eastwood333
Banned
What games can't you wait to play on your brand new all-American console system?
Do you have something against an "all-American console" or something? Strange comment to make.
What games can't you wait to play on your brand new all-American console system?
Where the heck do those numbers come from? By the most optimistic assessment (comparing max clock to guaranteed clock) it is more than 20% behind.lets say PS5 is 0-18% behind
Yeah, but they are also comparing different metrics.Posted previous page back, what we know so far....points as so...
Sony claims TE is roughly an entire PS4 cpu (1.6ghz 8 jagcores)
MS claims XSX-a is more powerful then entire X1X cpu. (2.6ghz 8 jagcores)
Yeah well, Audio Engineering is complicated field...for a human. How to make shit sounds good from crappy headphones to massive speakers. Not sure that this cannot be somewhat automated, compression, stereo/surround-imaging, dithering, etc...shit is not easy.Dead serious fam, one of my degrees is in Audio Engineering and Production and this thread is a few pages of people arguing that ish when I don't even care lol. As long as it sounds good lol
Well at least on the audio we know PS5's Tempest Engine is a reworked CU so roughly 285 GFLOPs raw performance there and able to take up to 20 GB/s of system bandwidth
OTOH Series X's audio solution being equivalent to One X CPU would put it at around 148 GFLOPs if this chart is to be believed. That's raw numbers, anyway. They say it's actually greater though, so it would be at least 150 GFLOPs of audio performance here, and then you also need to take architectural gains into account. I don't know the IPC gains Zen 2 has over Jaguar, but assuming it's same as RDNA1 over GCN, that'd be a 50% IPC gain, so it would be equivalent to 222 - 225 GFLOPs of the One X CPU for their audio solution (on the low end, it could be more than that in actuality).
So not quite as capable as Sony's but not far off, either. They're within great range of one another and that's just off of what I could analyze very quickly.
XsX 599/549 ( monster energy promo)Possibly, but after the disaster of the Xbox One launching one hundred bucks more than the PS4, i can't see them ever doing that again. Then you go by the rumors from some well respected insiders about XSX being even cheaper than the PS5.
I think MS is against a wall here and are desperate to gain back marketshare and Phil has hinted that he has Satya(MS CEO) full support. I think MS can afford to take a hit and must given the sheer dominance of Sony this gen.
I 100% believe XSX will be the same price as PS5, or lower. XSS will be 200 bucks lower than what ever the XSX/PS5 price is.
The mental gymnastics are impressive. You don't understand this information, much less are capable of making any comparisons. Since when is audio equipment measured in teraflops?
Stop trying to hype yourself up and others over something you don't understand.
Now it's pretty clear that XoS v2 at 299USD seem pretty plausible because these consoles is going to cost more. Wonder if that XoS v2 is X1X APU with some more run of a mill cooling.XsX 599/549 ( monster energy promo)
PS5 599/499
PS5 DE 499/399
XsS 399
XoS v2 299 ( so media stores had update )
Thats how prices will be.
XsX 599/549 ( monster energy promo)
PS5 599/499
PS5 DE 499/399
XsS 399
XoS v2 299 ( so media stores had update )
Thats how prices will be.
So, let me get this straightXsX 599/549 ( monster energy promo)
PS5 599/499
PS5 DE 499/399
XsS 399
XoS v2 299 ( so media stores had update )
Thats how prices will be.
I think that this waiting game is only because neither company want's to be "bearer of bad news." If it is clear, that new consoles will be around 599$, I didn't want to be that person who will tell that to the public first.Definitely makes sense why neither company wants to go first with pricing. So much at stake. However, MS/Sony can always change the price again if the other one up's the other, despite a little bad PR publicity that will be quickly be forgotten/understandable.
At the end of the day anyone interested in the best quality surround sound knows who does it better - Xbox. Mostly because they have decided to actually put an emphasis on it and support it properly (including with Dolby Atmos). Sony wants to focus on "3D stereo" in headphones - that's fine, but if you have a nice high-end surround sound setup don't expect more than 5.1/7.1 from Sony, they don't care. All the gflops in the world will not help you have height & overhead speaker info, so the tempest is constrained to a tea-pot. Big whoop.
Where the heck do those numbers come from? By the most optimistic assessment (comparing max clock to guaranteed clock) it is more than 20% behind.
Wake up, XSeX has 44% more CUs, the gap is MASSIVE. The fact that they managed to cut it in half via OCing is also remarkable on Sony side.
I think that this waiting game is only because neither company want's to be "bearer of bad news." If it is clear, that new consoles will be around 599$, I didn't want to be that person who will tell that to the public first.
Yeah, but they are also comparing different metrics.
Tempest -> Where we ended up is a unit with roughly the same SIMD power and bandwidth as all eight Jaguar cores in the PS4 combined.
Xbox -> Greater SPFP HW math then all 8x CPUs in Xbox One X.
As much as arm chair engineering about audio chip is annoying, I don't see any RDNA 1 stuff in here. ONly IPC comparison. MAybe I overlooked, but it's certainly less annoying than how much audio silicong has flops...People still peddling the RDNA 1.0 FUD lol.
God, the year before a new gen launch is the worst time to be a gamer. The amount of armchair engineering makes me dizzy.
I guess MS was bemused by the Tempest Engine hyping, despite they have the stronger audio compute which we know of now.
I mean audio is just 100~150GF in both of them, lotsa spare change.
As for that post, it is assuming that PS5 will sustain 2.23ghz in all scenarios.
And do we know PS5 ROP count yet?
Sony still so quiet on specs breakdown...
So, let me get this straight
Sony will take out disc drive and instantly lower the price of system to 399$
Microsoft will take out disc drive, make a smaller APU, lower the requirements of cooling, make a smaller box and they will have price it at 399$
I don't know what are you smoking, but I want some of that...
As much as arm chair engineering about audio chip is annoying, I don't see any RDNA 1 stuff in here. ONly IPC comparison. MAybe I overlooked, but it's certainly less annoying than how much audio silicong has flops...
Based on what people wrote, PS5 has power of PS4 CPU, which is lower than X1X CPU. But pardon me, I am only sort of "moderating" this thread of mine, I have not verified anything.How did you come to this conclusion?
Shame...![]()
Microsoft Xbox Series X's AMD Architecture Deep Dive at Hot Chips 2020
If anybody knows MS engineers, please forward them a request to have remote play feature supporting macbooks. :lollipop_raising_hand: Thank you.www.neogaf.com
Also feels like at least MS was power bound, so it can use that 2pin power plug, not sure about regulation, but maybe game consoles are now bound with power restrictions as well thanks to them being on most of the time. Not sure tho.It really seems that both companies focussed on different paths. I doubt the PS5 has secrect sauce left, they just took a different route and will try to deliver the best they can through optimization and gaming experience. I personally think, nothing can put the PS5 in front of XSEX anymore. XSEX will be more powerful in raw-computational power and thus also in Ray Tracing performance. At the end of the day it was always what Phil, Aaron and Xbox wanted, to be the Most Power, Fastest Console in the world and they are looking to be become just that.
Now it is all up to games to demonstrate whether Sony has put the money on the right things to deliver an amazing performance.
The last solution to all of this is for sure even a "last-minute change" or a re-fresh PS5Pro Mid-Gen.
Sounds like "true dlss" solution is still way off, so first they going to try run at higher resolution and then they add more advanced features. I guess that with every console gen you see big graphical improvement even tho HW stays the same.The most interesting part in this is the ML capabilities, Sony hasn't talked about something like that AFAIK.
It's quite interesting they try to hit native 4K when they have dlss like features, it's a bad choice IMO.
Better IQ and ML upscale that thing.
Sony, your turn.
Yes, I get itTo be fair, a digital only version of the console would guarantee Sony a 30% cut of all game sales.
Also feels like at least MS was power bound, so it can use that 2pin power plug, not sure about regulation, but maybe game consoles are now bound with power restrictions as well thanks to them being on most of the time. Not sure tho.
How does the Lockhart fit into this narrative? After all that will be the development baseline and not the series x........At the end of the day it was always what Phil, Aaron and Xbox wanted, to be the Most Power, Fastest Console in the world and they are looking to be become just that.
I think with their clocks, I guess they could run chip at 2Ghz GPU part, but it would eat much of power budget. It's speculation, but most likely this is max what they can run and not overshoot the power budget. (like what you can draw from the wall)But power bound with what effect? Because they choose a quite potent system here. Do you mean they could have been even more powerful or how do you mean your argument, just for my understanding?
How does the Lockhart fit into this narrative? After all that will be the development baseline and not the series x........
The most interesting part in this is the ML capabilities, Sony hasn't talked about something like that AFAIK.
It's quite interesting they try to hit native 4K when they have dlss like features, it's a bad choice IMO.
Better IQ and ML upscale that thing.
Sony, your turn.
I/O and SSD being much, much faster doesn't factor into the power difference?
More games will start taking better advantage of data streaming and RT.
PlayStation 5 will have an advantage of data streaming and Xbox Series X will have the advantage of Ray Tracing.
Interesting, Moore's Law Is Dead suggest based on XSX Hot Chips info RDNA2 RT performance will be supperior compared to Turing. I knew it must be the case, because RT results on PS5 were too impressive. RTX 2060 cant run RT at 4K 30fps like PS5, and it looks like PS5 will run some RT games at 4K 60fps as well.
Oh trust me it fits perfectly well: Xbox strategy is not about the console.How does the Lockhart fit into this narrative? After all that will be the development baseline and not the series x........
You'll find out 2022Right
I'm expecting both of them to come in $549 - $599. Shit I bought a ps3 day one at $599 as a broke college student, I can definitely afford a PS5 or Xbox Series X without breaking the bank just like I did the 2080 Super in my machine, and the one downstairs in my wifes machine lol.
They built a behemoth of a console. Now they just have to show us what it can do. Same with Sony, let them games fly its time
You'll find out 2022
What you describe is a recipe for desaster on the software side.,.....This might all sound nice from a marketing perspecitve but from a games perspective this is a nightmare.you are getting the most powerful console on the market. With that argument you can easily drag the price up quite a bit. >(600+)
However, what do you do with the people who like console gaming and chilling on their couch ? You give them something more affordable, something that is sufficient and that can bring forward the gaming in an acceptable next gen experience= Lockhart. (300+)
...and what do you do with the people who don't give a crap about 1080p/4K graphics, but just want to play games and not pay too much money?
You give them Xbox One S v2.0 at a very good price point (~199)
and I agree with you 100%, I don't believe in the concept, but I start seeing it...What you describe is a recipe for desaster on the software side.,.....This might all sound nice from a marketing perspecitve but from a games perspective this is a nightmare.
Because of their first party cross-gen policy?!Why so late?
Why so late?
I mean welcome to PC programming 101, besides at least here the CPU side is same and GPU is not even 4x weaker (you know 4x 1080p = 4K). I think that it could work, especially when it seems like it's going ot be expensive.What you describe is a recipe for desaster on the software side.,.....This might all sound nice from a marketing perspecitve but from a games perspective this is a nightmare.
Meh that's just for 1st party and we already see that they are not prepared. The "cross-gen policy" sounds like a "we don't have next-gen games ready"...Because of their first party cross-gen policy?!
Also, reading this thread it's baffling how many disingenuous side chars imply Sony hasn't shown anything running on PS5.
They literally informed you that every single gameplay snippet in their presentation was literally fucking CAPTURED on PS5. Open your eyes do the old flushing procedure.
What you describe is a recipe for desaster on the software side.,.....This might all sound nice from a marketing perspecitve but from a games perspective this is a nightmare.
Oh trust me it fits perfectly well: Xbox strategy is not about the console.
They do not focus on selling consoles, their value proposition is GamesPass, no matter what you choose to play the games from. However, should you choose MS to be your sole-provider for Hardware and Software, you are getting the most powerful console on the market. With that argument you can easily drag the price up quite a bit. >(600+)
However, what do you do with the people who like console gaming and chilling on their couch ? You give them something more affordable, something that is sufficient and that can bring forward the gaming in an acceptable next gen experience= Lockhart. (300+)
...and what do you do with the people who don't give a crap about 1080p/4K graphics, but just want to play games and not pay too much money?
You give them Xbox One S v2.0 at a very good price point (~199)
Well, Phil actually play games. And I do think that it's vastly overrated how much potential XSS will compicate development.MSFT never had gamers or game developers at the top positions.
They really don't see any problem here.
Well it's also going to be Hot Chips for PS5, no need to bring some aggressive debate in here. It's always the same...
Well, Phil actually play games. And I do think that it's vastly overrated how much potential XSS will compicate development.