azertydu91
Hard to Kill
Meanwhile on Reeee:FTFY
Users experimented thoughts banned.
Last edited:
Meanwhile on Reeee:FTFY
That's not the same because Microsoft is good and kind unlike Sony. Those games side with Xbox because it's the righteous path unlike Sony who pay Money to take games away...or something.Damn right like high on life, Stalker, ARK etc...But of course you'd only mention Sony....I guess it is your creative choice to omit MS.
Meanwhile on Reeee:
User experimented : thoughts banned.
I wouldn't say they have a high profit margin MS, Sony and playstation uses the majority of its revenue to pump it back into its business because of how expensive development is
At least here both sides can argue. Over there you’ll get banned for having a different opinionAs opposed to here? Lol
sounds like he is reassuring his own employees, that's allOh wow! This email from Jim Ryan!
Just a "thought experiment."sounds like he is reassuring his own employees, that's all
Imagine what it's like having zero dignity.
How? That was January 2022, long before the deal offer battles.He has lost all credibility on this merger now. Well done Jimbo!
Can you explain that? if you read the email, it's obvious he emailed employees who were worried. If your CEO came out and said we're done, I give up, would you trust him/her?He has lost all credibility on this merger now. Well done Jimbo!
He has lost all credibility on this merger now. Well done Jimbo!
Jimbo acknowledged himself that he expected to see CoD on PS platforms for many years to come.
There goes the foreclosure argument.
I won't go as far as to say 'lost all credibility' but this is certainly an important update we didn't know about before.
So was the FTC only reason to block based on Jim Ryan’s views of COD foreclosure?
Convenient to forget it’s pre contract talks.
Convenient to forget MS doesn’t want to talk about what happened during those contract talks.
Precisely. Was going by Phil's public words, until Phil started bullshitting to the public about private meetings after that email, which caused Jim Ryan to go public and reveal the "3 year deal" shit.Convenient to forget it’s pre contract talks.
Convenient to forget MS doesn’t want to talk about what happened during those contract talks.
Real talk.Considering their favorite thing yesterday was “that email was from 2019, it doesn’t count,” they should really keep quiet lol
Well convenient that neither Jim nor MS stipulate what version of COD will come to PS. Do the FTC even know Warzone is a thing?Based on what I've read in the cliff notes, their entire opening argument was about foreclosure.
Considering their favorite thing yesterday was “that email was from 2019, it doesn’t count,” they should really keep quiet lol
Considering their favorite thing yesterday was “that email was from 2019, it doesn’t count,” they should really keep quiet lol
Jimbo acknowledged himself that he expected to see CoD on PS platforms for many years to come.
There goes the foreclosure argument.
It was before the contract talks and based on Spencer's public remarks prior to said talks.Come on lol. This email they showed in the hearing is after the acquisition being announced and Jim is talking about talking to MS and Activision.
Talk about drawing false equivalencies.
It was before the contract talks and based on Spencer's public remarks prior to said talks.
My fuck, do we have to go and bring receipts, again, for the timeline for you intellectually dishonest clowns?
Some of them truly are this pathetic. In less than 24 hours as well.“This email showing why they want acquisitions doesn’t count cause it’s from 2019, but this email from before the contract talks counts because I said so” basically.
It was before the contract talks and based on Spencer's public remarks prior to said talks.
My fuck, do we have to go and bring receipts, again, for the timeline for you intellectually dishonest clowns?
“This email showing why they want acquisitions doesn’t count cause it’s from 2019, but this email from before the contract talks counts because I said so” basically.
It won't matter. You have shown to have no dignity the past 24 hours. You tucked you little tail and ran out of that other email thread.You can bring the receipts if you want, but the fact is this is communique after the acquisition was announced and Jim specifically talked to both MS and Activision before saying that he expects CoD on PS for many years to come.
This is not something Kaz Hirai sent to Shawn Layden in 2019 talking about destroying the competition lol.
Comparing this with the Booty email is false equivalency.
Feel free to reply with a gif or "ok" as needed![]()
They didn't plan on having to contend with an injunction request at this timing.Jim telling employees not to panic because he is pretty sure COD will remain for many years when it first happened does not sink the FTC's case.
On a different topic though, I'm wondering what is up with the CMA process. MS sounds like they intend to close without question if the injunction is denied. Can't help but wonder if they pulled the necessary strings in the UK already. Or if they really would pull out of the UK. These hearings would be a lot of dirty laundry getting aired for no reason if they give a crap about the CMA decision.
It won't matter. You have shown to have no dignity the past 24 hours. You tucked you little tail and ran out of that other email thread.
There is a reason why he had that tag.It won't matter. You have shown to have no dignity the past 24 hours. You tucked you little tail and ran out of that other email thread.
It won't matter. You have shown to have no dignity the past 24 hours. You tucked you little tail and ran out of that other email thread.
The Jim email is fair game if admitted into evidence (opening arguments not evidence). It will not be dispositive, as the FTC would be allowed to provide more context and evidence why they disagreed with Jim's thoughts (and/or why Jim would change his thoughts). But if would be fair game and something the judge can consider. It may even genuinely hurt the FTC case.You can bring the receipts if you want, but the fact is this is communique after the acquisition was announced and Jim specifically talked to both MS and Activision before saying that he expects CoD on PS for many years to come.
This is not something Kaz Hirai sent to Shawn Layden in 2019 talking about destroying the competition lol.
Comparing this with the Booty email is false equivalency.
Feel free to reply with a gif or "ok" as needed
Did the 2019 email talk about specific acquisitions ?
First of all, we are making jokes about the other thread.First, relax and simmer down.
Second, it is false equivalency because you're drawing a parallel between a non-specific email sent in 2019 with an email very specifically sent after this acquisition that the hearing is about being announced, directly naming all 3 key parties.
Jim telling employees not to panic because he is pretty sure COD will remain for many years when it first happened does not sink the FTC's case.
I know I am but what are you?You're all retarded