This is not the battle we are faced with today.What I see is that people before were too lax with respecting the common cold or flu (myself included). Now we got a battle between two sides. The people who don't give a damn and don't care if they infect another person with an illness versus the people who want zero deaths. This is a battle which has already existed, now it just has the limelight. Of course, many other external groups are taking advantage of this battle.
What month is it?
Lockdowns were initially sold as temporary measures to prevent hospitals from getting overwhelmed. Prevent a sharp short spike that would cause excess deaths due to lack of access to treatment. This was NOT about preventing all cases. The bill of goods they sold us was that the area under the curve would be similar, but with a blunted peak. The idea wasn't to save lives by reducing absolute case counts, because at that time people seemed to understand that prolonged lockdowns would be untenable in terms of the social/economic impacts.
At this point that has been long forgotten. There's no more "flatten the curve"; over six months ago this changed to "prevent all cases and try to run out the clock until a vaccine hypothetically saves us all, consequences and collateral damage be damned".
Fearmongering? HAHAHAHA !
...
If you or your family died because you spread it to them then dont blame us its all your responsibilities
The underlined is key. You're telling me to do what I want for the entire world: personal responsibility. Let's get back to normal and take responsibility for our own lives, keep our deceptive governments out of this.
Anyone that wants to make a comparison to Idiocracy should consider how easily the masses have fallen for lie after lie after ridiculous lie these last few years. Many of our governments are deceiving us daily in order to keep this pandemic alive (ironic...). I don't care for injecting politics into this, but the message in the clip below can be applied universally and is as relevant as ever today:
Much of the data that runs counter to the mainstream narrative is publicly available, you're simply not getting the full/balanced story from the mainstream media or most governments. That's not conspiracy theory, that's the cold, hard truth. If you can't accept that it's not my problem.
The mainstream sources occasionally reveal those hard truths and then bury them with the usual sensationalized reporting, that CTV News story I highlighted from last weekend being a prime example.
There are many battles being faced today. The one you mention is one you focus on. I pointed out a different one.This is not the battle we are faced with today.
Today's battles is between "COVID response needs to not cause more deaths and economic disaster than COVID would" vs. "Screw that, better 1 million people commit suicide and bankrupt the entire world than 1 more person die from COVID".
This was NOT about preventing all cases.
In some circles it definitely is about preventing all cases. I would expect especially so in the science community. Obviously not the entire science community because there would be people making the above suicide argument.
As for the economy tanking. All I can say is the entrepreneurs will find a way to keep moving forward while others complain about how oppressed they are.
Wow, someone pro-COVID who doesn't understand sarcasm. Who woulda thunk it?Those million suicides pale compared to the billion who died from corona.
(making up numbers is fun)
Connecticut is similar. Almost bang on 92% of deaths are over 60, and 98% over 50. Last I heard over 70% of deaths were in nursing/LTC homes (residents I think, not workers), but that was a report over the summer. The median age of death is above the life expectancy. This shit needs to stop.So if all the data is correct than how does the Canadian government explain itself?
CTV is not some right wing source, its not RebelNews. Its mainstream liberal parroting Canadian bacon news. They say 98.4% of deaths are either LTC patients or workers.
Death by age 92% of deaths people over 60.
So basically the entire pandemic is based on people dealing with old people every day, or old people. Were talking a few hundred deaths in the general population and around 1000 in non seniors. I don't even know if that qualifies as a bad flu season for a country with 35 million people.
Maybe other countries are different, but thats what the data says about Canada. Yet we are racking up a huge debt and Trudeau keeps talking about a Great Reset and their are red zones all over the place.
Please tell me how this is justified?
I
I will just say that very anecdotally, where I am in PA, we had pretty much exclusively seen icu patients who were either +65 or already had pretty significant health problems. That was up until about the last two weeks or so. Recently we have been seeing a few really sick people under 60 who aren’t quite as chronically unhealthy.Connecticut is similar. Almost bang on 92% of deaths are over 60, and 98% over 50. Last I heard over 70% of deaths were in nursing/LTC homes (residents I think, not workers), but that was a report over the summer. The median age of death is above the life expectancy. This shit needs to stop.
Age Group | Cases | Hospitalized | ICU | Deaths | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Count | Count | Case rate | Pop. rate | Count | Case rate | Pop. rate | Count | Case rate | Pop. rate | |
Total | 49536 | 1652 | 3.3 | 37.8 | 298 | 0.6 | 6.8 | 492 | 1.0 | 11.3 |
Under 1 year | 295 | 8 | 2.7 | 14.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1-4 years | 1496 | 5 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
5-9 years | 1995 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
10-19 years | 6008 | 26 | 0.4 | 5.0 | 5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
20-29 years | 9664 | 83 | 0.9 | 13.8 | 12 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
30-39 years | 9616 | 149 | 1.5 | 21.0 | 15 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
40-49 years | 7975 | 162 | 2.0 | 27.2 | 31 | 0.4 | 5.2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
50-59 years | 5691 | 249 | 4.4 | 45.0 | 53 | 0.9 | 9.6 | 10 | 0.2 | 1.8 |
60-69 years | 3460 | 279 | 8.1 | 61.1 | 87 | 2.5 | 19.1 | 46 | 1.3 | 10.1 |
70-79 years | 1637 | 346 | 21.1 | 140.7 | 66 | 4.0 | 26.8 | 107 | 6.5 | 43.5 |
80+ years | 1692 | 344 | 20.3 | 253.3 | 28 | 1.7 | 20.6 | 319 | 18.9 | 234.9 |
Yeah, Finland hardly had a pandemic (and half the population of Sweden).Sweden numbers are nuts
Population Sweden 10M vs UK 68M.
Infections per day Sweden 7K vs UK 11K
Finland vs Sweden daily infections:
"Covid zero" is a respectable scientific ambition, same as eliminating AIDs, but it is not by any stretch of the imagination a rational approach to governance. That is the scientific community's battle, not the world's. Upending life for months/years every time a new strain of the flu or some other communicable disease pops up does not make any sense.
The goal was to prevent hospitals from being overrun - that's it, that's all. We largely avoided that despite our best efforts to crash the system with 24/7 panic porn that succeeded in convincing everyone this needed to be treated with unprecedented measures.
Remove the ridiculous news coverage from the equation such as the collapsing people in China's streets, the high mortality rate out of Wuhan, the fake stories about how it kills healthy children, teenagers and twenty/thirty-somethings just as easily as anyone else, the highly contagious asymptomatic spreaders, etc, etc and this would not have been viewed as anything more than a bad flu, similar to what Australia experienced in 2019. No masks, no social distancing, no lock downs - none of it, just common sense measures like staying home when sick and covering up your cough. Sweden came closest to taking that path without imposing draconian measures.
We've learned too much since the start of the year, if opinions haven't changed then something is wrong. Like almost everyone else I played it safe early on, but if you still think this virus is deserving of the measures imposed on us chances are high that you're missing out on a great deal of valuable information.
In 2017 there were 1,255 deaths due to influenza, recording a standardised death rate of 3.9 per 100,000 persons. This is a significant increase from 2016 where 464 influenza deaths were recorded. An individual dying from influenza in 2017 was most likely to be female, aged over 75 years, have multiple co-morbidities and living in the eastern states of Australia.
What I want to see is year over year comparisons of total hospital utilization, and total ICU utilizations. I want to see a fancy line graph. Nationwide, by region, by country, by city, whatever. I know that there was something like this for the UK that showed utilization BELOW the five year average for their most recent spike of COVID activity.I will just say that very anecdotally, where I am in PA, we had pretty much exclusively seen icu patients who were either +65 or already had pretty significant health problems. That was up until about the last two weeks or so. Recently we have been seeing a few really sick people under 60 who aren’t quite as chronically unhealthy.
There has definitely been a big spike in my region. We’ve got about 4x the number of people hospitalized and about 3x the icu patients. Now we’re also the largest hospital in the system, so we’re taking icu level transfers from other smaller regional hospitals.
Being obese is definitely a risk factor for this. Big time. I haven’t seen anyone under 60 who ended up on a vent who wasn’t also obese. Most people are fine after 4-6 days and go home no problem. But it’s pushing the limits right now. If it continues to escalate like it has the past 3 weeks, it will be a serious issue.
Slightly unrelated but most states here are working pretty close to normal again (South Autralian lying pizza guy aside), and even where I live in Victoria, who were the 1st in the world to go full draconian with curfews and shit, has eased a few things lately. They even changed the mask mandate to indoor public places only a few days ago. We're still the only state with any sort of mandate though. The last couple of days has been interesting still seeing some people walking their dogs or whatever and still wearing a mask (in 30 degree celcius weather). Tells me who the easily scared are that can't formulate a thought for themselves.
That all said, the media and politicians here sure are talking about fucking 'covid normal' more and more these days. Thats starting to take shape with things like the CEO of our biggest airline coming out and saying once there's a vaccine, they'll implement a 'no jab, no fly' policy...
