If the person that comes in . . . passes the background check, I can sell them a gun.
Why the fuck can a person get a gun without having to be check that they're mentally fit to own it?!
where do you draw that line?
where do you draw that line?
By govt I hope you just mean republicans. Democrats have been trying to change laws for eons.
where do you draw that line?
where do you draw that line?
Uhh certainly well before "diagnosed schizophrenic"?
You draw the line at mental wellness. Obviously. If you have any sort of prior history with mental illnesses, you don't get a gun. Granted, I personally believe guns shouldn't be sold *at all*, apart from hunting rifles, obviously.
That's what doctors are for.
You draw the line at mental wellness. Obviously. If you have any sort of prior history with mental illnesses, you don't get a gun. Granted, I personally believe guns shouldn't be sold *at all*, apart from hunting rifles, obviously.
there is no precedent afaik, which is why im asking.
You asked a question, the reply was "it should be decided by the actual experts in the field", inquiring further is pointless.
Ideally, the government would work it out carefully with leading field experts to draw the line.
I kind of agree with the gun store. You can't just obey some random phone call and deny a sale to a customer. If they pass the checks, you don't necessarily know about their mental state under the surface. The mother should have gone to the store with proper documentation and the request. Even then, it's at the owner's discretion (though I'd argue he has a moral obligation).
The real answer here is that the government is not mandating any sort of check for mental conditions.
Yep. The amendment needs to go.Well, someone had their constitutional rights taken away, and it wasn't the crazy lady with the handgun she shouldn't have been sold in the first place. Sadly, the Second Amendment always wins - doesn't matter how many rooms full of elementary school children die, things will never change.
A man is dead because someone didn't heed a warning.
The court disagreed.
Because the gun makers write those laws in the US. There was a New Yorker article a while back that covered how this ended up happening. Don't remember which issue but I'm sure you can search for it.Why the fuck can a person get a gun without having to be check that they're mentally fit to own it?!
im asking the users who seem to have decided that mental wellness is just a black and white scenario. Obviously I cant ask "actual experts" here now can I.
Like im interested to know if people here think that someone stable but on antidepressants should be denied
Mr.Shrugglesツ;231598609 said:
Even before getting there, a history of gun suicide attempts should be enough to deny someone a gun.
At a time when it seems that basically any-fucking-body can buy a gun on a whim it doesn't seem so terrible to throw a blanket over "mental illness" in it's entirety as maybe not the best candidates to sell a glock to... ya know?
Don't blame this on Trump please.
This is a Republican thing. Don't let those weasels get away with blaming it on the God Oompaloompa of Alt Right Kind.
He does a lot wrong, and I despise him for it, but that law has Republicans pleasing the gun lobby written all over it!
Goodness, I'm angry about this law.