There was this guy in a thread a while back.Does Geert have any supporters on GAF?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1344189#post230356676
There was this guy in a thread a while back.Does Geert have any supporters on GAF?
I only eat molten cheese, so it doesn't matter much to me
/edit: This is also about being known for cheese....like Swiss cheese, there it's even in the name + it's used to describe things as well.
I know what you're talking about. Just waiting for folks to come out in support of this fascist.Don't know but I've read quite a few from Holland saying if you don't want to integrate then leave. One or two are in this thread.
hint: "Swiss cheese" doesn't exist in Europe, including Switzerland for that matter. It's entirely an American thing.
Yeah, I should have used quotation marks but you are wrong if you think "Swiss cheese" doesn't exist in Europe.
Yeah, I should have used quotation marks but you are wrong if you think "Swiss cheese" doesn't exist in Europe.
Yeah, I should have used quotation marks but you are wrong if you think "Swiss cheese" doesn't exist in Europe.
http://www.france24.com/en/20170312-turkey-france-foreign-minister-referendum-rally-eu"The Netherlands, the so-called capital of democracy, and I say this in quotation marks because they are actually the capital of fascism...," remarked Cavusoglu during his visit to the northeastern French city of Metz.
Cavusoglu was addressing a gathering organised by a local Turkish association in Metz ahead of an April 16 referendum on whether to amend the Turkish constitution. The Turkish government is campaigning for a ”yes" vote, which would considerably increase the powers of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
#NotAllEuropeyeah "Swiss cheese" is definitely a thing. In Germany Emmentaler is often refered to as "Schweizer Käse"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmental_cheese
Cheese with holes = "Swiss cheese". There are tons of expressions, like "Your wall is full of holes, like a Swiss cheese". Or after someone is being shot several times: "They made Swiss cheese out of him".You are referring to Emmental I suppose, which the American "Swiss cheese" resembles. It is just one cheese variety that originates from Switzerland. Usually when people in Europe refer to cheese as being Swiss it designates the country of manufacture, not type.
Yeah, read that on Reuters. I really wish the EU would act more like a political bloc, especially the Western/Northern part.But coming back to topic.
Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu was granted access to speak in France in a pro-Erdogan referendung rally, his rhetoric seems to follow the official line of the Turkish government.
http://www.france24.com/en/20170312-turkey-france-foreign-minister-referendum-rally-eu
That does not mean that they support the PVV. Rotterdam's mayor, Aboutaleb (PvdA, labour party), has said the same for example.
I have a feeling stuff like this will be a nice boon for Wilders next week.
they are basically making tons of OJ
Just popped in this thread.
So, is globalisation officially dead yet?
Yeah, telling the people who are hardcore nationalistic for Turkey, that they should probably go to Turkey, isn't that outrageous.pretty much, painting regular Dutch people who are angry at these Edrogan supporters as fascists is kind of a big face palming on the part of the bleeding hearts who want to take a knee to anyone who doesn't want to integrate
after 2 or 3 generations, why wouldn't one intergrate already?
and then rally for a quasi-dictator Edrogan?
Edrogan is a jerk
Don't know but I've read quite a few from Holland saying if you don't want to integrate then leave. One or two are in this thread.
I can't comprehend how the turkish people can't see that the AKP is simply provocating. No friendly country goes batshit insane because they received a "no". Instead of persuading the opposite side with reason they just simply insult them in a fascist manner. I know that the turkish people saw an enhancing of their society for many years under Erdogan and its AKP. I also know that the former leading parties were elitist assholes and that the recent years are tough for muslims and it was always tough for brown people but it is way too easy to see what the Erdogan really wants to achieve and I'm sad that so many followers are just blind right now.
People should never be loyal to their political leaders. It should work vice versa.
