• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Multiple Stabbing at Neo-Nazi Rally in Sacramento

Status
Not open for further replies.
They don't care. Getting run out of the neighborhood doesn't change their racist views, and indeed might cement their resolve to act with more preemptive violence next time now that a battlefield has been established.

Those reveling in seeing Nazis get beat up are being selfish. If it actually had some positive effect on changing anything, I would be out there with a fucking baseball bat. But it does nothing positive.

The idea that winning a brawl like this serves any purpose other than making the victors feel good about themselves is complete shit.

Fuck that, they need to be ostracized at every opportunity, and not by the minorities they hate, but by EVERYONE.

It's the whole world against shitcunts like these

We need to go back to racists feeling pressured to start their sentences with 'I'm not racist , but', not the recent trend of them feeling like it's okay to be openly racist again. Because that is just emboldening them. All this talk about extremism lately, but it's this kind of extreme right racist extremism that is the big threat
 

Fantastapotamus

Wrong about commas, wrong about everything
They don't care. Getting run out of the neighborhood doesn't change their racist views, and indeed might cement their resolve to act with more preemptive violence next time now that a battlefield has been established.

Those reveling in seeing Nazis get beat up are being selfish. If it actually had some positive effect on changing anything, I would be out there with a fucking baseball bat. But it does nothing positive.

The idea that winning a brawl like this serves any purpose other than making the victors feel good about themselves is complete shit.

Getting run out of the neighborhood shows them that people won't just let them run around and spout their racist bullshit. It sends a signal. It prevents them from gaining an inch of legitimacy. Because that's what happens when you are allowed to do that. Justl etting them do whatever they want also won't change their views and will indeed strengthen their believe that what they do is okay and tolerated.
There is nothing selfish about people being glad that other people stood up against Nazi scum and didn't just start a Twitter campaign.
While I don't support violence, I'm also not crying myself to sleep because a bunch of fucking Nazis got beat up.
 

tfur

Member
Ah, some seemed like they were fairly certain early in the thread, so that explains my confusion.



This is probably true. Since reports paint both with weapons of a sort.



Few things, one, the original LA Times story had none of this and similar reporting seems to back that up (see below). I have no citation for the "by any means necessary" quote.

The counter protesters were Anti-Fascist Sacramento, a smaller subsection of the Anti-Fascist Network. (Note the pink flags?) The young woman mentioned in CNN's story is also a part of BAMN, which is short for Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration, and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary.

This protest in question was established by the Golden State Skinheads, in association with the TWP, at the behest of their chairman, who was the gentleman involved in an earlier incident of violence towards a Trump protester.



Note, Heimbach was not present for the riot.

You can get a full view of both protesting and counter protesting organizations in their own words from the links above.

The only one who is pointing directly at the counter protesters is CNN analyst Art Roderick, who was A) not there and B) has a history of questionable statements in this regard..

Here's the assorted stories from other networks:

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2016/06/26/multiple-people-stabbed-during-rally-at-state-capitol/
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/six-stabbed-during-white-supremacy-rally-california-n599281
http://fox6now.com/2016/06/26/quite...iolence-broke-out-during-rally-in-sacramento/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/26/white-nationalist-rally-stabbings-california
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2016/06/26/multiple-people-stabbed-during-rally-at-state-capitol/

All largely the same. But again, if you have further information, by all means.

And while I understand your ire, I'd like much less of the hoping anyone dies in this thread. Thanks. Consider this your warning from the future.

I don't know. I guess just turn on CNN and watch the interview with "By any means necessary " woman. She said they would stop it by any means necessary, and said they brought the violence, and even said they would do it again. It's was a video that they played dozens of times. They then also show the videos of the people with sticks chasing the nazis. They end with videos showing the police escorting the bloody skin heads.

Your news links have less info than what CNN has reported. I guess when more info comes out, we will get more details. There were many flags. I saw rainbow, red, black, yellow, and I think I saw a Che Guevra flag. There were all kinds of people there.
 

Koyuga

Member
Anybody condoning or encouraging violence of any kind is absolute trash. It is regrettable that they couldn't be forced out by non violent means.
 
Getting run out of the neighborhood shows them that people won't just let them run around and spout their racist bullshit. It sends a signal. It prevents them from gaining an inch of legitimacy. Because that's what happens when you are allowed to do that.
There is nothing selfish about people being glad that other people stood up against Nazi scum and didn't just start a Twitter campaign.
While I don't support violence, I'm also not crying myself to sleep because a bunch of fucking Nazis got beat up.

Agreed.

Also, the worst action in the footage is the nazi blindsiding that woman with a wooden plank. That wasn't self-defense! They didn't take the high road so fuck them.

And people in here want to defend these guys' right to free speech now? They go there with weapons and shit to incite violence. Can't believe they've fooled people here lol.
 

Toparaman

Banned
Fuck that, they need to be ostracized at every opportunity, and not by the minorities they hate, but by EVERYONE.

It's the whole world against shitcunts like these

We need to go back to racists feeling pressured to start their sentences with 'I'm not racist , but', not the recent trend of them feeling like it's okay to be openly racist again. Because that is just emboldening them. All this talk about extremism lately, but it's this kind of extreme right racist extremism that is the big threat

Yeah, just feed into their persecution complex and paranoia, what a great idea.

Mockery would've been far more effective than violence. You're only alienating normal people from the progressive cause by condoning vigilante-style violence against people with opposing views. These guys already made fools of themselves with their LARP shields and middle school dresscode. But the counter-protestors turned them into more than fools.
 
I think these kinds of demonstrations are illegal in Canada IIRC.

I assume primarily because there's no redeeming value to racist demonstrations to anyone other than other racists, further emboldening them and their irrational hatred.

Freedom of speech isn't an issue, because absolute freedom of speech being a good thing is a naive view.
 
They don't care. Getting run out of the neighborhood doesn't change their racist views, and indeed might cement their resolve to act with more preemptive violence next time now that a battlefield has been established.

Actually, social stigma is one of the tools through which society enacts change. It is not the only one, but one must also acknowledge that rehabilitation is a long and time-consuming process that cannot be applied to every situation and in some cases, condemnation and social stigma has produced a positive outcome for society as a whole.

I agree with the premise that "better ideas beat bad ideas", but it's a logical one that ignores the humanity of the situation. It's not always borne out in history and ignores the real harm that occurs in the meantime.

Essentially, there is no requirement to treat bad actors with kid gloves, as long as we stay away from violent actions. This is where I sometimes run into a lack of understanding, in relation to the outpouring of empathy for those with a poor point of view (racism, sexism), but not for the effect those overall actions and ideas have on their victims. Rigorous condemnation and condemnatory counter-speech is always needed.

I don't know. I guess just turn on CNN and watch the interview with "By any means necessary " woman. She said they would stop it by any means necessary, and said they brought the violence, and even said they would do it again. It's was a video that they played dozens of times. They then also show the videos of the people with sticks chasing the nazis. They end with videos showing the police escorting the bloody skin heads.

Your news links have less info than what CNN has reported. I guess when more info comes out, we will get more details. There were many flags. I saw rainbow, red, black, yellow, and I think I saw a Che Guevra flag. There were all kinds of people there.

Here's the interview. On CNN. So perhaps you can offer up that citation?
 

mr stroke

Member
Getting run out of the neighborhood shows them that people won't just let them run around and spout their racist bullshit. It sends a signal. It prevents them from gaining an inch of legitimacy. Because that's what happens when you are allowed to do that. Justl etting them do whatever they want also won't change their views and will indeed strengthen their believe that what they do is okay and tolerated.
There is nothing selfish about people being glad that other people stood up against Nazi scum and didn't just start a Twitter campaign.
While I don't support violence, I'm also not crying myself to sleep because a bunch of fucking Nazis got beat up.


Nope

Those 15 clowns showing up to an empty crowd, with no one giving a shit, is more defeating than any violence.

It sucks when you find out no one gives a shit about your movement.
Silence speaks volumes......
 

sphagnum

Banned
Wait, you can just get a permit for a Nazi rally in the US? Okay?

Freedom of speech isn't absolute in the US but it's pretty close to it. You can have a rally for any political position as long as you don't openly advocate immediate violence/incite a breach of the peace (the "fighting words" doctrine) or do something violent there.

So Nazis can stand around and yell Sieg Heil and the KKK can go on parade in their white hoods and everyone knows what it means, but as long as they don't literally go up to a Jewish or black protestor and say they're going to kill them then they're pretty much covered.
 

Quixzlizx

Member
Wait, you can just get a permit for a Nazi rally in the US? Okay?



That sick skull mask though.

I remember when the KKK got a permit to march in NYC, but the city government mandated that they weren't allowed to wear their cheesy-ass hoods (or any kind of face coverings). Hardly any of them showed up.

I don't know how bad it is in Europe/elsewhere, but hardly anyone takes skinheads seriously, because they have no political influence here. Racists, yes, but not neo-Nazis. From the info posted in this thread, the antifa forces would be better off burning down the Russian embassy if they want to send a message.
 
I don't know how bad it is in Europe/elsewhere, but hardly anyone takes skinheads seriously, because they have no political influence here. Racists, yes, but not neo-Nazis.

I was under the impression that they threw you in jail for hate speech.

For both groups.
 

Speely

Banned
I appreciate the sentiment of those who have different views than mine regarding the wisdom of violence against racist bigots. I understand the motivation, and even share it on a knee-jerk level for sure. But I think there is big gulf between what people HOPE to accomplish by violently opposing these shit-stains and what ACTUALLY happens.

What do you think happens in the mind of a Neo-Nazi when people they view as brainwashed by the establishment show up and fight them? Do you think they rethink their agenda at all? Do you really think that someone who has chosen to embrace Neo-Nazi views is going to IN ANY WAY be dissuaded from continuing to embrace their ideologies? Do you think others watching say "hey, they got beat up... probably not a good idea, huh?"

Doesn't happen. Doesn't work. Does nothing except cause more violence. This might make those who oppose the horrible views espoused by hate groups FEEL like they are doing something good, but they are NOT. It's just violence.

"Obstructing" hate groups (edit: with violence) does nothing because the hate is still there. Causing a hiccup in their demonstrations might actually strengthen the organizational element of their demonstrations in an effort to adapt. Stuff like this makes them step up their game. I will not be surprised if sometime soon we see a bigger and more violent event related to this one. (Quote me on this.)

Fighting them in the streets is exactly the kind of vindication for their "struggle" that they are looking for. It's the blood on the concrete by which they paint their hate speech and strengthen their resolve.

You would have to go out and literally MURDER Neo-Nazis in large enough numbers to cull their reproductive capacity in this country to actually harm their movement. Is anyone advocating that? This kind of shit is just more harmful to the tenuous place that non-violent protest currently holds over violent protest and furthers the narrative of "us vs them, and fuck them with fists" that we are moving toward, thus threatening to invalidate (in the eyes of the masses) some of the issues that should be addressed with forceful (not violent) protest that is needed to fight for the rights of minorities that seriously need to be addressed.

More empowerment and equality for all, and generation by generation this stuff CAN disappear, or at least become extremely marginal. Reacting with primitive means for perceived instant results just yields primitive results instantly.
 

tfur

Member
.



Here's the interview. On CNN. So perhaps you can offer up that citation?


It was part of the second video on that page, but the web site is truncated footage. There was much more before the "you seem proud of the outcome". What citation are you looking for? That she is "By any means necessary " group, or that she was the part of the group that shut them down with violence? After CNN finishes their scheduled programming, they should start the coverage again.
 
neonazis want to commit genocide so allowing them to hide behind free speech is bullshit.

U.S. law is such that, unless someone's speech poses an immanent threat to a specific individual or set of individuals, or advocates breaking the law, it is protected under the first amendment. This is a reasonable standard, and I'd generally rather have these groups out in the open, where their bullshit can be intelligently countered and where they can be identified and ostracized, rather than festering in back rooms.

Edit: And no, in America, people generally don't get thrown in jail for hate speech. We are VERY different from Europe in this regard.
 

Valhelm

contribute something
Anybody condoning or encouraging violence of any kind is absolute trash. It is regrettable that they couldn't be forced out by non violent means.

This is ridiculous. Violence is often necessary to prevent a much more horrible alternative. Look at WW2.
 
It was part of the second video on that page, but the web site is truncated footage. There was much more before the "you seem proud of the outcome". What citation are you looking for? That she is "By any means necessary " group, or that she was the part of the group that shut them down with violence? After CNN finishes their scheduled programming, they should start the coverage again.

Your previous statements:
"By any means necessary " was interviewed and said they were there to stop the nazi group by any means necessary. CNN reports it as them who started the violence.

She said they would stop it by any means necessary, and said they brought the violence, and even said they would do it again.

From what I've seen in that very interview on CNN's site, these statements are incorrect. You say there's more to the interview, perhaps it will be uploaded later.
 

aliengmr

Member
We fought world war II to stop the japs from cutting in on our hegemony in the Pacific, not the Nazis. Do you really think we gave a shit about racism?

Wrong.

Firstly, we went to Europe first to stop the Nazi's. Secondly, Japan were the aggressors, even before Pearl Harbor. They certainly were not the victims by any stretch.

What the fuck are schools teaching these days that "America went and beat up the poor Japanese", is a thing?
 

tfur

Member
Your previous statements:




From what I've seen in that very interview on CNN's site, these statements are incorrect. You say there's more to the interview, perhaps it will be uploaded later.


Well, I did not record it. It was enough that the CNN reporter was repeating that phrase as well. I don't know, I hope there is more footage that will be shown.

CNN quickly moved the story to the who the group leader is, and his Trump rally presence. Now its Sunday scheduled programming.


Found her saying 'by any means necessary", as well as confirming and agreeing with the reporter that she attacked them.

https://youtu.be/-O6q0nlGydc
 
I still think the US is incredibly naive when it comes to freedom of speech (despite it being about government intervention, we still act like it's about freedom of speech all the time), and how to deal with hate.

Talking doesn't fix everything. And sometimes you got to defend yourself.
 

Torokil

Member
what a bunch of clowns

fQNHqh6.jpg



hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

which one designed the Menorah logo
 

FroJay

Banned
What a weird mindset. Not everything can be settled with words.

Don't be passively naive.

Justifying stabbings......this country is fucked if any group on any side thinks violence is the answer. The violence is growing.....and it's gonna come to a head as long as people are supporting this disgusting behavior.
 
I still think the US is incredibly naive when it comes to freedom of speech (despite it being about government intervention, we still act like it's about freedom of speech all the time), and how to deal with hate.

Talking doesn't fix everything. And sometimes you got to defend yourself.

We're (generally/in theory/practically in a selective sense/etc) "fine" with situations that escalate to the point of causing problems by and large and then trying to deal with or sweep under the mess afterwards. From the environ, to healthcare---we're not quite square on the notion of preventative care.

It isn't really naive so much as a reckoned calculus built into the status quo on making allowances for terrible things to happen, ideally briefly, then wind right on back to carrying on as per the norms. Free speech and civil reckoning is damn important, in theory guns are way up there too given their spots in the amendments---but you can see all the Stuff that has come of the latter getting used to serve other ends with the NRA and all else....so this is an application on contorting the former in motion.

Only way to ultimately stamp out Nazis and the like is the same as it has always been---hopeful folks doing well in life with a solid understanding of reality around them generally won't get sucked in...aside from the usual other misc bits like cutting off funding sources. Of course, much like many other social ills, that valuable work would require considerable money/time/efforts that isn't really in the best interests of a great many that have a vested value in angry dudes having targets painted for their hate alongside people in high places that straight up already share their values in secret care of whatever convenient fig leaves they deem to employ.

So yeah, a situation like this coming to violence? Not at all surprising, especially in a case where if these Nazi folks Become A Problem, it would be because they finally got to do that which they seek to, which would likely be something on par or far worse than the events today focused on their targets to "count" with law enforcement and whatnot. For the people on the other side of that trying to think this sequence of events through to a logical course, mixed in with panic and more likely than not actual righteous indignation, I'd have to reckon they(thinking of them and their local friends/family/etc) are not in a hurry to become a quickly dusty statistic for the next time a group goes technically too far and gets beaten back a bit by the actual authorities of the land...but little else for posterity.

Probably plenty of folks over here are going to nod to themselves with nervous resignation in the wake of this not at all unlike folks across the pond when it comes to the likes of that (IIRC) Polish father and son that got a savage beating to hell and back---both are pretty damned ill portents.
 

tfur

Member
I stand corrected. Interesting how the video was taken from Stormfront, but I stand corrected. (Had to scrub that bad boy from my YouTube watch history, given the linked videos and channels.)

Searched "Sacramento by any means" in YouTube. Don't know where it comes from, but it was originally on CNN. I doubt they will show it again, as they moved to nazi leader and trump connection story.
 

Breads

Banned
Worker party? Made up of working families?

The fuck?

They think they the only ones working or something?

Fuck off with that thinly veiled hate group bullshit.
 

Odrion

Banned
I think these kinds of demonstrations are illegal in Canada IIRC.

I assume primarily because there's no redeeming value to racist demonstrations to anyone other than other racists, further emboldening them and their irrational hatred.

Freedom of speech isn't an issue, because absolute freedom of speech being a good thing is a naive view.
Thinking that the American government and racists in power wouldn't abuse the ability to ban speech is pretty fucking naive too.

Republicans would looooooove to classify Black Lives Matter demonstrations as "hate speech" and ban it.

You can't just plop certain laws from other counties into a different country with a different culture and expect the same results.
 

sphagnum

Banned
Worker party? Made up of working families?

