that have a pedigree until it bottoms out and the only shit that anyone notices are the things that have actual skill and heart behind them.

It's like anything in the world. Can only go so far up until the guys building the top floor are so high up that they've forgotten the techniques of the guys who planted the foundation and Babel comes crumbling down.

Nah, all this doomsaying is nonsense.

Theres plenty of talented indivuals working and plenty of talented creative in the industry making good movies. And most of rhe guys who made the movies you grew up enjoying are still working. Ridley Scott, sam raimi, James Cameron, etc.

You have to actively ignore plenty of content to approach otherwise.
 

Toons

Member
I ended up watching the prequel trilogy in its entirety yesterday. It's the first time in 18 years.

Ultimately I'm struck by how much care and effort was put into constructing this story. Lucas clearly researched Ancient Rome to draw from not only the last days of the Republic but also the several hundred years leading up to it. He drew from Shakespeare for the doomed love story between Anakin and Padme. Yes, the politics and trade disputes are a bit dry at times--see House of the Dragon for how to maintain tension and audience engagement during political intrigue--but they succeed in fleshing out the setting and making it feel real and far bigger than the individual characters existing within it, despite those characters' importance and influence on events.

Lucas deliberately crafted all the characters to be deeply flawed and complex, as humans are, which ran the risk of alienating fans who were accustomed to the archetypical Hero's Journey arc of the OT. Obi-Wan is not the right teacher for Anakin at all, and his own ego and insecurity get in the way of raising him well. Anakin's traumatic past as a slave and his lack of mother and father figures leave him damaged, afraid of losing Padme, unable to find approval from Obi-Wan or the Jedi Council. The Jedi are arrogant, complacent, and blind to their shortcomings and hypocrisy. Mace Windu is a mirror image of Palpatine's rationalizations, which cements Anakin's decision to commit to the dark side. This is heavy, mature stuff.

It also fits well overall with the OT. You can nitpick a few things like the Jedi robes or the youngling training, maybe the midichlorians demystifying The Force too much (though, in retrospect it's not a big deal and just demonstrated the level of technology available during the republic and the methods the Jedi used as a mainstream organization), but overall a lot of care is taken to fit it in logically with the original trilogy while still going in a completely different narrative direction.

I can't dislike the prequels anymore.

Nah, can't agree with this.

Even if you dont like the new stuff.

Even in a vacuum. I can respect it i suppose but I csnt agree. I am due for a rewatch of both trilogies tho.


Small correction for the OP, while TLJ did profit, it didn't exactly perform well. Underperformed actually. After it opened just slightly under TFA, the projections for the final take were $1.8B+ WW. After its massive drop in the 2nd weekend, the projections were changed to $1.5B+ WW. It ended up doing $1.33B. It's legs just weren't very good.

It did 400 million dollars in profits. Thats not underperming in any universe. And after that number from theaters, was then one of the highest home video sellers of the year.

The first movie did almost 600 mil in profit.

It was absolutely a success to the studio and by any metric imaginable.

Another thing to note is that, the movies aren't actually that hated in the general audience. Their audience score are all higher than the prequels equivalent on IMDB save for ROTS and TROS.

Theres just no tangible reason for KK to lose her job. Any other company would wish for similar numbers, for something as ubiquitous and divisive as star wars too.
 
Last edited:

Ulysses 31

Gold Member
I felt bad for the actress who played Rose in the sequel trilogy. I heard she's really nice in real life and in a restaurant when people were talking about Star Wars she introduced herself as the actress and had her picture taken with them. So she seemed to loved the fan base but she unfortunately got a lot of shit and harassment from people who didn't like her character. It's not her fault. Blame it on the freaking writers.
People keep pushing the narrative that it was SW fans driving her away from social media while in an interview she called out the agents and pr teams she worked with telling her what to say, how to act and feel to the point she didn't feel comfortable anymore.
 
Last edited:

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
It did 400 million dollars in profits. Thats not underperming in any universe. And after that number from theaters, was then one of the highest home video sellers of the year.
The first movie did almost 600 mil in profit.

It was absolutely a success to the studio and by any metric imaginable.

Another thing to note is that, the movies aren't actually that hated in the general audience. Their audience score are all higher than the prequels equivalent on IMDB save for ROTS and TROS.

Theres just no tangible reason for KK to lose her job. Any other company would wish for similar numbers, for something as ubiquitous and divisive as star wars too
That’s not the financial situation. Turning a profit for the sequel trilogy is not the necessary bar for success. The sequel trilogy could’ve been written by Seth Rogen and directed by Bret Ratner and it would’ve turned a profit with the fandom desperate for new material, a beloved IP for countless millions of people, and hundreds of millions of dollars in marketing invested.

Disney paid $4 billion for the IP. You don’t pay that much and put the force of everything Disney has behind ongoing promotion of the brand (theme parks, tv and kids shows, events, Disney+, etc etc.) to make some money here and lose some money there. Expectations were much higher and opportunity costs exist.
 

CGNoire

Member
I remember back in the day I don't remember if it was here or that other place. We had some hardcore zealots that would defend TLJ with such fanaticism and ferociousness that it was quite impressive. I always wonder about fanatics and how their minds work. I'm glad that for most part everyone now recognizes how shit the sequel trilogy actually is.
Those same people probably have Disney Tattoos.
 

TheInfamousKira

Reseterror Resettler
Nah, all this doomsaying is nonsense.

Theres plenty of talented indivuals working and plenty of talented creative in the industry making good movies. And most of rhe guys who made the movies you grew up enjoying are still working. Ridley Scott, sam raimi, James Cameron, etc.

You have to actively ignore plenty of content to approach otherwise.

We're losing entertainment icons faster than they're being replaced. I'm absolutely sure I could inundate myself with fantastic contemporary cinema, but I'm not a film enthusiast, and linking to my point, none of what filters into the mainstream lately is looking like it's gonna turn me into one.
 

Tams

Gold Member
I felt bad for the actress who played Rose in the sequel trilogy. I heard she's really nice in real life and in a restaurant when people were talking about Star Wars she introduced herself as the actress and had her picture taken with them. So she seemed to loved the fan base but she unfortunately got a lot of shit and harassment from people who didn't like her character. It's not her fault. Blame it on the freaking writers.

Inability to take responsibility and control.

Yes, as an unknown actress she was in a far weaker position, but she should have seen how bad her character looked from miles away and complained to and about the director.

Would that have likely gotten here fired? Yes. But as it is, she gets vitriol (that mostly the director deserves) for just accepting it.
 
Last edited:

Tams

Gold Member
What "Essence"? they are terrible movies, with terrible scripts and terrible performances.

Yes, the world of Star Wars.

You know, the bit that creates a lasting fandom.

The prequels had fantastic world building and the characters were second to that.

The sequels focus on the characters, and by doing it so badly for almost all of them, are shit. And then there's no good world building for the films to fall back on.

But hey, enjoy your Mary Sue and token characters that are written like a bad young adult novel. Thanks for encouraging the missed and only opportunities we had to get some good sequels with the original cast.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fbh

BadBurger

Many “Whelps”! Handle It!
Fun thread. I agree with a lot, disagree with a lot.

Personally, I think at the end of the day no one should be blaming any of the actors for anything about the ST. While I enjoyed Force Awakens, the next two films were victims of first horrific writing and direction, then too much studio interference in an attempt to course correct. And some of the actors like Kelly Marie Tran don't deserve any of the weird-ass hate they've gotten for seemingly just existing.

The PT were good fun. Especially Revenge of the Sith. They were products of their time and hence flawed in predictable ways, sure, but not as bad as many make them out to be.

At the end of the day there's going to be more billion dollar movies. More random TV hits like The Mandalorian. Regardless of who is helping to shepherd this vehicle.
 

Fbh

Gold Member
Yes, the world of Star Wars.

You know, the bit that creates a lasting fandom.

The prequels had fantastic world building and the characters were second to that.

The sequels focus on the characters, and by doing it so badly for almost all of them, are shit. And then there's no good world building for the films to fall back on.

But hey, enjoy your Mary Sue and token characters that are written like a bad young adult novel. Thanks for encouraging the missed and only opportunities we had to get some good sequels with the original cast.

