• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nebraska Supreme Court rules 16-year-old ‘not mature enough’ for abortion

Status
Not open for further replies.
No one forced her to become pregnant. I understand that the girl has gone through some tough times in her young life mostly because of her parents. It is still not a reason to have an abortion. She should go through the pregnancy and then give up the baby for adoption if she wanted to. It sucks, but it is better than killing an unborn child.

It's not a child.
 
No one forced her to become pregnant. I understand that the girl has gone through some tough times in her young life mostly because of her parents. It is still not a reason to have an abortion. She should go through the pregnancy and then give up the baby for adoption if she wanted to. It sucks, but it is better than killing an unborn child.

Rollicking good number of assumptions out the gate.

Do you know the circumstances of conception?

Do you know they didn't use some form of birth control?

What say you to the fact that she's under the age of legal consent in her state?

Oh, right, it's easier just to say YOU DUN GOOFED.
 
Rollicking good number of assumptions out the gate.

Do you know the circumstances of conception?

Do you know they didn't use some form of birth control?

What say you to the fact that she's under the age of legal consent in her state?

Oh, right, it's easier just to say YOU DUN GOOFED.

Great for society too. Fuck you, you gonna have that baby whether you want to or not. Who has the moral high ground again?


Also, if you don't want kids to not have kids at 16 because "they are too young", then they shouldn't be having sex.

They shouldn't have sex.

The rally cry when you don't want to deal with reality and stick it to everyone.
 

Metaphoreus

This is semantics, and nothing more
Girls obviously can't decide for themselves that they don't want to go through a fucking pregnancy and birth!

I read this as "a fucking, pregnancy, and birth!" I'm not sure that's how you meant it.

Your comment reminds me: this opinion is only limited to the one girl, and the court's holding shouldn't be read as a statement that all sixteen-year-old girls are likewise insufficiently mature and well-informed.
 
I read this as "a fucking, pregnancy, and birth!" I'm not sure that's how you meant it.

Your comment reminds me: this opinion is only limited to the one girl, and the court's holding shouldn't be read as a statement that all sixteen-year-old girls are likewise insufficiently mature and well-informed.

I don't really give a shit. Any girl should be able to decide to terminate her pregnancy.

People wanna talk shit about Sharia Law, how about we have some decent fucking laws in our own country that allows girls/women control over their reproductive organs huh?
 

ivysaur12

Banned
The title of the article and the summary of the holding that opens the article are inaccurate. SCONE (as I'll refer to the Supreme Court of Nebraska) did not decide that the girl was not mature enough to have an abortion, much less that she was mature enough to give birth and care for the child. If I were to rewrite the opening paragraph of the article so as to accurately reflect SCONE's holding, I'd do it like this:

Anonymous 5, a 16-year-old girl, is not mature enough to decide for herself to obtain an abortion. Instead, she must first have a parent or guardian consent to the procedure.

So ruled the Nebraska Supreme Court on Friday.

That's much less inflammatory and wouldn't generate nearly as many clicks, but, like I said, it's at least accurate.

As an aside, the dissent didn't believe that SCONE should have permitted the girl to have an abortion without parental or guardian consent. The dissent argued that there was no jurisdiction to hear the case, and so it should have been dismissed without more.

The text of the opinion begins on page 642 of this link.

EDIT: Actually the Houston Chronicle article on this case is very good. I suggest anyone interested in what the court held give it a read.

The practical effects absolutely mirror the thread title. Because she was a ward of the state, she has no way of having any abortion access that other 16-year olds in Nebraska might have with parental consent. Practically, they are barring any ward of the state from ever having an abortion because there is no possible way for those young women to get parental consent. It's fairly odious.

Not to mention the statement made by the trial judge telling she was killing the baby inside of her.
 
The studies of that particularly researcher seems to have been debunked and the American Psychological Association doesn't consider them accurate.

apparently she defended herself against her critics by saying "but look at all this other stuff I published."

lulz.
 

pigeon

Banned
Also, if you don't want kids to not have kids at 16 because "they are too young", then they shouldn't be having sex.

God, I wish somebody had thought of that before! Maybe you should go and tell them not to have sex. See how well it works.
 

crozier

Member
That's exactly what we don't want.

