You are ignoring all the evidence that this is political that I have presented. The article you quote is not evidence but 'modelling' which on the hierarchy of scientific evidence is very low and is superceded by RCT studies. The highest standard evidence we have are the RCT studies I have cited. It is very disingenuous of Fauci to say it has become political - by states mandating masks, this makes them political!
If you can find RCT studies on masks (which you won't be able to as I've looked for them) that show they offer statistically significant differences in infection rates, instead of 'modelling' and cherry picked observational studies of dubious origin by Chinese authors, then we can discuss those further. As it is, the weight of scientific and journalistic evidence shows that masks:
1. Have been mandated not due to evidence but due to political lobbying.
2. Are ineffective in controlling infection rates and
3. May be harmful if used improperly
In Switzerland there was no difference in infection rates between different cantons that had different policies:
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-swiss-mask-wearing
Please read this in its entirety - it was posted before in the thread by
Joe T.
but has been ignored as far as I can see:
There is scientific fraud going on for political purposes. You really need to understand this and be very wary and critical when reviewing evidence for masks. RCT studies are the gold standard - modelling and observational studies that go against those studies can safely be dismissed as 'political theatre'.