• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Mad Men - Season 6 - Sundays on AMC

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've always thought that American television should limit the run of a series (like they do in the UK) so we can get a focused and tight storytelling experience with no fluff, but I honestly wish this show would go on forever. The characters are just so fascinating.
 
That's interesting, I just assumed Henry would eventually lose whatever he was running for. Even though he has the trappings of a successful life, I couldn't imagine him with any real power, or with Betty being that close to real power, or however much a state senator has.

Being a member of the State Senate isn't the same as being a U.S. Senator, but it's still a decent amount of political influence, especially regionally. The read that we're going to watch Henry & Betty become the Republican 70s is really interesting, and I hope it happens now.
 

Dance Inferno

Unconfirmed Member
I've always thought that American television should limit the run of a series (like they do in the UK) so we can get a focused and tight storytelling experience with no fluff, but I honestly wish this show would go on forever. The characters are just so fascinating.

I'm personally not a fan of 24-episode seasons, and not surprisingly my favorite shows all have seasons in the 13 episode range (Mad Men, Battlestar Galactica, The Shield). I think 6 episodes the way the British do it is a little too short to fully flesh out a season's story arc.
 
Content Roundup - Episode 5 - "The Flood"

2y549jB.jpg


Videos:
- Inside Episode 605 Mad Men: The Flood (youtube)
- Promo for next week's episode (please spoiler tag any discussion, youtube)
- Janie Bryant on Costumes in Episode 605: Inside Mad Men (youtube)


Reviews:
- Sepinwall
- Onion A|V Club
- Maureen Ryan
- Rolling Stone
- Slate.com, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4
- The Atlantic
- Salon.com
- EW.com
- Zap2It
- Tom & Lorenzo (Mad Style will be up later this week)
- Matt Zoller Seitz
- Esquire
- NY Times
- New Republic
- Grantland
- TV.com
- Alyssa Rosenberg
- IndieWire
- Deborah Lipp
- Tim Goodman's review for THR
- The Atlantic Part 2

Other:
- AMC Q&A: Vincent Kartheiser (Pete Campbell)
- THR: Matthew Weiner Talks Photography, Nude Scenes With Gregory Crewdson
- Ad Age: Yep, That's How the Ad Biz Reacted to a 1968 Tragedy
- The Atlantic: A Pivotal 'Mad Men' Scene, as Written by the New York Times 45 Years Ago
- Grantland: Mad Men Power Rankings, Episode 605: 'The Flood'
- Over on his personal website, William Mapother with a cryptic Q&A earlier this week talking about his appearance on Mad Men
- The song over the closing credits: L'Amour Est Bleu by Paul Mauriat (thanks, hiryu)
- NY Mag: When Bad Parents Want Good Kids
- Wired: Martin Luther King Jr. and Molotov Cocktails: Seeing Mad Men Through Its Ads
- GQ: Mad Men Costume Designer Janie Bryant on Bobby Draper's Sweater Game, SCDP's Evening Wear, and How to Buy a Tux
- Tom & Lorenzo's Mad Style: The Flood
- Don & Bobby Draper Go See Planet Of The Apes: The Musical
- Jon Hamm on The Daily Show
- NY Mag: Mad Men’s Jay R. Ferguson on Stan and Peggy, Playing Stoned, and His Tremendous Beard
- NY Mag: How Jon Hamm Became America’s Sexiest Comedy Nerd


Might be a few things missing, but I think that's about it.
 

Jackben

bitch I'm taking calls.
I watch via iTunes season pass and while I get 5 minute 'making of' summaries for each episode, I miss out on the promos. Which isn't a huge loss since most are pointless. But in the case of the one for this coming episode, it seems hype:
seems to have more Roger and a situation in which Pete, Joan and Cooper are in plainclothes...secret/emergency business proposition?
 

Wool

Member
Just watched Sunday's episode. I was pretty confused what that accountant wanted to do. What company/product is he trying to market? Was he supposed to eccentric or was he on LSD or something?

I thought Peggy was talking to Dawn after the MLK assassination. Both firms have one token black secretary?



That dinner with Ginsburg and the student teacher was my favorite scene this season. It was cringe-inducing, but I can also relate to the uncomfortable first date . That girl was really cute too. Hopefully a recurring character.
 

Jackben

bitch I'm taking calls.
But...the CGC secretary didn't look or sound anything like Dawn. The only similarity is that they are both black secretaries...

So I noticed that the Draper's old housemaid is now working at SCDP. Why hasn't there been more discussion about how Carla has begun a double life just like Don in assuming the identity of a black secretary named Dawn???
 

Wool

Member
But...the CGC secretary didn't look or sound anything like Dawn. The only similarity is that they are both black secretaries...

Yeah, I know. I did a face-palm. It was probably ten minutes after Peggy had talked to her secretary, and then a light bulb went off in my head and I remembered that Peggy doesn't work with Dawn, and there are now multiple black people on the show.


Edit: I will say that when I first posted I expected someone to call me racist or something, but I didn't think it would happen in less than 5 minutes.
 
So I noticed that the Draper's old housemaid is now working at SCDP. Why hasn't there been more discussion about how Carla has begun a double life just like Don in assuming the identity of a black secretary named Dawn???

Hollis, the old elevator operator must have taken a job cleaning movie theaters RIGHT GAF?
 
Just watched Sunday's episode. I was pretty confused what that accountant wanted to do. What company/product is he trying to market? Was he supposed to eccentric or was he on LSD or something?

This. Roger refers to the fact that he owed him, for talking Roger down off a roof.

I think the point here is that Roger's still into tripping and has gotten weird friends, and also that this is what the early drug days looked like.
 

CrankyJay

Banned
This. Roger refers to the fact that he owed him, for talking Roger down off a roof.

I think the point here is that Roger's still into tripping and has gotten weird friends, and also that this is what the early drug days looked like.

That's an odd way of revealing that...lol
 

Colasante

Member
I spent half of the episode confusing Ginsberg with Peggy's boyfriend, and not remembering when Peggy and Ginsberg got together. Eventually I figured it out. I really enjoyed Ginsberg's storyline, I hope he and Stan continue to receive more screen time. Along with Harry's transformation into something resembling villainy and Pete's struggles with emulating Don, I've been far more interested in the underlings than the major executives at SCDP this season.

As for the LSD-influenced accountant, I think another major part of his presence wasn't just to show the drug culture that Roger was tangentially apart of, but also to introduce the idea of using the social rights movements of the time to your favor with your advertisements, be it by targeting the demographic or by using fear tactics to appeal to those who oppose the movements. As they said, even if they didn't make the molotov cocktail insurance commercial, there will be advertising agencies who would gladly do that.
 
This thread has taught me that having two characters who are black or moustachioed is confusing to some viewers.

I admit, I've watched all seasons of this show but I still have problems with some character's names. Like Peggy's boyfriend. Or the guy who used to work at Sterling Cooper and is now some religious guy. And I always forget Harry's name.
 

Dance Inferno

Unconfirmed Member
So here's my question for you all:

Stan Rizzo vs. Sal Romano: Who is your favorite art director?

I also just realized that they both have the same initials.

Personally I liked Sal and his struggles with homosexuality, but I think Stan is just a much more fun character to watch. Plus dat beard.
 

Bladenic

Member
So here's my question for you all:

Stan Rizzo vs. Sal Romano: Who is your favorite art director?

I also just realized that they both have the same initials.

Personally I liked Sal and his struggles with homosexuality, but I think Stan is just a much more fun character to watch. Plus dat beard.

Sal was a deeper character while Stan is more fun to watch, I guess. Stan doesn't really have much of a role besides comic relief. That beard is disgusting though. I'm expecting a bird to pop out any scene.
 
I think I like Stan more. Sal was too defined by his closetedness, while Stan is just Stan.

I do miss Sal though. I keep hoping for at least a cameo.
 
Do people really not get why Betty is still around?

It's just kind of funny that someone would say this after this week's episode, where we're really starting to see where Weiner is taking Betty. We got a glimpse of Betty's political ambition with the Junior League reservoir deal in Season 3, and now we'll see it emerge once again as Henry seeks a spot in the NYS Senate.

I think there's a group of people that understand this, they just still don't care about it.

----------------

And Stan's the best obviously.
 

jtb

Banned
@sepinwall
This week's Mad Men was apparently briefly available to download at Australia iTunes Store. Matt Weiner will NOT be happy.
 
Yeah, saw that. If anyone ends up watching early, just make sure you use spoiler tags if you want to discuss the episode here. Thanks.
 

Arnie

Member
mBW7QKe.png


This made me snortle (a patented combination of snickering and chortling).

:looooooool

Is the implication that his ability to effectively advertise as times change is forcing him to use bottom of the barrel ideas and steal other's copy?
 

Jackben

bitch I'm taking calls.
Last season was all about Glen. Same with this season, all the events are just background drama setting up his next appearance.
 
I don't know how you can miss the consistent ominous references of death in some way. It's definitely not as blatant as last season but it still looms.
 

Wool

Member
Yeah I definitely notice it, its just that if you go through the season 5 thread everyone was constantly pointing out every minor detail that you could associate with death. Discussion is good, but people look too far into things sometimes. Remember this?

666better.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom