cryptoadam
Banned
Its possible more deaths will be backdated in the future though.
Its only one city, Melbourne, where its been mandated. That extends to the rest of the state in the next few days. Including back of bumfuck country towns, that would never have seen the virus too I guess.
Sydney is getting more cases lately as well, and there's talk of doing the same with masks there too.
As to if people wore them prior, they were around but the majority wouldn't. It depends though. Outside, you wouldn't see many. Supermarkets and shopping centers prob a few more, but still the majority didn't wear them. At least from my experience in inner city Melbourne.
And I fucking hate having to wear these masks. I only do when I go into stores or places of business so as not to cause a stink. But the whole idea is stupid and unnecessary and I hope it doesn't become a thing every flu season from now on.
Media's having a great time with the division its caused though. Surprise
Stage 4 lockdown declared now for Melbourne. Curfew 8pm, can only travel 5km.
State of Disaster declared providing extra powers... For fucks sake.
One of the saddest, but truest, comedy tweets about the pandemic response of the Trump admin (it veers off into other categories too):
It’s why you need to be responsible and cautious and follow the simple rules. Can also happen to young people who had it mild. This virus is no joke , I personally know someone who is 34 and still not 100 % 4 months now.Probably rare, but these are the kinda things that worry me about COVID more than anything. The potential brain and heart issues it may cause.
Heart issue ends season for Red Sox's Rodriguez
Red Sox lefty Eduardo Rodriguez won't pitch this season after being diagnosed with heart inflammation that team doctors believe was caused by the pitcher's battle with the coronavirus.www.espn.com
Sweden didn't let the virus run its course. They used voluntary social distancing to suppress it.Japan is in a massive second wave just like almost all countries. One of the only countries not seeing a spike is Sweden who did not lock down. This is a virus. You must let it runs its course while protecting the weak. Still little evidence masks have a benefit. Cases would have dropped in LA but they have not and that is because the virus must spread. You cannot stop it. Just like NY. It spread and now it has pretty much ran its course.
But dead’s would not rise according to some posters in this thread , who seem to have fled this thread ...Lol at Japan having a "massive" second wave. Florida alone had 10x the amount of cases and 100x the deaths today.
Yup, but that’s what they don’t want to read , it did basically the same stuff as other countries, but are less populated than most eu countries.Sweden didn't let the virus run its course. They used voluntary social distancing to suppress it.
They also never closed schools or businesses. They only tested hospitalized patients. They didn’t shut they’re society in any significant way. I feel like when people say “run it’s course” they mean two very different things.Sweden didn't let the virus run its course. They used voluntary social distancing to suppress it.
You can only dampen the spike if you keep the reproduction rate of the virus, R, (the average number of people that each infected person infects) at or below 1. Otherwise it will grow exponentially. You could do this with a high number of cases, so it plateaus at a high level, but the risk of that strategy is that it could spiral out of control at any moment. Sweden kept R below 1 despite not closing down the economy, presumably due to the low population density and high levels of social compliance. So even though according to the initial serology studies, only around 6% of the population got infected, cases are heading for zero.They also never closed schools or businesses. They only tested hospitalized patients. They didn’t shut they’re society in any significant way. I feel like when people say “run it’s course” they mean two very different things.
I don’t think anyone is advocating for 10,000 packed into concert halls or large events. But places like California have basically forced every business that isn’t a grocery store to close since March.
The virus is going to move through the population as some level. The key is and has always been dampening the spike to keep the hospitalizations manageable. Hopefully enough healthy people can recover and that will slow the spread as there will be less people to infect as time goes on.
But there is no stopping this. Not in the long term. And temporary crackdowns are pointless. As soon as you reopen, it will be there.
This is kinda stupid though. Our (swe) neighbors are not as similar as you think and we did not have the same initial exposure.Yup, but that’s what they don’t want to read , it did basically the same stuff as other countries, but are less populated than most eu countries.
But you see that deaths are higher than their neighboring Scandinavian countries.
but because of their spread population they could do it this way to see if the could also get herd immunity, but that’s impossible for now the coming 2 years.
You u could even say it hurt their economy more because they got cut-off by other countries because of the risk of spread.
This is like not even remotely close to real figures, where do you get this bad data?So even though according to the initial serology studies, only around 6% of the population got infected, cases are heading for zero.