You're not going to find left-leaning media trumpeting suicide rates for girls who have abortions. Read the articles, open the links to genuine medical studies, and make your own determination from there. Even if the commentary from the original article (or website) is garbage, the studies often are not.
 

Derwind

Member
Also, if you don't want kids to not have kids at 16 because "they are too young", then they shouldn't be having sex.

Yes, abstinence forever.

You might want a camera or maybe an imvasive monitoring device to stop people who are too immature to have an abortion to not have sex.

I'm sorry but your post is not relastic, more like teach them safe sex, provide birth control and condoms freely to them and give them the option to deal with pregnancy if it arises early on.

But no, make a foster child have a foster child, once out of the womb let it fend for itself, living the american dream.
 
You're not going to find left-leaning media trumpeting suicide rates for girls who have abortions. Read the articles, open the links to genuine medical studies, and make your own determination from there. Even if the commentary from the original article (or website) is garbage, the studies often are not.

Do you know how objective statistics work? Serious question.
 

ivysaur12

Banned
You're not going to find left-leaning media trumpeting suicide rates for girls who have abortions. Read the articles, open the links to genuine medical studies, and make your own determination from there. Even if the commentary from the original article (or website) is garbage, the studies often are not.

But the study you listed was debunked by the APA. So, no Devo, don't read the article.
 
You're not going to find left-leaning media trumpeting suicide rates for girls who have abortions. Read the articles, open the links to genuine medical studies, and make your own determination from there. Even if the commentary from the original article (or website) is garbage, the studies often are not.

Well, we already talked about the female researcher. The male researcher is a known anti-abortion advocate.

Smells like bias. If the studies were so concrete, surely you could produce unbiased proof.

eta: shit, even less-biased proof.
 
No one forced her to become pregnant. I understand that the girl has gone through some tough times in her young life mostly because of her parents. It is still not a reason to have an abortion. She should go through the pregnancy and then give up the baby for adoption if she wanted to. It sucks, but it is better than killing an unborn child.

The only reason she isn't allowed to have an abortion is because Nebraska's backwards law saying that when it comes to abortion, parents get to supercede a pregnant girl's consent to an abortion even though if it were almost any other medical procedure she would be guaranteed the right to refuse or request treatment (specifically because she is pregnant) assuming she is alert and oriented.


I wish someone would make a remix of that recent antiobamacare add with the uncle sam puppet, but make it about conservartives and abortion.
 

FyreWulff

Member
Our state is still pretty fucking shameful at the legislative and executive level.

Fucking hell.

Nebraska is one of the states where it's damn near impossible to get your tubes tied as a woman because you have to basically get your husband to sign off, or you need to "save yourself" for a future possible man, but a dude can go get clipped without his wife ever being notified.

Can't wait until I get out of here
 

Smellycat

Member
Rollicking good number of assumptions out the gate.

Do you know the circumstances of conception?

I am assuming she wasn't raped or anything like that, otherwise her foster parents would know.

Do you know they didn't use some form of birth control?

Why does that matter? No form of birth control or condom can prevent pregnancies 100% of the time. There is always that chance of it happening.
 
Why does that matter? No form of birth control or condom can prevent pregnancies 100% of the time. There is always that chance of it happening.

I should know -- my five month old daughter happened after a busted condom and a Plan B. I chose to have her because I'm married and stable and can afford it. Was nice to have the choice, though.

For all we know, this girl could have been trying not to get pregnant and is now possibly stuck in an even worse situation than her already worse situation.
 
The only reason she isn't allowed to have an abortion is because Nebraska's backwards law saying that when it comes to abortion, parents get to supercede a pregnant girl's consent to an abortion even though if it were almost any other medical procedure she would be guaranteed the right to refuse or request treatment (specifically because she is pregnant) assuming she is alert and oriented.


I wish someone would make a remix of that recent antiobamacare add with the uncle same puppet, but make it about conservartives and abortion.

There's already this bit of brilliance.

e6z6ZQN.jpg
 

Dead Man

Member
Also, if you don't want kids to not have kids at 16 because "they are too young", then they shouldn't be having sex.

If you know of a way to stop 16 year olds having sex short of locking them, please let us know. Kids have sex, it is a biological imperative, to mix the domains of philosophy and biology.

The way to deal with this is to educate kids so they can make informed decisions, not punish them for being ignorant when the government sponsors that ignorance.
 

Metaphoreus

This is semantics, and nothing more
Because she was a ward of the state, she has no way of having any abortion access that other 16-year olds in Nebraska might have with parental consent. Practically, they are barring any ward of the state from ever having an abortion because there is no possible way for those young women to get parental consent. It's fairly odious.

If you're saying that only parents can consent for a child to have an abortion, then you're wrong. Guardians also can consent for a child to have an abortion. In this case, the trial court said that meant that the foster parents would have to consent, but it seems more likely the case that (as the dissent emphasized) the Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services would have to consent. If you're pointing out that the Department will not grant or withhold its consent, and that this short-circuits the exceptions normally available, then you're arguing what the dissent argued.

In any event, saying that a person is not mature enough to decide to have an abortion without parental or guardian consent is not the same as saying that a person is not mature enough to have an abortion. The latter implies that the abortion would not be permitted even with parental or guardian consent. That's why I say that the title and summary of the article are misleading. I think it's enough to point that out, though, and don't intend to argue over whether it is or is not misleading, since that's not really what the thread is about.
 

crozier

Member
Fox News proves that there is an actual market for intentional misinformation.

People want to hear what they want to hear. Both right and left leaning media in the United States caters to a particular audience to attract marketers and/or ratings. None of it is unbiased...not even close. Even when they pretend to keep it real, you get crap like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isMtxbPdvzg

If you want real news--or as close as you're going to get--you have to read the BBC (which has its own problems) or Aljazeera. Our media is crap. Period. All of it.
 

Derwind

Member
Why does that matter? No form of birth control or condom can prevent pregnancies 100% of the time. There is always that chance of it happening.

So at no point should people have sec recreayional but only when they want children? You don't give out many options.
 

Dead Man

Member
If you're saying that only parents can consent for a child to have an abortion, then you're wrong. Guardians also can consent for a child to have an abortion. In this case, the trial court said that meant that the foster parents would have to consent, but it seems more likely the case that (as the dissent emphasized) the Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services would have to consent. If you're pointing out that the Department will not grant or withhold its consent, and that this short-circuits the exceptions normally available, then you're arguing what the dissent argued.

In any event, saying that a person is not mature enough to decide to have an abortion without parental or guardian consent is not the same as saying that a person is not mature enough to have an abortion. The latter implies that the abortion would not be permitted even with parental or guardian consent. That's why I say that the title and summary of the article are misleading. I think it's enough to point that out, though, and don't intend to argue over whether it is or is not misleading, since that's not really what the thread is about.

That is an awfully fine distinction, and one that may be legally relevant, but for the purposes of judging the actions of the Nebraska court, family services, and government, not very important.
 

Smellycat

Member
I should know -- my five month old daughter happened after a busted condom and a Plan B. I chose to have her because I'm married and stable and can afford it. Was nice to have the choice, though.

For all we know, this girl could have been trying not to get pregnant and is now possibly stuck in an even worse situation than her already worse situation.

I am sorry, but that is not an excuse. She could have avoided that shitty situation by not having sex at all. Why should we encourage kids to have sex? It is absolutely ridiculous and irresponsible, regardless of whether that sex is safe or not.

People should know the risks and consequences of their actions and they should take responsibility for it. We shouldn't be teaching teenagers that it is ok to have sex all you want and we will give you an abortion if you need it.
 

Dead Man

Member
I am sorry, but that is not an excuse. She could have avoided that shitty situation by not having sex at all. Why should we encourage kids to have sex? It is absolutely ridiculous and irresponsible, regardless of whether that sex is safe or not.

People should know the risks and consequences of their actions and they should take responsibility for it. We shouldn't be teaching teenagers that it is ok to have sex all you want and we will give you an abortion if you need it.

Abused by her parents, living with religious foster parents, and in Nebraska. How much sex education do you think she has received?
 

Pau

Member
I am sorry, but that is not an excuse. She could have avoided that shitty situation by not having sex at all. Why should we encourage kids to have sex? It is absolutely ridiculous and irresponsible, regardless of whether that sex is safe or not.

