Ark-AMN said:I mean good talent wise of course
The fact that this game is like 110% non-stop action that gets your blood pumping and also it looks better/more fun than BattlefrontRedbeard said:Looks like Battlefront forests with softened lighting (or bloom or whatever it's called). What's so amazing here?
Redbeard said:Looks like Battlefront forests with softened lighting (or bloom or whatever it's called). What's so amazing here?
SolidSnakex said:That its being done on current gen systems and runs at 60fps.
SolidSnakex said:That its being done on current gen systems and runs at 60fps.
SolidSnakex said:That its being done on current gen systems and runs at 60fps.
Ark-AMN said:Man, that is pretty good. Criterion is probably the only good team EA has at their disposal now (I mean good talent wise of course)
jarosh said:but.. but.. did no one see something odd in that picture?
![]()
:lol :lol :lol :loljarosh said:but.. but.. did no one see something odd in that picture?
![]()
Haleon said:I don't recall anyone saying this was ever going to run @ 60 fps.
Sadly, Criterion wasn't prepared to publicly release any media of Black just yet; as the team was adamant about keeping it and its conventions a secret for just a bit longer. Even so, you'll have to take our word for it that the game is absolutely stunning; with a bevy of special effects, animation, and lighting bits with almost no slowdown from the 60fps benchmark at all. We really wish we could show it to you, as we haven't been this excited for a game in quite sometime. Hopefully, we'll soon be back to tell you even more reasons why.
Good question -- non-exclusive, mature, third party games usually do quite well on the GC.PhoenixDark said::lol :lol :lol :lol
btw, why isn't this on the GC? -_-
This thread is useless without Battlefront forest pics. You can't just tease us with a pic war like that!Redbeard said:Looks like Battlefront forests with softened lighting (or bloom or whatever it's called). What's so amazing here?
PhoenixDark said::lol :lol :lol :lol
btw, why isn't this on the GC? -_-
DSN2K said:going by Criterion's typical bullshit the "online mode" is so important to the game they clearly cant put it on GC....
SolidSnakex said:I don't even think this is online.
Vaandaviii said:This is fucking awesome. ¿Will this forest be fully destructible just like the urban level? That could be orgasmic.
no. It is coming to Xbox and PS2, and possibliy Xbox 360Ramirez said:I did a search at EBgames.com,is this PS2 exclusive?Please say no...DS2=teh suck for FPS.![]()
PhoenixDark said::lol :lol :lol :lol
btw, why isn't this on the GC? -_-
At this point, the excuse would be "lack of sales"...DSN2K said:really ? that sucks but still maybe we might get a honest answer for a change on why the lack of GC support.
QFTShowDog said:Because Criterion obviously doesn't care about the Gamecube.
DSN2K said:really ? that sucks but still maybe we might get a honest answer for a change on why the lack of GC support.
ding ding dingrs7k said:Maybe because Criterion makes to want money?