I also remember this being mentioned here. We'll see come tonight.Trip Warhawkins said:Don't be so sure, the big media outlets here have also ignored the issue, I remember brief mentions of it back in April.
Honestly, I wouldn't use the word "social" to describe the effects cocaine and ecstasy have on people.Chichikov said:So a social alcohol usage is possible but social cocaine or ecstasy isnt?
Your logic is amazing.
And of all the controlled substance (outside maybe some exotic shit) alcohol users are the most likely to harm others.
By far.
Uh, until the product can't be sold at a ridiculous profit right across the border, they won't go away.Kipz said:Only until the government controls the production and selling of drugs will the cartels go away.
Kipz said:Only until the government controls the production and selling of drugs will the cartels go away.
Kipz said:Only until the government controls the production and selling of drugs will the cartels go away.
Boogie said:And what colour is the sky in your world?
teh_pwn said:A step in the right direction, but we've got to do something similar too because America is a huge buyer market for these drug cartels. Offer treatment for addicts, and stop putting them in jail. Because the only way to get rid of a drug dealer is to legalize and control the substance. Any other approach is not effective.
One of the primary effects of ecstasy is highly elevated levels of empathy. So, wrong.TitaniumGroceries said:Honestly, I wouldn't use the word "social" to describe the effects cocaine and ecstasy have on people.
Are you saying you'd do heroin if it was legal? I sure wouldn't . . . nor would most people.TitaniumGroceries said:The effects of alcohol, especially when it's merely social drinking, don't reach the level of cocaine, ecstasy and crystal methamphetamine. Not everyone who has a drink goes black-out drunk, and thank god, because there are a lot of people who drink. Throw enough heroin around and things will go bad even before all the infections and disease spread from shared intravenous needles.
EschatonDX said:Canada, you should do this too.
Maybe then America will consider it.
Mercury Fred said:Yeah, that stuff is nice, but seeing some federal action on drug laws, the prison system, marriage equality and capital punishment would be excellent.
The U.S. is an embarrassment now.
By what I understand, aren't pot laws very laxly enforced in Canada? It is not officially decriminalized but not really enforced much either.EschatonDX said:Canada, you should do this too.
Maybe then America will consider it.
JGS said:This won't get rid of the drug dealer. Even if drugs were legalized, not 5 grams decriminalized, it would not stop a drug dealer/cartel, just like the prohibition ending didn't stop the Mafia.
Illegal cigarettes are selling fine and dandy despite tobacco being legal for forever. If anything this makes the cartels wealthier, because demand will go up from all those people that were too afraid to try drugs for fear of getting caught.
The same thing would happen in the US.
My opinion is that although it's silly to lock people up for possessing it recreationally, it should always be fineable. If I get a ticket for not wearing a seat belt, then Mr. Cokehead should at least get an equal fine for possession.
The law defines "personal use" amounts for drugs, also including LSD and methamphetamines.
Yeah, I'm sure there were tons of Al Capones after the end of prohibition. Oh wait, no there weren't.fortified_concept said:I'm sorry but your comparison is terrible. If anything you prove that the legalization of drugs would get rid of the drug dealers 99% of the time just like the end of prohibition decimated the alcohol dealers.
If this man runs for any office, I will donate (even though he probably doesn't need the money).Mercury Fred said:Yeah, that stuff is nice, but seeing some federal action on drug laws, the prison system, marriage equality and capital punishment would be excellent.
The U.S. is an embarrassment now.
Kipz said:Yeah, I'm sure there were tons of Al Capones after the end of prohibition. Oh wait, no there weren't.
speculawyer said:By what I understand, aren't pot laws very laxly enforced in Canada? It is not officially decriminalized but not really enforced much either.
Well, President Bush is no longer in office. There is a new mellow sheriff in town.thefit said:I'm surprised because when the original bill was brought to then president Fox, the Bush white house immediately jumped on it and it was all over the news. Its really like this time they just said fuck it and passed it to get tourism up:lol
Most people use meth and crack because they're dirt cheap and readily available. I imagine few would touch them if other drugs were cheaper and more available.teh_pwn said:Methamphetamine makes respectable people paranoid and shoot children because they're "out to get them." The drug should never be legal. But offering rehabilitation without jail time (if there's no violence) is the way to go.
EschatonDX said:Canada, you should do this too.
Maybe then America will consider it.
speculawyer said:By what I understand, aren't pot laws very laxly enforced in Canada? It is not officially decriminalized but not really enforced much either.
fortified_concept said:I'm sorry but your comparison is terrible. If anything you prove that the legalization of drugs would get rid of the drug dealers 99% of the time just like the end of prohibition decimated the alcohol dealers. Mafia lost huge profits and was forced to downsize.
Stop wasting the time of the police. Just tax it heavily. Raise revenue and discourage the behavior.JGS said:My opinion is that although it's silly to lock people up for possessing it recreationally, it should always be fineable. If I get a ticket for not wearing a seat belt, then Mr. Cokehead should at least get an equal fine for possession.
I've had some really strong acid here (microdots), which was just as heavy (if not more) as the american ones I've tried (drops, paper and geltabs). Hoffmans aren't unknown here, y'know.Death Dealer said:What are the odds of finding real acid in Mexico ? .001%?
Are they going to be easier on sellers ?
I'd love to see Amsterdam style smart shops in TJ. :lol
JGS said:This won't get rid of the drug dealer. Even if drugs were legalized, not 5 grams decriminalized, it would not stop a drug dealer/cartel, just like the prohibition ending didn't stop the Mafia.
Illegal cigarettes are selling fine and dandy despite tobacco being legal for forever. If anything this makes the cartels wealthier, because demand will go up from all those people that were too afraid to try drugs for fear of getting caught.
Boogie said:How is his comparison all that terrible when organized crime still owns half of the market for cigarettes in Canada east of Manitoba, an ostensibly "legalized" product?
Boogie said:How is his comparison all that terrible when organized crime still owns half of the market for cigarettes in Canada east of Manitoba, an ostensibly "legalized" product?
speculawyer said:Stop wasting the time of the police. Just tax it heavily. Raise revenue and discourage the behavior.
Trip Warhawkins said:I've had some really strong acid here (microdots), which was just as heavy (if not more) as the american ones I've tried (drops, paper and geltabs). Hoffmans aren't unknown here, y'know.
Yes, I had the microdot back in Halloween last year, a friend of mine always has in stock (she mainly sells x but given as acid isn't as popular getting some is rarely a problem).Death Dealer said:Wow are you from Mexico ?
I've never heard of anyone finding the real thing down there. At least not from the places gringos typically buy from. How long ago did you find the microdot ?
Fixed1979 said:What? Do you have a source for this? I would just like to read something more on this if you have a link.
According to recent threat assessments, approximately105 organized crime groups 1 of varying levels of sophistication are currently known to be involved in the illicit tobacco trade. Compounding the problem is that 69% are also involved in drug trafficking, mainly marihuana and cocaine, and/or weapons trafficking. Furthermore, 30% of these groups are known to have violent tendencies.
The Canadian tobacco industry contracted a third-party research company, GfK Group, to assess smoking trends in Canada. In June 2007, their research indicated that 22% of smokers are consuming illegal tobacco products. This estimate is up from 16.5% in 2006
fortified_concept said:I don't know what's happening east of Manitoba but you can't use anecdotal evidence to prove a point. Fact is illegal trade of legal substances like tobacco and alcohol is limited and you certainly don't hear about murder sprees between gangs that control their trade. And let's not forget that all countries make huge amounts of money by taxing them, not to mention they're able to control their quality.
Hitokage said:I tend to like the Dutch approach. Be lax on soft drugs, and then come down on hard drugs with a vengeance.
Boogie said::lol
Welcome back, F_C.
Anecdotal my fucking ass.
No murder sprees? Not quite, but you do have native Canadians taking regular target practise at the border post on Akwesasne, to the point that the Canadian Border Services Agency had to pull all their officers from the Cornwall crossing.
But you wouldn't know fuck all about that, would you?
coke, right? half a gram runs you about 15 bucks.AlternativeUlster said:How much is a half gram going to be do you guys think?
fortified_concept said:No I wouldn't because I don't know what happening east of Manitoba. But as I said your evidence is anecdotal and it's certainly not indicative of what's happening in the world. Not to mention that if we compare the trade of illegal substances to the trade of legal ones your argument crumbles immediately due to the huge difference in actual crime and illegal trading.
This makes the most sense, but I doubt it would ever be incorporated in most countries.Hitokage said:I tend to like the Dutch approach. Be lax on soft drugs, and then come down on hard drugs with a vengeance.