And I'm sure that'll be just the tip of a whopping great iceberg when it comes to the vaccine and being able to live a normal life without it
I know a large hospital in the county over is dealing with a spike that is far less significant than the one at my hospital. I’m sure it’s a very localized thing.What I want to see is year over year comparisons of total hospital utilization, and total ICU utilizations. I want to see a fancy line graph. Nationwide, by region, by country, by city, whatever. I know that there was something like this for the UK that showed utilization BELOW the five year average for their most recent spike of COVID activity.
I want to see this for the United States. That's what'll tell us how serious any of this actually is. Not all this other noise and breathless fearmongering.
I know a large hospital in the county over is dealing with a spike that is far less significant than the one at my hospital. I’m sure it’s a very localized thing.
But it’s a real thing at least temporarily. This is really the first significant increase in my area since this all started. My hope is that it will make it’s way through over the next few weeks and things will begin to get back to a more manageable place in time. It’s not a disaster, but it’s putting some stress on things right now.
Oh I agree. I’m not advocating we really do anything about it except acknowledge the reality. Tell people to take their vitamins, lose some weight, stay home when sick. The normal stuff. It does make work pretty stressful, but that’s kind of the of the game anyway.Nobody has said that hospitals cannot be strained from this. The skepticism comes from:
1. ICUs are not sitting around empty normally, like here in NYC, they are 80% full on a normal day, so these media reports are talking about these occupancy numbers without context.
2. Bad flu seasons can and have filled up hospitals, it happens every few years, with very little reporting and certainly no calls for lockdowns or talk of hospital system collapse.
3. These hospital systems had 8 months to prepare for a second wave they said they knew was coming.
Has there been a real explanation yet how the US manages to record more coronavirus deaths in a a day than Japan has total?
I would have thought we'd know the factors behind this by now.
Has there been a real explanation yet how the US manages to record more coronavirus deaths in a a day than Japan has total?
I would have thought we'd know the factors behind this by now.
At a cursory level it's probably not much different than the way it's happening elsewhere: ridiculously liberal labeling of covid deaths.
Jesus does everything has to be resolved around politics with you?
That wasn't political at all.
Has there been a real explanation yet how the US manages to record more coronavirus deaths in a a day than Japan has total?
I would have thought we'd know the factors behind this by now.
No...no..no..
Your previous post says" ridiculously liberal labeling of covid death"
That obviously means something...you have a goalpost and youre deff on to something here..
Your previous post also brought Iraqi WMD into this conversation...which is...weird...youre deff on to something here....
But first let me ask you this...are you Trump supporters ?
Cos i ve encountered lots of Trump supporters on social media that says this virus is fake...fake virus...this virus is a conspiracy....government wants to scare people....wearing mask is useless...wearing mask is a sign of lack of faith to god blablabla....
And im kinda seeing similar patern with you....
Its ok if you want to admit it...
You do understand that liberal has a meaning outside of politics, right? Because you seem to be confused so you’re lashing out. No one here is talking about fake viruses or any of the other nonsense you’re discussing here.No...no..no..
Your previous post says" ridiculously liberal labeling of covid death"
That obviously means something...you have a goalpost and youre deff on to something here..
Your previous post also brought Iraqi WMD into this conversation...which is...weird...youre deff on to something here....
But first let me ask you this...are you Trump supporters ?
Cos i ve encountered lots of Trump supporters on social media that says this virus is fake...fake virus...this virus is a conspiracy....government wants to scare people....wearing mask is useless...wearing mask is a sign of lack of faith to god blablabla....
And im kinda seeing similar patern with you....
Its ok if you want to admit it...
You're wrong on this one, man.
No...no..no..
Your previous post says" ridiculously liberal labeling of covid death"
That obviously means something...you have a goalpost and youre deff on to something here..
Your previous post also brought Iraqi WMD into this conversation...which is...weird...youre deff on to something here....
But first let me ask you this...are you Trump supporters ?
Cos i ve encountered lots of Trump supporters on social media that says this virus is fake...fake virus...this virus is a conspiracy....government wants to scare people....wearing mask is useless...wearing mask is a sign of lack of faith to god blablabla....
And im kinda seeing similar patern with you....
Its ok if you want to admit it...
This is essentially a bad flu season unless you are 70 years old or work in a nursing home.
Wow, this is news to me, can you link to an article showing that covid kills young people at the same rate as old people?If youre still thinking this thing only kills old people then sorry youre abit late with the news