www.rollingstone.com
Lostprophets Singer and Convicted Pedophile Ian Watkins Stabbed in Prison
Former Lostprophets singer and convicted pedophile Ian Watkins sustained multiple stab wounds after being held hostage by fellow inmates Saturday.
He's a big time cuck.
Apparently, he was the alt of Vawn, another fanatical console warrior of the distant past.
I am Nostradamus.Captain Toad is back!
I wonder how long until he gets banned again..
I'm thinking he won't make it past November.
Why did you buy the game if you're unfamiliar with D & D?Catch up on work after being gone or play BG3…………..
…………………?
I have no idea how to D&D
I’m D&D curiousWhy did you buy the game if you're unfamiliar with D & D?
LolEviLore can you unlock the aliens & ufos thread please? I prefer discussing the topic here as opposed to reddit as the smaller, more select group of posters means there's less noise and it's easier to follow.
It got stupid.
That sounds a bit much imo. Is there such a thing in the Christian thread? Do we ask them to justify their beliefs? Aliens should be a fun topic. Not something to be "justified"
I agree with lumping the aliens thread with the Christian thread fwiw
Of course you do
Wait wait I made an edit
Oh yeah. That makes it better. Have a blessed day.
Thank you! You too!
Reasonable to your standards is not everyone's. I don't think it's remotely unreasonable to believe in alien life. Maybe some people got to heavy into conspiracy theories in the thread. Idk. I only checked in once and a while.
I don’t think it’s unreasonable to believe in alien life. I do think it’s really difficult to believe in alien life here on earth because of what we know about physics, and because the evidence is fleeting and much more plausibly explained by other answers.
In some aspects, yes. Some people can be stricter than others in terms of "reasonableness". However, there should be a pretty clear line on what kinds of evidence is considered acceptable to warrant justified belief. The more we consider "reasonable evidence" a subjectively relative standard than a quantifiable objective one, the more we are prone to logically unjustified beliefs.
On that I definitely agree. The possibility of intelligent life existing during the same time as us is incredibly low, but given the vast scale of the universe it's very reasonable to assume that intelligent life exists somewhere out there. However, given that immense vastness between galaxies and even between solar systems, it is unreasonable to think that they've actually visited Earth and that our government is covering it up. Those are two huge assumptions that need more evidence than just "some guy said so".
Probably. I didn't actually check. Maybe I should lol.
Grildon Tundy
's thread here: https://www.neogaf.com/threads/expl...arth-originating-from-another-planet.1659281/You had me at Fermi paradoxWe were having that in
From what I could tell, the Aliens and UFO thread was recently more about the recent testimonials before Congress, which lead people to overhype the findings.
I'm more than happy to discuss concepts like the Fermi Paradox and what not. I'm less than happy to discuss whether or not the current evidence for aliens visiting Earth should be categorized as "strong evidence" when it very clearly isn't.
Is she a blonde or a brunette?
Nobody_Important
post feet pls
adamsapple
a month+ ban?
Aye, I've decided to carry on the Toad legacy.
