Moana (Vaiana for EU bros) - Live-Action Teaser
- Thread starter Stitch
- Start date
DonkeyPunchJr
World’s Biggest Weeb
Zero diversity, sadly I'll have to pass on this one.
falconhoof
Member
Easier to earn more of a "loss" by making a new production.
Hollywood be:
Get a big pile of cash
Spend it on making a movie by paying themselves to make the movie
Release movie at a "loss"
Oh no, can't pay taxes on loss
DonkeyPunchJr
World’s Biggest Weeb
Even the boring + pointless Moana 2 from last year made a shitload of money. They are going to milk this franchise for all it's worth.
Codes 208
Member
On top of that, for something thats very straight forward and hard to fuck up, they'll still find a way to fuck this up like they did Lilo and Stitch.
Like making the heart the sea an actual villain instead of a heartless antagonist, or not including that shiny schafrillas tomato tomba guy (or butchering his song like they did to 'be prepared' in the lion king movie)
Last edited:
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
I thought GAF would like this
I don't really get these Live-Action versions when over 90% is CGI again lol
Like all of the arts, nothing more than a laundering and evasion/loophole vehicle.
Last edited:
DonkeyPunchJr
World’s Biggest Weeb
They'll probably add like a 45 minute subplot telling Maui's origin story.
kevboard
Member
she's the reason Moana is called Vaiana in Europe btw.
both due to the connotations of having the same name as a porn star, and because she actually had that name registered as a trademark.
Last edited:
analog_future
Resident Crybaby
I thought GAF would like this
I don't really get these Live-Action versions when over 90% is CGI again lol
It looks like the animated film but cheaper and less magical.
Poppinfresh
Member
Now, Put the original Song of the South back in the theaters.
Codes 208
Member
I unironically could see them doing that
There were some blonde kids in the beginning, bet they get cooked and eaten with the comment "Yum, tastes like vanilla!"
The_hunter
Gold Member
Water graphics were great in that movie. Also the rock.
Last edited:
kpopSuperstar
Member
Oddly, these live-action remakes are very on and off, Snow White was a disaster, but the Lilo & Stitch live-action made over a billion at the box office and was a massive success.
Trogdor1123
Member
Really liked the first one, second was a real let down.
I'd say this is the first live action I've been interested in.
I'd say this is the first live action I've been interested in.
poodaddy
Member
Even more unpopular opinion, grown men watching these films is a huge red flag and it's fucking creepy. My daughter doesn't even watch this shit, it cringes her out too much, and she's 14.
MayauMiao
Member
I thought GAF would like this
I don't really get these Live-Action versions when over 90% is CGI again lol
I'm beginning to wonder if they will make Toy Story into Live-Action with only the humans being real while the rest remain CGI.
Disney is really desperate.
kevboard
Member
well, there are real actors in it. that's why it's "live action"
it's essentially the reverse of Who framed Roger Rabbit, where real sets are filled with a few animated characters.
here, fully animated environments are filled with a few real actors.
Chuck Berry
Gold Member
Damn, what a braggart
Aesius
Member
Yep. It's a visually appealing movie. Part of the reason Finding Nemo was so big. Also, the songs are great. My kids love Maui's song and "Shiny" by Jemaine Clement.
Fbh
Member
Yup, I don't get the point of live action adaptations.
You take beautiful 3D/2D animation that's visually cohesive and full of charm and character, then replace it with soulless realistic CG and make it visually clash with some real actors who are very clearly on green screen for 90% of the movie
CastorSoze
Member
I'd say this was more of a Rock idea/vanity project before Disney agreed.
Was looking up to see if it was the same actress but the original actress said she'd let someone else step in and give another young actor a chance.
She's still only 24 while the new actress is 18 so no reason she couldn't still play the role.
I doubt the Rock would do the same and give someone else a chance.
Was looking up to see if it was the same actress but the original actress said she'd let someone else step in and give another young actor a chance.
She's still only 24 while the new actress is 18 so no reason she couldn't still play the role.
I doubt the Rock would do the same and give someone else a chance.
Last edited: