Is opencritic stupid?
![]()
The game itself is deep and elegant even by today's standards, so if they've recreated it successfully then it's a 90. Unfortunately the UE5 fears have come to pass, no stuttering though from the sound of it which is a plus.86 metascore is much, much higher than I expected, now I'm excited, seriously.
Some of these people think they're Hunter S. Thompson and T.S. Eliot illegitimate love child and that their genius is simply stuck in the gaming ghetto for now.This review is absolutely stupid and nonsensical. Some people should not write reviews or even have the privilege to reviewing games
The worst part is that its been a couple of hours since the review was uploaded and they still haven't changed it. Its so stupid
Go right ahead, see what happens.Does this game have scores like in MGS V? Or can I kill everyone with no repercussions?
Does this game have scores like in MGS V? Or can I kill everyone with no repercussions?
I mean, they're reviewers, some of them always have been and nothing has changed. Just depends on who you want to flock to.They have to use Ai or DEI people that are clinically retarded.
Yup, it's why I never understood review praise. People talk mess about reviewers, but then they still crave their numbers, lol. If anything looking at the total summed percentage is enough to go, "Oh, okay it's apparently pretty good" or "it's shit". Finding out for yourself is the best method, especially if it's something you're genuinely interested in IMO.Some of these people think they're Hunter S. Thompson and T.S. Eliot illegitimate love child and that their genius is simply stuck in the gaming ghetto for now.
They're just waffling goofballs. They can write all they want though, I think it's funny.
Good reviews but it needs patches to fix performance.
Yup, going to wait for patches on PC before jumping in.
Does this game have scores like in MGS V? Or can I kill everyone with no repercussions?
Why you wanted something different from a remake/remaster of MGS3 in particular? Game was great back in the day, now it has great graphics, doesn't need to change anything, well, except some of the stupid kerotan locations...Yeah, it's just a glorified Remaster, as expected. Gonna buy it anyway.
A good Remake can stand on it's own alongside the original - see RE1+2+3+4 Remakes. Upgrading the graphics is nice and all but I think it's a waste, especially because a Remaster of the Original was released on the current gen not long ago. What the point of that Remaster now with the release of the Remake?Why you wanted something different from a remake/remaster of MGS3 in particular? Game was great back in the day, now it has great graphics, doesn't need to change anything, well, except some of the stupid kerotan locations...
It really is just playing the game from 2004 with "better" graphics
I said "otherwise" in my post. Throwing a good model and pairing it with the skeleton of a 2004 game is not better. The eyes don't fucking move!They've been saying that from Day 1. And it does look a lot better, don't know how you can say otherwise.
What do you think the Solid in the title means? A Solid 60fps, but no more.capped to 60FPS on PC ....
We are laughing.gif