• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

McKinney TX school board puts $220M bond proposition to voters, incl. $50m HS stadium

Status
Not open for further replies.

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/...ection-12000-seat-stadium-to-a-may-vote.html/

McKinney ISD school board members Thursday night unanimously approved putting a $220 million bond proposition before voters on May 7.

“You get to vote your values,” said school board member Bobby Amick.

The bond proposal includes a new 12,000-seat stadium northwest of Central Expressway and State Highway 121.

Thursday’s vote followed a recommendation of projects earlier this month by a bond committee — which includes about 100 community members, parents, staff and students.

An estimated $50.3 million of the overall package would be for a stadium and attached events center. About $12.5 million left over from the 2000 bond election is planned for stadium infrastructure — roads, water, sewer and electricity.

Besides the stadium and events center, nearly one-fifth of the bond amount has been slated for facility upgrades — heating, ventilation and air conditioning replacements; new roofs; and plumbing and electrical work.

Other big projects include band hall expansions at Evans and Cockrill middle schools and McKinney Boyd High School and safety and security upgrades.

There’s also a plan for the district’s oldest high school to get a new auditorium and acoustics. McKinney High School’s auditorium currently seats about 500 — about half the capacity of auditoriums at McKinney North and McKinney Boyd high schools.


For the first time in more than a decade, building a school isn’t part of the plan.

“Much has been said tonight about a stadium,” Superintendent Rick McDaniel said. “I don’t see our bond proposal as just a stadium.”

Several residents spoke before the vote in support of and against the bond.

...

Parking at the stadium is one of the biggest concerns; there are fewer than 400 spots.

cLjbzXJ.jpg
 

Piecake

Member
reduce class sizes? Give teachers more prep time to plan lessons and give feedback to students? Na, who cares about that. Lets build a big fucking stadium. That is how we will turn our students into successful adults.
 

The Lamp

Member
McKinney is jusy down the road, only been a few times. Seemed pretty bumfuck.

It's a suburb. Downtown McKinney is fun to go to. Great restaurants.

I highly doubt the textbooks are from the 80s unless that's the most popular or latest edition. Texas schools like having (senselessly) new editions of books.
 

commedieu

Banned
reduce class sizes? Give teachers more prep time to plan lessons and give feedback to students? Na, who cares about that. Lets build a big fucking stadium. That is how we will turn our students into successful adults.

Gasp.. it almost seems like it's by design. Else we keep having a loop of coincidences.. but hey. People fight against free healthcare. So whatever the fuck.
 
America sure loves its unnecessarily huge sporting stadiums. The money could likely be spent better elsewhere, but it is Texas...and the US.
 

jbug617

Banned
Didn't Texas recently build a gigantic high school football stadium that ended up having a bunch of problems with it?
 
McKinney is jusy down the road, only been a few times. Seemed pretty bumfuck.

Downtown McKinney is great. We do a lot of photoshoots and filming there. Very old-style downtown square, well-preserved. But it has wider than normal sidewalks and walkways which make shoots easier than other downtown squares in the DFW area. The citizens seem nice and cooperative, and the surrounding businesses are also accommodating.
 
reduce class sizes? Give teachers more prep time to plan lessons and give feedback to students? Na, who cares about that. Lets build a big fucking stadium. That is how we will turn our students into successful adults.

Stadium brings them money. Kids getting better grades doesn't.
 

Veins

Unconfirmed Member
America is amazing. Why does a high school need a massive stadium like that
Are tens of thousands of people interested in watching kids play football?
 

MJPIA

Member
Something about sporting arenas that always sucks so much funding away from other areas of schools.

Kinda reminds me of how one airport I work at decided to spend large part of its budget to build a new outdoor parking area for aircraft while completely ignoring the fact that our airport is far under capacity for owners that lease outdoor ramp parking and that the only access to the new parking area will be by going across the runway, while thats fine for normal cars the company operating the fuel trucks has stated their trucks will never touch the runway and there is no interest from anyone currently on the airport to use it when they can just park their aircraft where you can have the fuel truck drive right up to it.
And while they do this other small airports in the region that are actually upgrading their infrastructure that the pilots ask for are sucking away more and more owners leading to decreased revenue and more and more delays due to funding issues.

