timetokill
Banned
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_trilogy
Check these books out. Awesome realistic scifi about the colonization of Mars that, among others, covers your moral question.
Yup, excellent books, some of my favorites.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_trilogy
Check these books out. Awesome realistic scifi about the colonization of Mars that, among others, covers your moral question.
So what's the plan of attack as far as excavating rocks and usiung that bad ass laser and such? I'm excited for the pictures, but am really excited for the meat and potatoes of the mission. Though I do understand it's going to be a slow process that takes years, I'm just anxious. Has the rover even moved yet? Are they still getting the thing up and running?
EDIT ... just as I pust post I see the above imaged timline.
EDIT 2: Althought it does't have anything about rock analysis.
the sad thing about these mars shots is...... if man was to go there and begin life. we'd fuck it up
So what's the plan of attack as far as excavating rocks and usiung that bad ass laser and such? I'm excited for the pictures, but am really excited for the meat and potatoes of the mission. Though I do understand it's going to be a slow process that takes years, I'm just anxious. Has the rover even moved yet? Are they still getting the thing up and running?
EDIT ... just as I pust post I see the above imaged timline.
EDIT 2: Althought it does't have anything about rock analysis.
Do people really care about preserving a barren, lifeless wasteland?
So what's the plan of attack as far as excavating rocks and usiung that bad ass laser and such? I'm excited for the pictures, but am really excited for the meat and potatoes of the mission. Though I do understand it's going to be a slow process that takes years, I'm just anxious. Has the rover even moved yet? Are they still getting the thing up and running?
EDIT ... just as I pust post I see the above imaged timline.
EDIT 2: Althought it does't have anything about rock analysis.
They are also going to delete the landing software to make room for a more surface-optimized software package. (Yeah, they're flashing the firmware. ON MARS.)
Why do they have to do it on Mars or why can't they switch from one to another? I'm using all my strength not to try some PS3/Memory joke. lolSo far they've been powering up the various instruments, running diagnostics and calibrating stuff. They are also going to delete the landing software to make room for a more surface-optimized software package. (Yeah, they're flashing the firmware. ON MARS.)
Sweet!The imaging dude said that they're going to download full-color HD versions of some photos from the panorama tomorrow. Can't wait.
Why do they have to do it on Mars or why can't they switch from one to another?
Oh god, the 7 seconds of terror.
Myspace angle. Looks hot.
I'm not seeing anything like a plush toy, model-kits will surely come soon. there might be someone out there making custom stuff, NASA has room for improvement on the merch-end but it is nice to see that it is not a focal point of the organization.is there any Curiosity Merch being done by NASA[?].
They were still working on the software while Curiosity was flying to Mars (it was already updated at least once before landing), and it makes sense to have the remote update capability anyway. It has two identical computers, so there's a backup in case something goes wrong.
I think it could help with generating extra money for operations, but the lack of merch whoring has it's plus side too. I just mean in licencing things out.I'm not seeing anything like a plush toy, model-kits will surely come soon. there might be someone out there making custom stuff, NASA has room for improvement on the merch-end but it is nice to see that it is not a focal point of the organization.
Myspace angle. Looks hot.
Oh god, the 7 seconds of terror.
The lander operated for 2245 sols (about 2306 Earth days or 6 years) until November 11, 1982, when a faulty command sent by ground control resulted in loss of contact. The command was intended to uplink new battery charging software to improve the lander's deteriorating battery capacity, but it inadvertently overwrote data used by the antenna pointing software. Attempts to contact the lander during the next four months, based on the presumed antenna position, were unsuccessful.
I'm sure that there will be, if there aren't already. Here is a Lego-build from a JPL engineer:Does NASA offer accurate replica models of the Curiosity? I think it would be cool to buy one.
Surface of Venus:
Yeah this. That's basically how NASA lost Viking 1.
No way to press "reset" from here.
The black parts is where NASA redacted all the alienzWell DAMN!
Click to see panoramic shot in color!
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/675227main_pia16029-full_full.jpg
Growing up, I always wanted a Sojourner one. I was just the right age when Pathfinder landed.Does NASA offer accurate replica models of the Curiosity? I think it would be cool to buy one.
