Miles Quaritch
Member
It seems like a silly thing for Microsoft to do on purpose, considering it did nothing to stop IE's downward trend in market share.
Surprised to see Firefox declining. Chrome continues its inexorable rise though.
It seems like a silly thing for Microsoft to do on purpose, considering it did nothing to stop IE's downward trend in market share.
This browser shit is stupid, OSX comes with a browser and doesn't show any option window to choose other, same with Ubuntu, Android, etc...
No, you don't understand how this works. Every single operating system deployed that has an effective monopoly on some segment of the market should not be bundled with software used to gain a monopoly in another market.
Awesome. Though I think we should be fining the shit out of Apple and Google instead. Technically both are monopolies under EU law. Any reason to fine them is ok in my book, they've evaded billions in tax.
Fair enough but I just feel that the law should apply equally to everyone. For example, if Apple finds itself in a similar market position as MS in the EU then they too could be in the firing line as well ... why not nip it in the bud and make sure that all companies follow the law from the outset?
Fair enough but I just feel that the law should apply equally to everyone. For example, if Apple finds itself in a similar market position as MS in the EU then they too could be in the firing line as well ... why not nip it in the bud and make sure that all companies follow the law from the outset?
Microsoft Corp. MSFT +0.71% has been hit with a €561 million ($732.2 million) fine by European Union regulators after it broke its promise to offer millions of users of its Windows system a choice of rival Web browsers.
The European Commission said it was imposing the fine after the U.S. software giant became the first company to break a voluntary agreement with regulators, which would have allowed 15 million consumers to pick alternatives to its Internet Explorer browser.
Dumb question highlighting my pathetic ignorance of the real world --> where does this money go?
Italy, Greece, Spain... lol
While Apple and Google get away with everything in the EU.
We wish!Italy, Greece...
So it gets divided up evenly to the governments?
So is Chrome really where it's at now, I always thought firefox was the most popular.
So is Chrome really where it's at now, I always thought firefox was the most popular.
Microsoft is going to single handedly get Europe out of recession.
Where does the money go to?
That's a good question.I wish we knew the answer.
That's a good question.I wish we knew the answer.
So true...That's a good question.I wish we knew the answer.
So is Chrome really where it's at now, I always thought firefox was the most popular.
Because you are not forced to use their website it's by choice where as on windows you had no option but to use IE even to get another browser. You could argue that the most popular car manufacturers, mobile phone manufacturers ect would have to sell competitors brands at their own outlets but no one is forcing you to purchase and use only their products.Google clearly has a monopoly on search engines so why aren't they forced to offer me alternatives on their website?
Give your competitors one of the biggest markets in the world. I'm sure software and hardware manufacturers would be delighted as well.
What could possibly go wrong ?
You might have a point if Google only showed Google products if you search something.
Because you are not forced to use their website it's by choice where as on windows you had no option but to use IE even to get another browser. You could argue that the most popular car manufacturer, mobile phone manufacturer ect would have to sell competitors brands at their own outlets but no one is forcing you to purchase and use only their products.
The EU needs the money for bailing out entire bankrupt countries, of course they're looking to collect money from huge companies that they can rort under auspicious terms. I fear the "law" will be applied heavily in light of these circumstances.
I say "law" because the rules here aren't laws in the traditional sense.
Google clearly has a monopoly on search engines so why aren't they forced to offer me alternatives on their website?
It's a fucking antitrust lawsuit settlement that Microsoft agreed to and then discarded for a while
They're not going to just let that slide, as they damn well shouldn't
And I don't know why Google keeps coming up in this thread, anyone who follows the news knows that the EU and American DoJ have both been coming down on Google hard for the past few years
Always astounded how ordinary consumers stand up for huge mega-corps against their own interests. The EU has its faults but at least it's ostensibly government for the people rather than the corps. as seems to be the case in the USA.
Because google as search engine is chosen by people which type www.google.com in their browser.
google as main search engine in android thought will soon be probably countered same as IE.
They were using pre-installed software and their monopoly in the OS market to their advantage, to (unfairly) attempt to gain market share in other areas and force competitors out. You buy/use the OS, you're immediately represented with their own software to (hopefully) keep you away from competitor's software.
While Google certainly uses their status and power to their advantage, using their search engine doesn't seem to enforce their products. I don't even get their own service (Google Maps) on top when I search for a route. That said, we should keep an eye on Google as well.
So you think it's a coincidence that these fines are the largest anyone has ever seen? Sure, fine them but asking for 7bn is beyond satire.
But Microsoft employs 100,000 people, and their jobs are potentially affected by things like this.
Windows is chosen by people that go to the store any buy a Windows PC or a Windows OS.
It is not the only alternative you can buy in the market.
Once again I am reminded that GAF is always pro-corporate and anti-consumer
I don't think that's the case - I just think people here are naturally wary of punitive measures that aren't consistently applied.
Microsoft used it's monopoly on the desktop to supposedly remove competition and gets punished.
Apple uses it's monopoly on the tablet to remove competition and... nothing.
Plus the browser choice was annoying and intrusive.
I don't think that's the case - I just think people here are naturally wary of punitive measures that aren't consistently applied.
Microsoft used it's monopoly on the desktop to supposedly remove competition and gets punished.
Apple uses it's monopoly on the tablet to remove competition and... nothing.
Plus the browser choice was annoying and intrusive.
Windows is chosen by people that go to the store any buy a Windows PC or a Windows OS.
It is not the only alternative you can buy in the market.
Look up the definition of "monopoly"
A company does not have to own literally 100% of their market in order to qualify
You do not see that monopolists essentially kill jobs by removing any competition.
Monopolism is worst thing that can happen to market and government is the one that always resolve those issues.