To be fair on the stadium parking though this article says the new stadium will have 2,400 parking spots assuming I didn't screw up my math again.
For starters, the venue will call for one parking spot for every five seats – the city’s code outlines one spot per four seats at a facility – a dramatic improvement from the 1-to-11-seat ratio at Ron Poe, which was built in 1962.

If this goes through I have a severe lack of faith that the total cost will be what the current estimate is.
 
It's a suburb. Downtown McKinney is fun to go to. Great restaurants.

I highly doubt the textbooks are from the 80s unless that's the most popular or latest edition. Texas schools like having (senselessly) new editions of books.


When I was in school in Grand Prairie in the 90s our textbooks were always pretty new. It was shocking moving to raleigh and using 15-20 year old text books.


My middle school in Texas had nicer facilities than pretty much every high school here when we moved. It got used a ton by all types of people walking the track and for rec soccer leagues. Texas knows how to do althetics.
 
People talk about how participation trophies will mess up kids egos in the future. Wouldn't this be a far worse thing for a kid? What kind of disappointment in life will these kids have to confront if they went to a High School with such an extravagant stadium?
 

Krejlooc

Banned
To give some frames of reference, this is just down the road from Allen, where they built eagle stadium for $60 million dollars:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagle_Stadium_(Allen,_Texas)

They never played a game in that stadium. After they built it, they found out it had structural damage and had to be rebuilt.

And both of these stadiums are juuuuuust outside the edge of DISD, dallas' school district. DISD is $1.5 billion in debt. I have several friends who were teachers at DISD. I say were, because they cut like 65% of their staff 7 years ago to counter what was, at the time, called a historic debt. That was about .5 billion dollars ago.
 

Madness

Member
Friday Night Lights. That's a better stadium than our university had and it's for high school. But it's whatever. Surely a school that can afford a stadium like that is probably one of the better schools no? Is it all rich kids?
 

Krejlooc

Banned
Friday Night Lights. That's a better stadium than our university had and it's for high school. But it's whatever. Surely a school that can afford a stadium like that is probably one of the better schools no? Is it all rich kids?

McKinney isn't rich. It's middle class at best. But they are outside of DISD, so they are unburdened from the astonishing debt.

I think this shit is cruel as fuck. Dallas is a metroplex area. How can you waste hundreds of millions of dollars on football stadiums when down the road the school system is crumbling?
 

Krejlooc

Banned
America is amazing. Why does a high school need a massive stadium like that
Are tens of thousands of people interested in watching kids play football?

In 2013, the Texas 5-A Highschool football state championship game drew an attendance of 54,347.
 

Eusis

Member
Can your fancy smancy evolution sell tickets or catch a ball?

Didn't think so
Yes actually since otherwise we'd be bacteria, if not mere molecules incapable of doing anything.

Unfortunately evolution apparently also instilled a deep fascination with being able to catch balls and count up the money from those sold tickets. A terrible catch 22.
 
McKinney isn't rich. It's middle class at best. But they are outside of DISD, so they are unburdened from the astonishing debt.

I think this shit is cruel as fuck. Dallas is a metroplex area. How can you waste hundreds of millions of dollars on football stadiums when down the road the school system is crumbling?

It's the result of massive white flight. The same thing has happened in Detroit too. The old school district is saddled with massive amounts of debt through long accumulated obligations, the white people flee, incorporate in a county over, get a free interstate into town paid for by the federal government while the people who can't afford to get out to suburbia are left fucked with crumbling infrastructure and social services.

Welcome to the legacy of 1970s White America.
 
Yes actually since otherwise we'd be bacteria, if not mere molecules incapable of doing anything.

