You didn't see Benefits Street on Channel 4? And the papers are always telling us the brown people with 30 kids are coming over and being handed all our mansions.
hmm fair enough, i hadn't thought of that.
You didn't see Benefits Street on Channel 4? And the papers are always telling us the brown people with 30 kids are coming over and being handed all our mansions.
Would you not rather pursue council tax reform? The poor inherently pay far more than their fair share in this regard. Yes. It may[/i/] be costly in the short term, but much needed over the longer term.
I despise ukip but this is a democracy. Just because I don't like them doesn't mean they shouldn't be represented fairlyI feel zero sympathy for UKIP voters.
Would you not rather pursue council tax reform? The poor inherently far pay more than their fair share in this regard. Yes. It may[/i/] be costly in the short term, but much needed over the longer term.
There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.You didn't see Benefits Street on Channel 4? And the papers are always telling us the brown people with 30 kids are coming over and being handed all our mansions.
Lord knows we can't pursue the corporations and reform the benefits system! It's one or the other.
There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.
Wait, is the majority at 323 or 326? I'm confused.
Wait, is the majority at 323 or 326? I'm confused.
Wait, is the majority at 323 or 326? I'm confused.
There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.
When the fuck did Scotland become the boogieman of English politics
I feel zero sympathy for UKIP voters.
It's not really about whether I'd rather A, B, or C. I'd want (and expect) these lazy fuckers to look at all 3.
There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.
Wait, is the majority at 323 or 326? I'm confused.
At no point have I said I'm happy to have the Tories in power. I did not vote for the Tories. My missus did, and I gave her (light hearted) stick over it. I'm just less unhappy than I would've been had Labour been elected.i mean again, i don't know why you'd be happy to have the tories in power if this is what you think. they're massively less likely to take an even handed approach like this than labour.
The truth is that neither 'no abuse' or 'rampant abuse' is true. Therefore, I'm fine with the idea of scrutiny and reform.not really; the truth lies far closer to the 'no abuse' than it does to 'there's rampant abuse'
the abuse is negligible as a percentage of the total welfare bill
But this is a UK election, and in the UK as a whole, UKIP gathered more votes.
Impressive SNP, that's the best thing could happen for Scotland and Europe.
Thanks a lot Scots!
Has Nick Clegg resigned yet?
You use proportional representation which means each vote matters. You look at all the votes cast and each party gets a proportional number of seats. Now, you can split this up in zones so Scotland gets 60 seats in all cases and the division of that is decided by the proportional vote in Scotland. You can also set a minimum percentage a party needs to get to be able to qualify for a seat. So if you get less than 5% of the vote for instance, you don't get a seat.
Which is fine, when the scrutiny / reform doesn't cost you more than the fraud did. Say hello to Universal Credit.The truth is that neither 'no abuse' or 'rampant abuse' is true. Therefore, I'm fine with the idea of scrutiny and reform.
At no point have I said I'm happy to have the Tories in power. I did not vote for the Tories. My missus did, and I gave her (light hearted) stick over it. I'm just less unhappy than I would've been had Labour been elected.
The truth is that neither 'no abuse' or 'rampant abuse' is true. Therefore, I'm fine with the idea of scrutiny and reform.
The truth is that neither 'no abuse' or 'rampant abuse' is true. Therefore, I'm fine with the idea of scrutiny and reform.
they pretty much secured a conservative win.
Those who say there is rampant fraud/abuse can be ignored a lot more so since they're further from the truthIt's not really about whether I'd rather A, B, or C. I'd want (and expect) these lazy fuckers to look at all 3.
There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.
Yup. The scots pretty much secured a conservative ran country. Crazy stuff.
At no point have I said I'm happy to have the Tories in power. I did not vote for the Tories. My missus did, and I gave her (light hearted) stick over it. I'm just less unhappy than I would've been had Labour been elected.
The truth is that neither 'no abuse' or 'rampant abuse' is true. Therefore, I'm fine with the idea of scrutiny and reform.
Yup. The scots pretty much secured a conservative ran country. Crazy stuff.
Yup. The scots pretty much secured a conservative ran country. Crazy stuff.
tories would have won even if all of the seats in scotland voted labour...
Yup. The scots pretty much secured a conservative ran country. Crazy stuff.
Clegg gone.
Miliband gone.
Farage gone.
Bennett gone?
Gonna be a lot of changes in UK politics.
It depends if the Sinn Fein MP's will boycott the parliament or not.
There's no 'it depends', they're not going to take their seats.
Because I don't like the Labour Party. I have been demonstrably less happy when they are in power. The Conservatives have not (yet) inspired such revulsion.but why? in both of the reasons you've highlighted for your voting, it's not at all clear that the tories would be better than labour. in fact there's pretty strong evidence they're worse.
Bring Back Blair?
Will Labour go to the right? I was pretty shocked to hear that Labour, were 'too far left', it never really felt like that, but I suppose when neoliberalism becomes the ONLY narrative in town, even the Lib Dems feel like a left-leaning party.
Will Labour go to the right? I was pretty shocked to hear that Labour, were 'too far left', it never really felt like that, but I suppose when neoliberalism becomes the ONLY narrative in town, even the Lib Dems feel like a left-leaning party.