• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

May 7th | UK General Election 2015 OT - Please go vote!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kathian

Banned
It might have already been discussed on this thread (I've taken a bit of a break because I'm too miserable) so might have missed it, but have we discussed why it looks like Lib Dem supporters have gone across to the Tories?
Makes no sense to me

Loss of trust means right wing lib dems wouldn't know what they'd support in a Lab coalition.
 
try to remember (as I see several posts slamming services being cut etc)

that a lot of this is local council cuts, the government does not force that

Erm perhaps I am wrong here but from what I understand local councils get a grant from the government (as well as raising money via the council tax). If the Government reduces the size of that grant (which I believe they are doing) then the council has to reduce the services it can provide. So yeah I would say the government can force council cuts and are doing so. It should also be noted that the councils are very restricted in how much they can raise the council tax too which is another way the Government can force them to cut services.

As for the Tory Voter being victimised, I mean this is a serious thing ? Shall we ignore the "looney left" insults and ignore the 5 or more years where the poor and disadvantaged in society have been painted by the Tory press as feckless, scum, scroungers, work shy, lazy and barely even human. If you think as a Tory voter you are being victimised because someone unfriended you on facebook then really I don't have any words to convince you otherwise. The left and many others in socity haven't just been "victimised" they have been literaly "demonised" by the right.
 

Empty

Member
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/09/alan-johnson-labour-aspirational-voters-tony-blair

Red flags already. 'Wealth creators' is the right-wing favourite's favourite buzzword. Two days after the election and they're already gearing up for a lurch to the right.

i don't think the wealth creators stuff was a problem really, all milibands proposals about the rich polled well iirc. the country is center-right but it doesn't worship the rich.

miliband just wasn't 'aspirational' though, to use another right wing buzzword in that article, he was all about minor improvements to people lives and fairness which are nice, but he couldn't sell them an exciting narrative about the future.

that's a genuine problem and the void of which allowed cameron to exploit uncertainty over influence of snp narrow nationalism in england, miliband as leader and lingering beliefs that labour can't be trusted on economy to win a majority.
 

PJV3

Member
Yes, the Labour Party absolutely needs to be separated. It's the only viable solution at this point; Scottish Labour can go left while English Labour goes right.

FFA would make it easier.
They would just need agreement on UK policy.

They won't square the south east and Scotland for a long time.
 

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
It is truly depressing that there are people with seemingly more sympathy for the poor Conservative voters, so afraid to speak their true views in public for fear of those views being challenged by the left, than they have for those actually being marginalised and hugely impacted by the policies being put in place by the party.

"Challenge" is in the eye of the beholder. People object to being reviled as evil for the views they hold. This shouldn't be surprising based on how the concept of morality has evolved in Western societies. You can get an instant banning for that line of thinking applied to some subjects. "But this is different" you might say. OK, it is for you. But not for everyone.
 

Real Hero

Member
I mean the SNP won by appealing to the left, but it's simply unthinkable and impossible that anyone could win by appealing to the left in England? Maybe I should move to Scotland...
They could but probably not the next election or the one after. It would take years of winning people to the left and changing the collective consciousness. Only way is if the Tories go extremely harsh on certain groups.
 
It was only until I saw the map of the country with all the respective results of the night colour coded that I realised how much the Tories cleaned up here in the South, I mean wow. I expected them to win the seat of my constituency (Bexley & Bromley), but, fuck.

Probably been discussed already, but I'm pretty confident that they've secured their spot in Westminster until 2025.
 

RedShift

Member
Just joined the labour party.

I'm thinking about it but I'm worried they're about to make a move towards a position that doesn't really represent me.

Might just join and then if it looks like a bad idea later on join the Greens or something. Or maybe even the Lib Dems; I probably prefer them to Labour, it was only their support of a Comservative govt that made them unvotable for me, and I doubt they'll be doing that again anytime soon after Thursday.
 

PJV3

Member
I'm thinking about it but I'm worried they're about to make a move towards a position that doesn't really represent me.

Might just join and then if it looks like a bad idea later on join the Greens or something. Or maybe even the Lib Dems; I probably prefer them to Labour, it was only their support of a Comservative govt that made them unvotable for me, and I doubt they'll be doing that again anytime soon after Thursday.

The Libdem's have a bigger identity crisis than Labour at the moment. They don't know what they are doing.

Elements of the party hate the left and unions, and they lost a lot of the SDP crowd.

I'd wait to see what they decide they stand for when the flapping stops.
 
Oh yeah, those lines Labour were spouting that no one believed hence they lost the election. I'd love to know where they got that 1600 quid figure from.

http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/we-s...ers-about-how-theyre-feeling-this-morning-672

Much arm flapping from people working in the NHS. Someone should go and tell them that everything is fine and nothing will change.

Poor old beans should dust themselves down and stiffen that upper lip.

We're all in it together.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
I'm thinking about it but I'm worried they're about to make a move towards a position that doesn't really represent me.

Might just join and then if it looks like a bad idea later on join the Greens or something. Or maybe even the Lib Dems; I probably prefer them to Labour, it was only their support of a Comservative govt that made them unvotable for me, and I doubt they'll be doing that again anytime soon after Thursday.

I mean, if you join them you have the capacity to influence which they move.
 
http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/we-s...ers-about-how-theyre-feeling-this-morning-672

Much arm flapping from people working in the NHS. Someone should go and tell them that everything is fine and nothing will change.

In terms of mental health, it's going to get much worse – I just can't see how it won't. "Worse", in this case, means severely ill people needing a bed and not being able to get one. We'll have to rely more and more on private hospitals.

How it begins. Start with the little known or talked about areas and then slowly spread the same strategy out to other, more widely used areas and claim it's under the guise of reliving stress when what you're really doing is quietly introducing ever increasing privatisation.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Is he good?

He's a bit tricky to pin down ideologically. He's a member of Progress which by all rights should make him the among the more right of Labour MPs, but that's not what his voting record shows. He's big on the 'aspirational' aspect and was a Burnham protege, but I think he'd give the Conservatives a hell of a fight. He's an excellent speaker and it's hard to represent a man awarded military honours for bravery as weak.
 

PJV3

Member
He's a bit tricky to pin down ideologically. He's a member of Progress which by all rights should make him the among the more right of Labour MPs, but that's not what his voting record shows. He's big on the 'aspirational' aspect and was a Burnham protege, but I think he'd give the Conservatives a hell of a fight. He's an excellent speaker and it's hard to represent a man awarded military honours for bravery as weak.

Thatcher tried that with Tony Benn, not knowing he served in the RAF during WW2 and he had a really violent dislike of NAZIs.

I haven't really heard of him before, I'm keeping an open mind for now. I'm gonna rejoin later today.
 

kitch9

Banned
How it begins. Start with the little known or talked about areas and then slowly spread the same strategy out to other, more widely used areas and claim it's under the guise of reliving stress when what you're really doing is quietly introducing ever increasing privatisation.

For clarity, are suggesting that the private sector provides no services at all and that the NHS should keep abrest of the hundreds of thousands of new advancements and specialist services in every aspect of medicine?
 

Tak3n

Banned
Erm perhaps I am wrong here but from what I understand local councils get a grant from the government (as well as raising money via the council tax). If the Government reduces the size of that grant (which I believe they are doing) then the council has to reduce the services it can provide. So yeah I would say the government can force council cuts and are doing so. It should also be noted that the councils are very restricted in how much they can raise the council tax too which is another way the Government can force them to cut services.

As for the Tory Voter being victimised, I mean this is a serious thing ? Shall we ignore the "looney left" insults and ignore the 5 or more years where the poor and disadvantaged in society have been painted by the Tory press as feckless, scum, scroungers, work shy, lazy and barely even human. If you think as a Tory voter you are being victimised because someone unfriended you on facebook then really I don't have any words to convince you otherwise. The left and many others in socity haven't just been "victimised" they have been literaly "demonised" by the right.

you are right, but what I meant is they are not told what services to cut, local councils choose what services to cut, and will often use the cuts as a excuse, you should look at what your local council spends it money on, you would be amazed!

for example our local council who justified cutting services because of cuts were found to of spent 26 million on buying themselves out of a contract that they signed before building permission was giving...

have a look at your local council and you will see the wastage is eye opening
 

Biggzy

Member
He's a bit tricky to pin down ideologically. He's a member of Progress which by all rights should make him the among the more right of Labour MPs, but that's not what his voting record shows. He's big on the 'aspirational' aspect and was a Burnham protege, but I think he'd give the Conservatives a hell of a fight. He's an excellent speaker and it's hard to represent a man awarded military honours for bravery as weak.

