• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NASA's Mars Science Laboratory |OT| 2,000 Pounds of Science!

Status
Not open for further replies.

fanboi

Banned
Which could also mean life took a trip from Mars to Earth and got it all started...

I hope Curiosity can find some hard evidence of past life, even if microscopic. How amazing would it be if it takes a picture of a fossil since it's sitting in a sea bed that has layers stripped off.

What if it finds....
















us?
 

Samus4145

Member
Which could also mean life took a trip from Mars to Earth and got it all started...

I hope Curiosity can find some hard evidence of past life, even if microscopic. How amazing would it be if it takes a picture of a fossil since it's sitting in a sea bed that has layers stripped off.

I want it to find some top secret, either Russian or Chinese spacecraft that already has landed on Mars 30 years ago.
 

Log4Girlz

Member
Which could also mean life took a trip from Mars to Earth and got it all started...

I hope Curiosity can find some hard evidence of past life, even if microscopic. How amazing would it be if it takes a picture of a fossil since it's sitting in a sea bed that has layers stripped off.

I don't believe mars had liquid water long enough to support the evolution of multi-cellular life forms. Hope I'm wrong.

Mt. Everest was much higher than it is today etc.

Everest is constantly on the rise. I believe there was some bounce when it first formed at it was a bit higher though.
 

G_Berry

Banned
ArnoldsFaceTotalRecall.gif

animated.gif
 

Culex

Banned
Earths axis is slowing its spin down ever so slowly. Eventually, the earth with be like the moon, forever facing one direction.
 

ced

Member
I don't believe mars had liquid water long enough to support the evolution of multi-cellular life forms. Hope I'm wrong.

Yeah, but I was thinking that recently most agree that the meteorite ALH84001 did contain fossilized bacteria from Mars. Maybe I'm wrong though.

Edit: I see you said multi cell, at least Curiosity has the tools to photograph microscopic fossils if they are there.
 

Log4Girlz

Member
Yeah, but I was thinking that recently most agree that the meteorite ALH84001 did contain fossilized bacteria from Mars. Maybe I'm wrong though.

This rover does not have the capability to look that close. I believe those supposed bacterium were so small we needed electron microscopes to see them (almost being proto-bacterium). Well, if they are proper bacterium size, then perhaps.
 
I want it to find some top secret, either Russian or Chinese spacecraft that already has landed on Mars 30 years ago.
The Soviets would have flaunted a probe landing on Mars and would have little reason to hide such an endeavor. The Chinese would need to travel back from the future to get a probe on Mars thirty years ago. A covert spacecraft would be difficult to hide if it was to regulary send communications back to Earth.
 
Well, terrestrial bacteria survived to the Moon and back, and there are many nooks and crannies on a spaceship. They try to sanitize everything, but they simply can't get into every space.

I recall someone claiming in an issue of Science or Popular Mechanics claiming (I only skimmed the article in a Borders) a few years ago that the radiation is to intense for humans to go to Mars. Is there any validity to that claim?

I know similar claims were made about the Van Allen Belts (and that still that long term habitation isn't possible) in regards to the Apollo Program.
 

ToxicAdam

Member
We are very fortunate to have Mars. We have so much to learn from it and it's a (relatively) short trip to get there.

It's almost like a perfect laboratory waiting to be opened up and played with. Hopefully enough people (with power) keep viewing it that way and not just another dead rock like the cynics do.
 

Log4Girlz

Member
I recall someone claiming in an issue of Science or Popular Mechanics claiming (I only skimmed the article in a Borders) a few years ago that the radiation is to intense for humans to go to Mars. Is there any validity to that claim?

I know similar claims were made about the Van Allen Belts (and that still that long term habitation isn't possible) in regards to the Apollo Program.

I am not sure, but it shouldn't be any worse than what astronauts go through on the way to the moon...the difference is the length of stay. I think the bigger problem is that the dust in mars, which is all pervasive, can carry an electric charge, often quite powerful which will really fuck with survival systems if we attempted to go.
 
Yeah, just read that on Wikipedia. Didn't realize it was so thin. Too bad, that would have been cool.

While on Wiki, I also found this picture of a Martian sunset. Amazing.


(Click for full resolution)

I visited the wiki page but can't find the photo. How was it captured?
 
I recall someone claiming in an issue of Science or Popular Mechanics claiming (I only skimmed the article in a Borders) a few years ago that the radiation is to intense for humans to go to Mars. Is there any validity to that claim?
There is a maximum amount of radiation that an astronaut is allowed to be exposed to (a value that is totaled throughout all space-flights). The measurements that MSL took en route to Mars showed “tenths of lifetime exposure” on the one-way voyage. So, current radiation shielding would likely make a trip to Mars and back cap the radiation threshold for astronaut eligibility. People could survive the trip, but there is a possibility that intense radiation could flare-up along the way; and so, the better our measurements of this, the better our chances to prepare and survive for such events.
 

Log4Girlz

Member
There is a maximum amount of radiation that an astronaut is allowed to be exposed to (a value that is totaled throughout all space-flights). The measurements that MSL took en route to Mars showed “tenths of lifetime exposure” on the one-way voyage. So, current radiation shielding would likely make a trip to Mars and back cap the radiation threshold for astronaut eligibility. People could survive the trip, but there is a possibility that intense radiation could flare-up along the way; and so, the better our measurements of this, the better our chances to prepare and survive for such events.

I remember reading a program about new age propulsion systems that started discussing how it would cut the travel time to mars by months and make it a feasible trip. The only thing to look out for would be a big solar flare on our route to the planet.
 

Vagabundo

Member
There is a MEGAOUTFLO hypothesis about a cyclic wet (maybe warm) mars. So Mars could be just in a dormant part of it's cycle and "wake" up one day soon. Although the odds of it happening while we're around is slim. Unless we somehow engineer one of these events, we could make the plant habitable within a, relatively, short time frame.
 
There is a maximum amount of radiation that an astronaut is allowed to be exposed to (a value that is totaled throughout all space-flights). The measurements that MSL took en route to Mars showed “tenths of lifetime exposure” on the one-way voyage. So, current radiation shielding would likely make a trip to Mars and back cap the radiation threshold for astronaut eligibility. People could survive the trip, but there is a possibility that intense radiation could flare-up along the way; and so, the better our measurements of this, the better our chances to prepare and survive for such events.

Isn't that one of the reasons suggesting the initial trips only be one way, compared often to the initial colonization of the new world, as a way around it.
 
Geologically? Probably its small size. Core froze relatively quickly, magnetic field stopped, solar wind stripped the atmosphere away, water all dried up.

Wait, how does the core freeze? I still don't understand how the Earth's core works. Why do the planets closest to the sun have cores, while the planets far away don't? Is it because iron only accumulates close to the star formation zone?

There is a MEGAOUTFLO hypothesis about a cyclic wet (maybe warm) mars. So Mars could be just in a dormant part of it's cycle and "wake" up one day soon. Although the odds of it happening while we're around is slim. Unless we somehow engineer one of these events, we could make the plant habitable within a, relatively, short time frame.

wow this is very interesting, I need to read up on this.
 

Samus4145

Member
The Soviets would have flaunted a probe landing on Mars and would have little reason to hide such an endeavor. The Chinese would need to travel back from the future to get a probe on Mars thirty years ago. A covert spacecraft would be difficult to hide if it was to regulary send communications back to Earth.

But the Chinese travel back in time from the far future to help Russia, but are suddenly trapped by the Russians in time.

Heavy.
 
Isn't that one of the reasons suggesting the initial trips only be one way, compared often to the initial colonization of the new world, as a way around it.
I'm sure this plays a part but the bigger concern is the required fuel for the return trip. Taking all that weight to Mars would be impractical with current chemical rockets.

I posted this video before but it is worth the 45 minutes to watch and explains the difficulties of launch.

[edit:]
But the Chinese travel back in time from the far future to help Russia, but are suddenly trapped by the Russians in time.

Heavy.
Check-out the Obama is a chrononaught conspiracies.
He went to Mars and fought some big Jabba-the-Hutt-like Rancor
 
Wait, how does the core freeze? I still don't understand how the Earth's core works. Why do the planets closest to the sun have cores, while the planets far away don't? Is it because iron only accumulates close to the star formation zone?

I'm still fascinated by how certain bodies in the solar system seem to accumulate more of certain materials, like how did Io get so much sulphur and Europa get so much water, etc. Earth's heat comes from both pressure and radioactive decay from massive amounts of Uranium and other things like Potassium with half lives of billions of years. Tidal forces may have some influence as well, but it's not going to be anything like poor Io.

The reason our atmosphere is protected from some of the worst bits of the solar wind is because of how much molten Iron there is in the outer core, resulting in a giant dynamo whose magnetic field redirects lots of high energy particles.
 

gutshot

Member
What we really need to do is build floating cities high in the acid clouds of Venus.
bJVzn.jpg


http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=14334.0

Yes! I was reading up on this and the atmospheric pressure and temperature at a certain altitude in Venus (I think it was like 35 miles above the surface) is comparable to Earth. Not only that, but oxygen is less dense than the other gases that make up Venus's atmosphere, so in theory all we'd have to do to get our cities to float is pump them full of oxygen. Of course, we'd still have to account for the acidic rain and crazy winds on Venus, but it is pretty cool to think about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom