Italy updates
BNO should tweet soon, edit
Jesus terrible
Italy updates
BNO should tweet soon, edit
USA reported its first case mid-January, two weeks before Italy. How are we behind them?Italy...fuck and to think we are roughly 3 weeks behind them.....
USA reported its first case mid-January, two weeks before Italy. How are we behind them?
Who knows. For one the USA is a big country. Big buildings, big houses... less cramped. And maybe Italy had bad luck with some eldercare facilities getting hit first - bet entire families got exposed visiting grandpa.
USA reported its first case mid-January, two weeks before Italy. How are we behind them?
Well saidSomething the States Gov. and White House have been saying at press events lately so if you hear it, that is the source.
4 days in row no increase in new cases for Italy. This is good news and they're on route following China. Hopefully we are a few days away from declining.
Carnival season in Italy.
Canada represent.USA reported its first case mid-January, two weeks before Italy. How are we behind them?
USA reported its first case mid-January, two weeks before Italy. How are we behind them?
USA reported its first case mid-January, two weeks before Italy. How are we behind them?
we can all hope they have peakedWhy is no one talking about Switzerland?
This hinges on the assumption that the vacationers were the first ones who brought it back in high enough volume for it to matter.Our first cases were isolated cases and were not causing community spread. Then Italy and Iran erupted, and we had vacationers coming back spreading it. We are basically 2 weeks behind Italy on the exponential growth curve.
Covid-19: the cases in Italy at 6 pm on March 17th
As regards health monitoring relating to the spread of the new Coronavirus on the national territory, there are 31506 total cases, at the moment 26062 people are positive for the virus.
There are 2941 people healed.
There are 12894 patients hospitalized with symptoms, in intensive care 2060, while 11108 are in home isolation.
2503 have died, however this number can be confirmed only after the Istituto Superiore di SanitĆ has established the actual cause of the death.
Do not want
That looks amazingly convenient tbh
Our first cases were isolated cases and were not causing community spread. Then Italy and Iran erupted, and we had vacationers coming back spreading it. We are basically 2 weeks behind Italy on the exponential growth curve.
Do not want
This hinges on the assumption that the vacationers were the first ones who brought it back in high enough volume for it to matter.
We know enough about the current testing -- specifically, it's high false-positive rate and its low % of total cases tested -- so I'm not convinced vacationers returning was the big splash. We've had it in the country for weeks before the first case in January was caught, in my opinion.
Vermont is changing the way it reports cases. There are now 10 cases in the state.
From CNN's Carma Hassan
Vermont will no longer report non-Vermont resident cases of the novel coronavirus, according to the stateās Department of Health spokesman Ben Truman.
Yesterday, the state was reporting 12 cases of coronavirus: 8 Vermont residents and 4 non-Vermont residents with coronavirus.
Today, it is only reporting 10 cases of coronavirus among its residents.
New Jersey has 89 new cases of coronavirus
New Jersey confirms 89 new coronavirus cases, bringing the statewide total to 267, Gov. Phil Murphy just announced in an ongoing press
.Live updates: Coronavirus pandemic puts countries on lockdown - CNN
Millions are under lockdown in Europe as some Asian countries close schools and non-essential businesses, and curb travel. Follow here for live updates.www.cnn.com
What? Care to elaborate?
We will have a lot of them returning to canada.
Though if they show any symptoms they will be denied boarding the plane.
We have here a large persian community so
What are you talking about?
Do not want
[WITHDRAWN: Potential false-positive rate among the 'asymptomatic infected individuals' in close contacts of COVID-19 patients] - PubMed
<span><b>Editor officeās response for Ahead of Print article withdrawn</b> The article āPotential false-positive rate among the āasymptomatic infected individualsā in close contacts of COVID-19 patientsā was under strong discussion after pre-published. Questions from the readers mainly focused...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Results: When the infection rate of the close contacts and the sensitivity and specificity of reported results were taken as the point estimates, the positive predictive value of the active screening was only 19.67%, in contrast, the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%. The multivariate-probabilistic sensitivity analysis results supported the base-case findings, with a 75% probability for the false-positive rate of positive results over 47%. Conclusions: In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the 'asymptomatic infected individuals' reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives.This jives with reports from several countries -- S. Korea, USA, UK, to name three that are relatively trustworthy -- that among symptomatic patients who were tested for the virus, only 1-4% were positive.
Add a low % of confirmed cases among symptomatic people who were tested +
a high false-positive % among asymptomatic people who were tested +
(presumably) a high number of unidentified cases (since we know ~80% only get mild symptoms or no symptoms at all)
=
a suggestion that the available numbers are skewed.