Only $24 million left to go...c'mon, legs!!!
I'd be surprised if it makes it. It will lose even more screens next weekend.
Only $24 million left to go...c'mon, legs!!!
It was amazing. I was in awe that we finally got a fight like this live action. The music topped it off. The moment we saw Zod and Clark fly around each other, fighting while flying mid-air was a dream come true for me. Fuck all the collateral damage complaints, we never got anything like this in Returns or any other Superhero movie. Best scene in the film for me.
Just came back from watching it here in Brazil. Every single theater was sold out. no Empty seats all all. It's probably going to be the same thing next week.It got released in Brazil today, I hope for some good numbers from there.
We did however get a very similar scene in The Matrix Revolutions....10 years ago.
I would go so far as to say that the final fight scene in Revolutions was actually shot and choreographed better as well.
We did however get a very similar scene in The Matrix Revolutions....10 years ago.
I would go so far as to say that the final fight scene in Revolutions was actually shot and choreographed better as well.
Ugh no thanks. The fight in superman was far better imo and actually more fitting for the movie.
If You Love These People
all day
every day
at home
during exercise
in the car.
I'd be surprised if it makes it. It will lose even more screens next weekend.
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=71162&start=25
Spoiler in link potentially
So this guy who is a long time member there said he has word the next villian in man of steel sequel isand is being played bylex luthoror atleast wb hopesdenzel washington
They might intentionally be trying to distance their version of Lex Luthor from the Gene Hackman version. People are understandably a bit sick of Lex Luthor, so they want to spice him up to not be so predictable.What? How? no way. It's like getting Ron Howard to play Martin Luther King or something. Just doesn't seem to compute. It's like taking all that is known about them and throwing it in the bin for someone who has none of the look.
They might intentionally be trying to distance their version of Lex Luthor from the Gene Hackman version. People are understandably a bit sick of Lex Luthor, so they want to spice him up to not be so predictable.
It's like making Alfred a muscular younger guy in that new CGI Batman cartoon.
I'm surprised this moment from Superman: Sacrifice / Infinite Crisis hasn't been mentioned at all in the discussion of Man of Steel.
If I recall correctly, a lot of the conflict between the Trinity came from Wonder Woman's above action, Batman's Brother Eye paranoia, and Superman's disappointment.
What? How? no way. It's like getting Ron Howard to play Martin Luther King or something. Just doesn't seem to compute. It's like taking all that is known about them and throwing it in the bin for someone who has none of the look.
Amazing.
MLK is a real person who did real things. Lex Luthor's skin color has zero bearing on his character.
No it's not. MLK was an actual human being. Lex Luthor is a fictional character. He can look like whatever DC Comics decides to make him look like.What? How? no way. It's like getting Ron Howard to play Martin Luther King or something. Just doesn't seem to compute. It's like taking all that is known about them and throwing it in the bin for someone who has none of the look.
I am absolutely against changing the race of iconic characters. It's so fucking stupid and just looks like an attention grab. If they want a black villian they can select one or they can create a new one from scratch. Making Lex black would be just as dumb as having a different ethnicity playing as Blade or Luke Cage.
They might intentionally be trying to distance their version of Lex Luthor from the Gene Hackman version. People are understandably a bit sick of Lex Luthor, so they want to spice him up to not be so predictable.
It's like making Alfred a muscular younger guy in that new CGI Batman cartoon.
What? How? no way. It's like getting Ron Howard to play Martin Luther King or something. Just doesn't seem to compute. It's like taking all that is known about them and throwing it in the bin for someone who has none of the look.
are people actually complaining about denzel washington? hes an amazing actor and we can be lucky if he actually gets the job.
Shame on you! Both movies were awesome but I liked MoS quite a bit better.I pretty much hated this film. Worst experience at the cinema this year, cant wait for pacific rim to wash away the taste :'(
What if it's not actually an attention grab? What if the race of the character is not a factor in the story? What if the best actor for the job happens to be black and is more deserving than all the other lesser skilled white actors? Does the black actor still not get to work because he's not white, even though he would objectively do a better job and the film would be better for it? Hypothetically speaking, lets say there is a limited pool of actors from which the filmmakers can choose, and all the white actors are at the bottom of that pool, while the very best actor at the top is black, and the story makes no fuss about the race of the character in question. You would be genuinely outraged that they did not pick a white actor, even if doing so would hurt the quality of the film? Is there any scenario at all where you could imagine yourself being OK with casting an iconic character of one skin tone with an actor of a different skin tone?
In this case, nah, they shouldn't ever do it. Not because Denzel couldn't nail the character, but because there's an element of symbolic crossover in Superman with Friedrich Nietzche's ubermensch (frequently translated as superman from the German), the perfected man who provides inspiration to those around him in a post deistic world. The trouble is, that was a philosophy which in no small part inspired the Nazis. Hitler frequently used the term to describe his Aryan master race.
Making Superman's primary antagonist black would introduce a subtext of racial conflict to a character who is meant to be an inspiration to the best that lies in all humanity. Since it's obvious we don't live in a post-racial world, that reading is just unavoidable.
The primary antagonist defines the main character in a particular way that other characters don't; having Perry White or Lois or anyone else be a different race wouldn't alter the dynamic of the story in the same way (I think an interracial romance with a black Lois would reinforce what he already stands for).
Just listened to it driving home. Such a great song.
See I can get with that. I had similar thinking on it myself, tbh.In this case, nah, they shouldn't ever do it. Not because Denzel couldn't nail the character, but because there's an element of symbolic crossover in Superman with Friedrich Nietzche's ubermensch (frequently translated as superman from the German), the perfected man who provides inspiration to those around him in a post deistic world. The trouble is, that was a philosophy which in no small part inspired the Nazis. Hitler frequently used the term to describe his Aryan master race.
Making Superman's primary antagonist black would introduce a subtext of racial conflict to a character who is meant to be an inspiration to the best that lies in all humanity. Since it's obvious we don't live in a post-racial world, that reading is just unavoidable.
The primary antagonist defines the main character in a particular way that other characters don't; having Perry White or Lois or anyone else be a different race wouldn't alter the dynamic of the story in the same way (I think an interracial romance with a black Lois would reinforce what he already stands for).
In this case, nah, they shouldn't ever do it. Not because Denzel couldn't nail the character, but because there's an element of symbolic crossover in Superman with Friedrich Nietzche's ubermensch (frequently translated as superman from the German), the perfected man who provides inspiration to those around him in a post deistic world. The trouble is, that was a philosophy which in no small part inspired the Nazis. Hitler frequently used the term to describe his Aryan master race.
Making Superman's primary antagonist black would introduce a subtext of racial conflict to a character who is meant to be an inspiration to the best that lies in all humanity. Since it's obvious we don't live in a post-racial world, that reading is just unavoidable.
The primary antagonist defines the main character in a particular way that other characters don't; having Perry White or Lois or anyone else be a different race wouldn't alter the dynamic of the story in the same way (I think an interracial romance with a black Lois would reinforce what he already stands for).
Wow. Didn't notice who owned that building. It's definitely gonna be played on in the sequel(s).
It's difficult to tell exactly what he is. He could be nearly any race.Wasn't Luthor black in the animated series anyway? No one would bat an eyelash if they cast a black actor to play him...
It's difficult to tell exactly what he is. He could be nearly any race.
I liked how he combined the devious corporate Luthor and the mad scientist Luthor into one calculating pile of evil goodness.I want him to be this ambiguous. This guy is my definitive Lex Luthor. The movies are a complete joke when it comes to Luthor. Even Returns.
It's cause had that patented Black Man Bass in his voice. lolSuperman and Lex had the same tan in DCAU. For some reason people only want to remember the latter.
I am absolutely against changing the race of iconic characters. It's so fucking stupid and just looks like an attention grab. If they want a black villian they can select one or they can create a new one from scratch. Making Lex black would be just as dumb as having a different ethnicity playing as Blade or Luke Cage.
I always saw Luthor as a light skin brotha in the DCAU.
I just want a good modern Luthor on screen finally. Lex is by far my supervillain in comics. Dude is just awesome, and way better than that piece of shit Doomsday (seriously, why do people like this character so much).
It's difficult to tell exactly what he is. He could be nearly any race.
For what it's worth, Clancy Brown looks white.
Didn't read the thread completely, so forgive me if I'm trending on water that that has been covered already. I thought that the perfect scenario for Lex Luthor in the sequel is not one of bumbling criminal with hair brain schemes for beachfront property but rather one more cerebral.
Lex Luthor, imo, should capitalize on theurging the people of Earth to view Superman as a threat. Not because he is evil, but rather what his existance on Earth invites.destruction caused by Superman and the Kryptonians,
Also, exploit the fact that heIf he is truly on our side, what does he have to hide?shot down the Predator.
It might be interesting to have Lex Luthor running for President in this film, positioning himself, not as a villian but rather someone that is interested in protecting humanity. Then as POTUS, he could enact policy that would be anti-Superman.
Basically a play on the fear mongering after 9/11 that resulted in the Patriot Act that still affects us today.
I'll never drop it! I'll stomp and rage until DC editorial admits they were wrong and commit ritual Japanese suicide in retribution for his creation, and bury all remaining copies of "Death of Superman" in that landfill where Atari dumped E.T.what is your obsession with Doomsday? nobody lists him as their favorite, he's just a big engine of destruction that's fun in small doses that's all. honestly rei, drop it already. and all white people in DCAU are that same shade of color. look at John Stewart or Amanda Waller or Vixen.