Ivan A Nguyen
Member
The kreepers
I need a photoshop of that.
Something like them floating our in dark space at the end of ME2 spliced in with the green explosions of ME3 galaxy map.
The kreepers
I believe they say that Cerberus HQ moves around.
I believe they say that Cerberus HQ moves around.
Regarding Miranda, she's no longer with Cerberus, and the codex also states that they operate in multiple cells where they have no knowledge of each other, or how their particular work fits into the big picture.
Actually you can go into the horsehead nebula early in the game but the base isnt there
Which is a bullshit reason as you see that sun in the background throughout the games.
Really?
Because it seems like the Illusive Man was sitting in the same chair, in the same base, in the same galaxy, looking at the same sun he always had been looking at in Mass Effect 2.
I believe they say that Cerberus HQ moves around.
Hologram! Come on this isnt that hard to explain away.
So it's just a pure coincidence that you finally run into them at that exact sun? If you're using a hologram, why in god's name would you then go to that place? Especially when you're on the run.
Well that star was a different color at the end of ME2.
I guess.
*gasp*What's this? A plot hole in ME3? Really? Would you believe it!Wasn't she literally in that room (with the view of the big-ass star) with the Illusive Man at the start of ME2? Wouldn't she at least have an idea of the system?
Seems thin/anorexic.
They should've just killed Miranda off, like her father shoots her or something. Plothole resolved.
If shes already dead in Mass Effect 3, who puts the tracer on Kai Leng? Oriana?
Who do you play as if your shepard died at the end of ME2?
Who do you play as if your shepard died at the end of ME2?
Erik Kain back with another article and on "artistic integrity".
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkai...-ending-wont-threaten-its-artistic-integrity/
Erik Kain said:Video games and the video game industry are still evolving. This entire controversy is most likely just part of the growing pains of that evolution. But hiding behind the skirts of artistic integrity is just a terrible business decision. The customer is always right, even when hes wrong.
Pundits may say otherwise, but we thrive on controversy and calamity. And dont you forget it.
Its non canon.
Is it always the same Forbes guy who writes articles about ME3 ending? If so, he sure seem very interested in the whole thing.
yup, no import.So you just start the game off with a clean-slate shephard?
Is it always the same Forbes guy who writes articles about ME3 ending? If so, he sure seem very interested in the whole thing.
Rob N Banks said:They should have mentioned this but BioWare obviously doesn't give a shit about plotholes or their own universe.
Narkeh said:Apologies if this has been posted before
This pic is by the vent where you try to save the kid
Needless to say, I feel like I'm being trolled by Bioware and it does not feel good -.-. I only hope that their "Wait till April" announcement was not a PR attempt to prevent people from returning the game.
As you can see the pic is right next to the vent...is this a hint at
indoctrination? Too much of a coincidence to place a random electrical
warning pic right next to the spot where you find the kid that will
later become the god-child....
tobito113 said:Holy crap look at the DANGER sign
now look how DANGER is said in sign language
http://www.signingsavvy.com/sign/DANGEROUS/6157/1
Bioware can't properly animate a person giving a rock to another person but now they can animate hidden sign language messages?
Right.
I'm not buying it anymore, but if it al turns out to be true, holy trolling batman.
Funny how the intro and the ending were done last to..
But then again, it will stil be a shit ending.
People are going to bitch either way, this whole situation makes me smh.Lol, this takes 'grasping at straws' to a new level. Next Friday will be chaos when Bioware doesn't announce IT theory DLC.
Is it always the same Forbes guy who writes articles about ME3 ending? If so, he sure seem very interested in the whole thing.
I find it funny, BW games usually have fantastic endings and openings, and ME3's opening and ending were probably the worst parts of the game.
I'm not buying it anymore, but if it al turns out to be true, holy trolling batman.
Funny how the intro and the ending were done last to..
But then again, it will stil be a shit ending.
I think it would make it a better ending but I don't know if it's true or not and I would be more than happy with some more followup to the ending we got.Let's just say it is Indoctrination.
It doesn't make it less of a shit ending. It'just makes it a less vague, shit ending.
I was surprised it didn't get a line of dialogue. Why not have Shepard ask Miranda about it and get a response on how TIM is paranoid and moves the base around so she doesn't know. It shows attention to detail instead of telling your audience to guess or read the ME wiki.
GAF, would this ending have sufficed for you?
After Shephard activates the Crucible controls, she sits down with Anderson in their last moments.
Anderson: "I'm proud of you, Shepard"
Cue credits.
GAF, would this ending have sufficed for you?
After Shephard activates the Crucible controls, she sits down with Anderson in their last moments.
Anderson: "I'm proud of you, Shepard"
Cue credits.