The Frankman
Banned
True, but last year you might've just went 2 TE if you had the ability. You really liked Kendricks.I think the emphasis on Crazymoogle's comment is that most teams will DRAFT 4 running backs. Not that they'll necessarily carry them long-term. And drafting that way does make sense because extra TEs/Defense/Kickers will always be available on the wire.
Don't be like me last season and draft 2 Tight Ends and then start Lance Kendricks over Gronk which lost me my Week 1 matchup by a mere handful of points. Don't be cute with starting personnel because some schlub has a decent game or two against 3rd string defenders during the preseason. <slaps head repeatedly>
I dunno... WRs mostly get picked for KR/PR duties over RBs, so for that last W/R/T spot... do I want a 2nd TE I can flex, a WR who may go 2/35/0 but get me KR/PR points, or a very late round RB?You're not necessarily wrong, but given the current roster setup, I'd imagine you'd want your bench to be this:
WR-WR-RB-QB-W/R/T
That final slot there could be another WR or a TE, but in a large league value is still lost very quickly so I think you draft for value. If I can get a top 40 RB (Ryan Grant, Peyton Hillis, Toby Gerhart, etc. all qualified as that last year) I may very well do it over a top 70 WR (Arrelious Benn, Brian Hartline, etc) that is functionally just waiver fodder. It's very likely that 4th RB will be dropped due to waiver motility but in the draft you are looking for perks first.
I think guys like S-H just won't even be played under the current structure (admittedly a big improvement over last year's dregs!)
I guess what I'm saying is if you pick 3 halfway decent RBs, you'll have to get them before Round 7... you're going to risk having poor scoring balance from the rest of the roster, though it depends on your pick/amount of people I guess.
But then again I usually draft a QB in Round 1, picked Vick last year, and got reprimanded by management so what do I know?