The best thing the prequels did IMO was to give a different, fresh view into the world of Star Wars.
We got to see the world before the empire, we got to see what the Jedi were like when still in a position of power, we got to see beautiful cities like Naboo and big metropolises like Coruscant which was a big contrast to the more remote and rundown locations of the OT.
It introduced tons of new ships and gadgets and the battle droids, fun new concepts like pod racing and, even if some people don't like it, it completely changed the way we look at Jedi fighting with faster, more theatrical and over the top fights that many people enjoyed.

We got a story about the downfall of Anakin and the republic
from a perspective where the "good guys" start in a position of power and get it taken away from them through deceit and political manipulation (and eventually violence) as opposed to another story about the underdogs trying to beat the big authoritarian rulers.

With the sequels I feel like I didn't get anything new, and what little was there was bad. TFA basically begins with an identical status quo of A new hope except the Empire is called the first order and all the characters are worse.
As I said in an earlier post I think the whole rebels vs empire thing has gotten old. It took Lucas 3 movies to move past that, meanwhile the whole new trilogy is rebels vs empire, Rogue One is rebels vs empire, Andor is rebels vs empire, The Mandalorian is about Mando keeping Grogu safe from the empire (often teaming up with rebels), Obi Wan is rebels vs empire, etc
 

YuLY

Member
Noone's done a better Indiana Jones than Raiders in 1981.
Maybe not truly better, but as close as you can get: The Mummy 1. In a lower tier you can also add National Treasure 1 (lower tier, relax).

The harsh reality is we never got a real alternative to Star Wars as a space opera. There have been some shows, and some movies, I guess Star Trek is closest, but its just not the same vibe. One can make the case for Guardians of the galaxy but its less political, more superhero style. Hollywood is boring, instead of coming up with new interesting universes they keep doing remakes/reimaginations.

Remember in 1997 when we randomly got that cool cyberpunk, space opera-inspired movie with Bruce Willis called The Fifth Element? Korben Dallas multipass?? what happened to making movies like that....
 
Last edited:

NotMyProblemAnymoreCunt

Biggest Trails Stan
Maybe not truly better, but as close as you can get: The Mummy 1. In a lower tier you can also add National Treasure 1 (lower tier, relax).

The harsh reality is we never got a real alternative to Star Wars as a space opera. There have been some shows, and some movies, I guess Star Trek is closest, but its just not the same vibe. One can make the case for Guardians of the galaxy but its less political, more superhero style. Hollywood is boring, instead of coming up with new interesting universes they keep doing remakes/reimaginations.

There's 40k, but that's a more adult and violent alternative
 

FunkMiller

Gold Member
The greatest contribution of the sequel trilogy is to make people think the prequel trilogy was good.

It really wasn’t. But at least you can admire Lucas’s desire to tell a complex story with complex characters. He couldn’t actually do it, but at least he gave it a go.

Neither prequel trilogy nor sequel trilogy come anywhere near close the quality of the original trilogy.

This is because that’s the actual story… not a backstory, nor a poor repeat.
 

YuLY

Member
The greatest contribution of the sequel trilogy is to make people think the prequel trilogy was good.

It really wasn’t. But at least you can admire Lucas’s desire to tell a complex story with complex characters. He couldn’t actually do it, but at least he gave it a go.

Neither prequel trilogy nor sequel trilogy come anywhere near close the quality of the original trilogy.

This is because that’s the actual story… not a backstory, nor a poor repeat.
Eh, I dont agree. Some people just cant accept that the prequels are good. They only have one mediocre movie (Attack of the Clones), but it still works ok when watching the entire trilogy. The OG one wasnt perfect, I would go so far as to say Ep 6 is mediocre. Yes The Empire Strikes back is great, but so is The Revenge of the Sith which is my fav SW movie. I still get chills thinking about the scene where Anakin is pondering what to do if he must save Padme if he wants to join palpatine, with that eerie music in the background and the Coruscant futuristic landscape in the back, phenomenal atmosphere.



^ I'm sorry if some people cant accept it, but the prequels have a great trilogy.
 

NotMyProblemAnymoreCunt

Biggest Trails Stan
Yes it qualifies, I love the universe, but we didnt get movies did we? I think theres just some low budget animated ones.