Unfortunately evolution apparently also instilled a deep fascination with being able to catch balls at least. A terrible catch 22.

Darwin was never football state champ.

Checkmate, evolution THEORISTS.
 

Piecake

Member
It's the result of massive white flight. The same thing has happened in Detroit too. The old school district is saddled with massive amounts of debt through long accumulated obligations, the white people flee, incorporate in a county over, get a free interstate into town paid for by the federal government while the people who can't afford to get out to suburbia are left fucked with crumbling infrastructure and social services.

Welcome to the legacy of 1970s White America.

Sadly, it is even worse than that. I think these quotes from the Warmth of Other Suns really explains it well:

Part 1: Excerpt 1
Blacks, though native born, were arriving as the poorest people from the poorest section of the country with the least access to the worst education. Over the decades of the Migration, they came with every disadvantage and found themselves competing not only with newcomers like themselves but with second- and third-generation European immigrants already established in apprenticeships and factory jobs that were closed off to black migrants, the immigrants and their children permitted into the very trade unions that prohibited black citizens from joining.

Because they were largely excluded from well-paying positions in even unskilled occupations and were concentrated in servant work and other undesirable jobs, blacks were the lowest paid of all the recent arrivals. In 1950, blacks in the North and West made a median annual income of $1,628, compared to Italian immigrants, who made $2,295, Czechs, who made $2,339, Poles, who made $2,419, and Russians, who made $2,717. “There is just no avoiding the fact that blacks were more severely discriminated against in the labor market and elsewhere,” Lieberson wrote. They “had to work more hours to earn less money than anyone else,” the historian Gilbert Osofsky wrote.

The people of the Great Migration had farther to climb because they started off at the lowest rung wherever they went. They incited greater fear and resentment in part because there was no ocean between them and the North as there was with many other immigrant groups. There was no way to stem the flow of blacks from the South, as the authorities could and did by blocking immigration from China and Japan, for instance. Thus, blacks confronted hostilities more severe than most any other group (except perhaps Mexicans, who could also cross over by land), as it could not be known how many thousands more might come and pose a further threat to the preexisting world of the North.

The presence of so many black migrants elevated the status of other immigrants in the North and West. Black southerners stepped into a hierarchy that assigned them a station beneath everyone else, no matter that their families had been in the country for centuries. Their arrival unwittingly diverted anti-immigrant antagonisms their way, as they were an even less favored outsider group than the immigrants they encountered in the North and helped make formerly ridiculed groups more acceptable by comparison.

Ida Mae was so isolated, living as she was in the all-black neighborhood of South Shore, that she had little contact with other immigrant groups except perhaps at work. She tried to make the best of it since she had no control over who had gotten to Chicago before she did or how they lived or what they thought of her. Her world was small, purposely so, built around her family and the people she knew from back home in Mississippi, and that was the way she and her husband preferred it.

Excerpt 2
By the time George managed to find steady work, he was joining the forty percent of black men doing unskilled or semiskilled work in Chicago in the 1940s. Another thirty-four percent of black men were working as servants, meaning that, for three out of four black men, the only work they could get was work that nobody else wanted—lowly and menial or hard, dangerous, and dirty. Nearly the inverse was true for white men, the majority of whom—some sixty percent—were doing skilled, clerical, business, or professional work, clean indoor jobs.

The ceiling was even lower and the options fewer for colored women, a situation that was making it even harder for Ida Mae to find work. By 1940, two out of every three colored women in Chicago were servants, as against seventeen percent of white women (most of those newly arrived immigrants). Only a fraction of colored women—a mere seven percent—were hired to do clerical work—common and upstanding positions for women of the day—compared to forty-three percent of white women.

Under these conditions, Ida Mae and George found themselves at the bottom looking up at the layers of immigrants, native-born white people, and even northern-born black people who were stacked above them in the economic hierarchy of the North. It was all well and good that George now had a job at Campbell Soup. But they would never be able to get settled in Chicago until Ida Mae found reliable work. So Ida set out to look whenever George wasn’t at work and, the rest of the time, took care of the children.

Excerpt 3
Ida Mae soon discovered that there really was no getting out, not right off anyway. “Negro migrants confronted a solid wall of prejudice and labored under great disadvantages in these attempts to find new homes,” Abbott wrote. The color line in Chicago confined them to a sliver of the least desirable blocks between the Jewish lakefront neighborhoods to the east and the Irish strongholds to the west, while the Poles, Russians, Italians, Lithuanians, Czechs, and Serbs, who had only recently arrived themselves, were planting themselves to the southwest of the colored district.

With several thousand black southerners arriving each month in the receiving cities of the North and no extra room being made for them, “attics and cellars, store-rooms and basements, churches, sheds and warehouses,” according to Abraham Epstein in his study of the early migration, were converted to contain all the new arrivals. There was “rarely a place in these rooms for even suitcases or trunks.”

People like Ida Mae had few options, and the landlords knew it. New arrivals often paid twice the rent charged the whites they had just replaced for worn-out and ill-kept housing. “The rents in the South Side Negro district were conspicuously the highest of all districts visited,” Abbott wrote. Dwellings that went for eight to twenty dollars a month to white families were bringing twelve to forty-five dollars a month from black families, those earning the least income and thus least able to afford a flat at any rent, in the early stages of the Migration. Thus began a pattern of overcharging and underinvestment in black neighborhoods that would lay the foundation for decades of economic disparities in the urban North.

Ida Mae tried never to worry about things she couldn’t change and so made do with what they could get. She wasn’t the only one. “Lodgers were not disposed to complain about the living conditions or the prices charged,” Epstein wrote. “They were only too glad to secure a place where they could share a half or at least a part of an unclaimed bed.”
The story played out in virtually every northern city—migrants sealed off in overcrowded colonies that would become the foundation for ghettos that would persist into the next century. These were the original colored quarters—the abandoned and identifiable no-man’s-lands that came into being when the least-paid people were forced to pay the highest rents for the most dilapidated housing owned by absentee landlords trying to wring the most money out of a place nobody cared about.

Excerpt 4
It seemed as if little had changed from the hostilities of the early years of the Migration, when colored tenants on Vincennes Avenue got the following notice: “We are going to blow these flats to hell and if you don’t want to go with them you had better move at once. Only one warning.” The letter writers carried out their threat. Three bombs exploded over the following two weeks.

Thirty years later, things were no better and may actually have been worse, as the black belt strained to hold the migrants still pouring in even as the borders with white neighborhoods were being more vigorously defended.

By the late 1950s, Ida Mae and George, now both working blue-collar jobs and their children now adults and with blue-collar jobs of their own, were dreaming of finding a place where they could pool their incomes and live together under one roof. But it would be some time before they were in a position to act or could find a safe and affordable place to go.

At the same time, an urban turf war had risen up around them. Bombings, shootings, riots, or threats greeted the arrival of nearly every new colored family in white-defended territory. The biggest standoffs came between the groups with the most in common, save race: the working-class white immigrants and the working-class black migrants, both with similar backgrounds and wanting the same thing—good jobs and a decent home for their families—but one group not wanting to be anywhere near the other and literally willing to fight to the death to keep the other out.

Excerpt 4
The migrants brought new life to the old black neighborhoods. But by their sheer numbers, they pressed down upon the colored people already there. Slumlords made the most of it by subdividing what housing there was into smaller and smaller units and investing as little as possible in the way of upkeep to cash in on the bonanza. It left well-suited lawyers and teachers living next to sharecroppers in head scarves just off the Illinois Central. The middle-class and professional people searched for a way out. “They tried to insulate themselves by moving further south along the narrow strip that defined the gradually expanding South Side Black Belt,” wrote the historian James Grossman. “But the migrants inevitably followed.”