This is like not even remotely close to real figures, where do you get this bad data?
Antibody studies do not show immunity levels in the population, only how many currently have measurable antibodies.
Sweden did way less, I was there and also actually left during the lockdown. People in Sweden took it much less seriously than a lot of other EU countries.Yup, but that’s what they don’t want to read , it did basically the same stuff as other countries, but are less populated than most eu countries.
But you see that deaths are higher than their neighboring Scandinavian countries.
but because of their spread population they could do it this way to see if the could also get herd immunity, but that’s impossible for now the coming 2 years.
You u could even say it hurt their economy more because they got cut-off by other countries because of the risk of spread.
Yeah, that is missinformed. He is equating measured antibodies with immunity, that is not how it works. The antibodies can hardly be measured if you had mild symtoms and they dissapear for everyone within months making these snapshots.New study casts more doubt on Swedish coronavirus immunity hopes
Sweden's hopes of getting help from herd immunity in combating the coronavirus received a fresh blow on Thursday, when a new study showed fewer than anticipated had developed antibodies.www.reuters.com
Yes. A 'State of Disaster'. But not in the way they mean.
This has been declared because some old people are dying of what basically amounts to a new strain of the flu.
If I had the option to be smuggled out of this state and live elsewhere for a while, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Its beyond stupid now
Your solution is completely impractical. The testing is far too inconsistent and track/tracing isn’t workable in large cities without massive control of human movement. We already are seeing week delays in test results. It worked in Asia so far because they never had a spike. Once it’s broadly within the population, you can’t test/trace it away.You can only dampen the spike if you keep the reproduction rate of the virus, R, (the average number of people that each infected person infects) at or below 1. Otherwise it will grow exponentially. You could do this with a high number of cases, so it plateaus at a high level, but the risk of that strategy is that it could spiral out of control at any moment. Sweden kept R below 1 despite not closing down the economy, presumably due to the low population density and high levels of social compliance. So even though according to the initial serology studies, only around 6% of the population got infected, cases are heading for zero.
California peaked at 1.12 after the re-opening and are now estimated to be at 0.96 (https://rt.live/us/CA), so there is almost no room for manoeuvre, unlike in Sweden. I think the solution is to replace the lockdown with a massive scaling up of testing and track and tracing.
Managed spread is the only answer. Lockdowns have their role to play when things get out of control, ala New York City in March/April. But the cat has been out of the bag in the US for six months. It’s not going back in. Testing, behavior controls, tracing. They’re all tools to manage the spread, but managing the spread is all we can do. Maybe a vaccine swoops in 3 months from now and saves the day. Maybe not. We need to operate like it’s not. Locking down hoping for a vaccine is a fool’s errand.Here in New York, it is taking around 2 weeks to get test results back. Of course. by the time you get tests back, you're already over it. I don't think the testing capability of the scale people are talking about is physically possible. There's not enough labs and stuff.
Lockdowns ultimately just kick the can down the road. I think in this thread somebody posted 2 girls that made a cross state trip around Queensland infecting people. All it takes is one joker like that to restart things in a population without sufficient built-in immunity. And it is literally impossible for modern society to prevent that one person from getting through.
We need to be realistic here. The only thing lockdowns are good for is a short-term suppression of transmission - which is exactly what "flatten the curve" means. But it also means that the curve will go up when lockdowns are lifted. That is axiomatically true. If, as the current evidence in Sweden and NYC seems to point to, there is some level of herd immunity that can be built up in places where the virus has spent more time "roaming free", then that should be what every government should be going for.
Well they sure as hell can’t read them.Cooking the books, eh
Ok, that's a fair point. Though in that article Tegnell himself estimates a spread of immunity "from 4 to 5% to 20 to 25%". So that would be below the herd immunity threshold.Yeah, that is missinformed. He is equating measured antibodies with immunity, that is not how it works. The antibodies can hardly be measured if you had mild symtoms and they dissapear for everyone within months making these snapshots.
In Stockholm if you measured for these for a period of 6 weeks, the rate of antibodies would stay the same at some percentage (say 14 %). This is while spread continues and they should rise. This only means you find them in a different group of people that had the virus later.
I guess the right way of thinking about it is that the rate of acceleration will fall, since R will be falling as the percentage of susceptible population diminishes. But the number of cases will still be accelerating until the peak of the epidemic when R = 1, and the "speed" (number of cases every X time period) is momentarily constant. So letting the virus rampage through the population will only slow the spread *after* the peak has already been reached. If that peak is within the capacity of the healthcare system, you're fine. If it's not, you're screwed.Sweden has no idea what their R was because they didn’t test broadly. They only tested hospitalized people. The initial wave is going to be big. But you don’t need herd immunity to slow the spread. As the % of population with natural immunity increases, you begin to suppress the R. The idea that population immunity is all or nothing is wrong.
And are now locked out of Europe economy and traveling foreigners.Sweden did way less, I was there and also actually left during the lockdown. People in Sweden took it much less seriously than a lot of other EU countries.
And are now locked out of Europe economy and traveling foreigners.
Why spread a bunch of missinformation like this?And are now locked out of Europe economy and traveling foreigners.
If only every day was a Sunday...UK hits single digit deaths with 8 today
infections pretty flat at 770. Not sure what is driving the new round of panic.
If only every day was a Sunday...
There is no panic but your numbers are rising now since 3 weeks instead of falling. The trend reversal is the problem here.
Yup, but most of Europe’s are, The Netherlands also.If only every day was a Sunday...
There is no panic but your numbers are rising now since 3 weeks instead of falling. The trend reversal is the problem here.
You like to see more deaths? Is that what you are saying? Is 160k not enough? I don’t get your point?
Not completely true, if you test and keep finding rising numbers of infections you have a problem the virus is spreading, and you don’t want it as wide spread. And because almost 50 % is spreading without symptoms you can very fast have a overload in your health care system.Infections, not deaths. Don’t forget infection counts are a product of the amount of testing being done - deaths are the most reliable metric, and indeed the only one that matter.
It could also be that young people see getting it instead of wrinklies now we know to keep it away from them, and thus the CFR is dropping.
Neither of those scenarios invites panic.
Not completely true, if you test and keep finding rising numbers of infections you have a problem the virus is spreading, and you don’t want it as wide spread. And because almost 50 % is spreading without symptoms you can very fast have a overload in your health care system.
Kinda already fucked there, I'm more worried about the lungs/taste bud issues.I’ve seen several articles like this pop up in the last week or 10 days. It appears that covid-19 may cause hearing loss in some patients.
Whereabouts? (out of curiosity)They made our lockdowns slightly more strict again a few weeks ago due to “rising cases”. I was talking to my sister who is an ICU nurse and she said they have had zero patients in the ICU. The lockdown people are crazy at this point.
Whereabouts? (out of curiosity)
They made our lockdowns slightly more strict again a few weeks ago due to “rising cases”. I was talking to my sister who is an ICU nurse and she said they have had zero patients in the ICU. The lockdown people are crazy at this point.
I am skeptical about cross-country comparisons as there are many parameters at play, French refuse to wear masks, why Germans mostly do wear them, it depends on who your neighbor is, what the initial strike was, etc. But you have posted a number of things which are not right.overall death rate this year will hardly stick out compared to regular years unless deaths sky rocket this fall.
Hm... That metric depends on other parameters (average age of the population, for instance).Sweden has less deaths overall (per capita) compared to Finland this year.
diffusionx
There is a joke about that parachutes being good for health, when jumping from planes, is not proved, following standards used by medics to prove effectiveness of a measure.
Sometimes one has to go with common sense.
No:Sounds like a stupid joke.
People are asked to wear masks in places filled with strangers, such as grocery shops.Demanding people wear masks that cover their faces and puts a literal barrier in basic human interaction is an extreme measure
Not everyone here is knee deep in politician cock smh.It takes US and its ridiculous democrats vs republicans to turn pretty much anything into liberals vs conservatives nonsense.
No:
Sounds like certain approaches should not be applied universally.Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials - PMC
Objectives To determine whether parachutes are effective in preventing major trauma related to gravitational challenge. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Data sources: Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
People are asked to wear masks in places filled with strangers, such as grocery shops.
It takes US and its ridiculous democrats vs republicans to turn pretty much anything into liberals vs conservatives nonsense.