Good call, I too like judging entire groups by single members that did things I find annoying.See now THIS I can get behind. Fuck them in every way possible until they change, not the stressed out freshmen who has no idea why people are screaming at him.
If a protest doesn't come with a major risk of being arrested odds are it's a waste of time.
And, as earlier pointed out, they're in love with a fuzzy, misremembered caricature of the man, which is why you'll often see him quoted to browbeat protesters with bullshit like 'MLK would not have protested like that' or 'MLK didn't fight and die so y'all could act like [insert any modern social movement] does!'
Most of the "left" ignores everything he had to say about economic justice since that's inconvenient for them.
The MLK Pokémon defense is real.And, as earlier pointed out, they're in love with a fuzzy, misremembered caricature of the man, which is why you'll often see him quoted to browbeat protesters with bullshit like 'MLK would not have protested like that' or 'MLK didn't fight and die so y'all could act like [insert any modern social movement] does!'
Depressing. But not surprising the slant their coverage gets. Also shithead anarchists ruining shit for everyone else.
Keebler Elf Jefferson Beauregard Sessions just wants to help Nana get her Master's.
Because they were black members of the LGBT community and they don't want to march with their uniformed oppressors
And police is a job not an identity.
And Pride used to mean something before it became tamed and "unpolitical" once certain members of the community umm got theirs.
Is this a serious suggestion?
But majority of people march with their job group. If BLM want to be political and raise awareness they can march and put up signs, it's fine. I just think strongarming the organizer into banning another group is not the right way to gain people's respect.
Yes, white fragility is a thing and it is important for black people to remember the privelege that they have of not being so fragile.
Of course it wasnt a serious suggestion.
They didn't strong-arm anyone. They protested and Pride TO agreed because fuck yeah solidarity.
TO Police responded by trying to get all funding cut and then marched in Solidarity with the NYPD and claimed they, some of the most aggressive oppressors of black folk, were leading the way and so much ahead of Toronto Pride.
Aka they proved exactly why the queer folk of BLM TO didn't want to march with them
I usually stay out of these threads. But this can't be stressed enough. I applaud people who stand up and march for what they believe in. But anarchists come and ruin everything.
It is a damn shame how they have been vilified by the media.
My dad still says that BLM wants to kill cops, that they're all thugs and anarchists. It's frustrating as hell.This is the thing. The BLM well has been effectively poisoned because the media made it out be Blacks vs Law Enforcement, BLM being shown as rioters and looters. Look at the sheer hatred Colin Kaepernick ia getting for taking a knee or not standing during thr anthem. He is a tatted up thug, fuck him etc. Ignoring his community work, working with children etc.
I knew this woukd happen as soon as they came out with blue lives matter or all lives matter, positioning a movement about police brutality and how it is affecting black citizens the most into an us vs them. If you are for BLM it meant you want no cops and anarchy blah blah.
I dislike the name of the movement as it should have taken all of 1 second to realize that every racist and their grandma will reply "all lives matter!!!" or "blue lives matter!!". So now we have to see such stupid rebuttals all the time.
My dad still says that BLM wants to kill cops, that they're all thugs and anarchists. It's frustrating as hell.
My dad still says that BLM wants to kill cops, that they're all thugs and anarchists. It's frustrating as hell.
It's a symptom of that "both sides" shit.
People are so intellectually lazy and dishonest, they prefer to say "both sides" when they don't want to actually look at both sides and pick one, convinced that it gives them some moral and intellectual high ground because they're "in the middle."
And so, I'll say again: FUCK people in the middle. Fuck moderates right up their fucking asses. If you care about the issues, you won't call yourself a fucking moderate.
They'll never empathize because they don't see a son, husband, father, etc walking home; they see a police officer doing his job, self defense, "if they felt threatened, they have to protect themselves", the person killed was obviously in the wrong or else the cop wouldn't have killed himThis is a huge reason I am out on the NFL.
BLM was basically a response to innocent young black men getting killed and no one giving two fucks about it.
Anyone who is against that can go fuck themselves and I hope bad things happen to them. How you can't empathize with the families when their sons, fathers and husbands are murdered when walking home from a convenience store is beyond me.
Fox News and right wing media. My dad only watches Fox and only trusts them and Mark Levin; also, he use to be a state trooperI do kind of wonder where these kinds of opinions of Black Lives Matter come from. I mean, I more or less know where they come from, but specifically. Are these absorbed from the media, or are they malicious assumptions based of a knowledge no deeper than the name, mission statement?
That stat is American history in a nutshell.The 35 v 83 stat is damning.
Because they don't see it as a racial thing; they see it as a "cops wouldn't shoot if they didn't feel threatened" thing.How can 45% of whites agree that cops are too quick to shoot at African Americans and then 60% feel that there is no racial bias? That seems contradictory.
How can 45% of whites agree that cops are too quick to shoot at African Americans and then 60% feel that there is no racial bias? That seems contradictory.
The stalled the parade without any notice and refused to move until their demands were met, in my opinion that qualifies as strong-arming. That put the parade organizers in a difficult spot, forcing them to agree with the demands, though they soon recanted their agreement.
If a "moderate" wants nothing to change because of their apathy to everyone else, they're really just a conservative in denial.
Fox News and right wing media. My dad only watches Fox and only trusts them and Mark Levin; also, he used to be a state trooper
If that's all you follow, you only see rioters, thugs, threats to kill cops, and so on
I don't think I could respect another human being who has so little empathy for his fellow man.They'll never empathize because they don't see a son, husband, father, etc walking home; they see a police officer doing his job, self defense, "if they felt threatened, they have to protect themselves", the person killed was obviously in the wrong or else the cop wouldn't have killed him
Fox News and right wing media. My dad only watches Fox and only trusts them and Mark Levin; also, he used to be a state trooper
If that's all you follow, you only see rioters, thugs, threats to kill cops, and so on
The name doesn't matter, they would have found away no matter what they called it. Cause they want to be racist fucks
"I want to care about black lives, but the branding sucks"