The fuck?

They think they the only ones working or something?

Fuck off with that thinly veiled hate group bullshit.

The worker thing comes from fascism emerging out of a right wing strain of syndicalism, which is a socialist ideology. The official name of the Nazi Party was the National Socialist German Workers' Party, which claimed that the German workers were being ripped off by the capitalists (who were, of course, controlled by the Jews in Nazi ideology) and fooled by the communists (who were internationalists, also controlled by the Jews in Nazi ideology). The idea was that capitalism and communism both destroyed traditional life and values, and therefore fascists were the ones who would protect the worker whose proper place was to work for the good of the race/fatherland, raise a (patriarchal) family, etc.

It's why fascists position themselves as a "third way" between capitalism and communism and call themselves the alt-right these days instead of the far right.
 
I've been to events like this before. I lived with anarchists like this, who would jump on a bus and go to sweden, and germany and other places and fight neo nazis in demonstrations.
What I've learned from my experience of hanging around anarchists like this is that they are deformed warped version of the totalitarian right. "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster" is always the thinking that comes to mind the fastest.
If your way of life is about peace, prosperity and progress, being degenerate violent psychopath is not a very smart way of living that ideal. If you are above others in that your political opinion allows for you, and your group to lax the rules and stab those who are a threat to your ideal. It's the philosophical and moral question of tolerance for intolerance or intolerance for intolerance.

If bad thoughts has to be ostrized like this and this is something to applaud, would you also support violence against republicans? Prominent republicans who have done more real-world impactful damage. Are they also to be stabbed? Because you're essentially arguing that physical harm should be done to those with bad morals.
Reminds me of violent religious fanatics who tout about how peaceful their religion is- after they go fuck up people from other religions. Fucking laughable hypocrisy.
I've had this discussion more times than I can count, and I've still yet to see any evidence to the idea that Neo Nazi rallies do harm or that their protests have any effect in recruiting. They are trolls. They want attention in the media, and the counter-protesters feed into them. Nobody even knows or cares to give them attention otherwise.
So, like with a troll, you're helping their agenda with engaging them. Secondly, ostrizing or attacking them doesn't make them less likely to be racist. Then you don't understand the socio dynamics that make people join a group like this - Be it KKK, a facist front, a biker gang, or whatever. They do it because they feel shunned from the outside, and joining a group is a new home and family and life system. When you're a neo nazi you suck of the negative attention like a vampire and seeing violence against them is perfect PR for any conservative who feel liberals are too progressive.
Meanwhile, these events are another piss fire for good and decent anarchists to keeping having their reputation tarnished because these assholes think the way to solve problems if through violence.

Nobody becomes a neo nazi because its fun or sounds like a great life. I'd guarantee you that there is something wrong in the past of everyone of those misguided idiots. From neglible shitty parents to abuse and mistreatment from their surroundings which makes them fly of the hinges.
There is a lot of psychological studies on the inner workings of how people get out of their groupings and leave that life behind.


What is the value in having Nazi protests? The value in it is that there is a fantastic irony in having such right and good morals that you can handle- as a society to allow and accept hate groups like this. After all, had these hate groups been the government in power, they would have killed and cracked down on any opposing ideology.
Therefore it shows a great deal of power, wisdom and "we're better than you" by allowing them. Nobody sees them marching thinking that they have any great ideas. It has no effect, but it has all the effect in the world for everyone else.
You also have to look at this historically. Historically, when groups have been cracked down and burned, they have a tendency to grow stronger through presecution and vengeful retribution by the oppressing and violent majority that is totalitarian to not let them exist. That has happened many times in history. Neo Nazis want confrontation because they want to be proven right that just because they are violent, it doesn't mean the opposition is not just as bad.

Do you ever go in? Of course you do. Free speech extends itself to where something becomes so heinous that it makes it possible to incite violence outright. Countries who preach free speech often have laws against burning their flags, drawing certain symbols on the ground, talking bad shit about their monarchy / religious leader, simply due to the fact that they cannot control the outcome as people go ballistic on a nationalistic level.
You also engage with hate speech once it starts hurting people. Once there is proof that unrest groves to a point where minorities feel unsafe.
But I've not seen that with neo nazis. Neo nazis have held these rallies for decades- In many places they need to seek sanction to protest, and usually nobody cares. It's not reported on in the news, nobody talks about it. But it becomes a firestorms once the counter protesters take the bait, and make it worse.

We wouldn't be having this discussion if there had not been a violent response. Now the news of these idiots have become free PR and shows them being clubbed and stabbed horrifically. It's a fucking disaster and disgrace.
 
Various minority groups: "Please don't advocate and plan our wholesale extermination through state-sanctioned violence."
Nazis: "LOL no"
Various minority groups: "Oh, well. I guess they have a right to their opinion."

I mean...I'm pretty anti-violence, as a rule. I'm certainly not a fan of instigating violence.

But...I mean, Nazis. Actual, no messing around Nazis. We're talking about people who openly advocate for the elimination of entire groups along ethnic and religious lines. They basically ARE violence. Them being tolerated in public spaces saying, "Hey, y'know what'd be awesome? Wiping out these ethnic groups." isn't just a "difference of opinion".

This is a subject where I'm conflicted, where my anti-violence tendencies run right up against my firm "Nazis are pretty terrible" stance.

And the worst part is seeing people (including in the media) doing their whole, "Well, the truth must be somewhere in the middle!" routine. We're talking about Nazis. You're on the fence about Nazis. This is a thing you're undecided or a little wishy-washy on. "I'm not so much as a fascist as sorta fasc-ish".
 

Joezie

Member
I've been to events like this before. I lived with anarchists like this, who would jump on a bus and go to sweden, and germany and other places and fight neo nazis in demonstrations.
What I've learned from my experience of hanging around anarchists like this is that they are deformed warped version of the totalitarian right. "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster" is always the thinking that comes to mind the fastest.
If your way of life is about peace, prosperity and progress, being degenerate violent psychopath is not a very smart way of living that ideal. If you are above others in that your political opinion allows for you, and your group to lax the rules and stab those who are a threat to your ideal. It's the philosophical and moral question of tolerance for intolerance or intolerance for intolerance.

If bad thoughts has to be ostrized like this and this is something to applaud, would you also support violence against republicans? Prominent republicans who have done more real-world impactful damage. Are they also to be stabbed? Because you're essentially arguing that physical harm should be done to those with bad morals.
Reminds me of violent religious fanatics who tout about how peaceful their religion is- after they go fuck up people from other religions. Fucking laughable hypocrisy.
I've had this discussion more times than I can count, and I've still yet to see any evidence to the idea that Neo Nazi rallies do harm or that their protests have any effect in recruiting. They are trolls. They want attention in the media, and the counter-protesters feed into them. Nobody even knows or cares to give them attention otherwise.
So, like with a troll, you're helping their agenda with engaging them. Secondly, ostrizing or attacking them doesn't make them less likely to be racist. Then you don't understand the socio dynamics that make people join a group like this - Be it KKK, a facist front, a biker gang, or whatever. They do it because they feel shunned from the outside, and joining a group is a new home and family and life system. When you're a neo nazi you suck of the negative attention like a vampire and seeing violence against them is perfect PR for any conservative who feel liberals are too progressive.
Meanwhile, these events are another piss fire for good and decent anarchists to keeping having their reputation tarnished because these assholes think the way to solve problems if through violence.

Nobody becomes a neo nazi because its fun or sounds like a great life. I'd guarantee you that there is something wrong in the past of everyone of those misguided idiots. From neglible shitty parents to abuse and mistreatment from their surroundings which makes them fly of the hinges.
There is a lot of psychological studies on the inner workings of how people get out of their groupings and leave that life behind.


What is the value in having Nazi protests? The value in it is that there is a fantastic irony in having such right and good morals that you can handle- as a society to allow and accept hate groups like this. After all, had these hate groups been the government in power, they would have killed and cracked down on any opposing ideology.
Therefore it shows a great deal of power, wisdom and "we're better than you" by allowing them. Nobody sees them marching thinking that they have any great ideas. It has no effect, but it has all the effect in the world for everyone else.
You also have to look at this historically. Historically, when groups have been cracked down and burned, they have a tendency to grow stronger through presecution and vengeful retribution by the oppressing and violent majority that is totalitarian to not let them exist. That has happened many times in history. Neo Nazis want confrontation because they want to be proven right that just because they are violent, it doesn't mean the opposition is not just as bad.

Do you ever go in? Of course you do. Free speech extends itself to where something becomes so heinous that it makes it possible to incite violence outright. Countries who preach free speech often have laws against burning their flags, drawing certain symbols on the ground, talking bad shit about their monarchy / religious leader, simply due to the fact that they cannot control the outcome as people go ballistic on a nationalistic level.
You also engage with hate speech once it starts hurting people. Once there is proof that unrest groves to a point where minorities feel unsafe.
But I've not seen that with neo nazis. Neo nazis have held these rallies for decades- In many places they need to seek sanction to protest, and usually nobody cares. It's not reported on in the news, nobody talks about it. But it becomes a firestorms once the counter protesters take the bait, and make it worse.

We wouldn't be having this discussion if there had not been a violent response. Now the news of these idiots have become free PR and shows them being clubbed and stabbed horrifically. It's a fucking disaster and disgrace.

Took the words right out of my mouth. Best post of the thread.
 

ElRenoRaven

Member
I've been to events like this before. I lived with anarchists like this, who would jump on a bus and go to sweden, and germany and other places and fight neo nazis in demonstrations.
What I've learned from my experience of hanging around anarchists like this is that they are deformed warped version of the totalitarian right. "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster" is always the thinking that comes to mind the fastest.
If your way of life is about peace, prosperity and progress, being degenerate violent psychopath is not a very smart way of living that ideal. If you are above others in that your political opinion allows for you, and your group to lax the rules and stab those who are a threat to your ideal. It's the philosophical and moral question of tolerance for intolerance or intolerance for intolerance.

If bad thoughts has to be ostrized like this and this is something to applaud, would you also support violence against republicans? Prominent republicans who have done more real-world impactful damage. Are they also to be stabbed? Because you're essentially arguing that physical harm should be done to those with bad morals.
Reminds me of violent religious fanatics who tout about how peaceful their religion is- after they go fuck up people from other religions. Fucking laughable hypocrisy.
I've had this discussion more times than I can count, and I've still yet to see any evidence to the idea that Neo Nazi rallies do harm or that their protests have any effect in recruiting. They are trolls. They want attention in the media, and the counter-protesters feed into them. Nobody even knows or cares to give them attention otherwise.
So, like with a troll, you're helping their agenda with engaging them. Secondly, ostrizing or attacking them doesn't make them less likely to be racist. Then you don't understand the socio dynamics that make people join a group like this - Be it KKK, a facist front, a biker gang, or whatever. They do it because they feel shunned from the outside, and joining a group is a new home and family and life system. When you're a neo nazi you suck of the negative attention like a vampire and seeing violence against them is perfect PR for any conservative who feel liberals are too progressive.
Meanwhile, these events are another piss fire for good and decent anarchists to keeping having their reputation tarnished because these assholes think the way to solve problems if through violence.

Nobody becomes a neo nazi because its fun or sounds like a great life. I'd guarantee you that there is something wrong in the past of everyone of those misguided idiots. From neglible shitty parents to abuse and mistreatment from their surroundings which makes them fly of the hinges.
There is a lot of psychological studies on the inner workings of how people get out of their groupings and leave that life behind.


What is the value in having Nazi protests? The value in it is that there is a fantastic irony in having such right and good morals that you can handle- as a society to allow and accept hate groups like this. After all, had these hate groups been the government in power, they would have killed and cracked down on any opposing ideology.
Therefore it shows a great deal of power, wisdom and "we're better than you" by allowing them. Nobody sees them marching thinking that they have any great ideas. It has no effect, but it has all the effect in the world for everyone else.
You also have to look at this historically. Historically, when groups have been cracked down and burned, they have a tendency to grow stronger through presecution and vengeful retribution by the oppressing and violent majority that is totalitarian to not let them exist. That has happened many times in history. Neo Nazis want confrontation because they want to be proven right that just because they are violent, it doesn't mean the opposition is not just as bad.

Do you ever go in? Of course you do. Free speech extends itself to where something becomes so heinous that it makes it possible to incite violence outright. Countries who preach free speech often have laws against burning their flags, drawing certain symbols on the ground, talking bad shit about their monarchy / religious leader, simply due to the fact that they cannot control the outcome as people go ballistic on a nationalistic level.
You also engage with hate speech once it starts hurting people. Once there is proof that unrest groves to a point where minorities feel unsafe.
But I've not seen that with neo nazis. Neo nazis have held these rallies for decades- In many places they need to seek sanction to protest, and usually nobody cares. It's not reported on in the news, nobody talks about it. But it becomes a firestorms once the counter protesters take the bait, and make it worse.

We wouldn't be having this discussion if there had not been a violent response. Now the news of these idiots have become free PR and shows them being clubbed and stabbed horrifically. It's a fucking disaster and disgrace.

Damn good post. You nailed it on the head 100 percent.
 

Speely

Banned
Various minority groups: "Please don't advocate and plan our wholesale extermination through state-sanctioned violence."
Nazis: "LOL no"
Various minority groups: "Oh, well. I guess they have a right to their opinion."

I mean...I'm pretty anti-violence, as a rule. I'm certainly not a fan of instigating violence.

But...I mean, Nazis. Actual, no messing around Nazis. We're talking about people who openly advocate for the elimination of entire groups along ethnic and religious lines. They basically ARE violence. Them being tolerated in public spaces saying, "Hey, y'know what'd be awesome? Wiping out these ethnic groups." isn't just a "difference of opinion".

This is a subject where I'm conflicted, where my anti-violence tendencies run right up against my firm "Nazis are pretty terrible" stance.

And the worst part is seeing people (including in the media) doing their whole, "Well, the truth must be somewhere in the middle!" routine. We're talking about Nazis. You're on the fence about Nazis. This is a thing you're undecided or a little wishy-washy on. "I'm not so much as a fascist as sorta fasc-ish".

I don't think anyone here is saying that Nazis don't deserve forceful opposition or zero-tolerance stances vs them. They absolutely do. But literally fighting them physically does nothing to hurt their agenda. It actually helps it by drawing attention to it and even romanticizing their movement in the eyes of people who might otherwise not even take note when these troglodyte fuckwits are screaming at tumbleweeds.

If you form a social club based on fighting Nazis, you are giving Nazis free PR. You are making "Nazis vs Antis" the game and making trailers for it with human blood as the medium.

A better form of effective opposition would be to involve/form a group of community organizers, venue promoters, and activists FROM the neighborhood whose purpose it was to put together events during bigoted rallies of any kind in seperate locations that pulled attention away from them and were even themed against their policies. If these BAMN folks just all had good punk bands and decent draws, they could have held a fun anti-rally in a different place and actually done more good.

This would not only have the effect of drawing attention away from their rallies, but would also show real civic desire to fight their bullshit in civil ways while supporting local business. If the places people frequent are uniting against bigotry, it's going to have more positive effect than is a bunch of angry people stabbing Nazis in the streets.

Actually I think I just gave myself some ideas.
 
I am not surprised this went down, those dudes are creepy as hell.

I lived 45 minutes north of Sac, and worked selling cable door to door (yeah before Comsux brought in "contractors" to try to screw potential customers over) and we covered a mountain town that was chock full of these types. Went down a cul de sac to see three of four houses flying iron crosses, turned around and drove out of town. When we moved to California we were naive, we figured that the state as a whole was going to be a much more tolerant area, just don't leave the larger cities and it's peachy.
 
I'll keep it brief.

There are white supremacist businessmen and police officers, people who had genuine power in the state.

Being "above it all" doesn't autofix that. Ignoring it doesn't take their power when it's like that. Or when it's in the laws and media, protected by even the nicest people unconsciously.


That takes way more than trying to find a higher level of discourse. Or trying to be an effective distraction.
 
And honestly, I feel like way more effort is put into figuring out way to comfort and convert hateful people supporting hateful policies than actually trying to help the victims.

Combating those systems, group, and communities actively harming people on the regular, non-violently even. Especially non-violently; in many cases, it sounds more like just speaking rhetorically rather than setting up plans to perform actively.
 

Speely

Banned
I'll keep it brief.

There are white supremacist businessmen and police officers, people who had genuine power in the state.

Being "above it all" doesn't autofix that. Ignoring it doesn't take their power when it's like that. Or when it's in the laws, protected by said people.


That takes way more than trying to find a higher level of discourse. Or trying to be an effective distraction.


Fighting in the street against thugs also doesn't fix any of the issues you are referencing. In fact, your concerns are more troubling than street Nazis blowing hot air. They are my main concerns as well.

How would you fix the racism and hate enacted by those in places of power?
 
Fighting in the street against thugs also doesn't fix any of the issues you are referencing. In fact, your concerns are more troubling than street Nazis blowing hot air. They are my main concerns as well.

How would you fix the racism and hate enacted by those in places of power?

But a lot of the steps to alleviate concerns I see when it comes to those in power I see similarly in these street Nazi talks.

Like the ones in power, I don't think these street nazi's should be ignored. They are in these communities, they have families, friends, people who'll defend and excuse them because their presence has eased into their consciousness. Normalized.

Fighting should only be thought of if physically assaulted, or the assault is absolutely imminent. But in the meantime, I don't think these hateful people should be coddled, they should be actively challenged. That stuff should have no place in an inclusive community, 1st amendment or not.

And if that community would rather protect them, then people and businesses should be let known.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom