It's also Legacy legalIf it is wasn't on the reserved list, you could totally reprint Candelabra of Tawnos in standard with no impact whatsoever.
It's also Legacy legalIf it is wasn't on the reserved list, you could totally reprint Candelabra of Tawnos in standard with no impact whatsoever.
EDIT: I'm not that interested in it tbh.
you think this is circular topics? Don't step foot into the Dragon ball super thread.Glad we got the guns debate in one last time before 2017. Met the quota. Let's argue about Nahiri being a villain or not next or maybe about how a super powerful Legacy-banned card would be fine in standard.
It makes perfect sense. Guns fill a mechanical role similar to a whole bunch of actual magical stuff and they have their own mythology in terms of how powerful and destructive they are that doesn't jibe well with fantasy settings. And then if you make them accurately shitty for really early guns people complain that they're bad.
We have magic robots though.It makes perfect sense. Guns fill a mechanical role similar to a whole bunch of actual magical stuff and they have their own mythology in terms of how powerful and destructive they are that doesn't jibe well with fantasy settings. And then if you make them accurately shitty for really early guns people complain that they're bad.
Mental Misstep is the hero that Standard needs. Gotta counter all those Thraben Inspectors.Glad we got the guns debate in one last time before 2017. Met the quota. Let's argue about Nahiri being a villain or not next or maybe about how a super powerful Legacy-banned card would be fine in standard.
Drive to Work - Innistrad Showdown
MaRo compares the two Innistrad block mechanics. He howls a lot, which I think was to intentionally annoy his teenage daughter, who's often in the car when he records these.
Is madness complicated?!? Or soulbond for that matter?
... oh god.
They have done guns exactly once- Portal Second Age
We have magic robots though.
Izzet has electricityAnd automobiles. Which they have somehow invented before guns.
we have this as well, whatever it is.We have magic robots though.
Izzet has electricity
we have this as well, whatever it is.
The no guns rule is really just stubbornness more than anything.
Izzet has electricity
we have this as well, whatever it is.
The no guns rule is really just stubbornness more than anything.
Would loyal sentry stop infect? Does it destroy as soon as it's declared a blocker?
Ravnica and Kaladesh get to toe the line of sci-fi because of their themes. Having actual, mechanical guns show up in Magic prominently would be odd. Having some sort of magic-based projectile weapon that happens to have a trigger is less egregious, but still somewhat problematic. I suspect, when they do a western themed set, guns will be replaced with magic wands or something else less gun-like. Maybe walkie-talkies.
Cannons are kinda sweet though.
Magic Revolvers?
I think the Guns thing comes down to mechanics a bit. Archers / bow & crossbow creatures usually have Reach and / or deal with fliers. I think you'd want to follow the same logic and Reach / flier-hate seems kinda shallow and not interesting.
But yeah, there are all sorts of "weapons" already. Feels like there is a lot of variety already. Predator, Flagship, for example, is def shooting something
[imghttp://magiccards.info/scans/en/ne/135.jpg][/img]
Really looking forward to Aether Revolt and Amonket though. I feel like more Crocodiles are in our future lol
I think the guns in the block that I'd have in mind would have an emphasis on first strike because of gunslinger Quickdraw and whatnot
Yeah, that could be neat, and / or maybe creatures that deal damage when they are targeted.
Also: After playing Duels more and more, I feel like the set symbol should be more prevalent in the packaging. Maybe just the online component, but the set symbol and set packaging seem super divorced and I don't know if that is deliberate or an oversight. If I look at a card from Shadows and a card from Eldritch Moon, then look at the packaging, I have no idea which one came from which. Dunno, maybe that's just me.
I think the Guns thing comes down to mechanics a bit. Archers / bow & crossbow creatures usually have Reach and / or deal with fliers. I think you'd want to follow the same logic and Reach / flier-hate seems kinda shallow and not interesting.
But yeah, there are all sorts of "weapons" already. Feels like there is a lot of variety as it is with "magic" shooters. Predator, Flagship, for example, is def shooting something
Really looking forward to Aether Revolt and Amonket though. I feel like more Crocodiles are in our future lol
Crossbows have always been less pronounced in magic than bow and arrow, crossbowmen don't usually have reach, they often ping though. I think guns would just fill that spot, a set with guns would underemphasize toughness more than anything.I think the Guns thing comes down to mechanics a bit. Archers / bow & crossbow creatures usually have Reach and / or deal with fliers. I think you'd want to follow the same logic and Reach / flier-hate seems kinda shallow and not interesting.
Innistrad remains the most egregious set for the lack of guns. Kaladesh and Ravnica are based on a sci-fi setting that gives room for much more timeless designs, meanwhile Innistrad evokes a very particular time in our history and designs that are simply synonymous with guns.Ravnica and Kaladesh get to toe the line of sci-fi because of their themes. Having actual, mechanical guns show up in Magic prominently would be odd. Having some sort of magic-based projectile weapon that happens to have a trigger is less egregious, but still somewhat problematic. I suspect, when they do a western themed set, guns will be replaced with magic wands or something else less gun-like. Maybe walkie-talkies.
Ravnica and Kaladesh get to toe the line of sci-fi because of their themes. Having actual, mechanical guns show up in Magic prominently would be odd. Having some sort of magic-based projectile weapon that happens to have a trigger is less egregious, but still somewhat problematic. I suspect, when they do a western themed set, guns will be replaced with magic wands or something else less gun-like. Maybe walkie-talkies.
Open a masterpiece.
Seriously though
- complete my merfolk sideboard
Go to PT Kyoto. That's about it.
But more seriously, would like to get into modern at some point, win a PPTQ, and top 8 a reasonable legacy event with my DnT deck.
Still working on the balance of them. Currently trying 3 recruiter 2 prelate. Haven't tried palace jailer yet.
Currently the most popular thread title is "That shit that make your soul burn slow", so last chance for any challengers.
Basically, replace the symbol on the right with the set symbol would solve this issue.
My favorite card in my Karn deck when I hit infinite mana. Boom the board blows up. PULL! BOOM! PULL! BOOM!
Crossbows have always been less pronounced in magic than bow and arrow, crossbowmen don't usually have reach, they often ping though. I think guns would just fill that spot, a set with guns would underemphasize toughness more than anything.
Innistrad remains the most egregious set for the lack of guns. Kaladesh and Ravnica are based on a sci-fi setting that gives room for much more timeless designs, meanwhile Innistrad evokes a very particular time in our history and designs that are simply synonymous with guns.
It's funny that the story gets shit on, but as a "new" Magic player (2013), I love the Weatherlight stuff. I haven't read anything nor do I intend to... but when I first started searching cards and I saw the Weatherlight-related ones, I found them super interesting and was drawn to them.
MtG resolution time! Or shall we say oath?
I resolve:
What about you?
- to actually win a PPTQ
- practice legacy more often
- qualify for and attend a WMCQ
It was like this for me at the time too. Selenia and Crovax's story is what got me into Magic in the first place.
EDIT: That being, what we could piece together from the various cards. Didn't even know there was non-card/videogame Magic media for a good few years when I started playing.
Yeah, I only know what's up with some characters based on the cards I saw and eventually I wiki'd them, discovering a multitude of books / stories.
Now, I casually follow the story with the recaps and stuff posted in these threads. A lot of early Magic stories completely baffle me that they are actually real lol