Mexico has decriminalized drugs for personal use. ALL OF THEM.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hitokage said:
I tend to like the Dutch approach. Be lax on soft drugs, and then come down on hard drugs with a vengeance.

except Americans don't know the difference. We consider Marijuana hardcore while we consider Alcohol perfectly okay. Politicians here can't draw the line in the right place.
 
Boogie said:
What the fuck is your definition of "anecdotal", when I can provide approximate stats for AN ENTIRE COUNTRY?

One quarter of the cigarettes smoked by a population of over 20 million is contraband. I'm not talking about a couple of friends who buy illicit smokes here.
Basically he's saying [CITATION NEEDED], until then it's anecdotal.
 
Boogie said:
Didn't work for cigarettes.

My own father, a truck driver hauling cigarettes, was held up at gunpoint due policies similar to the ones you are espousing here.

It's not that simple.
I'm sorry, that's anecdotal. That doesn't count.
 
Boogie said:
What the fuck is your definition of "anecdotal", when I can provide approximate stats for AN ENTIRE COUNTRY?

Anecdotal as in anecdotal of only one area in Canada. Face it, your argument is ridiculous. Anyone who compares the illegal trading of cigarettes to that of illegal drugs and tries to convince that they're not that different in scale or violence is trying too hard. The trading of smuggled cigarettes isn't as widespread and the the violence resulting from it isn't even a fraction of the violence resulting from the trading of illegal drugs even though cigarettes are waaaay more mainstream than drugs.
 
fortified_concept said:
Anecdotal as in anecdotal of only one area in Canada.

"One area" equaling more than half the population of the entire country.

Face it, your argument is ridiculous. Anyone who compares the illegal trading of cigarettes to that of illegal drugs and tries to convince that they're not that different in scale or violence is trying too hard.

:lol :lol :lol

Spoken like someone who doesn't deal with this shit day in and day out.

Never change, fortified.

The trading of smuggled cigarettes isn't as widespread and the the violence resulting from it isn't even a fraction of the violence resulting from the trading of illegal drugs even though cigarettes are waaaay more mainstream than drugs.

Again, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Is the potential for violence in the trafficking of illegal drugs such as cocaine, heroin, meth, etc. greater than for contraband smokes? Yes, absolutely.

Is it in entirely different league from it? No, absolutely not, and all you'd have to do is talk to some of the Customs officers and RCMP members who deal with this sort of thing to establish that.

but you live in magical left-wing fantasyland, so you don't have to accept my word for it.
 
Sweet, Im gonna stand right by the border patrol and snort some coke right in front of the american patrol officers, laugh then walk through.:D
 
EschatonDX said:
This will increase drug traffick in mexico, right? How big of an increase are we talking here?


let's just say that some of my family members from down there now wants to move over here cuz they fear is gonna get a whole lot worse with the violence...
 
EschatonDX said:
This will increase drug traffick in mexico, right? How big of an increase are we talking here?

Pretty much. There's not really any way that this is a good idea for Mexico whatsoever.
 
Ninja Scooter said:
Time to visit the motherland

I'm surprised it wasn't you posting the take-off picture. :p

Eltacoman said:
Sweet, Im gonna stand right by the border patrol and snort some coke right in front of the american patrol officers, laugh then walk through.

I think that can still be jail time, given the cop has seen you snorting the coke. Plus don't the border offices have cameras? Yeah, good job letting them jail you. :|
 
damn, but the personal use limit is very very low when it comes to methamphetamine and LSD.

just wait and see how this one will work out, can't wait to see bill mahers comments on this news :D
 
Boogie said:
Again, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Is the potential for violence in the trafficking of illegal drugs such as cocaine, heroin, meth, etc. greater than for contraband smokes? Yes, absolutely.

Thank you for proving our point. If we also take into account that cigarettes are much more mainstream than drugs we come to the conclusion that the legalization of a substance drastically reduces violence and illegal trafficking.

The rest of your post is your typical spinning and gloating about how experienced you are about this stuff.
 
Mexico stopped being exclusively a drug exporting country to become a consumer one not long ago. Drug use has increased greatly in the last 10 years, so I don't think we'll see a significant increase because of this law. It is, like our beloved lawmakers say, a simple distinction of the individuals involved indirectly in the so called drug war. I'm personally benefited but in reality I would rather pay a tax in exchange for quality weed.
 
i think this will work out for the better for mexico, but however it goes, there'll be valuable lessons to learn..
 
Megadragon15 said:
I'm guessing this is Mexico's "nuclear option" when it came to fighting drug cartels.


Great opportunity for a brave experiment. Good luck. be funny to see cartels corrupting politicians to enforce harsher drug laws to drive prices back up. and by funny I mean tragic.
 
OuterWorldVoice said:
Great opportunity for a brave experiment. Good luck. be funny to see cartels corrupting politicians to enforce harsher drug laws to drive prices back up. and by funny I mean tragic.

Yeah but, unless I'm reading the OP wrong, they haven't actually decriminalized drugs...just possession in small amounts.

So then, the low level, casual usage will increase... but it doesn't really change much of anything (except maybe increase traffic) for the big cartels with massive amounts of product.

I would think that all those theories about legalizing drugs don't really come into play here.
 
Realistically though, decriminalization is just fucking silly. Tons of the disadvantages of prohibition and less of the profits of legalization.
 
Has anyone else noticed this

Anyone caught with drug amounts under the personal-use limit will be encouraged to seek treatment, and for those caught a third time treatment is mandatory — although the law does not specify penalties for noncompliance.

wat.
 
This isn't really that big of a deal.

Marijuana is already decriminalized in many US States (including CA, woo!).

Most other drugs aren't worth messing around with.
 
Boogie said:
but you live in magical left-wing fantasyland, so you don't have to accept my word for it.

Yea you really need to live in magical left-wing fantasyland if your opinion is that the war on drugs is a huge gigantic failure that can never succeed.

And comparing the drug smuggling business with the cigarette smuggling business and from that drawing the conclusion that decriminalization is bad, just make you look dumb. Yes, there are criminals doing it, because it's overtaxed. Where there is money to be made, then people will be there trying to make money off it. If we were to criminalize tobacco use, you would have gang style cigarette murder sprees within weeks, as new groups of people tried to get their cut of the new gigantic market that just got opened.

If you really wanted to reduce cigarrette smuggling, the only - only - viable way to do it, is to lower the taxes on tobacco. But seeing as there is a lot of money to be made on taxing tobacco, we will continue to have cigarette smugglers. And whats the big deal with that? The only thing we lose is some tax income.
 
ronito said:
plane-taking-off.jpg

:lol

let's seem em try to build a wall to keep americans out.

:lol :lol :lol
 
Boogie said:
Didn't work for cigarettes.

My own father, a truck driver hauling cigarettes, was held up at gunpoint due policies similar to the ones you are espousing here.

It's not that simple.
Nothing is perfect. Yes, cigarettes are one of the biggest smuggled substances. But so what? All that means is reduced tax revenue. No big deal.
 
Get over yourselves. You don't know what decriminalization has done for countries like Portugal and Holland, you dont know. Go and find out about statistics.

Look at the number of americans (majority black of course)in jail for marijuana possession, drug addictions to meth, etc. This is the best way to lower prison pressures and the RIGHT way to treat drug addicts.

I assume its also going to help police to focus on the BIG FISH, the killers and kidnappers, who are the MAJOR PROBLEM in the Mexican drug wars.
 
EschatonDX said:
Realistically though, decriminalization is just fucking silly. Tons of the disadvantages of prohibition and less of the profits of legalization.

I dk about that. Doesn't Holland get a decent percentage off tourism and cost savings in terms of reduced legal costs?
 
A step in the right direction imo, why should people who use small amounts of drugs be punished when billions of people drink alcohol every day.

5 grams of weed for 2-3 joints is pretty weird though, with 5 grams I smoke for 2 whole weeks, everyday.

Yeah, I’m Dutch, we use tobacco in our joints. ;)
 
Nyx said:
A step in the right direction imo, why should people who use small amounts of drugs be punished when billions of people drink alcohol every day.

5 grams of weed for 2-3 joints is pretty weird though, with 5 grams I smoke for 2 whole weeks, everyday.

Yeah, I’m Dutch, we use tobacco in our joints. ;)

So tell me Nyx what are the benefits you have seen in Holland? Including what i mentioned above?
 
Nyx said:
A step in the right direction imo, why should people who use small amounts of drugs be punished when billions of people drink alcohol every day.

5 grams of weed for 2-3 joints is pretty weird though, with 5 grams I smoke for 2 whole weeks, everyday.

Yeah, I’m Dutch, we use tobacco in our joints. ;)

Maybe Mexicans don't have access to that insane super skunk you do? I know i don't and i live a lot closer to holland..=)

And dosage does depend a lot on what you are trying to achieve...

tintinrudd said:
So tell me Nyx what are the benefits you have seen in Holland? Including what i mentioned above?

One immediate benefit i can think of is that normal people who just mind their own business, do not hurt anyone, pay ther taxes - but still like to smoke a joint isn't branded a criminal and a menace to society anymore.
 
jorma said:
One immediate benefit i can think of is that normal people who just mind their own business, do not hurt anyone, pay ther taxes - but still like to smoke a joint isn't branded a criminal and a menace to society anymore.

Correct, most people don’t look weird at me when I say I smoke a joint to relax after a day of work.

Also it saves a lot of jail-space, can’t even imagine what it would be like if you get imprisoned for having 5 grams of weed in your pocket.
And I think if you look at the amount of people who smoke weed in The Netherlands, it’s probably less than in countries like the USA where it’s illegal. (percentage-wise)

Oh and it’s also nice ofcourse that I can walk into a coffeeshop to buy some, and not in some dark alley where mr. Pusherman tries to sell me some cocaine too. ;)
 
Nyx said:
Correct, most people don’t look weird at me when I say I smoke a joint to relax after a day of work.

Also it saves a lot of jail-space, can’t even imagine what it would be like if you get imprisoned for having 5 grams of weed in your pocket.
And I think if you look at the amount of people who smoke weed in The Netherlands, it’s probably less than in countries like the USA where it’s illegal. (percentage-wise)

Oh and it’s also nice ofcourse that I can walk into a coffeeshop to buy some, and not in some dark alley where mr. Pusherman tries to sell me some cocaine too. ;)

This is the thing im interested in. Does decriminalization inevitably lead to lower amounts of the worst big fish crimes. Because this is the problem, murder and kidnappings are the things that have to be stopped.
 
The surprising thing is how lsd has been mentioned specifically. This is not really in fashionat the moment, or for the last 15 years. Plus it's really hard to get hold of and make. So, it must be relatively popular over there. And there must be someone producing it.

How much are tickets to Mexico anyway? I assume quite a bit from London. And how expensive is it compared to London?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom