"Coin runners and mirror mode are great inclusions to the franchise and the familiar modes are as fun as ever."
...um
Excellent trolling from Jim Sterling again: 5/10
Isn't Mirror Mode in Mario Kart since like 64?
and the familiar modes are as fun as ever
Isn't Mirror Mode in Mario Kart since like 64?
No, he is just saying that having them in the 3DS version is a great thing.
Is the Mario Kart Channel just built into the game and not something you install to the console like the Wii version? That's disappointing.
I've got too much shit on my start menu already. I really hate not having folders. Different pages isn't the same as folders.It's an app that is installed onto the start menu. Don't quote me on that I might be thinking of something else.
It's an app that is installed onto the start menu. Don't quote me on that I might be thinking of something else.
Online racing, two stages (Music City and Mario Circuit SNES): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gM1GTPH2T4w
Hooollly shit. My gameshop is getting Mario Kart 7 in tomorrow!
And I'm getting Tales of the Abyss today.
So goood
Are you in Europe or whatever? I'm in the US and I keep getting excited when people mention getting it on Wednesday or Thursday and then I remember that it's not being released simultaneously everywhere.
Honestly, all I care about are the good reviews. HueHueHue.
Oh gosh, I remember dropping banana peels and shells just before the ramp to screw over people behind me.Online racing, two stages (Music City and Mario Circuit SNES): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gM1GTPH2T4w
Haha! Hopefully "HueHueHuhe" means "JK," but if not, kudos for being honest about it at least.
It's half a joke. I read the bad reviews and can see where some of them are coming from, but they will not dissuade me from buying the game. And since I've alreayd pre-ordered the game, I like the good reviews because it helps validate my choice to buy the game!
EDIT: wtf is up with the mii's voice?
Excellent trolling from Jim Sterling again: 5/10
IGN said:The online multiplayer is a dream come true. You could, and probably will, spend hours taking on friends and strangers from around the world.
I never understand why people do that. You already decided to buy the game, it seems pretty damn unlikely that you won't like it. If you're having fun with the game, which is kind of the point of owning it, why do you need positive reviews on top of that to validate your choice?
You can do a pretty nice shortcut for the last curve of the SNES Mario Circuit 2 actually.
While hang gliding, land on the yellow bumper to the left and dive into the goal from there. Saves you some precious time.
How is that trolling? He backs up his opinion well, and while I'll still buy and I'm sure love the game, I'm sure there's tons of people tired of the series.
And this is true of 9/10s of the cases where someone dismisses a review because they disagree with the score, but if you actually read the review he says he considers it average, not bad.
im readyIt's a Swooper glider, anyway. They made some... odd choices for those.
Are you in Europe or whatever? I'm in the US and I keep getting excited when people mention getting it on Wednesday or Thursday and then I remember that it's not being released simultaneously everywhere.
Pretty much what PC advisor said in their review:This only highlights the problem with numerical scores for games yet again. And the problem that most writers in video games can't tell the difference between critique and statements of taste.
The real question is: did Jim Sterling give Modern Warfare 3 a 5/10 because it was 100% as old and unchanged as Mario Kart 7?
The problem with reviewing a game like Mario Kart and sticking a number on it, is that Mario Kart, like Modern Warfare, exists to service a specific purpose. It's the new MK game for its platform, designed to maximize the features of its platform. Which by all accounts, is exactly what it does. If one is tired of Mario Kart, one is not going to be excited by its existence.
But for the Mario Kart audience, the game appears to be exactly what is wanted and heaven for them. So, how do you communicate that with a number? Numbers are useless.
PC ADVISOR said:At this point, I think everyone's opinion on Mario Kart is pretty much set, and I don't think Mario Kart 7 will change anyone's mind one way or another. It is the quintessential Nintendo party game, and a recommended purchase if you happen to have a friend or two with a 3DS, which should be a bit more likely now that Cyber Monday is over.
What I find interesting about the Destructoid review is that the reviewer seemed to be tired of the MK series in general long before he played MK7. His negativity seems to be directed towards the series itself and not the specifics of this new game. Is it odd that a website would have a gamer who clearly no longer enjoys a series review the newest game in said series? Does Destructoid only have one reviewer?
I'm a huge MK fan and 7 doesn't appear to be "heaven" to me. There's a wider range of opinion here than "I'm sick of the game" and "This is the greatest thing ever!" I'm sure I'll have a ton of fun with the game, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't prefer a MK with more new tricks up its sleeves.This only highlights the problem with numerical scores for games yet again. And the problem that most writers in video games can't tell the difference between critique and statements of taste.
The real question is: did Jim Sterling give Modern Warfare 3 a 5/10 because it was 100% as old and unchanged as Mario Kart 7?
The problem with reviewing a game like Mario Kart and sticking a number on it, is that Mario Kart, like Modern Warfare, exists to service a specific purpose. It's the new MK game for its platform, designed to maximize the features of its platform. Which by all accounts, is exactly what it does. If one is tired of Mario Kart, one is not going to be excited by its existence.
But for the Mario Kart audience, the game appears to be exactly what is wanted and heaven for them. So, how do you communicate that with a number? Numbers are useless.
Sorry for the double post but I'm on my phone.What I find interesting about the Destructoid review is that the reviewer seemed to be tired of the MK series in general long before he played MK7. His negativity seems to be directed towards the series itself and not the specifics of this new game. Is it odd that a website would have a gamer who clearly no longer enjoys a series review the newest game in said series? Does Destructoid only have one reviewer?
I'm a huge MK fan and 7 doesn't appear to be "heaven" to me. There's a wider range of opinion here than "I'm sick of the game" and "This is the greatest thing ever!" I'm sure I'll have a ton of fun with the game, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't prefer a MK with more new tricks up its sleeves.
I get what you're saying though, and it really is a case where the score is meaningless. It totally depends on whether the reviewer is grading based on how fun it is compared to other games or how new it feels compared to other MKs.
Personally if I were a reviewer I'd go with rating based on how new it feels because people who will love the game likely already know it, and grading the game a 10 doesn't really inform anyone.
Those that have the game - how is online multiplayer stat-tracking? Does it show time played / wins / losses?
Excellent trolling from Jim Sterling again: 5/10
Right, but again, even if they are satisfied they still may preferred a more heavily remixed MK more.Don't take "heaven" too literally, I guess. I more meant that to the audience the game is meant to service, a new entry that hits the primary points is guaranteed to make them pretty happy.