Just took an inventory of my own storage. I've got 7.5 TB of storage including my boot volume on an SSD, and it's not enough.
I remember when I got an iMac with a 4GB and thought that was the most storage I'd ever use...
The thing with storage and time is that it's cumulative, but mostly that file sizes are increasing with time. SD->HD->soon, 4k. Higher bit rate music files, higher megapixel cameras, RAW images etc. apps contain compatibility modes for convenience.
I haven't even started doing any sort of categorization with tags yet. I hate that they don't let you use the color picker to colorize custom tags any color other than the default rainbow colors. Such a stupid oversight. They're useless if I can't tell at a glance what the circles mean. Plus it only shows three at once on the icon. I liked labels with the whole line being colored in list view. Now it's just a small circle.My music collection is big (80GB mostly ALAC), but my biggest hit is my stock library of textures, sounds, footage and projects I've done. That totals 4TB alone, and I've still got discs of it lying around somewhere I haven't added.
I'm really interested in seeing if the Mavericks labeling actually does speed up organization beyond my old standby of labels.
Anyone else remember people talking about the "death of the Finder" when Spotlight appeared? I get a kick thinking about it...
The new iMacs are depressing. They are keeping all the bad stuff of the last model:
- can't get a decent GPU before paying at least ~2000 euros
- no SSD as default, upgrading to the smallest available SSD is 200 euros
I can understand the problems people have with the iMacs and no doubt there are a few negatives though I was overall pretty happy with the update. I feel though where things will really shine is when nVidia introduces the Maxwell line or whatever AMD uses if they go the AMD route for 2014.
Yes but what's in stock is pretty random. It just depends on what Apple gets to fix/refurb.Has anyone ever seen the Apple refurb site sell Airs with only the ram upgraded? I'm looking to get an Air with 8GB's but don't need the i7 or 512GB hard drive. So far they have only listed the base model, the 256GB, and the fully loaded.
And this isn't a problem for you because you have a backup.... right?My MBPr fails Memtest with 65,530+ errors and my screen randomly flickers so that the screen is split horizontally refreshing, so I take it into the Apple Store and they tell me it's a filesystem problem and they're only going to wipe the SSD.
Not impressed.
Yeah, of course.And this isn't a problem for you because you have a backup.... right?
My MBPr fails Memtest with 65,530+ errors and my screen randomly flickers[...]
Not impressed.
yep.Running memtest off USB? If so then wiping the SSD wouldn't have been my suggestion, but I am not a Genius.
Www.refurb.me is your new best friend.Has anyone ever seen the Apple refurb site sell Airs with only the ram upgraded? I'm looking to get an Air with 8GB's but don't need the i7 or 512GB hard drive. So far they have only listed the base model, the 256GB, and the fully loaded.
Thanks for the link but it's missing the spec I'm looking for. I'm looking for a 13" i5, 8GB, and 128/256GB. I'll just have to keep checking.Www.refurb.me is your new best friend.
Thanks for the link but it's missing the spec I'm looking for. I'm looking for a 13" i5, 8GB, and 128/256GB. I'll just have to keep checking.
Well you'd probably want to reformat and reinstall the OS anyway. Then restore from your backup via Migration Assistant just to be safe. Especially with all those errors.Yeah, of course.
Just a bother that they don't seem to believe me regarding the issues I've been having / that their diagnostic tools don't show any problems when industry-standard ones show extensive issues.
I'm not taking it back until it passes tests with zero errors in the store, though.
Rather than more performance, I would have liked to see an Intel Iris 5100 and a dual-core CPU in the base model. That's plenty for run-of-the-mill office work and non-gaming, non-specialized home use. Apple's problem isn't just that they fail to offer a high performance option, but also that they make useless gestures of "performance" in their low end where the only thing it does is keep the entry price sky-high.I like that they at least stopped being greedy with video memory and made 1 GB standard instead of the 512 MB available from last year's models. However what would you have wanted in the say the base 27" model? 765M?
The 780M's thermal envelope is 100W while a nice desktop GPU like the 770 (maybe 30% faster, also cheaper) is 230W. Up to a certain point, higher TDP budget means more performance at lower cost. This is a matter of physics, and is not going to change in the next GPU generation or the one after that. GPUs on the iMac will always be weak and ridiculously overpriced as long as their #1 design priority is obsessing over chassis thickness.I can understand the problems people have with the iMacs and no doubt there are a few negatives though I was overall pretty happy with the update. I feel though where things will really shine is when nVidia introduces the Maxwell line or whatever AMD uses if they go the AMD route for 2014.
Otherwise... I may actually get one of the updated iMacs. I currently use a 2-year old iMac and do animation, so getting a fusion drive, leaping 2 gens of Intel processors and going from my current AMD Radeon HD 6770M w/ 512MB GDDR5 ------> NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M 4GB GDDR5 would probably be insane!
The upgrade to a Mac Pro would be insane
Well technically Fall 2013 goes to December 20...Next month supposedly
Well technically Fall 2013 goes to December 20...
My question is whether what they demoed is set or they will fiddle with the configuration any.
I assume that as well, but who knows what goes on in their head sometimes.The sensible thing to do would be to launch it along with Mavericks, which is supposed to be late October.
They only mentioned a few things to begin with, and most of them were "up to" configurations. The only things apparently set in stone from the wording seemed to be E5 Xeons (which range from $200 to $2600) and dual FirePros (around $400 to $3500 each for the W series). The big questions are which parts they'll be using for lower end configs and what kind of prices they're getting from AMD, and I guess the possibility of a GPU delete or second SSD options (the latter might be limited by available PCIe lanes though).Well technically Fall 2013 goes to December 20...
My question is whether what they demoed is set or they will fiddle with the configuration any.
I think most 4K displays are $3500ish, and they've come out with $3000+ displays before (...once) so it's not out of the question. They did specifically mention connecting to third party 4K displays which could've been read any number of ways, so who knows.I assume that as well, but who knows what goes on in their head sometimes.
Think we'll see first party 4K displays?
I'm hoping that you can do a card swap for internal storage if you want, or there are some gaming card options down the line, because I'd rather keep a setup similar to my current one (a Radeon 5770 for displays and games and then a Quadro 4000 for CUDA and DaVinci) rather than exclusively workstation cards.They only mentioned a few things to begin with, and most of them were "up to" configurations. The only things apparently set in stone from the wording seemed to be E5 Xeons (which range from $200 to $2600) and dual FirePros (around $400 to $3500 each for the W series). The big questions are which parts they'll be using for lower end configs and what kind of prices they're getting from AMD, and I guess the possibility of a GPU delete or second SSD options (the latter might be limited by available PCIe lanes though).
From Geekbench results leaked so far it looks like there's going to be the E5-2697v2 (12 core, $2600) and E5-1680v2 (8 core, $1700), which are the highest end E5 parts for those two lines. I'm hoping for lower end E5-16xx configurations with the more reasonably priced parts.
I think most 4K displays are $3500ish, and they've come out with $3000+ displays before (...once) so it's not out of the question. They did specifically mention connecting to third party 4K displays which could've been read any number of ways, so who knows.
Hey NeoGAFFers,
is it worth it for $200 to go from i5 3.4 GHz to i7 3.5 GHz??
is the only difference a 0.1 clock speed increase? or does i7 mean other upgrades?
I do a lot of rendering, compositing and animation in AE, so I do want FAST FAST FAST, but not sure if this is worth it?
Water said:Rather than more performance, I would have liked to see an Intel Iris 5100 and a dual-core CPU in the base model.
Hey NeoGAFFers,
is it worth it for $200 to go from i5 3.4 GHz to i7 3.5 GHz??
is the only difference a 0.1 clock speed increase? or does i7 mean other upgrades?
I do a lot of rendering, compositing and animation in AE, so I do want FAST FAST FAST, but not sure if this is worth it?
Frankly, AE renders horribly, so if you want more bang for your buck you might want to plunk down the coin for BGRenderer instead. http://aescripts.com/bg-renderer/
well I just bought it!
core i7, 8 GB RAM (will upgrade to 16 or 32 soon), 1 TB Fusion, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M 4GB GDDR5.
Magic Mouse for sell!
Do you guys think $900 is fair to sell my old 27" to a friend? (27", 16 GB, AMD 6770M 512 MB, i5, 1 TB).
thanks Fuchsdh.... I will check out BGRenderer.
I was expecting this to be $500 or something. I guess I'll buy it if it improved rendering time.
Ok, so here's a question: I really want to upgrade my mini's HDD. I figure if I swap out its 500GB 5400rpm HDD for a decently spacious SSD, I can just use it as a dedicated video capture setup controlled by Screen Sharing like I'm using now (except just for SD home video conversion since it doesn't have the bandwidth to cap anything else.)
The ifixit guide is pretty damn crazy... anyone have any experience with OWC's mini pro installation? I figure $99 is a fairly low price to prevent myself from nuking a $400 + RAM upgrade cost purchase... http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/mac-mini/install/
AFAIK most/all recent Mac Minis have slots for two drives, even if they only have the cable for one. So you could roll with both. That's what I did when I updated mine. You could also turn it into an unofficial fusion drive, though then you would be reliant on both drives to be working instead of just one.
I think that's a pretty fair price when all is said and done. To upgrade mine I had to buy their upgrade kit (not the drive, but the tool and components to add it) then watch the video and read the notes and spent about an hour struggling to rebuild the thing. There are two spots where yeah, a wrong move and you need to order new parts to make your Mac work again. $100 for the upgrade and 72 hour turnaround time seems like a pretty cheap price for my time, if you ask me. (But it is achievable by yourself, if you have the gumption)
I'm a bit scarred from my experience with my iPod video when I was a kid. I had to hustle across the street and it popped out of my hoodie pocket and hit pavement. It worked fine but somehow the click wheel's tabs popped out-so the only way to fix it was to open the entire thing up. It died on the operating table :\
At $400, are you looking at a 512GB SSD? Keeping the 500GB drive around could be useful as a nightly backup clone.Ok, so here's a question: I really want to upgrade my mini's HDD. I figure if I swap out its 500GB 5400rpm HDD for a decently spacious SSD, I can just use it as a dedicated video capture setup controlled by Screen Sharing like I'm using now (except just for SD home video conversion since it doesn't have the bandwidth to cap anything else.)
The ifixit guide is pretty damn crazy... anyone have any experience with OWC's mini pro installation? I figure $99 is a fairly low price to prevent myself from nuking a $400 + RAM upgrade cost purchase... http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/mac-mini/install/
Need some advice.
I ordered my iMac yesterday with a 1 TB Fusion Drive.
but now I'm thinking... maybe I should just get a 1 TB Thunderbolt external drive? It looks like they go for around $180 which is the upgrade price of the Fusion.
would a thunderbolt HDD be similar in performance to an SSD?
I replaced the HDD in my Mac Mini with an SSD although next time I'll be going with one through Apple. Despite following OWC's directions I could not get it to snap in perfectly so I cannot reassemble my Mac mini and thus the bottom of the case sits on top of the computer rather than snaps over it. The SSD is connected securely to the SATA port or else I wouldn't be typing this as I am now.
There's no reason why it shouldn't fit in correctly. I've put many SSDs into Mac Minis with no issues.
What part is actually sticking up? Can you not get the "lovely" metal part to slide back in with the big plastic wireless part on it?