Mexico has decriminalized drugs for personal use. ALL OF THEM.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Only until the government controls the production and selling of drugs will the cartels go away.
 
Trip Warhawkins said:
Don't be so sure, the big media outlets here have also ignored the issue, I remember brief mentions of it back in April.
I also remember this being mentioned here. We'll see come tonight.
 
I'm surprised because when the original bill was brought to then president Fox, the Bush white house immediately jumped on it and it was all over the news. Its really like this time they just said fuck it and passed it to get tourism up:lol
 
Chichikov said:
So a social alcohol usage is possible but social cocaine or ecstasy isn’t?
Your logic is amazing.
And of all the controlled substance (outside maybe some exotic shit) alcohol users are the most likely to harm others.
By far.
Honestly, I wouldn't use the word "social" to describe the effects cocaine and ecstasy have on people.
 
Kipz said:
Only until the government controls the production and selling of drugs will the cartels go away.
Uh, until the product can't be sold at a ridiculous profit right across the border, they won't go away.
 
Kipz said:
Only until the government controls the production and selling of drugs will the cartels go away.

I was thinking that myself, they could seize the cartels assets including the pot fields, nationalize the product, heavily regulate and tax it. But of course the US would immediately get in the way that.
 
teh_pwn said:
A step in the right direction, but we've got to do something similar too because America is a huge buyer market for these drug cartels. Offer treatment for addicts, and stop putting them in jail. Because the only way to get rid of a drug dealer is to legalize and control the substance. Any other approach is not effective.

This won't get rid of the drug dealer. Even if drugs were legalized, not 5 grams decriminalized, it would not stop a drug dealer/cartel, just like the prohibition ending didn't stop the Mafia.

Illegal cigarettes are selling fine and dandy despite tobacco being legal for forever. If anything this makes the cartels wealthier, because demand will go up from all those people that were too afraid to try drugs for fear of getting caught.

The same thing would happen in the US.

My opinion is that although it's silly to lock people up for possessing it recreationally, it should always be fineable. If I get a ticket for not wearing a seat belt, then Mr. Cokehead should at least get an equal fine for possession.
 
TitaniumGroceries said:
Honestly, I wouldn't use the word "social" to describe the effects cocaine and ecstasy have on people.
One of the primary effects of ecstasy is highly elevated levels of empathy. So, wrong.
 
TitaniumGroceries said:
The effects of alcohol, especially when it's merely social drinking, don't reach the level of cocaine, ecstasy and crystal methamphetamine. Not everyone who has a drink goes black-out drunk, and thank god, because there are a lot of people who drink. Throw enough heroin around and things will go bad even before all the infections and disease spread from shared intravenous needles.
Are you saying you'd do heroin if it was legal? I sure wouldn't . . . nor would most people.

And alcohol is a pretty nasty drug. Yeah it is not as bad as meth or heroin. But the real point is that some people are doing these drugs no matter what but most people know the dangers and stay away. So there isn't much point in wasting police, court, and prison resources on people that abuse drugs.
 
Mercury Fred said:
Yeah, that stuff is nice, but seeing some federal action on drug laws, the prison system, marriage equality and capital punishment would be excellent.

The U.S. is an embarrassment now.

I know how pro-civil rights/equality and all of that you are, but Im sorry, that is the very least of the problems in the US. The fucking school and health systems are the main priorities, even the government seems to believe so. People wanting everything to be fixed at the same time....:lol


As for this news, is great to hear that the mexican government is playing all of their cards to fix this problem. Im glad to see that both Mexico and Colombia are putting plans in place to fight the drug cartels, hopefully there is substantial enough results.
 
This is amazing. I can't believe they actually went through with this decision. I can't imagine what has to be going through Obama's head at the moment. I can't say that I understand the reprecussions, or advantages of this decision clearly, but this will really give the cartels hell.
 
EschatonDX said:
Canada, you should do this too.

Maybe then America will consider it.
By what I understand, aren't pot laws very laxly enforced in Canada? It is not officially decriminalized but not really enforced much either.
 
JGS said:
This won't get rid of the drug dealer. Even if drugs were legalized, not 5 grams decriminalized, it would not stop a drug dealer/cartel, just like the prohibition ending didn't stop the Mafia.

Illegal cigarettes are selling fine and dandy despite tobacco being legal for forever. If anything this makes the cartels wealthier, because demand will go up from all those people that were too afraid to try drugs for fear of getting caught.

The same thing would happen in the US.

My opinion is that although it's silly to lock people up for possessing it recreationally, it should always be fineable. If I get a ticket for not wearing a seat belt, then Mr. Cokehead should at least get an equal fine for possession.

I'm sorry but your comparison is terrible. If anything you prove that the legalization of drugs would get rid of the drug dealers 99% of the time just like the end of prohibition decimated the alcohol dealers. Mafia lost huge profits and was forced to downsize.
 
The law defines "personal use" amounts for drugs, also including LSD and methamphetamines.

What are the odds of finding real acid in Mexico ? .001%?


Are they going to be easier on sellers ?
I'd love to see Amsterdam style smart shops in TJ. :lol
 
fortified_concept said:
I'm sorry but your comparison is terrible. If anything you prove that the legalization of drugs would get rid of the drug dealers 99% of the time just like the end of prohibition decimated the alcohol dealers.
Yeah, I'm sure there were tons of Al Capones after the end of prohibition. Oh wait, no there weren't.
 
Mercury Fred said:
Yeah, that stuff is nice, but seeing some federal action on drug laws, the prison system, marriage equality and capital punishment would be excellent.

The U.S. is an embarrassment now.
If this man runs for any office, I will donate (even though he probably doesn't need the money).

27416_brad_pitt_02.jpg
 
They should lift federal bans and such here in the US, but I have a feeling that this current government would only force all states to legalize it if it chose that avenue. The 10th amendment has meant nothing since that Lincoln.

I'm looking forward to shady businessmen peddling heroin through billboards in NYC. Better that money legitimately go through our economy than through poor people.
 
speculawyer said:
By what I understand, aren't pot laws very laxly enforced in Canada? It is not officially decriminalized but not really enforced much either.

It might as well be, exactly.
 
thefit said:
I'm surprised because when the original bill was brought to then president Fox, the Bush white house immediately jumped on it and it was all over the news. Its really like this time they just said fuck it and passed it to get tourism up:lol
Well, President Bush is no longer in office. There is a new mellow sheriff in town.
 
Mexico is about to begin experiencing an influx of illegal immigrants (of the American variety.) Time for a little role reversal. :D
 
teh_pwn said:
Methamphetamine makes respectable people paranoid and shoot children because they're "out to get them." The drug should never be legal. But offering rehabilitation without jail time (if there's no violence) is the way to go.
Most people use meth and crack because they're dirt cheap and readily available. I imagine few would touch them if other drugs were cheaper and more available.
 
EschatonDX said:
Canada, you should do this too.

Maybe then America will consider it.

:lol

Canada follows America's lead on initiatives such as this. We'll never have widespread decriminalization so long as America maintains prohibition. Bank on it.

speculawyer said:
By what I understand, aren't pot laws very laxly enforced in Canada? It is not officially decriminalized but not really enforced much either.

Oh, broad can of worms here.

In very general terms, mere possession of drugs nets almost zero jail time. And trafficking nets very little hard time in comparison to the USA as well.

But, in essence, ALL crimes in Canada net very little jail time. Rather frustrating, to be honest. You have people committing brutal, premeditated murders who are out of jail within 5 or 6 years here.

In spirit, though, yes, marijuana enforcement has negligible resources dedicated to it in comparison to cocaine, heroin, ecstacy and meth.

fortified_concept said:
I'm sorry but your comparison is terrible. If anything you prove that the legalization of drugs would get rid of the drug dealers 99% of the time just like the end of prohibition decimated the alcohol dealers. Mafia lost huge profits and was forced to downsize.

How is his comparison all that terrible when organized crime still owns half of the market for cigarettes in Canada east of Manitoba, an ostensibly "legalized" product?
 
JGS said:
My opinion is that although it's silly to lock people up for possessing it recreationally, it should always be fineable. If I get a ticket for not wearing a seat belt, then Mr. Cokehead should at least get an equal fine for possession.
Stop wasting the time of the police. Just tax it heavily. Raise revenue and discourage the behavior.
 
Death Dealer said:
What are the odds of finding real acid in Mexico ? .001%?


Are they going to be easier on sellers ?
I'd love to see Amsterdam style smart shops in TJ. :lol
I've had some really strong acid here (microdots), which was just as heavy (if not more) as the american ones I've tried (drops, paper and geltabs). Hoffmans aren't unknown here, y'know.
 
JGS said:
This won't get rid of the drug dealer. Even if drugs were legalized, not 5 grams decriminalized, it would not stop a drug dealer/cartel, just like the prohibition ending didn't stop the Mafia.

Illegal cigarettes are selling fine and dandy despite tobacco being legal for forever. If anything this makes the cartels wealthier, because demand will go up from all those people that were too afraid to try drugs for fear of getting caught.

He does have a point. Cigarettes are the largest smuggled product around. But then again, who the fuck cares? Yeah, they should go after them but it is not really a violent business and the biggest problem from it is reduce tax revenue.

But I totally disagree that it will make the cartels wealthier. The profit margins will go way down if something is legal and taxed.
 
Boogie said:
How is his comparison all that terrible when organized crime still owns half of the market for cigarettes in Canada east of Manitoba, an ostensibly "legalized" product?

What? Do you have a source for this? I would just like to read something more on this if you have a link.
 
Boogie said:
How is his comparison all that terrible when organized crime still owns half of the market for cigarettes in Canada east of Manitoba, an ostensibly "legalized" product?

I don't know what's happening east of Manitoba but you can't use anecdotal evidence to prove a point. Fact is illegal trade of legal substances like tobacco and alcohol is limited and you certainly don't hear about murder sprees between gangs that control their trade. And let's not forget that all countries make huge amounts of money by taxing them, not to mention they're able to control their quality.
 
speculawyer said:
Stop wasting the time of the police. Just tax it heavily. Raise revenue and discourage the behavior.

Didn't work for cigarettes.

My own father, a truck driver hauling cigarettes, was held up at gunpoint due policies similar to the ones you are espousing here.

It's not that simple.
 
Trip Warhawkins said:
I've had some really strong acid here (microdots), which was just as heavy (if not more) as the american ones I've tried (drops, paper and geltabs). Hoffmans aren't unknown here, y'know.

Wow are you from Mexico ?

I've never heard of anyone finding the real thing down there. At least not from the places gringos typically buy from. How long ago did you find the microdot ?

acid has become scarce up north in the last decade, after this guy was busted in a silo in Kansas. I read the DEA estimated he supplied 90% of the country.

There are still families around the Bay Area that do limited runs, but it's a lot more underground now it seems. I rememeber back in the 90s, everyday average weed dealers in middle america would get blotter, acid would be on the market a few times a year and everyone had it. I used to get pretty strong liquid (1-2 drops and you were frying hard for 24 hours) in SoCal around 2002, but haven't seen any in years. I occasionally eat shrooms, but there is nothing like LSD. If it's that easy to find in Mexico, I would take a road trip. I guess ask a taxi driver ?
 
Death Dealer said:
Wow are you from Mexico ?

I've never heard of anyone finding the real thing down there. At least not from the places gringos typically buy from. How long ago did you find the microdot ?
Yes, I had the microdot back in Halloween last year, a friend of mine always has in stock (she mainly sells x but given as acid isn't as popular getting some is rarely a problem).
 
Oh my god, I am so going to overdose on cocaine GAF by the end of this year. If I don't post 3 days in a row, it means AlternativeUlster died of a cocaine overdose in Mexico. I probably will have a raging boner too.
 
Fixed1979 said:
What? Do you have a source for this? I would just like to read something more on this if you have a link.

:lol


edit: though many of these links are saying that 25% of the cigarette trade in Canada are contraband. I can't find the links that said around half of the Ontario and Quebec tobacco trade is contraband.

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/ce-da/tobacco-tabac-strat-2008-eng.htm

According to recent threat assessments, approximately105 organized crime groups 1 of varying levels of sophistication are currently known to be involved in the illicit tobacco trade. Compounding the problem is that 69% are also involved in drug trafficking, mainly marihuana and cocaine, and/or weapons trafficking. Furthermore, 30% of these groups are known to have violent tendencies.

The Canadian tobacco industry contracted a third-party research company, GfK Group, to assess smoking trends in Canada. In June 2007, their research indicated that 22% of smokers are consuming illegal tobacco products. This estimate is up from 16.5% in 2006



http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/176/11/1567

http://www.otru.org/pdf/special/special_nov_2007.pdf

http://www.bizaims.com/articles/illegal+business/contraband+tobacco+canada

http://www.imperialtobaccocanada.co...83FBBFC1257291005C32CF?opendocument&DTC=&SID=

fortified_concept said:
I don't know what's happening east of Manitoba but you can't use anecdotal evidence to prove a point. Fact is illegal trade of legal substances like tobacco and alcohol is limited and you certainly don't hear about murder sprees between gangs that control their trade. And let's not forget that all countries make huge amounts of money by taxing them, not to mention they're able to control their quality.

:lol

Welcome back, F_C.

Anecdotal my fucking ass.

No murder sprees? Not quite, but you do have native Canadians taking regular target practise at the border post on Akwesasne, to the point that the Canadian Border Services Agency had to pull all their officers from the Cornwall crossing.

But you wouldn't know fuck all about that, would you?

Hitokage said:
I tend to like the Dutch approach. Be lax on soft drugs, and then come down on hard drugs with a vengeance.

Have I ever said that I like the way you think, Hito?
 
I know you can find it in El Paso for sure, dunno about SD or Laredo (wouldn't surprise me). From experience and geographical location I would hit Albuquerque or Denver for some lysergic.
 
Boogie said:
:lol

Welcome back, F_C.

Anecdotal my fucking ass.

No murder sprees? Not quite, but you do have native Canadians taking regular target practise at the border post on Akwesasne, to the point that the Canadian Border Services Agency had to pull all their officers from the Cornwall crossing.

But you wouldn't know fuck all about that, would you?

No I wouldn't because I don't know what happening east of Manitoba. But as I said your evidence is anecdotal and it's certainly not indicative of what's happening in the world. Not to mention that if we compare the trade of illegal substances to the trade of legal ones your argument crumbles immediately due to the huge difference in actual crime and illegal trading.
 
I am speechless that Mexico actually did this. I'll need a couple days to adjust to this reality. Holy motherfucking shit! This is a big deal, right? I can't comprehend this. I'm not overhyping this in my head, am I? Holy shit!

I will celebrate this week by getting high in
Illinois
 
fortified_concept said:
No I wouldn't because I don't know what happening east of Manitoba. But as I said your evidence is anecdotal and it's certainly not indicative of what's happening in the world. Not to mention that if we compare the trade of illegal substances to the trade of legal ones your argument crumbles immediately due to the huge difference in actual crime and illegal trading.

What the fuck is your definition of "anecdotal", when I can provide approximate stats for AN ENTIRE COUNTRY?

One quarter of the cigarettes smoked by a population of over 20 million is contraband. I'm not talking about a couple of friends who buy illicit smokes here.
 
On the one hand, I hate drugs (Though I am equally against laws prohbiting them while allowing cigs and booze mind you). On the other hand, my dad has been diagnosed with Glaucoma.

Were going to Mexico! :D
Hitokage said:
I tend to like the Dutch approach. Be lax on soft drugs, and then come down on hard drugs with a vengeance.
This makes the most sense, but I doubt it would ever be incorporated in most countries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom