• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Mac OSX Noob thread of OSX noobs

Bboy AJ

My dog was murdered by a 3.5mm audio port and I will not rest until the standard is dead
JeffDowns said:
Okay. I want a new router. I have $125 credit from the Apple Store since I'm taking the kb/mouse back (got an iMac and it came with them, so no need for these now). Would you recommend the Airport Extreme? I have a DD-WRT Linksys 802.11G Router now, and while the options are nice, I can certainly do without them. I've been holding off on G for a while. Is the Airport Extreme Dual Band worth the high premium? Especially for those with Macs?
You can buy an iMac and return the included kb/m for $125? I had no idea. Bad ass.
 
Bboy AJ said:
You can buy an iMac and return the included kb/m for $125? I had no idea. Bad ass.
No, no, no... Don't run out that door yet. I had a Mac mini, and I had a kb/mouse that I bought for it less than a month ago. Long story short, I sold the mini, and had leftover kb/mouse. Total for that is like $125, so I was wondering if I should just put that towards an Airport Extreme, or a Magic Trackpad, or something. Sorry for the confusion. :lol
 

hirokazu

Member
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:
Do you have an external hard drive plugged in? Those always stall me for 15 seconds.
Not always, but I'll test that the next time I boot up.

I checked Software Update and this started happening on the boot immediately following Security Update 2010-006 (and iTunes 10.0.1).
 

hirokazu

Member
JeffDowns said:
Okay. I want a new router. I have $125 credit from the Apple Store since I'm taking the kb/mouse back (got an iMac and it came with them, so no need for these now). Would you recommend the Airport Extreme? I have a DD-WRT Linksys 802.11G Router now, and while the options are nice, I can certainly do without them. I've been holding off on G for a while. Is the Airport Extreme Dual Band worth the high premium? Especially for those with Macs?
I have an Airport Extreme b/g/n single band and a 1TB Time Capsule and I love them heaps. My experience with routers has generally been rather unsatisfactory - crap hardware, crap software and whatnot.

The WAN port on the Extreme screwed up after two years though and the activity light for LAN port 1 doesn't light up, which is pretty shoddy. I just put the ADSL modem into one of the LAN ports instead. It's been a year since that happened, I intend to get it fixed one day...
 

hirokazu

Member
Dreams-Visions said:
as opposed to?
Chrome, I guess. I've stayed with Firefox and intend to continue using it because I don't want to invest the time in finding replacement extensions for what I've currently got, but it really falling behind Chrome in feeling innovative, fast and efficient.
 
hirokazu said:
Chrome, I guess. I've stayed with Firefox and intend to continue using it because I don't want to invest the time in finding replacement extensions for what I've currently got, but it really falling behind Chrome in feeling innovative, fast and efficient.
Agreed. I can't go back to the Fox anymore. Chrome > Firefox > Opera > Netscape Navigator > AOL > Looking up your information in an encyclopedia > Internet Explorer
 

Ashhong

Member
Dreams-Visions said:
as opposed to?

I was really reluctant to switching to Chrome, and I don't even know how much better it is, but the experience is as good as, if not better than Firefox for me.
 

LCfiner

Member
Safari gets ignored around here, i think.

it may not be as fast as Chrome but it's never been a slouch for me and it integrates with the Mac OS so well that it keeps pulling me back in whenever i experiment with another browser. the keychain integration for filling out forms, the text auto correction and system dictionary integration, and the new extensions with 5.0

it’s all really good and useful.

the biggest thing it would benefit from, imo, is the addition of separate tab processes - something we know the webkit team is working on.
 
JeffDowns said:
Agreed. I can't go back to the Fox anymore. Chrome > Firefox > Opera > Netscape Navigator > AOL > Looking up your information in an encyclopedia > Internet Explorer
Might be a tough switch for me.

I'm using so many of the plug-ins daily. the Web Developer plug-in is necessary. The ability to add additional search engines from Mycroft is a necessity to me.

If I those things are available on Chrome, I'll download it tomorrow and give it a whirl (about to head out). But those things are the reason why I left Safari and went back to Firefox (gave Safari 2 months of exclusive time...it too had memory leak issues).
 
You really don't need Web Developer at all. Everyone at my job has moved to Chrome for web design. It has its own Web Developer toolbar addon too, but it doesn't have all the features of the Firefox one.
 

Doytch

Member
How do I get a decent reading as to how many resources (mem, cpu) Chrome in total is taking up? I futzed around in the Activity Monitor and couldn't come up with anything.

Also, there's no way to sync Chrome history across computers like Firefox is there?
 

Sean

Banned
LCfiner said:
Safari gets ignored around here, i think.

it may not be as fast as Chrome but it's never been a slouch for me and it integrates with the Mac OS so well that it keeps pulling me back in whenever i experiment with another browser. the keychain integration for filling out forms, the text auto correction and system dictionary integration, and the new extensions with 5.0

it’s all really good and useful.

the biggest thing it would benefit from, imo, is the addition of separate tab processes - something we know the webkit team is working on.

I used to use Safari until just recently when I tried out a Chrome nightly.

It's really fast and has some nice features. Google Instant is baked into the address bar which is really useful, syncs all your extensions and bookmarks and stuff and there is some nice features like the translating one where it detects another language and you just click a button to translate.

I miss some things from Safari (merging windows into tabs for example, gifs & Flash seem to play better in Safari) but overall I think Chrome has them beat for now.

Doytch said:
How do I get a decent reading as to how many resources (mem, cpu) Chrome in total is taking up? I futzed around in the Activity Monitor and couldn't come up with anything.

Also, there's no way to sync Chrome history across computers like Firefox is there?

Type "Chrom" in the filter part of Activity Monitor's toolbar (might have to customize toolbar and add that):
dafb9


also Window > Task Manager inside Chrome
 

Jasoco

Banned
Just change it to "My Processes, Hierarchally".

2zzhrh2.jpg

Then I sort by PID decending. Shows what processes belong to what other processes. Like Chrome and all its tabs, extensions and plugins or GeekTool and its occasional calls to the Unix system.
 

FuturusX

Member
Just a random statement of appreciation. I bought a magic mouse and downloaded 'BetterTouch Tool'....My life will never be the same.
 

hirokazu

Member
FuturusX said:
Just a random statement of appreciation. I bought a magic mouse and downloaded 'BetterTouch Tool'....My life will never be the same.
Haha, that's funny, I just bought a Magic Touchpad today and am currently configuring extra gestures (middle click!) with BTT, which has been fantastic with the Magic Mouse. I have been getting sore wrists lately from mice, the Magic Mouse's ergonomics is questionable, so I'm trying to Magic Touchpad to see how it goes in alleviating that.

When using mice, I end up concentrating movement to my wrists out of habit. :|
 

hirokazu

Member
LCfiner said:
Safari gets ignored around here, i think.

it may not be as fast as Chrome but it's never been a slouch for me and it integrates with the Mac OS so well that it keeps pulling me back in whenever i experiment with another browser. the keychain integration for filling out forms, the text auto correction and system dictionary integration, and the new extensions with 5.0

it’s all really good and useful.

the biggest thing it would benefit from, imo, is the addition of separate tab processes - something we know the webkit team is working on.
I do really like Safari, and it would preferably be my browser of choice above Firefox and Chrome, but it feels too restrictive in terms of customisability, as you'd expect from Apple.

I was initially excited about Safari getting extensions support, but the offerings so far have been rather lacklustre - often buggy, slow and limited compared to what can be done with extensions on Firefox.

Interestingly, both of my sisters have switched to using Safari rather than Firefox by their own accord. I haven't installed Chrome on their machines.
 

Pachimari

Member
I have had my Mac Mini since spring and has been using it for movies, music and photos - like a media center. I don't know what answer I'm looking for but are there any interesting things i can do with such a Mac? It's my first one mind you, so I don't know a whole lot of this scene yet. I'm thinking alongside Cydia on the iOS devices, are there any cool apps out there? Any Mac app websites?
 
LCfiner said:
Safari gets ignored around here, i think.

it may not be as fast as Chrome but it's never been a slouch for me and it integrates with the Mac OS so well that it keeps pulling me back in whenever i experiment with another browser. the keychain integration for filling out forms, the text auto correction and system dictionary integration, and the new extensions with 5.0

it’s all really good and useful.

the biggest thing it would benefit from, imo, is the addition of separate tab processes - something we know the webkit team is working on.
Which is my case exactly. Plus the fact that Firefox has always taken so much longer to start up, and, at least in benchmarks, has always been slower.

Not to mention that Firefox and Chrome on Mac seem to get treated as a second-tier platform by developers. Has it gotten any better lately?
 

Doytch

Member
Alright, switching to Chrome for a while to really check it out. I've always had it installed on my computers but never really used it... Syncing across my Macbook and a W7 PC.

The one thing that I was scared about was whether or not D4Danger made a version of his GAF Live Thread extension for Chrome. :lol

And thanks guys for helping me sort out the shared memory mumbo-jumbo of the Activity Monitor!

I kinda wish I could selectively sync extensions though. I don't need a Gmail checker on my Macbook, but I do want one on my W7 PC.
 

Blackhead

Redarse
Anastacio said:
I have had my Mac Mini since spring and has been using it for movies, music and photos - like a media center. I don't know what answer I'm looking for but are there any interesting things i can do with such a Mac? It's my first one mind you, so I don't know a whole lot of this scene yet. I'm thinking alongside Cydia on the iOS devices, are there any cool apps out there? Any Mac app websites?
50 eesential apps for OS X users
70 essential apps for advanced OS X users

there is no equivalent to the Cydia store on the mac (Cydia derives its system from linux). The closest you'll get is a mix of the macupdate app and iusethis.com


I can't leave Firefox for any other browser without both Tree style tabs and Hyperwords but Safari's cleaner youtube extension (and other prettifying websites extensions) is pretty impressive as well as the hoverzoom extension (also available for Google Chrome which I can't stand)
 
I go to a University where, in the dorm rooms, there is no wireless. Instead we all get an ethernet port, have to plug it into our computer, go to a gateway website to log in, and then we are on the Internet.

Basically, for Xbox Live and my iPad, I have been connecting to the Internet via the ethernet to my Macbook and putting off a Wifi called "Macbook" and Internet Sharing with a static IP. This works great for everything, the only downside is that the computer has to be plugged in and pretty much not in use.

My question: is it possible to set up a wireless router that automatically logs in or at least tricks the University's Restech system into thinking that it's connected so that I can actually use wireless ON my computer, rather than using that computer as a wireless hotspot?
 
Charred Greyface said:
50 eesential apps for OS X users
70 essential apps for advanced OS X users

there is no equivalent to the Cydia store on the mac (Cydia derives its system from linux). The closest you'll get is a mix of the macupdate app and iusethis.com


I can't leave Firefox for any other browser without both Tree style tabs and Hyperwords but Safari's cleaner youtube extension (and other prettifying websites extensions) is pretty impressive as well as the hoverzoom extension (also available for Google Chrome which I can't stand)

I stopped reading the first list when it said the mac version of office was better than the windows version. And they suggest Adobe reader for pdfs....
 

KtSlime

Member
Saren is Bad said:
I go to a University where, in the dorm rooms, there is no wireless. Instead we all get an ethernet port, have to plug it into our computer, go to a gateway website to log in, and then we are on the Internet.

Basically, for Xbox Live and my iPad, I have been connecting to the Internet via the ethernet to my Macbook and putting off a Wifi called "Macbook" and Internet Sharing with a static IP. This works great for everything, the only downside is that the computer has to be plugged in and pretty much not in use.

My question: is it possible to set up a wireless router that automatically logs in or at least tricks the University's Restech system into thinking that it's connected so that I can actually use wireless ON my computer, rather than using that computer as a wireless hotspot?
Can you go to the Resnet office and register a Mac address for 'dumb' devices? If so I dont see why you can't give them the router/hotspot mac and do it that way. Although I suspect that you might not even have to do that, this was the same way my university had resnet set up my senior year, and they disallowed all routers but mine still worked perfectly, just plugged it in.

(any weblog browser > firefox)
 

KtSlime

Member
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:
I stopped reading the first list when it said the mac version of office was better than the windows version. And they suggest Adobe reader for pdfs....
Hahaha, At times I had to go to the computer lab to print out a PDF, and i'd open the file, and see the damn adobe splash screen and kick myself for forgetting that they have reader set as default, then I'd drag the file to preview, it open instantly and I'd wait for reader to finish opening so that I could quit it and get in with my work.

It's kind of sad that apple can write a better PDF viewer than adobe.
 
JeffDowns said:
Well, went ahead and opted for Apple's Airport instead of the Magic Touch Pad, and I have to say I'm extremely impressed.
It is pretty sweet. I wish it had an internal admin webpage rather than an application, but it hasn't given me even one fussy moment in 3 years. I had the original WRT54G before that which was sweet as hell too, but I wanted 5 GHz wireless N.
 
I have a late 2009 imac. Upped to 8gb.
I have CS5, cinema 4d, textmate, coda, transit, Parallels, handbrake the lot running at once, no issues at all.
Yet Safari...... 1gb-1.3gb of memory in use ...... seriously
 

LCfiner

Member
DefectiveReject said:
I have a late 2009 imac. Upped to 8gb.
I have CS5, cinema 4d, textmate, coda, transit, Parallels, handbrake the lot running at once, no issues at all.
Yet Safari...... 1gb-1.3gb of memory in use ...... seriously


yeah, I have safari open for weeks at a time and sometimes it’ll grow to almost 2 GB in memory usage. I have 8 GB in my imac.

but it doesn’t feel slow and more importantly, my page outs to the hard drive virtual memory is now at around 2.3 MB. I haven’t rebooted in around 3 weeks.

essentially, safari will release the memory as needed for other apps. and it will only use the extra memory if it’s available. it never used more than 1 GB for me when I had 4 GB in my system.
 

KtSlime

Member
DefectiveReject said:
I have a late 2009 imac. Upped to 8gb.
I have CS5, cinema 4d, textmate, coda, transit, Parallels, handbrake the lot running at once, no issues at all.
Yet Safari...... 1gb-1.3gb of memory in use ...... seriously
As the old adage goes, unused memory is wasted memory.

Safari does use quite a bit, but just think of it as being prepared. If it is taking a lot of memory and is sluggish, then you have a problem, are you on many flash sites?
 

Blackhead

Redarse
LCfiner said:
yeah, I have safari open for weeks at a time and sometimes it’ll grow to almost 2 GB in memory usage. I have 8 GB in my imac.

but it doesn’t feel slow and more importantly, my page outs to the hard drive virtual memory is now at around 2.3 MB. I haven’t rebooted in around 3 weeks.

essentially, safari will release the memory as needed for other apps. and it will only use the extra memory if it’s available. it never used more than 1 GB for me when I had 4 GB in my system.
1GB on a 4GB system is atrocious for a browser. I'd suspect it of having a memory leak.
 

LCfiner

Member
Charred Greyface said:
1GB on a 4GB system is atrocious for a browser. I'd suspect it of having a memory leak.

if the page outs are still super low then why does it matter?

I’m gonna go to the apple store and start opening up 20-30 tabs in safari (and Chrome too) on a 2GB MBA and check total memory usage and page outs. :lol

see how slow they get on constrained machines

I swear more people here check memory used than the actual speed of the app they’re using.

but, then again, we’re nerds.
 
Mecha_Infantry said:
Safari for me all day.

I do use firefox and chrome on PC though. But I love the integration of safari and the OS.
If Safari let me add additional search engines, I'd strongly consider using it. But it doesn't, and the Bing/Yahoo/Google setup doesn't work for me in 2010. Right now, my Firefox search bar has 19 search engines, most of which I use regularly. It's unacceptable for me to go back to having to go to Amazon or eBay or Dictionary.com THEN search for what I want when Firefox allows me to simply switch search engines right in the browser then search for whatever I want.

It's a backwards step to me.

also, the second reason I switched away from safari is that it too was using gratuitous amounts of memory. 1GB+ as well. I'll try Chrome today and see what my options are with that browser. If all goes well, you guy will be the first to know. Thanks.
 
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:
It is pretty sweet. I wish it had an internal admin webpage rather than an application, but it hasn't given me even one fussy moment in 3 years. I had the original WRT54G before that which was sweet as hell too, but I wanted 5 GHz wireless N.

Yep it is. I too wish it had more features, but for someone adopting Apple minimalism, I'm not going to complain. I like the fact that it only has one light on the router as well. :lol
I've never had a wireless N router, so the difference is pretty amazing to me. It's crazy fast.

I compared downloads between wireless and wired, and they were exactly the same. This has allowed me to undo the tangled mess behind my desk. I was able to get rid of three separate devices, and no telling how many ethernet cables because of this single device. Very nice.
 
LCfiner said:
if the page outs are still super low then why does it matter?
both Firefox and Safari begin acting weird and laggy when their memory footprint exceeds 1GB. stuttering page scrolling, for example. you *know* something is wrong.
 

LCfiner

Member
Dreams-Visions said:
both Firefox and Safari begin acting weird and laggy when their memory footprint exceeds 1GB. stuttering page scrolling, for example. you *know* something is wrong.

not for me it doesn’t. not even when it’s using over 1.5 GB. talking about Safari here.

if it did, I would be restarting it every day or using another browser.


anyway, going back to browsers for a second, Chrome is still top notch and if it were not for the OS X text correction added in 10.6, I’d probably be using Chrome daily.

actually, if Chrome were to be updated to use the system keychain and system text tools instead of rolling their own for multiplatform purposes, I’d switch to Chrome for the tab process isolation and unified search bar.
 
LCfiner said:
not for me it doesn’t. not even when it’s using over 1.5 GB. talking about Safari here.

if it did, I would be restarting it every day or using another browser.


anyway, going back to browsers for a second, Chrome is still top notch and if it were not for the OS X text correction added in 10.6, I’d probably be using Chrome daily.

actually, if Chrome were to be updated to use the system keychain and system text tools instead of rolling their own for multiplatform purposes, I’d switch to Chrome for the tab process isolation and unified search bar.
What is text correction?
 
ivedoneyourmom said:
As the old adage goes, unused memory is wasted memory.

Safari does use quite a bit, but just think of it as being prepared. If it is taking a lot of memory and is sluggish, then you have a problem, are you on many flash sites?
Nope no flash sites. Purely web apps i'm working on, wamp server usually a GAF page and twitter. Sometimes maybe codrops or smashing magazine.
I know from my tests that nothing I'm developing is doing anything. Could be same as another user. In that I shut down once week
 

LCfiner

Member
JeffDowns said:
What is text correction?


when I type in “ahve” the system automatically corrects it to “have”. same with “teh” and “the” basically it uses the built in dictionary to automatically replace text. you can add your own custom replacements as well


I just have to check “correct spelling automatically” option under the spelling and grammar menu item in “edit” on the menu bar.

it’s the type of feature that’s used in MS Office but it’s systemwide for any OS X app that uses the default text boxes. apps that don’t use system default text boxes -like chrome or firefox - can’t use it.
 
LCfiner said:
when I type in “ahve” the system automatically corrects it to “have”. same with “teh” and “the” basically it uses the built in dictionary to automatically replace text. you can add your own custom replacements as well


I just have to check “correct spelling automatically” option under the spelling and grammar menu item in “edit” on the menu bar.

it’s the type of feature that’s used in MS Office but it’s systemwide for any OS X app that uses the default text boxes. apps that don’t use system default text boxes -like chrome or firefox - can’t use it.
Ah, I was looking for something like this. Does this work in Pages? Doesn't seem so to me. SOmetimes I'll capitalize the first two letters in a word by accident, and Word will auto correct the mistake. Just like I did in the last sentence with the word "Sometimes."
 

LCfiner

Member
JeffDowns said:
Ah, I was looking for something like this. Does this work in Pages? Doesn't seem so to me. SOmetimes I'll capitalize the first two letters in a word by accident, and Word will auto correct the mistake. Just like I did in the last sentence with the word "Sometimes."


a couple things.

one. SOmetimes is not a spelling error. you can fix that in your browser by right clicking on it and picking “transformations” and then selecting Capitilize or lowercase. this would also work in textedit

two. Pages has its own text correction/ text transformation engine (you’ll note that the edit menu under textedit and pages have way different options) and you can check it out by choosing pages preferences and selecting the option for auto capitalization and adding your own options for auto text correction.
 

Bowser

Member
Tried this in the Back to the Mac thread and didn't get any responses, so I'll ask here: I'm looking to get a new laptop and I think I have my sights set pretty firmly on making the jump from PC to Mac. I'm looking at either picking up the 13" or 15" MBP (leaning towards 13" because I like smaller laptops and I don't really think I need the Core i5 and dedicated graphics card; I don't play computer games nor do I do any photoshop/heavy video editing, so I think a Core 2 Duo should suffice) sometime around either my birthday (Nov 21) or during Xmas. My question is, is it worth waiting to see if they release refreshed MBPs soon? I saw on Mac Rumors' Buyers Guide that it says "Buy only if need - approaching end of cycle," but if that "end of cycle" isn't until April, I don't think I'm willing to wait that long. Wondering if I shouldn't wait until at least the Macworld event (though I'm not sure they even traditionally reveal MBP updates/refreshes at Macworld).

tl;dr - Looking to get a 13" MBP end of this year, is it worth waiting to see if a refresh is around the corner?
 

LCfiner

Member
Bowser said:
Tried this in the Back to the Mac thread and didn't get any responses, so I'll ask here: I'm looking to get a new laptop and I think I have my sights set pretty firmly on making the jump from PC to Mac. I'm looking at either picking up the 13" or 15" MBP (leaning towards 13" because I like smaller laptops and I don't really think I need the Core i5 and dedicated graphics card; I don't play computer games nor do I do any photoshop/heavy video editing, so I think a Core 2 Duo should suffice) sometime around either my birthday (Nov 21) or during Xmas. My question is, is it worth waiting to see if they release refreshed MBPs soon? I saw on Mac Rumors' Buyers Guide that it says "Buy only if need - approaching end of cycle," but if that "end of cycle" isn't until April, I don't think I'm willing to wait that long. Wondering if I shouldn't wait until at least the Macworld event (though I'm not sure they even traditionally reveal MBP updates/refreshes at Macworld).

tl;dr - Looking to get a 13" MBP end of this year, is it worth waiting to see if a refresh is around the corner?


Apple doesn’t attend Macworld anymore so don’t worry about that. they’ll update laptops without much warning at all.

The Macbook Pro might get some small speed bump or similar in the next couple months as the last update was April. they typically update a couple times each year.

However, if you’re not going to do anything super intensive, you may want to seriously consider the brand new 13” Air. better screen that the current 13” Macbook Pro model, similar price (bit more expensive) but half the weight and faster in many cases due to the SSD. see the macworld or anandtech reviews online.


edit: The 13” is in a different situation than the 15” since it’s stuck with the C2D as it’s the only CPU they can package with a decent graphics chip in the smaller form factor. which means that the 13” update is more dependant on the schedule of Sandy Bridge Intel CPus that have OpenCL capable integrated graphics chips.

so the wait for a 13” spec bump update may actually be longer than the wait for a 15” spec bump update
 
Bowser said:
Tried this in the Back to the Mac thread and didn't get any responses, so I'll ask here: I'm looking to get a new laptop and I think I have my sights set pretty firmly on making the jump from PC to Mac. I'm looking at either picking up the 13" or 15" MBP (leaning towards 13" because I like smaller laptops and I don't really think I need the Core i5 and dedicated graphics card; I don't play computer games nor do I do any photoshop/heavy video editing, so I think a Core 2 Duo should suffice) sometime around either my birthday (Nov 21) or during Xmas. My question is, is it worth waiting to see if they release refreshed MBPs soon? I saw on Mac Rumors' Buyers Guide that it says "Buy only if need - approaching end of cycle," but if that "end of cycle" isn't until April, I don't think I'm willing to wait that long. Wondering if I shouldn't wait until at least the Macworld event (though I'm not sure they even traditionally reveal MBP updates/refreshes at Macworld).

tl;dr - Looking to get a 13" MBP end of this year, is it worth waiting to see if a refresh is around the corner?

Probably not, because of what you just said. You don't do gaming, graphics, etc. So what could they release besides a faster machine that would be worth waiting for?
 
LCfiner said:
Apple doesn’t attend Macworld anymore so don’t worry about that. they’ll update laptops without much warning at all.

The Macbook Pro might get some small speed bump or similar in the next couple months as the last update was April. they typically update a couple times each year.

However, if you’re not going to do anything super intensive, you may want to seriously consider the brand new 13” Air. better screen that the current 13” Macbook Pro model, similar price (bit more expensive) but half the weight and faster in many cases due to the SSD. see the macworld or anandtech reviews online.

I concur.
 

Bowser

Member
LCfiner said:
Apple doesn’t attend Macworld anymore so don’t worry about that. they’ll update laptops without much warning at all.

The Macbook Pro might get some small speed bump or similar in the next couple months as the last update was April. they typically update a couple times each year.

However, if you’re not going to do anything super intensive, you may want to seriously consider the brand new 13” Air. better screen that the current 13” Macbook Pro model, similar price (bit more expensive) but half the weight and faster in many cases due to the SSD. see the macworld or anandtech reviews online.


edit: The 13” is in a different situation than the 15” since it’s stuck with the C2D as it’s the only CPU they can package with a decent graphics chip in the smaller form factor. which means that the 13” update is more dependant on the schedule of Sandy Bridge Intel CPus that have OpenCL capable integrated graphics chips.

so the wait for a 13” spec bump update may actually be longer than the wait for a 15” spec bump update

There's a couple of little minor annoyances that I have with the Air that pushes me towards the MBP (no built-in ethernet port, no backlit keyboard, no dvd-drive which is big for me cause I like to watch dvds on my laptop); but, I am starting to warm up a bit to it. Definitely am going to play around with one at the Apple store, I'm just worried, mainly, about the lack of a dvd drive (I don't want to waste space ripping my DVDs onto a 128GB hard drive; though I suppose I could rip them to my portable external HD and watch off of that?). Also, I plan on installing Windows on my Mac and running either bootcamp or virtualization so I'm not sure how the Air would handle that either.
 
Top Bottom