Unlike their white counterparts, the old settlers had few places to go and were met with hostility and violence if they ventured into white neighborhoods. The color line hemmed them in—newcomers and old-timers alike—as they all struggled to move up. “The same class of Negroes who ran us away from Thirty-seventh Street are moving out there,” a colored professional man said after moving further south to Fifty-first Street ahead of the migrants. “They creep along slowly like a disease.”

Excerpt 6
Harvey Clark was from Mississippi like Ida Mae and brought his family to Chicago in 1949 after serving in World War II. Now that they were in the big city, the couple and their two children were crammed into half of a two-room apartment. A family of five lived in the other half. Harvey Clark was paying fifty-six dollars a month for the privilege, up to fifty percent more than tenants in white neighborhoods paid for the same amount of space. One-room tenement life did not fit them at all. The husband and wife were college-educated, well-mannered, and looked like movie stars. The father had saved up for a piano for his eight-year-old daughter with the ringlets down her back but had no place to put it. He had high aspirations for their six-year-old son, who was bright and whose dimples could have landed him in cereal commercials.

The Clarks felt they had to get out. By May of 1951, they finally found the perfect apartment. It had five rooms, was clean and modern, was closer to the bus terminal, and cost only sixty dollars a month. That came to four dollars a month more for five times more space. It was just a block over the Chicago line, at 6139 West Nineteenth Street, in the working-class suburb of Cicero. The Clarks couldn’t believe their good fortune.

Cicero was an all-white town on the southwest border of Chicago. It was known as the place Al Capone went to elude Chicago authorities back during Prohibition. The town was filled with first- and second-generation immigrants—Czechs, Slavs, Poles, Italians. Some had fled fascism and Stalinism, not unlike blacks fleeing oppression in the South, and were still getting established in the New World. They lived in frame cottages and worked the factories and slaughterhouses. They were miles from the black belt, isolated from it, and bent on keeping their town as it was.

That the Clarks turned there at all was an indication of how closed the options were for colored families looking for clean, spacious housing they could afford. The Clarks set the move-in date for the third week of June. The moving truck arrived at 2:30 in the afternoon. White protesters met them as the couple tried to unload the truck. “Get out of Cicero,” the protesters told them, “and don’t come back.”

As the Clarks started to enter the building, the police stopped them at the door. The police took sides with the protesters and would not let the Clarks nor their furniture in. “You should know better,” the chief of police told them. “Get going. Get out of here fast. There will be no moving in that building.” The Clarks, along with their rental agent, Charles Edwards, fled the scene. “Don’t come back in town,” the chief reportedly told Edwards, “or you’ll get a bullet through you.”

The Clarks did not let that deter them but sued and won the right to occupy the apartment. They tried to move in again on July 11, 1951. This time, a hundred Cicero housewives and grandmothers in swing coats and Mamie Eisenhower hats showed up to heckle them. The couple managed to get their furniture in, but as the day wore on, the crowds grew larger and more agitated. A man from a white supremacy group called the White Circle League handed out flyers that said, KEEP CICERO WHITE. The Clarks fled.

A mob stormed the apartment and threw the family’s furniture out of a third-floor window as the crowds cheered below. The neighbors burned the couple’s marriage license and the children’s baby pictures. They overturned the refrigerator and tore the stove and plumbing fixtures out of the wall. They tore up the carpet. They shattered the mirrors. They bashed in the toilet bowl. They ripped out the radiators. They smashed the piano Clark had worked overtime to buy for his daughter. And when they were done, they set the whole pile of the family’s belongings, now strewn on the ground below, on fire.

In an hour, the mob “destroyed what had taken nine years to acquire,” wrote the historian Stephen Grant Meyer of what happened that night. The next day, a full-out riot was under way. The mob grew to four thousand by early evening as teenagers got out of school, husbands returned home from work, and all of them joined the housewives who had kept a daylong vigil in protest of the Clarks’ arrival. They chanted, “Go, go, go, go.” They hurled rocks and bricks. They looted. Then they firebombed the whole building. The bombing gutted the twenty-unit building and forced even the white tenants out. The rioters overturned police cars and threw stones at the firefighters who were trying to put out the blaze.

Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson had to call in the National Guard, the first time the Guard had been summoned for a racial incident since the 1919 riots in the early years of the Migration. It took four hours for more than six hundred guardsmen, police officers, and sheriff’s deputies to beat back the mob that night and three more days for the rioting over the Clarks to subside. A total of 118 men were arrested in the riot. A Cook County grand jury failed to indict any of the rioters.

Town officials did not blame the mob for the riot but rather the people who, in their view, should never have rented the apartment to the Clarks in the first place. To make an example of such people, indictments were handed down against the rental agent, the owner of the apartment building, and others who had helped the Clarks on charges of inciting a riot. The indictments were later dropped. In spite of everything, the Clarks still felt they had a right to live in a city with good, affordable housing stock. But the racial hostility made it all but impossible to return.

Excerpt 5
The consequences of white flight were devastating to urban neighborhoods. It destabilized the neighborhood, causing housing prices to plummet and local businesses to flee. The people who moved in were forced to live in cramped conditions, paid excessively high rents, and could only work the worst sorts of jobs. The following excerpts talk about white flight and the consequences of it, and urban decay.

It was an article of faith among many people in Chicago and other big cities that the arrival of colored people in an all-white neighborhood automatically lowered property values. That economic fear was helping propel the violent defense of white neighborhoods. The fears were not unfounded, but often not for the reasons white residents were led to believe, sociologists, economists, and historians have found. And the misunderstanding of the larger forces at work and the scapegoating of colored migrants, those with the least power of all, made the violence all the more tragic.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, the decline in property values and neighborhood prestige was a by-product of the fear and tension itself, sociologists found. The decline often began, they noted, in barely perceptible ways, before the first colored buyer moved in.

The instability of a white neighborhood under pressure from the very possibility of integration put the neighborhood into a kind of real estate purgatory. It set off a downward cycle of anticipation, in which worried whites no longer bought homes in white neighborhoods that might one day attract colored residents even if none lived there at the time. Rents and purchase prices were dropped “in a futile attempt to attract white residents,” as Hirsch put it. With prices falling and the neighborhood’s future uncertain, lenders refused to grant mortgages or made them more difficult to obtain. Panicked whites sold at low prices to salvage what equity they had left, giving the homeowners who remained little incentive to invest any further to keep up or improve their properties.
Thus many white neighborhoods began declining before colored residents even arrived, Hirsch noted. There emerged a perfect storm of nervous owners, falling prices, vacancies unfillable with white tenants or buyers, and a market of colored buyers who may not have been able to afford the neighborhood at first but now could with prices within their reach. The arrival of colored home buyers was often the final verdict on a neighborhood’s falling property value rather than the cause of it. Many colored people, already facing wage disparities, either could not have afforded a neighborhood on the rise or would not have been granted mortgages except by lenders and sellers with their backs against the wall. It was the falling home values that made it possible for colored people to move in at all.

The downward spiral created a vacuum that speculators could exploit for their own gain. They could scoop up properties in potentially unstable white neighborhoods and extract higher prices from colored people who were anxious to get in and were accustomed to being overcharged in the black belt. “The panic peddler and the ‘respectable’ broker earned the greatest profits,” Hirsch wrote, “from the greatest degree of white desperation.”

Excerpt 7
By the end of the year, the 7500 block of Colfax and much of the rest of South Shore went from all white to nearly totally black, which in itself might have been a neutral development, except that many houses changed hands so rapidly it was unclear whether the new people could afford the mortgages, and the rest were abandoned to renters with no investment or incentive to keep the places up. The turnover was sudden and complete and so destabilizing that it even extended to the stores on Seventy-fifth Street, to the neighborhood schools and to the street-sweeping and police patrols that could have kept up the quality of life. It was as if the city lost interest when the white people left.

The ice cream parlor closed. The five-and-dime shut down. The Walgreens on the corner became a liquor store. Karen and Kevin enrolled in Bradwell Elementary School and remember being, along with two other kids, the only black children in the entire school in 1968. By the time they graduated four years later, the racial composition had completely reversed: only four white children were left.

South Shore would become as solidly black as the North Shore was solidly white. Ida Mae’s neighborhood never had a chance to catch up with all the upheaval and was never the same again. South Shore was one of the last white strongholds on the South Side, the completion of a cycle that had begun when the migrants first arrived and started looking for a way out of the tenements. There were fifty-eight bombings of houses that blacks moved into or were about to move into between 1917 and 1921 alone, bombings having become one of the preferred methods of intimidation in the North. In neighborhood after neighborhood, with the arrival of black residents the response during the Migration years was swift and predictable.

Excerpt 8
With all that grew out of this mass movement of people, did the Great Migration achieve the aim of those who willed it? Were the people who left the South—and their families—better off for having done so? Was the loss of what they left behind worth what confronted them in the anonymous cities they fled to?

Throughout the Migration, social scientists all but concluded that the answer to those questions was no, that the Migration had led to the troubles of the urban North and West, most scholars blaming the dysfunction of the inner cities on the migrants themselves. The migrants were cast as poor illiterates who imported out-of-wedlock births, joblessness, and welfare dependency wherever they went. “Masses of ignorant, uncouth, and impoverished migrants flooded the city,” the sociologist E. Franklin Frazier wrote of the migration to Chicago, “and changed the whole structure of the Negro community.” The presence of the migrants “in such large numbers crushed and stagnated the progress of Negro life,” the economist Sadie Mossell wrote early in the migration to Philadelphia.

Newly available census records suggest the opposite to be true. According to a growing body of research, the migrants were, it turns out, better educated than those they left behind in the South and, on the whole, had nearly as many years of schooling as those they encountered in the North. Compared to the northern blacks already there, the migrants were more likely to be married and remain married, more likely to raise their children in two-parent households, and more likely to be employed. The migrants, as a group, managed to earn higher incomes than northern-born blacks even though they were relegated to the lowest-paying positions. They were less likely to be on welfare than the blacks they encountered in the North, partly because they had come so far, had experienced such hard times, and were willing to work longer hours or second jobs in positions that few northern blacks, or hardly anyone else for that matter, wanted, as was the case with Ida Mae Gladney, George Swanson Starling, Robert Foster, and millions of others like them.

And we have an education system that is funded by its locality and cities that are a part of the same metropolis that don't share taxes. Probably some of the most unjust and unequal shit right there.
 

KodaRuss

Member
Three highschools are going to share the stadium. Not that ridiculous compared to many other cities in Texas. McKinney is just booming right now too. Tons of population growth over the past 10 years
 

Iorv3th

Member
Sec still will produce better football players

You mean the kids they draft from Texas highschools?

And yet the textbooks are still from the 80's.

No........The school in my town gets new textbooks every single year.


Maybe voters will stop it from going through. Though it seems every time they put up a bond proposal around us they pass it. Highest paid employee at many of the schools are the coaches. The basketball coach here is the highest paid and they had to give the superintendent a raise just to keep him (nobody can make more than the superintendent).
 

Zoe

Member
I don't know the specifics in this case, but there are many Texas suburbs that are having to build new district-wide stadiums due to old/failing infrastructure as well as the population outgrowing capacity. It also allows the districts to host more events as opposed to having to depend on other districts.

And stadiums aren't only used by football.
 

Krejlooc

Banned
I don't know the specifics in this case, but there are many Texas suburbs that are having to build new district-wide stadiums due to old/failing infrastructure as well as the population outgrowing capacity. It also allows the districts to host more events as opposed to having to depend on other districts.

And stadiums aren't only used by football.

they are like 5 miles away from another 20,000 seat, $60 million dollar stadium.

And even closer to Jerryworld.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom