It'll be the corporate zombie apocalypse.It isn't the zombie apocalypse that I've been waiting for but it'll do.
It'll be the corporate zombie apocalypse.It isn't the zombie apocalypse that I've been waiting for but it'll do.
However, the study said "unlimited economic growth" is still possible if world governments enact policies and invest in green technologies that help limit the expansion of our ecological footprint.
True enough. I'm just putting a little faith in the idea that we really can cooperate if faced with the prospect of imminent doom. Humans may be short-sighted and self-serving, but we're also innovative, determined little bastards when we need to be.
But nobody will take the initiative to just reset it all? i dont see why not, is it just greed?
I dont think the problem is fear for GM food, but companies like Monsanto. As long as such companies can exist i too really do not like GM food.Yes please, we need to stop slowing down the process at every turn because people are afraid of new technology. GM Foods are going to save millions (if not billions) of lives in the future.
There is a big distrust for GM food though. I doubt most people would know what Monsanto even is, but many of them would still be put off by the idea or principle of GM food.I dont think the problem is fear for GM food, but companies like Monsanto. As long as such companies can exist i too really do not like GM food.
Which part do you think is pseudoscience?
Because the current system is actually working, it just has some bumps in the road that need to be worked out.
Of course. Personally, I'm rooting for nuclear, and perhaps one day fusion, as the main workhorse for our energy supply, with renewables filling in the gaps. I'd also love to see us make more progress on tidal, thermal-solar, and artificial geothermal power for the grid, and hydrogen fuel cells and ethanol from cellulose for transportation.That still doesn't solve the infrastructure problem presented with replacing all our current electrical generation with solar. We need battery research to keep step with solar and wind research...
I dont think the problem is fear for GM food, but companies like Monsanto. As long as such companies can exist i too really do not like GM food.
Wait, so a controversial study ends up with the same results/model as a previous controversial study that it was based on, and that's a "warning bell"?
See, shit like that is part of why people tend not to give much regard to studies like this.
Global economic collapse by 2030 predicted by a completely unscientific computer simulation? thats not really a bump, more a rather large mound
You don't even need a study, just common sense to see that the global economy and the direction the world is going today is fucked and we're headed towards a mountain pile of shit.
We've been going this way for the past few decades and no one is doing a damn thing about it.
I'm taking a geography class that covers environmental issues, geopolitics, globalization, population demographics, world agriculture and production, human geography/culture and even some rough global history. My professor works with the local and national governments for Texas/U.S. and England.
After taking this class, there's no way shit isn't going to boil within 20 years. Basket cases in Europe, Africa, and Asia, with their exploding populations, terrible history, and turbulent economies are going to bring the world down with them.
Haiti's TFR is at a stable 4.7 and Niger's is at 7.5, isn't it? Good grief, our generation is in for a world of hurt.
And man, if Greece goes down...all the PIIGS will go down...
Regardless of this study, I'm not sure if "it'll work itself out" is the best approach to take.We only change when we have to. Human ingenuity will rise to the challenge, it always does. Nothing to worry about.
We only change when we have to. Human ingenuity will rise to the challenge, it always does. Nothing to worry about.
this times infinity. we rise to master every challenge.
Regardless of this study, I'm not sure if "it'll work itself out" is the best approach to take.
I'm glad you're an expert on the global economy after taking a class.
I'll direct all my specific questions to you from now on.
We only change when we have to. Human ingenuity will rise to the challenge, it always does. Nothing to worry about.
That's exactly what it is. That is 18 years from now and I love how it states based on current patterns like they won't change. 18 years ago the Internet was in its infancy, not many people owned cell phones. Things are changing even faster now. This won't happen. Though what will happen is there will be predictions like this in 2030I want to be on board with these conclusions, but it reeks a little bit of Malthusian hysteria. Like Malthus, it seems like models like these fail miserably at predicting the sort of revolutionary changes in technology that tend to render these projections incorrect. Not that I'm opposed to sustainable development, it just seems like we've been beating this drum for centuries.
http://media.smithsonianmag.com/images/Futurism-Got-Corn-graph-631-thumb.jpg[IMG]
[URL="http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Looking-Back-on-the-Limits-of-Growth.html#"]http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Looking-Back-on-the-Limits-of-Growth.html#[/URL][/QUOTE]
In no universe can there be a common Y axis for Industrial Output Per Capita, Population and Pollution Level.
I'm not an expert but it's been an enlightening class on what's going on in the world and my professor is incredible. Right now there are a few important issues going on that could trip the global economy fairly quickly, considering the way things are headed. I'm just gonna say I was fairly ignorant about any and all of this until I took this class; it makes me want to take more classes on it.
I mean, there's plenty of things that signal a bright economic future for places like the EU, like Britain's march towards a new stage in deindustrialization, but other factors like Greece and the PIIGS could take it down quickly if their economies collapse. It could go either way, but I wouldn't be surprised if stuff got crazy in 20 years.
Probably open war among the classical first world and second world before that, so a WW or similar, with sides being drawn by multiple nations. Resources are tight and tightening without a massive change to our direction of consumption. I hate that it's basically inevitable, but it should make people aware of what they do take for granted now.
I agree to a point. I don't subscribe to the "worst case" mentality, but I also disagree with the idea of accepting that success is an inevitability. There's another thread on the first page right now about internships and how unpaid positions exist to exploit workers. I see a connection between this thread and that one. "We'll make it" or "things will get better" is a concept everyone wants to hold, but you can't put blinders on and focus on just that or nothing will improve. Foresight is just as important as confidence is.I do trust in human ingenuity, but a reactionary approach to this idea would lead to bad news for some people I think.
There are genuine economic incentives for governments and companies to research and develop green technology so it's going to happen.
I dont understand how the entire world can go into debt, that shit just doesn't make sense, it' stupid, the world is stupid. Fuck you world
I can understand that, what I can't understand is who is it in debt to? Who owns the pinkslips to everyones souls?
That's exactly what it is. That is 18 years from now and I love how it states based on current patterns like they won't change. 18 years ago the Internet was in its infancy, not many people owned cell phones. Things are changing even faster now. This won't happen. Though what will happen is there will be predictions like this in 2030
We've been going down this road for a few decades now, no one's doing anything to stop the snowball. I don't see something drastically changing that in the next decade.
I'm not an expert but it's been an enlightening class on what's going on in the world and my professor is incredible. Right now there are a few important issues going on that could trip the global economy fairly quickly, considering the way things are headed. I'm just gonna say I was fairly ignorant about any and all of this until I took this class; it makes me want to take more classes on it.
I mean, there's plenty of things that signal a bright economic future for places like the EU, like Britain's march towards a new stage in deindustrialization, but other factors like Greece and the PIIGS could take it down quickly if their economies collapse. It could go either way, but I wouldn't be surprised if stuff got crazy in 20 years.
We will invent solutions to problems. We always do.
Keep the doom and gloom.
I was a finance and economics double major in undergrad. I remember after taking my first few economic classes I thought I had it all figured out…..in reality I was just regurgitating theory from someone that was regurgitating theory from someone else.
Malthusian predictions have been wrong for CENTURIES.