People should know the risks and consequences of their actions and they should take responsibility for it. We shouldn't be teaching teenagers that it is ok to have sex all you want and we will give you an abortion if you need it.
People have sex. It's not really possible to stop it. The best you can do is educate people about it so they can have it safely. And no, a consequence of sex should never be: "You give up the right to your body if you have a vagina, sorry."
 

pigeon

Banned
I am sorry, but that is not an excuse. She could have avoided that shitty situation by not having sex at all. Why should we encourage kids to have sex? It is absolutely ridiculous and irresponsible, regardless of whether that sex is safe or not.

Teenagers often drive while texting, which is dangerous and irresponsible.

Therefore we should make it illegal for teenagers to wear seat belts, as doing so will only encourage them to drive.
 
I am sorry, but that is not an excuse. She could have avoided that shitty situation by not having sex at all. Why should we encourage kids to have sex? It is absolutely ridiculous and irresponsible, regardless of whether that sex is safe or not.

People should know the risks and consequences of their actions and they should take responsibility for it. We shouldn't be teaching teenagers that it is ok to have sex all you want and we will give you an abortion if you need it.

You're sorry I have a beautiful baby girl? I thought you'd be all pro-baby. But tell me, who's encouraging kids to have sex? Is anyone here advocating that? In schools? Anywhere? Is that really a thing?

People have sex. It's not really possible to stop it. The best you can do is educate people about it so they can have it safely. And no, a consequence of sex should never be: "You give up the right to your body if you have a vagina, sorry."

I couldn't cosign this any harder. And for fuck's sake, this is a girl who could not legally consent in the first place, but TOO BAD, vagina = life ruined. Shoulda known better. Might as well call her a dumb whore; the "consequences" rhetoric is just the polite version.

Abused by her parents, living with religious foster parents, and in Nebraska. How much sex education do you think she has received?

I asked this, too. These are the tough questions, see, that require more than rote answers.
 
Creating better circumstances is how to avoid issues of teen pregnancy. Not just yelling at them to keep their legs shut. Some of the places with abstinence sex ed also have a higher teen pregnancy problem, pure coincidence I'm sure.
 
Creating better circumstances is how to avoid issues of teen pregnancy. Not just yelling at them to keep their legs shut. Some of the places with abstinence sex ed also have a higher teen pregnancy problem, pure coincidence I'm sure.

Too difficult.

Also might empower poor people and women, you know. Help them gain a better footing. Can't have that.
 

FyreWulff

Member
Also in Nebraska she's cut off from most contraceptives

Birth control? Got exempted from companies that didn't want it

Morning after pill? Needs a prescription for someone her age. And then she'd be carded anyway. (Strangely, you don't get carded for buying condoms). Then she needs to find a pharmacy that carries it. If she was outside of Omaha, she's fucked for that. Just about every pharmacy outside of the city claims pro life views as a reason for not carrying it. Even inside the city you have to hope someone carries it.

Let's just drop her down the hole, guys. No fucking empathy or compassion for her well being.
 

Derwind

Member
Also in Nebraska she's cut off from most contraceptives

Birth control? Got exempted from companies that didn't want it

Morning after pill? Needs a prescription for someone her age. And then she'd be carded anyway. (Strangely, you don't get carded for buying condoms). Then she needs to find a pharmacy that carries it. If she was outside of Omaha, she's fucked for that. Just about every pharmacy outside of the city claims pro life views as a reason for not carrying it. Even inside the city you have to hope someone carries it.

Let's just drop her down the hole, guys. No fucking empathy or compassion for her well being.

Well thats one of the more depressing things I've read today. Might have to take a break from GAF tonight, too much feels. I'd hate to be born a girl in Nebraska in the next life. :/
 
I was agreeing with your wish not to be reborn as a girl in Nebraska and adding on. It's cool, man, we're on the same side here.
 

Derwind

Member
I was agreeing with your wish not to be reborn as a girl in Nebraska and adding on. It's cool, man, we're on the same side here.

Alright.....

Well maybe I should redact my original sentiment and say I wish to not be reborn a girl in any evangelical red state.

Just to clear up any lingering misunderstandings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom