MAF, Drinky, What games do you *like*?

mrklaw

MrArseFace
I enjoy your caustic remarks but the constant torrent of abuse sometimes makes it difficult to get a bead on you.

So if you could let me have a quick run down on the sorts of games you like, what have you really enjoyed recently - that would help give me something to work from.

thanks : )
 
mrklaw said:
I enjoy your caustic remarks but the constant torrent of abuse sometimes makes it difficult to get a bead on you.

So if you could let me have a quick run down on the sorts of games you like, what have you really enjoyed recently - that would help give me something to work from.

thanks : )

Who the heck cares what those whiny bitches say anyway? Send them to opa for all I care. They'd be much more at home.
 
Normally, I try to stay out of "personality pimping" threads, but in this case, I'll bite:

I like 2D and rail shooters, mechanics-heavy RPGs (especially PC RPS and SRPGs), racing games, fighting games, turn-based 4X games, PC RTS titles, and any FPS that isn't badged with the Tom Clancy name or has pretensions toward military simulation. I appreciate strong iconography, clever abstract design, orthodox mechanics wed to unorthodox style, and a strong emphasis on the mathematical component of gameplay.

I tend to avidly dislike immersion, anime storylines, cutscenes, context-ignorant controls, mini-games, military/urban fetishism, simulations of any variety other than rally racing (a weird preference of mine), a silly overemphasis on "realism", and innovation for innovation's sake.

The games I prefer almost always devalue immersion in favor of strong mechanics, or have a sufficiently complicated system to make the cutscenes and plot more bearable. Currently, my favorite games range from old-school shooters like the R-Type and Gradius series, to the Nippon Ichi strategy RPGs, to the Zelda titles, to PC offerings like Diablo 2, Shadow Magic, Kohan AG, and Disciples 2.

I'm indifferent on most of the popular titles because most don't fit my tastes. I dig Halo 2 a lot, granted, although the SP cutscenes really wore on me -- thank God I could skip 'em. I might give GTA:SA a shot if/when it hits Xdude. MGS3 -- I can't stand the scenario design, the controls, or the mechanics of the series, and while I appreciate the post-modern pretention of the series, as ironically earnest as it is, I don't think I could stomach another after meandering through the second MGS title (on PC). I always THINK that I'll enjoy emergent games like Morrowind, The Sims, or other "sandbox" titles, but they always wind up being too shallow and too reliant on an idea of immersion rather than providing real challenge. Fable worked for me because it was over before it wore out its welcome. Nintendo games were classic back when they defined genres -- I think Yoshi's Island is the most sublime 2D platformer ever made -- but outside of the Zelda series and Pikmin 2, their recent offerings have left me cold. (Well, I enjoyed SMS, but it also had a lot of wasted potential.)

I absolutely HATE the survival horror genre as well as the generic mascot-driven action adventure so popular these days. "Stylish action" is also becoming very tired, although I dug Otogi 2 just for the lush visuals and stellar score.


The short version: I'm an old C64/Amiga/PC gamer who played consoles only as an alternative to his beloved computer games in high school. I had a Nintendo, but it didn't really blow me away -- it had ugly graphics/sound (by an Amiga fanboy's standards), and it didn't host the nerdy RPGs and turn-based games I dug. I never became a console fanboy because I never had a favorite console, despite owning a TG-16, a Genny, and a SNES in college. I've always bought a console because it had a specific game I just *had* to play, not because of the name or lineage of the hardware manufacturer.

Me and MAF are not the same person despite what the local Art Bell crowd would have you believe, and we actually have pretty distinct tastes. MAF lives near me, and we hang out a fair bit -- and occasionally send each other links to "interesting" threads over IM or #ga -- but any of the folks who know us (Shouta, kiryogi, Frag) will recognize that while we have a lot of overlap in taste when it comes to fighting and RTS games, we also have a lot of differences of opinion. He digs BF1942 and online FPSes; I don't mind watching 'em, but I don't feel any urge to play 'em. I play more "nerdy" PC 4X "bearded man" games which probably bore him to tears. I also play more RPGs than he does, and he values a quirkiness of theme more than I do.
 
Drinky likes Under the Skin so he'll probably be pimping games like Adventure Island next week


See, this illustrates my point nicely: I can like a game and be perfectly happy even if everyone else loathes it, to the point that I don't even feel the need to support it. Under The Skin has a lot of problems -- if you ask me nice, I'll share my perspective on it -- but other than that, IT'S OKAY WITH ME IF PEOPLE HATE THE HELL OUT OF IT.
 
Nope. I hate the concept of Steam and refuse to endorse it. That, and I didn't like the first Half-Life all that much -- the mid-game was great, but the teleporting monsters and Xen really brought the whole experience down for me.
 
I don't remember what the Xs stand for: eXploration, eXpansion, eXtermination and somethin' else. Basically, it's a PC nerd term for games like Civ, Master of Magic, and Master of Orion.
 
Ceaser games as well?

Or do those lean more towards Sim City style?
 
I don't really like to play proctor with genre definitions, but I'd venture that they aren't. I think Shadow Magic is pushing it, with its lack of emphasis on settling strategies. THe closer it is to Civ, the more it is a "4X", as near as I can tell.
 
Drinky Crow said:
Normally, I try to stay out of "personality pimping" threads, but in this case, I'll bite:

I like 2D and rail shooters, mechanics-heavy RPGs (especially PC RPS and SRPGs), racing games, fighting games, turn-based 4X games, PC RTS titles, and any FPS that isn't badged with the Tom Clancy name or has pretensions toward military simulation. I appreciate strong iconography, clever abstract design, orthodox mechanics wed to unorthodox style, and a strong emphasis on the mathematical component of gameplay.

I tend to avidly dislike immersion, anime storylines, cutscenes, context-ignorant controls, mini-games, military/urban fetishism, simulations of any variety other than rally racing (a weird preference of mine), a silly overemphasis on "realism", and innovation for innovation's sake.

The games I prefer almost always devalue immersion in favor of strong mechanics, or have a sufficiently complicated system to make the cutscenes and plot more bearable. Currently, my favorite games range from old-school shooters like the R-Type and Gradius series, to the Nippon Ichi strategy RPGs, to the Zelda titles, to PC offerings like Diablo 2, Shadow Magic, Kohan AG, and Disciples 2.

I'm indifferent on most of the popular titles because most don't fit my tastes. I dig Halo 2 a lot, granted, although the SP cutscenes really wore on me -- thank God I could skip 'em. I might give GTA:SA a shot if/when it hits Xdude. MGS3 -- I can't stand the scenario design, the controls, or the mechanics of the series, and while I appreciate the post-modern pretention of the series, as ironically earnest as it is, I don't think I could stomach another after meandering through the second MGS title (on PC). I always THINK that I'll enjoy emergent games like Morrowind, The Sims, or other "sandbox" titles, but they always wind up being too shallow and too reliant on an idea of immersion rather than providing real challenge. Fable worked for me because it was over before it wore out its welcome. Nintendo games were classic back when they defined genres -- I think Yoshi's Island is the most sublime 2D platformer ever made -- but outside of the Zelda series and Pikmin 2, their recent offerings have left me cold. (Well, I enjoyed SMS, but it also had a lot of wasted potential.)

I absolutely HATE the survival horror genre as well as the generic mascot-driven action adventure so popular these days. "Stylish action" is also becoming very tired, although I dug Otogi 2 just for the lush visuals and stellar score.


The short version: I'm an old C64/Amiga/PC gamer who played consoles only as an alternative to his beloved computer games in high school. I had a Nintendo, but it didn't really blow me away -- it had ugly graphics/sound (by an Amiga fanboy's standards), and it didn't host the nerdy RPGs and turn-based games I dug. I never became a console fanboy because I never had a favorite console, despite owning a TG-16, a Genny, and a SNES in college. I've always bought a console because it had a specific game I just *had* to play, not because of the name or lineage of the hardware manufacturer.

Me and MAF are not the same person despite what the local Art Bell crowd would have you believe, and we actually have pretty distinct tastes. MAF lives near me, and we hang out a fair bit -- and occasionally send each other links to "interesting" threads over IM or #ga -- but any of the folks who know us (Shouta, kiryogi, Frag) will recognize that while we have a lot of overlap in taste when it comes to fighting and RTS games, we also have a lot of differences of opinion. He digs BF1942 and online FPSes; I don't mind watching 'em, but I don't feel any urge to play 'em. I play more "nerdy" PC 4X "bearded man" games which probably bore him to tears. I also play more RPGs than he does, and he values a quirkiness of theme more than I do.

Man you all got fuck owned! Style and hip slang, followed by secret thesaurus usage. What a guy! Thumbs up duder!

thumbsup.jpg
 
Ninja Gaiden? I really liked it. Hard as hell (for me), but the crazy number of moves you could do mixed with the great level designs and difficult bosses made it one of the few games of that particular variety I liked.

I did in fact enjoy the King's Field games, although I attribute much of that to my deep and abiding love for the Ultima Underworld games.
 
Drinky Crow said:
I did in fact enjoy the King's Field games, although I attribute much of that to my deep and abiding love for the Ultima Underworld games.
Heh, me too, actually... and the Eye of the Beholder series. Love those old first person dungeon crawlers.
 
Drinky turned me onto zAngbandTk. I was into rogue-likes a while before this, but zAngbandTk was the one that rehooked me big time. Best game ever.
 
Drinky Crow said:
Nope. I hate the concept of Steam and refuse to endorse it. That, and I didn't like the first Half-Life all that much -- the mid-game was great, but the teleporting monsters and Xen really brought the whole experience down for me.

While the first Half-Life I enjoyed, comments on Steam get the patented...

\m/ ^_^ \m/
 
When we do year-end awards at 1UP, I wanna have a lot of weird honorable mention categories (so we can give Best Supporting Actor to Lawrence, Best Set-Piece to The Sorrow, Best Belated Bribe to this bicycle Rockstar just sent us, and some other stuff). I should come up with a category custom-tailored for Steam, too.

DFS.
 
"Best way to intrude on your computer and make it cry like a little girl": Steam

Anyway, what Drinky says is true. While he and MAF have some overlap in tastes, it's only limited to two or so genres. They do have wildly different tastes, it's just that they don't advertise it on the forum.
 
WarPig said:
When we do year-end awards at 1UP, I wanna have a lot of weird honorable mention categories (so we can give Best Supporting Actor to Lawrence, Best Set-Piece to The Sorrow, Best Belated Bribe to this bicycle Rockstar just sent us, and some other stuff). I should come up with a category custom-tailored for Steam, too.

DFS.
"most bitched about, yet pretty good delivery system" for steam.
 
firex said:
"most bitched about, yet pretty good delivery system" for steam.
Personally, I didn't have much trouble with it... but given how many others are having issues, I'd hardly call it "pretty good."
 
I had no problem with it (although I did buy one of the packages off steam instead of a hard copy), and it seems like a lot of the complaining was because the steam servers were getting hit hard with all the people wanting to validate it/sign up for steam at the same time. Any server handling as much traffic as I'm sure steam got with HL2's release is bound to be unresponsive.

but despite all the bitching about the HL2 launch, it's more than being able to preload HL2 and play it as soon as it was available that made me like steam. Just being able to download older content right away (and pretty fast) and play HL2 on any computer I want to just by downloading steam and logging in with my account is pretty good. along with the incorporation of other features that aren't by any means original or innovative, but helpful (the buddy list that also lets you see if anybody's playing games and join them, for example).
 
Drinky Crow said:
I don't remember what the Xs stand for: eXploration, eXpansion, eXtermination and somethin' else. Basically, it's a PC nerd term for games like Civ, Master of Magic, and Master of Orion.

A.K.A. The best genre ever.
 
Drinky Crow said:
Normally, I try to stay out of "personality pimping" threads, but in this case, I'll bite:

I like 2D and rail shooters, mechanics-heavy RPGs (especially PC RPS and SRPGs), racing games, fighting games, turn-based 4X games, PC RTS titles, and any FPS that isn't badged with the Tom Clancy name or has pretensions toward military simulation. I appreciate strong iconography, clever abstract design, orthodox mechanics wed to unorthodox style, and a strong emphasis on the mathematical component of gameplay.

I tend to avidly dislike immersion, anime storylines, cutscenes, context-ignorant controls, mini-games, military/urban fetishism, simulations of any variety other than rally racing (a weird preference of mine), a silly overemphasis on "realism", and innovation for innovation's sake.

The games I prefer almost always devalue immersion in favor of strong mechanics, or have a sufficiently complicated system to make the cutscenes and plot more bearable. Currently, my favorite games range from old-school shooters like the R-Type and Gradius series, to the Nippon Ichi strategy RPGs, to the Zelda titles, to PC offerings like Diablo 2, Shadow Magic, Kohan AG, and Disciples 2.

I'm indifferent on most of the popular titles because most don't fit my tastes. I dig Halo 2 a lot, granted, although the SP cutscenes really wore on me -- thank God I could skip 'em. I might give GTA:SA a shot if/when it hits Xdude. MGS3 -- I can't stand the scenario design, the controls, or the mechanics of the series, and while I appreciate the post-modern pretention of the series, as ironically earnest as it is, I don't think I could stomach another after meandering through the second MGS title (on PC). I always THINK that I'll enjoy emergent games like Morrowind, The Sims, or other "sandbox" titles, but they always wind up being too shallow and too reliant on an idea of immersion rather than providing real challenge. Fable worked for me because it was over before it wore out its welcome. Nintendo games were classic back when they defined genres -- I think Yoshi's Island is the most sublime 2D platformer ever made -- but outside of the Zelda series and Pikmin 2, their recent offerings have left me cold. (Well, I enjoyed SMS, but it also had a lot of wasted potential.)

I absolutely HATE the survival horror genre as well as the generic mascot-driven action adventure so popular these days. "Stylish action" is also becoming very tired, although I dug Otogi 2 just for the lush visuals and stellar score.


The short version: I'm an old C64/Amiga/PC gamer who played consoles only as an alternative to his beloved computer games in high school. I had a Nintendo, but it didn't really blow me away -- it had ugly graphics/sound (by an Amiga fanboy's standards), and it didn't host the nerdy RPGs and turn-based games I dug. I never became a console fanboy because I never had a favorite console, despite owning a TG-16, a Genny, and a SNES in college. I've always bought a console because it had a specific game I just *had* to play, not because of the name or lineage of the hardware manufacturer.

Me and MAF are not the same person despite what the local Art Bell crowd would have you believe, and we actually have pretty distinct tastes. MAF lives near me, and we hang out a fair bit -- and occasionally send each other links to "interesting" threads over IM or #ga -- but any of the folks who know us (Shouta, kiryogi, Frag) will recognize that while we have a lot of overlap in taste when it comes to fighting and RTS games, we also have a lot of differences of opinion. He digs BF1942 and online FPSes; I don't mind watching 'em, but I don't feel any urge to play 'em. I play more "nerdy" PC 4X "bearded man" games which probably bore him to tears. I also play more RPGs than he does, and he values a quirkiness of theme more than I do.


so what you're REALLY saying is that you and MAF are fuck buddies? You've sure gone a lot into his taste with no appearance in this thread of MAF.

* ps buy minish cap. My gba GOTY. if you like Zelda, you'll dig this.
 
I've played games with him a lot and talked about games with him. Geezus, are you ignorant of your friends' tastes in things?

A guy has a cool friend on here, and suddenly they're both "fuck buddies". No wonder you don't have any friends; do you feel obligated to fuck any dude you have a friendship with?
 
Drinky Crow said:
I've played games with him a lot and talked about games with him. Geezus, are you ignorant of your friends' tastes in things?

A guy has a cool friend on here, and suddenly they're both "fuck buddies". No wonder you don't have male friends; do you feel obligated to fuck any dude you have a friendship with?

:) touchy? I was being facetious. See this sort of trashing is the sort of trashing we sort of get from you and MAF in just about 90% of the threads I read (maybe cause you trash the threads I'm interested in)

and no. i'm not part of the gaying-age.
 
Top Bottom