I'm really looking forward to what Henry Cavill does with the live action adaptation. Him being a fan and him having full creative control is a positive for me. But since it's Amazon, I expect them to Try to screw it up somehow.

Truthfully, I have never gotten into 40k. Always wanted to though. The Lore sounds great and I just got all the The Horus Heresy books on Kindle. I'm planning on getting into the books in the coming months
 
Last edited:

BlackTron

Gold Member
I'm not sure about this. No large corporation will choose an agenda over money. The only way to reconcile your view would be that perhaps they think catering to diversity now might cost them some money in the short term but will make them more over the long term. But a pure agenda play over profits is just not believable for any major corporation.

I do think that this agenda play is way bigger than Star Wars or even Disney itself. It comes from the highest council of fuckwits that want to manipulate society. I think Disney's short-term ails over Star Wars are nothing in the big picture to these guys. Disney is just one arm/tentacle and we will never get to see the head.

Edit: BTW I don't think it's a PURE agenda play over money. Like the idea WAS to make money at the same time. But they are willing to take significant losses on this i the bigger scheme, absolutely.
 
Last edited:

NahaNago

Member
I think reboot is the only thing they can do for star wars and Indian Jones. They could simply just set star wars at a time much further ahead or in the past away from all of the skywalker drama. I don't really have much hope for either movie series though while the folks who work and are in charge of Lucasfilm are still there.
 

Razvedka

Banned
This was my thinking. For her to get fired, someone at Disney would need to have a problem with the job she is doing. Most likely, she is doing exactly the job she was intended to do.

There is some disparity between shareholder woes and agenda, which is why you have this crusade against the "toxic fans", that is, the problem isn't Star Wars, its the fanbase. But I think the goal was always to push an agenda first and make money second.
I don't believe this take at all. They're a publicly traded company, and like any company their "beliefs" are shallow, loosely held cynical things outside of the 'creatives', HR and maybe marketing. They only care about money deep down.

They pursue an agenda insofar as they think it augments, or doesn't hurt at a minimum, their ability to make money. The second they begin to think any agenda is working against their primary objective, it will be discarded.

We see this time and again, but perhaps the best & most recent example of this is Google.

I think the real answer is that the people running things are of mediocre intelligence. They're not geniuses, they're not "plugged in" to the lives of normal people. They're surrounded by a sea of yes men in their ivory towers located in sprawling metropolises. Things that are obvious to me or you are likely difficult for them to conceive.
 
Last edited:

FunkMiller

Gold Member
Eh, I dont agree. Some people just cant accept that the prequels are good. They only have one mediocre movie (Attack of the Clones), but it still works ok when watching the entire trilogy. The OG one wasnt perfect, I would go so far as to say Ep 6 is mediocre. Yes The Empire Strikes back is great, but so is The Revenge of the Sith which is my fav SW movie. I still get chills thinking about the scene where Anakin is pondering what to do if he must save Padme if he wants to join palpatine, with that eerie music in the background and the Coruscant futuristic landscape in the back, phenomenal atmosphere.

^ I'm sorry if some people cant accept it, but the prequels have a great trilogy.

It's all subjective. The prequel trilogy suffers from some poor characterisation, dreadful dialogue, poor pacing, and an over reliance on CGI. Is it better than the sequel trilogy? Of course it is, because it obeys its own internal logic, the story by and large makes sense, and you can tell it was designed as one long story with three acts. But does it compare to the original trilogy? Absolutely not. The OT was a masterpiece of effective, fast paced storytelling, featuring excellently crafted archetypal characters, and state of the art SFX for the time. The reason why Star Wars became such a juggernaut is because of the quality of those first three movies - especially Star Wars and Empire (Jedi has its fair share of issues).

They've never been able to move past the story of the first three movies, because that really is the only story worth telling.
 
Last edited:

AJUMP23

Parody of actual AJUMP23
Absolutely, she's just doing her job and wasn't out to destroy anything.

Captain Cringe Rian Johnson tried to relive his high school days over some nerd crush he had to further subvert expectations.

ia6myymf81741.png
Guess what character felt out of place in the movie. And nobody really liked. But taking the saddle off a horse made everything matter.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom