I understand that much.Presumably an interim (or perhaps permanent) creative director.
It seemed though that Don recognized him from a previous history which I can't remember.
I understand that much.Presumably an interim (or perhaps permanent) creative director.
I understand that much.
It seemed though that Don recognized him from a previous history which I can't remember.
2. Hmm. Good question. It's a character drama. Maybe give some Season 2 episodes a taste, but you've pretty much seen how it goes down. It's all about relationships, office politics, and personal growth and destruction.
t should be noted that these are grownup clothes, for the most part. This is not youthful like something a 20-year-old would wear. In fact, it looks more like a costume from Sweet Charity. Its sexy, of course; and more youthful than anything, say, Joan would wear. But compare this to Megans mini-dresses of the past season. She and Peggy are about the same age, but Megan stepped right off a magazine cover in the trendiest clothes imaginable. The Zou Bisou dress, which is somewhat similar to this, was something Megan wore over two years ago.
Peggy wore this on a date with some guy who worked in finance, which should give you some idea of where a dress like this falls on the youth/trend scale. Picture what a 30-year-old female executive would wear today on a date to look sexy.
Harry is wearing an SC&P company tie. Jim is in establishment red, white and blue a surprise, given his penchant for pale, ghostly looks. And Ted is wearing blue and green, which is another color combination motif this season; one very persistently applied to people cheating or people dealing with the fallout of cheating. Again, if youre new to Mad Style, we encourage you to look through the previous entries for dozens of examples.
When do you think the final season will pick up in 1969? I wonder if we will see the 70s.
What major events occur in 1969?
What major events occur in 1969?
I wonder if they'll show the truth behind the "landings". With Kubrick and whatnot.the moon landing?
reminds me of this videoWhat major events occur in 1969?
- Warming Glow: Not Great, Bob!: Here Are The Internets Best Reactions To The Mad Men Season Six Finale (gifs and whatnot)
HAHHAA
the moon landing?
lol. Such a fantastic line.
- Warming Glow: Not Great, Bob!: Here Are The Internets Best Reactions To The Mad Men Season Six Finale (gifs and whatnot)
I don't understand what IFT is.
It's a reference to another television show. Either you know what it is or it won't be funny/interesting at all.I don't understand what IFT is.
Brilliant. LOL.
hahaha
Nice, but I still don't like the assertion that Mad Men has "race problems." Black issues are highlighted as much as the setting makes appropriate.
Yeah, we could have more of Dawn, but we could also have more of Ginsberg, too. Minorities are more marginalized in the 60s.
good lord I know about that <_< I was wondering about everything that they could show.
Nice, but I still don't like the assertion that Mad Men has "race problems." Black issues are highlighted as much as the setting makes appropriate.
Yeah, we could have more of Dawn, but we could also have more of Ginsberg, too. Minorities are more marginalized in the 60s.
I honestly don't agree. This same argument could have been used to defend a Mad Men in which Peggy and Joan are minor characters because men are dominant figures throughout the 60s. But obviously that would have been a much worse show! I like Mad Men for what it is, and I think it's one of the strongest feminist shows basically ever. That's one reason I find it disappointing that Weiner hasn't really made much of an attempt to bring out and focus on African-American and other minorities. I find it especially frustrating because it's the civil rights era!
I honestly don't agree. This same argument could have been used to defend a Mad Men in which Peggy and Joan are minor characters because men are dominant figures throughout the 60s. But obviously that would have been a much worse show! I like Mad Men for what it is, and I think it's one of the strongest feminist shows basically ever. That's one reason I find it disappointing that Weiner hasn't really made much of an attempt to bring out and focus on African-American and other minorities. I find it especially frustrating because it's the civil rights era!
I am sure it would be forced.
Having two strong business people who are female is not out of line, especially when one of them literally slept their way to the top. A black businessperson would be odd.
It's the civil rights era, and there's been some focus on that, but I don't think a relative lack given the setting is at all unusal. If the show were about something less segregated and white-dominated, sure, but the show is about an advertising firm. The show isn't meant to be an all-encompasing look at the 60s. Heck, there's barely any counter-culture at all, and it's chief representitive got stabbed and sent packing. It's a narrow slice.
I think it's safe to say that white women started making inroads in the business world before African-Americans did.
To depict a black employee rising to the top of an ad agency in the midst of the Civil Rights movement is a borderline fantasy.
He was put on a leave of absence with no return date and Duck was bringing in someone to likely replace him.
He was fired.
I'm not saying it wouldn't be nice to see more of them (with an expanded show), just that saying it has "race problems" isn't correct.
I think they'll skip 1969, personally. Almost too much happens that year for it to be a good one to do.
That's impossible. 1969 has to be, it was expected from the start to be the end point of the series, they can't just leave it out. I mean, hell. You expect Mad Men to skip over moon landing? No no, just no.
I know this calls for a short time skip between seasons, but 2->3 was less than half a year too I believe.
Think of it this way: Freddy Rumsen was also put on a leave of absence with no return date.Except I think Weiner said it was just a leave of absence?