Is there a particular reason Doctor Strange hasn't released digitally here in the UK ? Amazon, iTunes and the Play Store all have it pegged for the 28th (the physical release date). I was hoping to pick it up today and watch through the behind the scenes stuff, what a shame.
Other regions, other releasedate
Someone here from TV-GAF mentioned that it is way more time than other TV productions. So they have plenty of time.There's no way Inhumans will manage to meet their September release schedule right? Only 6 months of shooting and post production seems ridiculous to me.
And they are still in the process of building sets!! lol
Is there a particular reason Doctor Strange hasn't released digitally here in the UK ? Amazon, iTunes and the Play Store all have it pegged for the 28th (the physical release date). I was hoping to pick it up today and watch through the behind the scenes stuff, what a shame.
Much better alien design as the shitty Guardians of the Galaxy one
He's a fan. Can't easily google it (because search is deluged with this news item) but I remember him talking about various characters he was a fan of. And it was about as deep as Coulson mentioning he read Warlock at NYCC once.Now Laurence Fishburne is throwing shade for the studio that gave him work.
Hard for me to believe he's into comics.
Wow Thor 3 could easily be the unexpected best MCU film this year for me.
Wow Thor 3 could easily be the unexpected best MCU film this year for me.
Please go watch What We Do in the Shadows and Hunt for the Wilderpeople pls.
Is Captain Marvel going to be in Infinity Wars part 1? Or part 2?
Does anyone think the next big phase is moving to The Skrull Wars?
Is Captain Marvel going to be in Infinity Wars part 1? Or part 2?
Been telling people to not sleep on Ragnarok when Waititi was tapped to direct.
No clue tbh.
Would make sense.
It does make sense, if they could get FF back, Galactus would be cool. I kind of want Kang the Conquer.
For real, Thor has a great cast of supporting characters but all Dark World gave us was two forgettable throwaway villains in Malekith and Kurse.Worst Part about Thor 2 is that didnt do anything g to expand his part of the MCU. Iron Man 2 and Winter Solider both expanded the characters roles and supporting cast in the MCU.
For Thor 2 Marvek just double down on Loki.
I think Brie Larson was listed in the casting call and the Russos "confirmed" her, but who knows, really? Given that Feige said Captain Marvel would be an origin story ("from the start"), I'd say we can't expect much (for IW).
The honest answer is that none of us know.
Edit:
Good God, don't let Captain Marvel be a prequel though.
If only they could do Kang Dyanasty and stretch it across an entire phase.
Well, I think this is where the rights are more nebulous. Kang appears in the Avengers comics, but he's strongly affiliated with the F4. It's like the Kingpin issue, where Kingpin appears first in Spider-Man but is strongly affiliated with Daredevil.Wait. What parts don't they own for Kang?
Well, I think this is where the rights are more nebulous. Kang appears in the Avengers comics, but he's strongly affiliated with the F4. It's like the Kingpin issue, where Kingpin appears first in Spider-Man but is strongly affiliated with Daredevil.
So, there's legal wrangling needed, but it's a shared character imo. I just think Feige would rather use Kang for an F4 story than an Avengers story but it all depends really.
Hmm. That's weird. Maybe it works such that the side the character is most closely linked to gets the rights. Kang's appeared in a hell of lot more FF stories than Avengers, so maybe that was the criteria. It would explain Kingpin as well.According to Gunn, Fox has the rights. Doesn't sound it's shared.
Hmm. That's weird. Maybe it works such that the side the character is most closely linked to gets the rights. Kang's appeared in a hell of lot more FF stories than Avengers, so maybe that was the criteria. It would explain Kingpin as well.
Well, I think this is where the rights are more nebulous. Kang appears in the Avengers comics, but he's strongly affiliated with the F4. It's like the Kingpin issue, where Kingpin appears first in Spider-Man but is strongly affiliated with Daredevil.
So, there's legal wrangling needed, but it's a shared character imo. I just think Feige would rather use Kang for an F4 story than an Avengers story but it all depends really.
I don't think so. I very seriously doubt that each contract they had spelled out explicitly which characters they could and couldn't use. More likely, the way the contracts were worded likely stated "Fantastic Four and all Fantastic Four affiliated characters." Namor was sold separately, hence why he's not available and was likely retconned into being a mutant since Namor was part of the initial Invaders books. Fesi was a Secret Warriors character, one Marvel owns as evidenced by Quake, so he's a character that showed up in a TV/Studios-owned book and is affiliated with Studios properties, hence he's theirs. He may be a mutant but there's a loophole or something that says newly created mutants are Studios' IP not Fox's.It's whatever is explicitly spelled out in the contracts. Scarlett Witch and Quicksilver are the lone exception to that rule as far as we know. Grey areas don't really exist with character rights. Same reason Namor is a mutant but can never appear in a Fox movie, same reason Eden Fesi is in the MCU as an Inhuman even though he's a mutant in the books.
I don't think so. I very seriously doubt that each contract they had spelled out explicitly which characters they could and couldn't use. More likely, the way the contracts were worded likely stated "Fantastic Four and all Fantastic Four affiliated characters."
I don't recall Eden Fesi being in the MCU? Where?
Mentioned in Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.I don't recall Eden Fesi being in the MCU? Where?
There's buzz around the island that two rival productions could be swimming on our waters. "Aquaman" & "Submariner". Fingers crossed!