That appears to be the only move in Erdogans playbook.I can't comprehend how the turkish people can't see that the AKP is simply provocating. No friendly country goes batshit insane because they received a "no". Instead of persuading the opposite side with reason they just simply insult them in a fascist manner. I know that the turkish people saw an enhancing of their society for many years under Erdogan and its AKP. I also know that the former leading parties were elitist assholes and that the recent years are tough for muslims and it was always tough for brown people but it is way too easy to see what the Erdogan really wants to achieve and I'm sad that so many followers are just blind right now.
People should never be loyal to their political leaders. It should work vice versa.
In a speech this month, Mr Erdogan said those voting "no" would be "siding with the coup-plotters", a reference to the attempted military overthrow last July.
Alluding to the Kurdish militant group the PKK, he added: "The separatist terrorist organisation says 'no'. Those siding with them say 'no'."
Other government officials, like the notoriously brash mayor of Ankara, tweeted that "all of the traitors say 'no'", adding a picture of opposition leaders and the exiled cleric the government blames for orchestrating the failed coup.
Penguen seized on the rhetoric. The message from the government is clear: you're either with us or with the terrorists.
Don't know but I've read quite a few from Holland saying if you don't want to integrate then leave. One or two are in this thread.
There's a limit to what even the most staunch supporters of multicultural society will tolerate, and this is one step too far.
The people who were protesting last night should just go (back) to turkey, they'll probably be happier there.
And no I'm not voting for the PVV, Wilders is a demagogue.
Don't know but I've read quite a few from Holland saying if you don't want to integrate then leave. One or two are in this thread.
All I know is that i'm now jonesin' for a nice turkey club sandwich.
Don't really see the problem here. Europe is very welcoming and tolerant and if you still can't integrate maybe you should just fuck off. I don't think we need to keep bending.
Funnily enough it's the same "non-integration" that happens in Turkey itself. Rural Turks migrate to the big cosmopolitan cities and stay amongst themselves. So even within Turkey itself these people do not integrate.Don't really see the problem here. Europe is very welcoming and tolerant and if you still can't integrate maybe you should just fuck off. I don't think we need to keep bending.
Poor france hahaCirculating Turkish social media is footage of a bunch of disgruntled Turks proclaiming "We don't recognize this flag!" and setting fire on...
Yeah.
Morans.Circulating Turkish social media is footage of a bunch of disgruntled Turks proclaiming "We don't recognize this flag!" and setting fire on...
Yeah.
Circulating Turkish social media is footage of a bunch of disgruntled Turks proclaiming "We don't recognize this flag!" and setting fire on...
Yeah.
Why are they burning a French flag? And seems hard to burn actually.Circulating Turkish social media is footage of a bunch of disgruntled Turks proclaiming "We don't recognize this flag!" and setting fire on...
Yeah.
First of all, being located in the Europe is kind of important when accepting new members. What is more, PKK has a long history of disputes and conflicts which haven't been resolved. I am not even going to touch the subject of Northern Cyprus. I wonder how accepting a barely-Eu continent country with ongoing conflicts is rational to you.
Turkey was in the "arms of danger" long before EU was formed. And no, if Turkey was a member of EU, it would be in the bottom of the living standards and human rights. It would also be the most different as far as the culture and religion go. Give me that list of EU countries which are less fit to be part of EU than Turkey is.
They do realize that we in the west tend to care less for symbols such as a flag than they do in Turkey?Circulating Turkish social media is footage of a bunch of disgruntled Turks proclaiming "We don't recognize this flag!" and setting fire on...
Yeah.
That is, hadn't it become a dictatorship.It's the same as Trump. Lots of rural and religious Turks support him.
Lets be honest, Turkey had no chance to join. There was a time Turkey would have done its best and complied and be european, but too many EU members have had an irrational hatred for Turkey.
And to put it bluntly, it is because Turkey is a majority Muslim country.
The prejudicial rejection these countries posed, has driven Turkey right into the arms of danger. Turkey would have been a better member than a number of EU countries I can think of.
Can you point out these Eastern European dictatorships? Belarus is not in the EU and is the only actual one. I guess you could make a case for Hungary going the wrong way. But besides that?That is, hadn't it become a dictatorship.
That said, most Eastern European countries in the EU also are.
They do realize that we in the west tend to care less for symbols such as a flag than they do in Turkey?
Also if you want to make a statement by burning a flag, at least burn it properly. Such a weak flame will only trigger my laugh.
They should burn the oranges they were stabbing before, that'd make for a real statement.
Wooden shoes?
Come on man, this shit writes itself.
Yes, we have an agreement. But that just means that we don't force Turks coming here to follow the integration lessons and such. We can still expect them to integrate on their own over time, since we are not talking about people who just arrived here, but people who have been here for decades or are simply born here.I agree with the approach of the Netherlands in this matter.
However, doesn't the Netherlands have an assosiation agreement with Turkey, allowing dual nationalities for Turkish citizens ánd pardoning them from integration to Dutch culture? Given this assosiation agreement, the Netherlands handled wrongly. They have an agreement with Turkey that Dutch Turks can be Turkish and that they don't have to integrate, why are they surprised that they act Turkish and don't integrate?
To be honest, this part is actually what bothers me. Namely, I do not believe for a second that our current government would have said "No" to this if (1) we weren't following suit of other European countries and (2) if it wasn't just before our general elections. We didn't dismiss their desire to come here and speak immediately, we backed out on an agreement which we shouldn't have agreed to in the first place. For what? To boast that you have a spine?
Kaya had nothing to do there. She wasn't even supposed to be there, and her traveling to Rotterdam was simply a provocation from Turkey after their other minister was denied landing rights.Agreement was not the right word to use. Unless the news article I'm reading is incorrect, the Dutch government initially stated that they would rather not have this political agenda occur on Dutch ground, but would have to take measures to make sure order is sustained if the meeting does go on. The next day they decided to cancel that and refuse the Turkish minister of foreign affairs access to Dutch grounds, though the dutch government states that this was because the Turkish government was reaching out to the community to protest. Did this reach-out happen early in these events? I remember reading that Turkish people were asked to protest because the Turkish minister was denied access. Then later the police deported Turkish Minister Kaya, who was on her way to the consulate and was in Rotterdam, though I assume this was because of the protests that had started.
Agreement was not the right word to use. Unless the news article I'm reading is incorrect, the Dutch government initially stated that they would rather not have this political agenda occur on Dutch ground, but would have to take measures to make sure order is sustained if the meeting does go on. The next day they decided to cancel that and refuse the Turkish minister of foreign affairs access to Dutch grounds, though the dutch government states that this was because the Turkish government was reaching out to the community to protest. Did this reach-out happen early in these events? I remember reading that Turkish people were asked to protest because the Turkish minister was denied access. Then later the police deported Turkish Minister Kaya, who was on her way to the consulate and was in Rotterdam, though I assume this was because of the protests that had started.
I'm glad Denmark has our back but silence from other EU-countries, particularly Germany, is super disappointing.
Apparently Turkey can just bully and blackmail a member country without challenge. Oh well, bring your empty insults, ineffectual sanctions and state-sponsored riots, Erdoğan. Our oranges can take it.
I'm glad Denmark has our back but silence from other EU-countries, particularly Germany, is super disappointing.
Apparently Turkey can just bully and blackmail a member country without challenge. Oh well, bring your empty insults, ineffectual sanctions and state-sponsored riots, Erdoğan. Our oranges can take it.
Fair enough. I retract my initial statement, though I wonder why you would rally up a protest if you're allowed to speak.
It has little to do with history. Or with outsidership, plenty of EU members come from formerly controverisial or adversarial backgrounds to EU countries. That is not a problem at all.
Denying genocide, oppressing citizens, denying human rights, and occupying Cyprus are some of the major roadblocks as to why Turkey's EU entry are raising concerns throughout EU citizenship.