May 7th | UK General Election 2015 OT - Please go vote!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Would you not rather pursue council tax reform? The poor inherently pay far more than their fair share in this regard. Yes. It may[/i/] be costly in the short term, but much needed over the longer term.


How about both?

How about land reform while we're at it. Now that's blue-sky thinking... :D
 
Would you not rather pursue council tax reform? The poor inherently far pay more than their fair share in this regard. Yes. It may[/i/] be costly in the short term, but much needed over the longer term.

It's not really about whether I'd rather A, B, or C. I'd want (and expect) these lazy fuckers to look at all 3.

You didn't see Benefits Street on Channel 4? And the papers are always telling us the brown people with 30 kids are coming over and being handed all our mansions.
There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.
 
Lord knows we can't pursue the corporations and reform the benefits system! It's one or the other.

i mean again, i don't know why you'd be happy to have the tories in power if this is what you think. they're massively less likely to take an even handed approach like this than labour.

There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.

not really; the truth lies far closer to the 'no abuse' than it does to 'there's rampant abuse'

the abuse is negligible as a percentage of the total welfare bill
 
Once the final seat is in I'll post a new news thread detailing the election results and so on, aimed at a broader viewership.
 
There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.

There are also those who cite government stats to suggest it's nowhere near 'the middle', and actually is far closer to being a smaller, but still important, issue than a lot of people seem to think.
 
It's not really about whether I'd rather A, B, or C. I'd want (and expect) these lazy fuckers to look at all 3.


There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.

How would somebody go about committing benefit fraud?
 
Wait, is the majority at 323 or 326? I'm confused.

A 'strict' majority is 326 - half of the MPs plus one. Practically, Sinn Fein abstains from taking up their seats, of which they won 4, so there are only 646 seats in practice, meaning a 'working' majority is 324. Most predictions had SF taking 5 seats, which was why people thought a working majority would be 323; that doesn't seem to be the case.
 
i mean again, i don't know why you'd be happy to have the tories in power if this is what you think. they're massively less likely to take an even handed approach like this than labour.
At no point have I said I'm happy to have the Tories in power. I did not vote for the Tories. My missus did, and I gave her (light hearted) stick over it. I'm just less unhappy than I would've been had Labour been elected.

not really; the truth lies far closer to the 'no abuse' than it does to 'there's rampant abuse'

the abuse is negligible as a percentage of the total welfare bill
The truth is that neither 'no abuse' or 'rampant abuse' is true. Therefore, I'm fine with the idea of scrutiny and reform.
 
You use proportional representation which means each vote matters. You look at all the votes cast and each party gets a proportional number of seats. Now, you can split this up in zones so Scotland gets 60 seats in all cases and the division of that is decided by the proportional vote in Scotland. You can also set a minimum percentage a party needs to get to be able to qualify for a seat. So if you get less than 5% of the vote for instance, you don't get a seat.

That sounds far better, and SNP wouldn't have swept every seat with ~35% vote total.
My vote (which was tactical anyway) meant nothing.
 
At no point have I said I'm happy to have the Tories in power. I did not vote for the Tories. My missus did, and I gave her (light hearted) stick over it. I'm just less unhappy than I would've been had Labour been elected.

but why? in both of the reasons you've highlighted for your voting, it's not at all clear that the tories would be better than labour. in fact there's pretty strong evidence they're worse.

The truth is that neither 'no abuse' or 'rampant abuse' is true. Therefore, I'm fine with the idea of scrutiny and reform.

okay, but 0.7% is closer to 0 than it is to, say, 1.5%

it strikes me as horrifically disingenuous to say that 'both sides have a valid point' when that actual benefit fraud is less than 1%
 
The truth is that neither 'no abuse' or 'rampant abuse' is true. Therefore, I'm fine with the idea of scrutiny and reform.

But that is the point. This is what bugs me about such discussions: point me to anyone who doesn't think any government system should be scrutinised. The point is precisely WHAT reform is needed, desireable or beneficial to the majority whilst retaining protections for the minority - i.e. how a supposedly civilised democratic country is run. Apparently we are eager to undermine the poor as a WHOLE because of small groups of fraudsters.
 
It's not really about whether I'd rather A, B, or C. I'd want (and expect) these lazy fuckers to look at all 3.


There are also people that would suggest there is no fraud or misuse of the benefits system whatsoever. Both groups can probably be ignored as the truth will lie in the middle somewhere.
Those who say there is rampant fraud/abuse can be ignored a lot more so since they're further from the truth
 
At no point have I said I'm happy to have the Tories in power. I did not vote for the Tories. My missus did, and I gave her (light hearted) stick over it. I'm just less unhappy than I would've been had Labour been elected.


The truth is that neither 'no abuse' or 'rampant abuse' is true. Therefore, I'm fine with the idea of scrutiny and reform.

The amount lost due to fraud and abuse is £1.6 billion a year. This is less than the amount lost due to government error in paying benefits, which is £2.2 billion. There is simply no way to make significant savings by targeting fraud, because there just isn't that much of it.
 
Cannabis Is Safer Than Alcohol have the following results:

0 seats in total.
0 seats gained.
0 seats lost.
0 net change in seats.
8,419 total votes taken.
0.0% share of the total vote
0.0


did not even know this party existed lol
 
Clegg gone.
Miliband gone.
Farage gone.
Bennett gone?

Gonna be a lot of changes in UK politics.

Bring Back Blair?

Will Labour go to the right? I was pretty shocked to hear that Labour, were 'too far left', it never really felt like that, but I suppose when neoliberalism becomes the ONLY narrative in town, even the Lib Dems feel like a left-leaning party.
 
I asume this has been posted but this was Cam's little speech in CCHQ:

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffee...ers-this-is-the-sweetest-victory-of-them-all/

He should talk like that more often. Obviously he's pumped up but man, he comes across so much better when he's less formal and talks about hating blogs.

In other news, you'd think Jo Johnson would get rewarded for his work on the manifesto (the degree to which it was important is obviously unknown, but he was working on it for literally years) but with Boris back in, they might not be too keen on the idea of a Dynastic cabinet. Then again, the Milibands were both in cabinet together and it worked out well enough for them.

OH.

But really, with no Lib Dems there should be plenty of junior minister positions to splurge around. I'm sure Jo will get something.

And Lord Crosby has to be in the first new Lords intake, no? Motherfucker was vindicated entirely.
 
Scotland showing the rest of us how it's done. Get why my parents moved back there now.

_82854092_scotland_historical_chart_624.png
 
The lib dem failure is damning to the whole idea of coalitions in the UK, so how can we proceed to argue for proportional representation?
 
Honestly, there's not much more for me to say on benefit reforms. Some say they should happen, many say they're not needed, and ultimately none of that has any effect on what will actually happen. It was supposed to be a minor point in response to an earlier post, not some hill I wish I die on.

but why? in both of the reasons you've highlighted for your voting, it's not at all clear that the tories would be better than labour. in fact there's pretty strong evidence they're worse.
Because I don't like the Labour Party. I have been demonstrably less happy when they are in power. The Conservatives have not (yet) inspired such revulsion.
 
Bring Back Blair?

Will Labour go to the right? I was pretty shocked to hear that Labour, were 'too far left', it never really felt like that, but I suppose when neoliberalism becomes the ONLY narrative in town, even the Lib Dems feel like a left-leaning party.

yeah, it's fucking miserable. this is the darkest day for left wing britons in a lifetime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom