donny2112 said:
The shipment rules it out from being an unqualified positive, though. It's not a negative, but it's not a clear positive, either.
No it doesn't. I'm not sure what you're trying to say here but there is nothing unqualified about MH3 being a successful release. It sold more than the previous games, and it has sold consistently even after the first week. The game is not being cleared at a ridiculous price by all major retailers, and it's the best selling third party game on the Wii.
An additional shipment is not a requirement for something to be a success. You're just making up rules in your head now to determine how is it not a clear position. If that's the case, you can make up these rules and play on your own, no one else is bothered.
It barely beat out the BEST re-release of Yakuza 1, and sold less than Yakuza 2. "But the userbase!" I'm looking for unqualified positives.
I never said anything about the userbase. You're just imagining this shit. You're making a really random comparison by saying it "barely beat out the BEST re-release of Yakuza 1". Why are you even comparing a 20 dollar re-release with a full price new sequel?
It sold more than the original Yakuza 1, and it sold much more than Kenzan. It didn't sell more than Yakuza 2, sure, but so what? Does that mean it's not a positive release? It's the third game in the series. RE3 didn't sell more than RE2, does that mean RE3 is not a positive in terms of sales now?
Seriously... trying to say sequel which sold 480k in a series that does 400k or so on average, is not a positive, is just talking out of your ass.
RE5 (PS360) did comparably to RE4 (GCN/PS2). However, RE4 GCN was hurt by the early announcement of PS2 RE4, and PS2 RE4 was hurt by the months earlier release of GCN RE4. The much better option there (from a sales perspective) would've been a simultaneous release or no GCN version, at all, but regardless, RE4 was a disappointment in sales following RE1/2/3. Matching up to a disappointment isn't what I'm looking for here.
Okay, this proves it once and for all. YOU are the one creating these qualifiers, and making these weird nonsensical rules about what counts and what doesn't. Based on this alone, basically what you're saying is that any franchise which has dipped in sales volume from a much higher original volume earlier on in the series, can NEVER count again as a success or a positive, unless it returns to selling what it used to sell originally. That's bullshit.
I'm done.