Kerotan
Member
But I like crappy games.If we forget about the crappy games in the past we are doomed to repeat making crappy games.
But I like crappy games.If we forget about the crappy games in the past we are doomed to repeat making crappy games.
That’s just not how their BC works. Not even the og emulation on the 360. They’ve always had games get repackaged in new formats for the emulator. When you put a disk in rn all it does is check to make sure it’s that game, and then download the new game package from their servers. They can’t make those new packages and let you download them without new licensing agreements.How is Analogue allowed to release FPGA retro consoles without any sort of licensing at all? Couldn't Sony and MS do the same for physical disc owners? I thought, so long as the game itself is not put up for sale, licensing is not an issue. Am I wrong here?
Imagine if MS released a "function update" for the Series X that will play the rest of your 360 and Original Xbox library, perfect or not perfect. No store involved. Isn't that how the 360 did BC? 360 had 500 Original Xbox games playable, including license heavy games. Heck, I'd love for Sony to release a new mini PS3 console that is 100% BC with PS2/PS1. I'm sure parts would perhaps be cheaper for the "emotion engine" and such. I guess a company would really need to be committed, I admit it require alot of work.
That’s just not how their BC works. Not even the og emulation on the 360. They’ve always had games get repackaged in new formats for the emulator. When you put a disk in rn all it does is check to make sure it’s that game, and then download the new game package from their servers. They can’t make those new packages and let you download them without new licensing agreements.
Licenses. There's only so much they can do with licenses owners. Some games were published by companies that even today they no longer exist, so it would be legally impossible to emulate them.But they just shut down their BC program. Where's the logic?
You can still buy the physical versions and they work without issue. Forza games delist after 5 years normally and they give plenty of notice ahead of time including a final discount.Didn't they just delist forza 7? Why can't they renew licenses for old games? They have infinite money after all.
They can and have. That's what virtual machines are for. You can use Windows XP with Word 2007 on new computers via virtual machines, since Word 2007 uses some REALLY old APIs that are no longer supported on new OSs.Maybe MS can preserve legacy PC programs like Microsoft Word 2007?
I really wish jim would do something about ps3 preservation other than shitty streaming. Its a damn shame that we cant play ps one games on ps4 or ps5 like we could on ps3. And the list of availible ps2 games is pultry at best. Sony can do so much better with this stuff, its a shame they cant be fucking assed to
You can run 2007 on W10, my father sure does that. Hell fucking ancient MS Works....*cough* works. The compatibility tab is amazing thing in Windows.They can and have. That's what virtual machines are for. You can use Windows XP with Word 2007 on new computers via virtual machines, since Word 2007 uses some REALLY old APIs that are no longer supported on new OSs.
How is Analogue allowed to release FPGA retro consoles without any sort of licensing at all?
They aren’t all worth saving. There are still a few notable exclusions though. I wonder if we might not see a few more trickle out alongside their remakes or sequels. At least for the Xbox published games that are not tied to car or sport licenses.632 games out of 2154 have been made backward compatible. Hard to believe there's not a single game out of 1522 remaining that they couldn't include. Very hard to believe.
They think its easy to port the game to the new console.because the FPGA consoles use already released and sold cartridges.
backwards compatibility on Xbox requires the games to be modified and repackaged, making them legally NEW releases that need to renew their licenses if needed and need to have the actually owner of the IP/Game to be on board
Brute forcing emulation would be an alternative that could play any game, but is really heavy on the CPU. 360 and PS3 emulation is still imperfect with really great pc dedicated CPUs, let alone console APUs.Ah ok, thanks for that. I've been seeking answers on this. That makes more sense, kinda really wish for an "all-in-one" from any company.
But they just shut down their BC program. Where's the logic?
Skies or Arcadia.....damn you took me back to some good memories, about to go watch some vids on youtube and trip through memory lane lolPreservation should be a priority for all of them.
The other day I was just thinking about the hoops I'd have to jump through just to play Skies of Arcadia. Shouldn't have to be that difficult to access software in 2021.
Brute Force?Where is Brute Force, Phil?
100% owned by Microsoft. Zero licensed music.
Corrected for accuracyGood thing the Series X can basically run anything up to Wii
CXBX-R is the one i checked and used, but it's still not good. Aroubd 10% games are playable, most with some (minor) glitches.Look for Xemu or CXBR-R, thank me later.
Sigh, another one. Maybe read what they said about their xbox/360 BC before spouting crap.But they just shut down their BC program. Where's the logic?
Damn, this is a horrible attempt at a "gotcha". Literally the single best console BC on the planet, by a large margin, and you wanna pull this shit over licensing issues? You just made his entire point, btw, that it needs to be an industry wide thing, which would make significantly easier for them to add the remaining games they are missing or, at the very least, keep these issues from happening in the future.But they just shut down their BC program. Where's the logic?
Your point is terrible. First off BC doesn't change the game software, it emulates it. The games that aren't on the platform are missing due to licensing issues, not because they need publisher permission due to changing code. Even boosted games, games that get resolution increases, and HDR aren't touched from their original state. Publisher's rights are exactly the same on XSX and PS5.My point stands. MS choose to run BC by changing the game software. And you need publisher agreement to change the software.
Do you still have the OG Ratbox to play those?!I'm a green rat now thanks in large part to being able to play Otogi 1-2.
Do you still have the OG Ratbox to play those?!
Classic rat behaviour, abandoning the console while its sinking.Sealed copies of both but not the system.
Classic rat behaviour, abandoning the console while its sinking.
Right? Like MS doesn’t have an army of lawyers and more money than God, either of which would be more than enough to make it happen. But no - “golly gee, those darn licensing issues are just too hard to solve!”632 games out of 2154 have been made backward compatible. Hard to believe there's not a single game out of 1522 remaining that they couldn't include. Very hard to believe.
Right? Like MS doesn’t have an army of lawyers and more money than God, either of which would be more than enough to make it happen. But no - “golly gee, those darn licensing issues are just too hard to solve!”
This. THIS!!Where is Brute Force, Phil?
100% owned by Microsoft. Zero licensed music.
Craig shutted down the whole thing when they changed from force to squad.Where is Brute Force, Phil?
100% owned by Microsoft. Zero licensed music.
You CAN, my point is that Microsoft had ceased support. And official support is the entire argument in this thread.They can and have. That's what virtual machines are for. You can use Windows XP with Word 2007 on new computers via virtual machines, since Word 2007 uses some REALLY old APIs that are no longer supported on new OSs.
Then make official emulators and push it on PC.
Would it not be prudent to make an offical emulator for original xbox and 360 that worked on them series consoles. I am sure Microsoft can do that and then we can all use our discs of the games we still own
There's something I still don't understand though. How come we can play every PS4 and Xbox One game without licensing issues even though they're BC? Why can't they do with older gens what they do with PS4 and Xbox One?
Okay why can't Microsoft just have a multi laser disc reader, so the console could read discs from the OG/360/One? I know PS3 basically had a PS2 inside, why can't they just do this again? I know costs but honestly it can't add that much on. If this was done, could they stop worrying about licensing? Digital would have licensing issues.
If you are a gamer , how in the world would you think this is a bad thing ? So many classic games that I would love to play in 2021 that I can't unless I go and find a ROM somewhere. But of course , you aren't allowed to ask anyone for a great rom site because that is illegal . That is what Phil is talking about it. And the legal side of things are screwing things up for all of us. Remember, just a few weeks ago , Metal Gear Solid HD collection had to be removed from the digital stores so that they can clear up some old license things.
Nope.You CAN, my point is that Microsoft had ceased support. And official support is the entire argument in this thread.
Because if you are talking about third party emulators, then there is no point having this thread at all.