Mass murderer Breivik threatened hunger strike over Rayman Revolution

zhorkat

Member
Brevik will never be released from prison so I don't know how that's rehabilitation. With this specific case your system is contradicting itself.

Well the way the system is set up it's still possible, albeit highly unlikely, that he won't spend the rest of his life in prison. I also don't think that a prison system allowing for a scenario of lifetime imprisonment necessarily contradicts a goal of rehabilitation over punishment.
 

RMI

Banned
From Metacritic:

Rayman 2: Revolution

GamePro - 100

"It's the best version of one of the best 3D platform games ever made."

GameSpot - 91

"One of the most engaging, entertaining, and original games for the PS2."

IGN - 88

"It's one of the greatest achievements in the history of 3D platform games and should be given the same admiration given to titles like Miyamoto's "Mario 64."

This guy is a piece of fucking garbage.
 

Shinta

Banned
I can't believe he tried to say he used Modern Warfare 2 to "train".

Reading Wikipedia articles on military tactics would be better training.

The military uses games to train as well. It's obviously not comprehensive training, but it probably can amount to something.

Flight sims, surgery simulations, driving simulations do the same thing.
 

fantomena

Member
21 years for killing 77 people , wtf?

Btw, for people skeptical about 21 years in prison. He will be tested for his psyche each 5 year if he has been restored. This means when 21 yearshas pasted, he will be tested, if he is still a sick cold blooded murderer who wants to kill people on the left side in politics, he will fail the test and need to wait 5 years till next time.

So he will never get out.

.
 

Yaoibot

Member
Is giving someone nothing really the standard we want for prisons? I know the emotional desire in humans is for some level of revenge, but what does it accomplish? The victims are dead. In practice, the family members of the victim wanting a deeper sort of revenge should not be considered in the way we treat prisoners. And such a system only works if we commit to helping even the worst offenders, not just those with crimes that don't send chills up ones spine.

A very illuminating movie called "Longford" is a true story about a member of the cabinet on the UK who was a supporter of prisoners and rehabilitation, and he destroyed his reputation defending a female who was a convicted child murderer and rapist, arguably the most infamous crime in the UK at the time. It's quite interesting to approach the idea of forgiveness even for the darkest amongst us, and why simply making ones like that suffer is not really gaining anyone anything.

I amemded my post as you were typing that. I don't think you can apply one set of standards to all people in the criminal justice system, nor can you indulge in the practice of an individual punishment for every crime in the world as that would paralyze our civic and legal systems. However, in the rarest instances, where someone has committed mass murder or criminality on this scale, special circumstances should be deeply considered.

My mother - rest her soul - was PGT for the Canadian government and she saw and protected some of the most broken human beings imaginable from subhuman abuse over the years. When you see what she had seen, you do occasionally encounter what can only be deemed as "evil". I'm not a religious man, and neither was she a woman of a particular faith, but the contaimemt and treatment we have for these individuals is inadequate. I don't know what the solution is. Should we have the right to vengence? Should we put down a rabid human as we do a dog? Is it not equally as unfair to the victims of his family to allow this person to remain in comforts while they have nothing but despair? I've seen Longford and that's a journey that many, many people aren't wise or brave enough to take. Nor should they be asked to if hate is all they have and the sum of what they want to cling to. Hate is a valid and understandable response to tragedy and we can not simply tell someone not to give into it.
 

Insaniac

Member
he was only sentenced to 21 years for killing 77 people? how does that logic work out?

edit: read above post.

If he chooses to go hungry even though they give him food, its his choice.
 
Give him a original gba with all the games and remove all the lamps from his cell.

No death sentence to him. Will be the easy way out.

All the parties, even the conservatives and liberals in Norway are against death penalty because it's pre-historic.

Easy way out? Who cares about him or his feelings? People like him simply should be removed from existence and forgotten quickly. The fact he can still make headlines and be known for his 'accomplishments' gives him satisfaction i'm sure and likely to produce copy cats.
 

fantomena

Member
Easy way out? Who cares about him or his feelings? People like him simply should be removed from existence and forgotten quickly. The fact he can still make headlines and be known for his 'accomplishments' gives him satisfaction i'm sure and likely to produce copy cats.

I care if killing him is the easy way out. Let him rot in jail.
 

Dr.Acula

Banned
he was only sentenced to 21 years for killing 77 people? how does that logic work out?

Been asked and answered many many times.

Basically 21 years is the maximum sentence on the books, but prison time can be extended indefinitely in the case of a dangerous offender. Canada has similar things, where people are allowed parole after 20 odd years or so, but our serial killers and other dangerous individuals just get denied at parole forever.
 

Piggus

Member
Of course he won't, but I have no intention to kill him. I would gladly pay taxes which let's the state get money to pay for his prison time.

And Im even one of the people he want to kill (Im a member of AUF, the Labour partys youth organization).

I didn't say anything about killing him. I just think it's disgusting that he gets to live so comfortably after he denied ANY life to so many people. You already determined he's not crazy so what exactly are you rehabilitating? You're not doing jack shit to make him "better" and even if you did he would never be set free anyway. You're letting this asshole live out his life and play PS2 games while 77 families will never see a loved one ever again. It's pathetic. I respect your prison system I know it works well but the stubbornness displayed by Norwegians in order to protect the "purity" of their prison system is mind boggling.
 

Ketch

Member
When my daughter starts whining I take her video games away.



If you've got the nerve to blame your killing spree on video games then you should be disqualified from ever playing them again. They should take that crap away and give him some kiddie books instead. Like some box car children or bearnstein bears.
 
Get him a fucking Polystation.

ORWfPy3.jpg
 

Artex

Banned
Fuck him.

Im a member of AUF, the labour partys youth organization he tried to kill everyone in.

Btw, for people skeptical about 21 years in prison. He will be tested for his psyce each 5 year if he has been restored. This mwans when 21 eyars has pasted, he will be tested, if he is still a sick cold blooded murderer who wants to kill people on the left side in politics, he will fail the test and need to wait 5 years till next time.

So he will never get out.

I think his psychiatric evaluation only raised more questions, because IIRC he didn't follow any previous model for reckless behavior or mass killings and he was called a "special case" i.e. by all standards he is not insane.
 

Shtof

Member
When my daughter starts whining I take her video games away.



If you've got the nerve to blame your killing spree on video games then you should be disqualified from ever playing them again. They should take that crap away and give him some kiddie books instead. Like some box car children or bearnstein bears.

I guess it's the reason he gets only "kiddie games".
 

fantomena

Member
I didn't say anything about killing him. I just think it's disgusting that he gets to live so comfortably after he denied ANY life to so many people. You already determined he's not crazy so what exactly are you rehabilitating? You're not doing jack shit to make him "better" and even if you did he would never be set free anyway. You're letting this asshole live out his life and play PS2 games while 77 families will never see a loved one ever again. It's pathetic. I respect your prison system I know it works well but the stubbornness displayed by Norwegians in order to protect the "purity" of their prison system is mind boggling.

So what would you do?
 

Dr.Acula

Banned
Kinda weird about the PC, since he obviously has one here.

That prison cell is much more in line with what I thought he would get. Not the club fed that was posted earlier.

For comparison, this is the cell of one of Canada's most notorious serial killers, Paul Bernardo.

X9j3Dpa.jpg
 

Yaoibot

Member
The prison systems goal we have here in Norway is to rehabilitate, not punish.

You can't rehabilitate a sociopath, his brain is wired not to care. Its like telling a dog it should be a bird, utterly useless even if one day you trick it through drugs or psychotherapy into leaping off a building.

In his case, and in my second less passionate response to Amirox, I speak on the value of individual assessments of punishment for exceptional crimes.
 

fantomena

Member
For those who haven't seen him. I recommend this Michael Moore video about the prison system in Norway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01mTKDaKa6Q

Being able to live a full life with life's simple pleasures is the easy way out. It sounds like he will even get better then that.

Before he got caught by the police on the island, he wanted to take suicide. If we kill him, he may get what he wanted.

Killing him will change out democracy, and that's excactly a part of what he wanted to accomplish.
 
He ......killed........77........people.

Just think on that for a moment, The man shouldn't be breathing himself let alone trying to justify his rights.
 
Well, he is in isolation probably for his own protection. Who would socialise with him in prison? He massacred dozens of teenagers.

Also, I don't think access to a wider selection of games is considered a human right. In most countries, he would have a few books and that is it.

If other humans have the right, it becomes a human rights issue, at least in Norway. Just because he ended the lives of 77 humans doesn't revoke his human rights.

Solitary confinement is certainly justifiable because of the gravity of the crime and the potential of the convicted influencing other inmates, but it must still be executed humanely.

If Norway wants to remain steadfast about its policies regarding humane treatment and rehabilitation of inmates it must not allow vindictiveness to crack the very core of these ideals. With that said, because this deals with entertainment, which is not a human necessity, this seems to be more of a civil rights issue than a human rights one.

Breivik receiving the games and treatment he is describing is certainly justifiable if his psychiatrist feels they are what's needed, but if this treatment is coming from angry COs trying to eke out a small measure of revenge, then it is a civil rights issue.
 
To play devil's advocate: as ridiculous as this sounds to an American, if other inmates are getting a wider selection of games and the ability to socialize, shouldn't he at least get some of his wishes?

Maybe the other inmates have lighter crimes than mass-killing kids at camp.
 
D

Deleted member 125677

Unconfirmed Member
No one cares, Breivik. Just rot away in your isolation.
 
Top Bottom