I never heard of him until now, and I was leaning towards Burnham becoming the next Labour leader, but having done a little research into him he seems to tick many of the boxes that I feel the next Labour leader needs.

Anyway, after Labour's disastrous performance in the GE, I am now going to join the Labour party so I at least have a tiny say in the direction the party will be going next.
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/05/labour-miliband-conservatives-british-elections/

Miliband, during the election campaign, tried to reassure middle-class voters that Labour utterly ruled out any SNP influence on policies like austerity or the Trident nuclear system. And while the Labour Party tailed the Tories on austerity, while they imitated Tory language on welfare, while they copied the UK Independence Party (UKIP) on immigration, the SNP defended a simple, civilized position: no austerity, stop demonizing people on welfare, and welcome immigrants.

In England, Labour aping the Right just leads to its base abstaining, as they have done in growing numbers since 2001. But in Scotland, working-class voters had a tried and tested reformist alternative, with an optimistic political identity linked to a profound socio-demographic shift, and were able to rally to it.

Glad to read I'm not the only one.
 

kitch9

Banned
you are right, but what I meant is they are not told what services to cut, local councils choose what services to cut, and will often use the cuts as a excuse, you should look at what your local council spends it money on, you would be amazed!

for example our local council who justified cutting services because of cuts were found to of spent 26 million on buying themselves out of a contract that they signed before building permission was giving...

have a look at your local council and you will see the wastage is eye opening

Having worked on numerous schools getting built over the past 15 years it has been amazing to see how insanely over specced they tended to be. The sheer money that was wasted on completely frivolous stuff was mind blowing. Designer chairs, statues, water falls, health spas, relaxation rooms, state of the art air conditioning systems, elaborate building designs that require expensive materials and techniques to achieve the list was endless. I'm not sure what they were thinking.

The architects must have creamed in every manufacturer rebate deal they had.
 

PJV3

Member
I never heard of the Jarvis until now, and I was leaning towards Burnham becoming Labour leader, but having done a little research into him and he seems to tick many of the boxes that I feel the next Labour leader needs.

Anyway, after Labour's disastrous performance in the GE, I am now going to join the Labour party so I at least have a tiny say in the direction the party will be going next.

He wasn't joking about the military stuff, having read his Wikipedia page. And good to see his stance on the nhs.

The state of affairs in England makes it a tricky pick. Scotland staying SNP isn't a disaster if labour can progress south of the border.
 

Randdalf

Member
I was just watching the BBC's election coverage from the last few elections and just realised that the virtual reality stuff they did with Jeremy Vine in 2015 is basically a fancier remake of what they did in 2005 with Peter Snow (and 2010 as well).
 

pulsemyne

Member
He's a bit tricky to pin down ideologically. He's a member of Progress which by all rights should make him the among the more right of Labour MPs, but that's not what his voting record shows. He's big on the 'aspirational' aspect and was a Burnham protege, but I think he'd give the Conservatives a hell of a fight. He's an excellent speaker and it's hard to represent a man awarded military honours for bravery as weak.
As I said he's unfuckable by the press.
 

pulsemyne

Member
I never heard of him until now, and I was leaning towards Burnham becoming the next Labour leader, but having done a little research into him he seems to tick many of the boxes that I feel the next Labour leader needs.

Anyway, after Labour's disastrous performance in the GE, I am now going to join the Labour party so I at least have a tiny say in the direction the party will be going next.
If you look a few pages back you will see a link I posted about him. The dude is damn hard working and has the respect of everyone in the House, even the tories.
 

pulsemyne

Member
We're hearing that the Conservatives aren't going to have it as easy as we think, anyone think similarly?

