rezuth said:Hey, you can pick which school you wanna attend here. They fight over the kids with free computers and shit.
True. Europe is awesome. I got a laptop in school!
rezuth said:Hey, you can pick which school you wanna attend here. They fight over the kids with free computers and shit.
this is fucking outrageousquadriplegicjon said:
''Because of the felony conviction, you will not be allowed to get your teaching degree under Ohio law as it stands today,'' the judge said. ''The court's taking into consideration that is also a punishment that you will have to serve.''
lowrider007 said:That is just terrible honestly, they've effectively destroyed her future for wanting her kids to have a better future, I can semi understand the jail sentence but to disallow her teaching degree, wow.
Sent her kids to a different school... fucking disgraceful outcome for everyone.Rez said:this is fucking outrageous
I'm not even entirely sure I understand what she did.
Kentpaul said:I would not want someone who has been in jail teaching my kids..
Those examples are stupid as shit and have nothing to do with the case in question.Enosh said:yes and lets pardon the guy dealing drugs too, he just does it to afford a xbox
and the guy that robed the bank, he just wanted a nice vacation
and the guy that shoplifted 30k worth of items, he REALY wanted a new suit to not look bad infront of her peers and the matching shoes
pardons for everyone!
fuck that hippie bullshit, the law is the law, like said before if it was up to me I'd find the other 39 cases and drag them before the court too
If it's the same as the UK then 'catchment' areas are assigned to you according to where you live. You can only choose schools inside that catchment area and it seems this woman went outside of her area. It's more complicated in the states because of the fucked up way they manage taxation. In essence, you have the right to choose a school, but only within a certain area (assuming it's the same as the UK).Rez said:is this some American law I'm unfamiliar with? you don't have the right to choose which public school you send your kids to? was she claiming some sort of government benefit?
the article is unclear.
Rez said:is this some American law I'm unfamiliar with? you don't have the right to choose which public school you send your kids to? was she claiming some sort of government benefit?
the article is unclear.
shagg_187 said:
LOL, what is that from?shagg_187 said:crazycalmbailout.gif
yes they do, they also commited a crimminal activity to better their live or the live of others in their familyKurtofan said:Those examples are stupid as shit and have nothing to do with the case in question.
it is, since beacose of using a false adress she defrauded the school of 30.000$ of payment they would have gotten otherwise, had she enroled her children from her real adress, that is outside the schools zoneKurtofan said:She just send her kids to a different school,wow that's some huge fucking crime here.
When did the laws of European countries start to apply in Ohio?Kurtofan said:Thousands of people do that legally in Europe,so you really have to be hypocrite to support this law.
quadriplegicjon said:
Actually, the reason the woman is in jail is because it's not a POS school.Baki said:Fucking POS school district. Somebody should send this shit to opera and make sure those POS get exposed for the POS they really are.
JGS said:Actually, the reason the woman is in jail is because it's not a POS school.
exarkun said:http://www.copley.oh.us/board-of-trustees
Its their own township? With their own board of trustees? Who serve as the legislative and executive part of a city hall? Obviously the judge is just as bad.
Its like a goddamn white paradise.
Secks4Food said:What the fuuuuuck, have they completely forgot about the eight amendment?
The case of Furman vs Georgia clearly outlines the four factors that determine cruel or unusual punishment:
-"A punishment must not by its severity be degrading to human dignity."
-"A severe punishment that is obviously inflicted in wholly arbitrary fashion."
-"A severe punishment that is clearly and totally rejected throughout society."
-"A severe punishment that is patently unnecessary."
The last three undoubtedly apply to this case, the first one arguably applies considering the incredibly minor nature of the "offense".
soundscream said:Report Card for Copley schools
http://www.ode.state.oh.us/reportcardfiles/2009-2010/DIST/049981.pdf
Akron schools
http://www.ode.state.oh.us/reportcardfiles/2009-2010/DIST/043489.pdf
Cant fault her.
kiunchbb said:Do we know what school and what school district is this? So people can write angry letter expressing their rage?
What the hell were they thinking?
Korey said:I've read several articles and none of them say why the school district was suspicious enough to hire a private detective to investigate in the first place.
The curriculum is only part of what makes it a good school. Their attitude plays a role too.Steelrain said:I'm pretty sure he wasn't talking about their curriculum.
The cost to school the fake students for a couple of years I think?mcrae said:can someone quickly explain the 30,000$ ? is that the amount that the woman would have payed if she sent her kids legally from out of zone? is it the amount the school didnt recieve in federal funding because of the mix up? where is the actual loss of 30k?
SmokyDave said:If it's the same as the UK then 'catchment' areas are assigned to you according to where you live. You can only choose schools inside that catchment area and it seems this woman went outside of her area. It's more complicated in the states because of the fucked up way they manage taxation. In essence, you have the right to choose a school, but only within a certain area (assuming it's the same as the UK).
yeah but my point is that it costs the school the same amount to teach any kid; so if this is a public school and none of the kids are paying for it, where does the lost 30,000 figure in?JGS said:The cost to school the fake students for a couple of years I think?
How dare people send there kids to a safer school?MidnightScott said:What a terrible person for wanting to send her kids to a better school district.
I think it's what the mother would have paid had she enrolled the kids in that school legally.mcrae said:yeah but my point is that it costs the school the same amount to teach any kid; so if this is a public school and none of the kids are paying for it, where does the lost 30,000 figure in?
I'm assuming that they are saying these were 2 extra kids that didn't deserve it since they weren't contributing to the cost (Especially if they were leeching off other things like lunches and such). Since it's broken down by child, there is still a cost related to them that could have went to someone else or could have been used on other programs.mcrae said:yeah but my point is that it costs the school the same amount to teach any kid; so if this is a public school and none of the kids are paying for it, where does the lost 30,000 figure in?
She may have cost them the most money or fought the hardest consider the comments her dad said, it was their right to send the kids there since he helped them.tirminyl said:Wow. This is crazy. What was it? 39-40 previous cases? You think if they wanted to send a message they would have done it on the 20th case, or earlier. I am not throwing a race card but they just so happen to convict the black woman with a felony charge without budging.
I think the punishment is excessive and if they wanted the tuition for the years her daughters attended school, they could have sued her instead of convicting her. Sad.
What if everybody does it?Baconbitz said:How dare people send there kids to a safer school?
Actually, the bad school will be better off since her taxes would contribute but her kids would not be there.SmokyDave said:What if everybody does it?
The good school becomes overcrowded, underfunded, and ceases to be a good school. The bad school dies on it's arse due to a lack of funding and the only pupils attending the school are the true 'bottom of the barrel'. That makes the results of the bad school look even worse.
It isn't as simple as 'I want to, so I will do'.
Edit: This is still unfair as fuck, predominantly because others were allowed to get away with exactly the same thing. Punish all or punish none.
mcrae said:can someone quickly explain the 30,000$ ? is that the amount that the woman would have payed if she sent her kids legally from out of zone? is it the amount the school didnt recieve in federal funding because of the mix up? where is the actual loss of 30k?
Based on where you live, is where you go to School at. You pay the District's Tax rate to say. So if you are in a shitty district, your normally pay much less in taxes, then a nicer one(Hell, this is probably the biggest distinction between good and bad areas). So if she is sending her kids to a school where people pay high taxes to live there, yet she isn't living there. It is fraud since your not paying for the services.Rez said:is this some American law I'm unfamiliar with? you don't have the right to choose which public school you send your kids to? was she claiming some sort of government benefit?
the article is unclear.
What he said.SmokyDave said:What if everybody does it?
The good school becomes overcrowded, underfunded, and ceases to be a good school. The bad school dies on it's arse due to a lack of funding and the only pupils attending the school are the true 'bottom of the barrel'. That makes the results of the bad school look even worse.
It isn't as simple as 'I want to, so I will do'.
Edit: This is still unfair as fuck, predominantly because others were allowed to get away with exactly the same thing. Punish all or punish none.
lowrider007 said:That is just terrible honestly, they've effectively destroyed her future for wanting her kids to have a better future, I can semi understand the jail sentence but to disallow her teaching degree, wow.