That's so crazy!!
Don't people say that Venus's surface is like pure lava? WTH? This picture shows rocks. Also what was the temperature measured by that rover?
It was always said to be a very hot planet, but never full of lava.
It looks so peaceful.
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3527/3235600348_33e247ea5b_z.jpg[IMG]
Not very imaginative. What makes them think that Martians plants were green in color?[/QUOTE]
Title of the pic is "Terraformed mars"
This is what Mars would look like, according to the artist, if humans introduced liquid water and organic life to Mars.
Presumably, we'd want to import our Earthly plants to Mars.
So with current tech how long and how much would it cost to terraform Mars?
If not technologically possible what needs to be discovered or invented to make it so.
Well, could nuke the poles to release the gases but there might not be enough material. Grabbing a few hundred thousand comets and icy bodies and redirecting their orbits for a Martian collision-course would probably do the trick, releasing enough water and gas to make the atmosphere "habitable." Then, little by little, species would be introduced as the biosphere changed. Speculative but theoretically possible.I would say the first part is how to generate a lot of energy. Terra forming, I assume, would require a vast amount of energy that wouldn't be possible with current tech.
I'm sure that there will be, if there aren't already. Here is a Lego-build from a JPL engineer:
You can upvote the design if you would like to see Lego produce this model. DIY instructions to build can be found in the link.
The transition temperatures for states of matter actually vary depending on the pressure forces as I recall. That's why water boils at a lower temperature at high altitude. Rocks under greater atmospheric pressure, like on venus would probably have a higher melting point than rocks on earth. So for all we know it could be hot enough to melt rocks at earth atmosphere, but it's clearly not at venus atmospheric pressure.
Although I really remember almost nothing about chemistry, so I could be wrong.
Wait, how does the core freeze? I still don't understand how the Earth's core works. Why do the planets closest to the sun have cores, while the planets far away don't? Is it because iron only accumulates close to the star formation zone?
wow this is very interesting, I need to read up on this.
Well, could nuke the poles to release the gases but there might not be enough material. Grabbing a few hundred thousand comets and icy bodies and redirecting their orbits for a Martian collision-course would probably do the trick, releasing enough water and gas to make the atmosphere "habitable." Then, little by little, species would be introduced as the biosphere changed. Speculative but theoretically possible.
Say one average sized comet cost 5 Billion and Mars required 250,000 impacts over X number of years. Terraforming would likely be a centuries-long project.
That's so crazy!!
Don't people say that Venus's surface is like pure lava? WTH? This picture shows rocks. Also what was the temperature measured by that rover?
So with current tech how long and how much would it cost to terraform Mars?
If not technologically possible what needs to be discovered or invented to make it so.
So with current tech how long and how much would it cost to terraform Mars?
If not technologically possible what needs to be discovered or invented to make it so.
In April 2012, it was reported that lichen and bacteria survived and showed remarkable adaptation capacity for photosynthesis after 34 days in simulated Martian conditions in the Mars Simulation Laboratory (MSL) maintained by the German Aerospace Center. On Earth, bacteria are about 80% of the biomass.
Don't remind me. I'd be happy with manned mission and a mars base. It will set things up nicely for my daughter to grow up with.Does it make anyone else sad that we'll all be long dead before all the cool stuff starts happening?
Does it make anyone else sad that we'll all be long dead before all the cool stuff starts happening?
Terrafforming isn't required though for colonies just part of the long term development.
Nukes would be generate some hilarious reactions even, sadly, when valid. Have nukes being used out side Earth and the immediate upper orbit ever been studied?
I mean what nuke would be used, how would it be detonated, and what yields? Would it require a spaceship that could launch a nuke like a sub or bomber?
Yeah I think it was Ivy Mike or the Castle Bravo test that inadvertently discovered EMP.Terraforming is a wild idea. Colonizing another plant is, simply, out-of-this World.
There have been high-orbit detonations, I believe the warhead was on top of a rocket. I think one of the first tests blacked-out a section of the national power grid.