The title of the article and the summary of the holding that opens the article are inaccurate. SCONE (as I'll refer to the Supreme Court of Nebraska) did
not decide that the girl was not mature enough to have an abortion, much less that she
was mature enough to give birth and care for the child. If I were to rewrite the opening paragraph of the article so as to accurately reflect SCONE's holding, I'd do it like this:
Anonymous 5, a 16-year-old girl, is not mature enough to decide for herself to obtain an abortion. Instead, she must first have a parent or guardian consent to the procedure.
So ruled the Nebraska Supreme Court on Friday.
That's much less inflammatory and wouldn't generate nearly as many clicks, but, like I said, it's at least accurate.
As an aside, the dissent didn't believe that SCONE should have permitted the girl to have an abortion without parental or guardian consent. The dissent argued that there was no jurisdiction to hear the case, and so it should have been dismissed without more.
The text of the opinion begins on page 642 of
this link.
EDIT: Actually the
Houston Chronicle article on this case is very good. I suggest anyone interested in what the court held give it a read.