That does happen to be the worst episode of any show ever.
However I liked the rest of the show and he might too. It's best he gets his own opinion.
is star trek popular outside of the US?
If you skip Season 1 of star trek TNG, a lot of Data's characterization goes out the window, and the entire Tasha Yar subplot of the series would make little sense.
You'd also lose out on beardless Riker, aka best Riker.
is star trek popular outside of the US?
I can't help but feel that this show is going to be a huge disaster because CBS is locking it behind their own paywall. Hardly anybody is going to even know about it, let alone subscribe for it.
When I studied in the UK for a year it was pretty big over there if I recall correctly, I was surprised and that's when I decided to give it a shot.
Star Trek in the UK historically got what is a great timeslot on BBC2 for kids and students, which was the 6.20 - 7.00 slot right after The Simpsons. Other alumni of that timeslot include Quantum Leap, Buffy and Sliders.
No, just the first episode will air on tv in the US. The rest of the series will be exclusive to All Access.
You think wrong. It's the crown jewel that's supposed to push the subscriptions to their streaming service.
Misread this earlier as US getting it on Netflix.
Thanks for ruining my day, OP.
btw, does CBS have an app on Xbox One or PS4 for their service?
Looks like I'll have to find other ways to watch the new Star Trek, because there's no way I'm subscribing to that access thing for one show.
Yo-ho.
They have to be aware of this, right? They aren't just gonna look at its performance and go "I guess people don't like Star Trek anymore".
Right?
EDIT: Misread. The US still needs to use the internets pirating platform.
That's my fear, too. I really have no idea what they're thinking with this idea. Do they have enough confidence in Trek that they think it can actually bolster All Access subs? The reboot has been successful and all, but still, I just can't imagine they think the brand is strong enough to do that.
CBS well have themselves to blame if the new series is not successful on a audience viewership level. What a way to stab yourself in the foot.
Put me down as another person who thinks locking Star Trek behind CBS's streaming service is going to hurt this series
This isn't the first time they've done something like this.
If you recall UPN started with Voyager exclusive to it, and that was back when a lot of areas didn't get it as it was a new network.
Of course the major difference is that consumers need to pay for it.
This isn't the first time they've done something like this.
If you recall UPN started with Voyager exclusive to it, and that was back when a lot of areas didn't get it as it was a new network.
Of course the major difference is that consumers need to pay for it.
I see the comparison you're making here but I'm not sure it's apt. When Voyager launched on UPN it already had a pretty solid install base of viewers plus I think at that time it also had WWF SmackDown back when that show was still fairly popular?
Nope. UPN launched (as in the first night of programming for it EVER) with the Voyager pilot.
Smackdown started in 1999. Voyager premiered in 1995, a full 4 years earlier. So Smackdown didn't even come around until Voyager was half over.
That's my fear, too. I really have no idea what they're thinking with this idea. Do they have enough confidence in Trek that they think it can actually bolster All Access subs? The reboot has been successful and all, but still, I just can't imagine they think the brand is strong enough to do that.
Star Trek tv show won't survive. Should have made a deal for the show to be on Netflix worldwide instead of CBS streaming garbage.
I have an issue of TV Guide from late 94 that is covered with a bunch of UPN/Star Trek Voyager promos announcing the launch date. Voyager was basically UPN's flagship tv series, they were banking on it making the channel popular.
Star Trek tv show won't survive. Should have made a deal for the show to be on Netflix worldwide instead of CBS streaming garbage.
Of course they think the brand is strong enough, or else why would they launch it only on All Access?
So where is Star Trek going to show in Canada? Shomi or CraveTV? I'll just use a trial to watch it then cancel.
I mean, yes, obviously. My statement is meant as more of a rhetorical one of disbelief that they feel the franchise is strong enough to actually do that.
Crave TV. Isn't Shomi owned mostly by Shaw?