Yep the next two years are going to be a Euro sceptic bloodbath for Cameron. The "Awkward squad" will give him loads of shit. Think of it like this, he no longer has a big-ish majority. In fact his position is actually weaker now than before as he's beholden to the right wing arm of the party.
It smells of John Major syndrome. He had to constantly rely on Ulster Unionists to push things through and Cameron has even less numbers than he did. He is not going to have it easy and the tories could tear themselves apart just like before.
 

DBT85

Member
We're hearing that the Conservatives aren't going to have it as easy as we think, anyone think similarly?

They have a majority of their own rather than needing the LibDems. But that majority is smaller than it was with the Lib Dems in bed with them.

The Lib Dems in part were just happy to be playing at the top table again so couldn't rock the boat too far, but were at least able to make some small changes in return for having to let the Tories win most of the time.

This time there is nobody but nobody who will feel a need to support the Tories to keep them sweet for the next 5 years.

A tiny amount of unrest in the cheap seats and they'll not be able to get things through as everyone else will be against it.
 
It might have already been discussed on this thread (I've taken a bit of a break because I'm too miserable) so might have missed it, but have we discussed why it looks like Lib Dem supporters have gone across to the Tories?
Makes no sense to me

Mainly to keep Labour out, and form another coalition with the Tories.

I think they over did it, just a wee bit.
 

hohoXD123

Member
Missed the ifs report stating that we are at pre crash levels then?

In contrast, after accounting for differential inflation, the median income of those aged 31–59 is projected to be 2.5% below its pre-crisis level in 2014–15, despite having risen by 1.2% in the last two years as the labour market has started to recover. Meanwhile,
young adults aged 22–30 have seen the largest falls in their income since the recession,
with their income projected to be 7.6% lower in 2014–15 than in 2007–08. Again this is
despite a recovery in the last two years, with an estimated 2.5% rise in median income
since 2012–13.

how can anyone dispute against such a legitimate article xD

Are you disputing that these are actual healthcare workers or the opinions/experiences of these workers?
 
you are right, but what I meant is they are not told what services to cut, local councils choose what services to cut, and will often use the cuts as a excuse, you should look at what your local council spends it money on, you would be amazed!

for example our local council who justified cutting services because of cuts were found to of spent 26 million on buying themselves out of a contract that they signed before building permission was giving...

have a look at your local council and you will see the wastage is eye opening

Of course cuts are decided at a local level after all the local council is more likely to understand the needs of their community. But the cuts are still being forced on the community by the Government.

Now here is the thing you could look at a list of council services and cut half of those because you consider them "wastage" or "non-essential". I could then look at the list you have finished with and probably find even more "wastage" or "non-essential" services. Between us by the time we are finished there would probably be sweet fuck all council services left and everyone would get a big council tax refund, initially cheer about the windfall then bitch when the essential service they need no longer exists because we decided it was just wastage.

I am not saying there isn't wastage or "efficiencies" that can be achieved because to say there isn't is moronic. However the cuts being forced on councils are so extreme and so huge that even if they eliminated all wastage they would still have to cut into essential services because of the severity of the cuts.

I do get what you are saying, especially in relation to councils making mistakes and costing millions. I live in Sheffield and we are still living with the legacy of the fucking pointless student games. But mistakes happen even the National Government is prone to wasting hundreds of millions on stupid mistakes (am I right there Iain Duncan Smith ?)
 
Whatever makes you feel better brah

Austerity measures have been enacted all across Europe in an attempt to appease markets, and George Osbourne is going to continue his cuts into a second term. To a lot of people it seems voters have decided that keeping the economy happy is paramount and they are willing to sacrifice the welfare of the vulnerable to do it.

Someone needs to explain otherwise if this is not correct?
 

PJV3

Member
We're hearing that the Conservatives aren't going to have it as easy as we think, anyone think similarly?

It's a possibility.

They scored big on a coalition with the Libdem's, does the right of the party assume too much and push too far.

Europe could turn messy, if Cameron says vote yes without a good deal the right will claim he's trying to fix the result.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom