nib95 said:
:lol :lol
nib95 said:
the thoroughbred said:The surprising thing is how lsd has been mentioned specifically. This is not really in fashionat the moment, or for the last 15 years. Plus it's really hard to get hold of and make. So, it must be relatively popular over there. And there must be someone producing it.
How much are tickets to Mexico anyway? I assume quite a bit from London. And how expensive is it compared to London?
DY_nasty said:Now if only there was a way to combine Mexico, Amsterdam, and Japan into one fantastic, magical country...
Adult lifetime cannabis use by countryNyx said:And I think if you look at the amount of people who smoke weed in The Netherlands, its probably less than in countries like the USA where its illegal. (percentage-wise)
Mexican weed, man...Nexus Zero said:Jesus, five grams = two or three joints? That's like an eighth and a bit, right? I'm smoking some weak-ass joints...
the thoroughbred said:The surprising thing is how lsd has been mentioned specifically. This is not really in fashionat the moment, or for the last 15 years. Plus it's really hard to get hold of and make. So, it must be relatively popular over there. And there must be someone producing it.
How much are tickets to Mexico anyway? I assume quite a bit from London. And how expensive is it compared to London?
Kabouter said:Adult lifetime cannabis use by country
Canada 44.5%
United States 42.4%
New Zealand 41.9%
Denmark 36.5%
France 30.6%
United Kingdom 29.6%
Italy 29.3%
Spain 28.6%
Germany 24.5%
Netherlands 22.6%
Belgium 13%
Portugal 7.6%
Trip Warhawkins said:coke, right? half a gram runs you about 15 bucks.
Nyx said:5 grams of weed for 2-3 joints is pretty weird though, with 5 grams I smoke for 2 whole weeks, everyday.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_lifetime_cannabis_use_by_countrypermutated said:Source?
fortified_concept said:I'm sorry but your comparison is terrible. If anything you prove that the legalization of drugs would get rid of the drug dealers 99% of the time just like the end of prohibition decimated the alcohol dealers. Mafia lost huge profits and was forced to downsize.
Blutonium said:Amsterdam is a city
viakado said:let's seem em try to build a wall to keep americans out.
Kabouter said:Adult lifetime cannabis use by country
Jamaica 95%
Canada 44.5%
United States 42.4%
New Zealand 41.9%
Denmark 36.5%
France 30.6%
United Kingdom 29.6%
Italy 29.3%
Spain 28.6%
Germany 24.5%
Netherlands 22.6%
Belgium 13%
Portugal 7.6%
Those numbers are bullshit.Kabouter said:Adult lifetime cannabis use by country
Canada 44.5%
United States 42.4%
acidviper said:Those numbers are bullshit.
YOU are bullshitacidviper said:Those numbers are bullshit.
acidviper said:Those numbers are bullshit.
JGS said:You missed the point.
The legalizing of alcohol did not diminish the the criminal element, just the product. This does not even do that as drugs are still illegal. The cartels aren't going anywhere. So not only did you miss the point, you're still wrong.
The Mafia moved into illegal cigarette sales (Did you miss that?), prostitution, laundering, & were quite active and powerful way after Prohibition. Capone may have lost a bit of clout but not the Mafia. The Mafia downsized because they lost their influence - to other gangs :lol .
It's amazing how so many can try to put a rose colored sheen on things just because they want to engage in drug use. Just say that.
Amibguous Cad said:Damn good idea.
Don't know if this has been brought up, but a similar program has been very successful in Portugal. You can learn more about it here:
http://www.cato.org/event.php?eventid=5887
http://cato.everyzing.com/m/audio/22072630/drug-decriminalization-in-portugal.htm?seek=2.679
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/03/14/portugal/index.html
http://www.cato.org/pubs/wtpapers/greenwald_whitepaper.pdf
You're being willfully ignorant if you think that repealing prohibition didn't weaken organized crime. They were still around, and still fairly powerful, but nowhere near their zenith.
In any case, you're right that since sale and distribution are still illegal, this won't have much effect on the cartels. What it will do, hopefully, is stop compounding the misery drugs inflict on people by sticking them in prison for several years and getting a black mark on their record, and free up the funds used to incarcerate these people to be used elsewhere- like, say, into winning the war against the cartels.
Nizar said:damn, but the personal use limit is very very low when it comes to methamphetamine and LSD.
SuperÑ said:I guess i will never travel to Mexico.
Scuba Steve said:How does decriminalizing these drugs put an end to drug dealers?
If anything, they're business gets boosted ten fold! Theses drugs are still illegal, so a dealer is necessary for the most part to even get ahold of these drugs.
But because it's decriminalized they get more business
There's been scarce mention of the news in the big newspapers (ex. el universal). Going by the comments, lots of people are pissed off about it. Let them cry, they'll forget about it in 2 months or less, depending on the telenovela airing at the time.SSM25 said:Wait wat?. I fucking live in Mexico, how did I found about this on gaf?
jorma said:Yea you really need to live in magical left-wing fantasyland if your opinion is that the war on drugs is a huge gigantic failure that can never succeed.
And comparing the drug smuggling business with the cigarette smuggling business and from that drawing the conclusion that decriminalization is bad, just make you look dumb.
Yes, there are criminals doing it, because it's overtaxed. Where there is money to be made, then people will be there trying to make money off it. If we were to criminalize tobacco use, you would have gang style cigarette murder sprees within weeks, as new groups of people tried to get their cut of the new gigantic market that just got opened.
If you really wanted to reduce cigarrette smuggling, the only - only - viable way to do it, is to lower the taxes on tobacco. But seeing as there is a lot of money to be made on taxing tobacco, we will continue to have cigarette smugglers. And whats the big deal with that? The only thing we lose is some tax income.
speculawyer said:Nothing is perfect. Yes, cigarettes are one of the biggest smuggled substances. But so what? All that means is reduced tax revenue. No big deal.