Support NeoGAF

[Amir0x]

:lol :lol :lol

Condemned sure as hell isn't on there, at least give me some credit.

Why not, man! That's from Monolith/SEGA! I mean, that's potential enough by name!

You know you want to. Complete the goal: Every XBX360 launch game in your hands on day 1

 

[dark10x]

uh, Saint's row wasn't running on the "whole console". The shots are pre-e3 putting the development kits at an even worse state than the PS3 kits. Now, I'm not saying its going to look any better when its complete, but you are twisting the facts.

Also, here is a screenshot of the getaway on PS2

doesn't look like the same Assets to me

perhaps you mean the assets from the original getaway demo

Just FYI...

The Getaway was NEVER shown in motion on the PS2 with visuals as you see in that second shot. Not only that, the second shot isn't even all that detailed...so it would hardly be classified as next gen.

The E3 PS3 demo WAS realtime, however, and was even running only on the CPU.

I love how impressed everyone seems to be in regards to that old fake Getaway shot, though. Look closely. While it sports good image quality and a nice design, the actual assets in use are dead simple. The buildings are EXTREMELY simplistic and the cars aren't much better. There is nothing impressive about it.

 

[TheJollyCorner]

........please hurry, TGS2005.

 

[PhatSaqs]

Now games are shitty if they dont have "next gen" graphics? :lol

 

[Ponn]

Now games are shitty if they dont have "next gen" graphics? :lol

Well yea, it's shitty because they could charge you $50 bucks instead of the expected $60 and put on Xbox.

 

[sangreal]

Just FYI...

Read the rest of the thread :rolleyes.

The Getaway was NEVER shown in motion on the PS2 with visuals as you see in that second shot.

So? Do you think you're the first person in the thread to point this out? Not only did I already concede that point, but it is entirely irrelevant.

Not only that, the second shot isn't even all that detailed...so it would hardly be classified as next gen.

Who the hell said it looked next-gen? My remark was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. I posted the Getaway ingame shot to compare to the PS3 demo. I only posted the Getaway render as a joke.

The E3 PS3 demo WAS realtime

This is true

and was even running only on the CPU.

This is not true, I already posted the quote earlier in the thread.

I love how impressed everyone seems to be in regards to that old fake Getaway shot, though. Look closely. While it sports good image quality and a nice design, the actual assets in use are dead simple. The buildings are EXTREMELY simplistic and the cars aren't much better. There is nothing impressive about it.

Who said its impressive? The point people make is that it looks better than the Getaway by quite a bit.

 

[Razoric]

Now games are shitty if they dont have "next gen" graphics? :lol

Yeah why would anyone spending $350+ on a new system expect "next-gen" graphics?

 

[TheJollyCorner]

Now games are shitty if they dont have "next gen" graphics? :lol

yup.
Grafix 4 th3 w1n

 

[bishoptl]

Yeah why would anyone spending $350+ on a new system expect "next-gen" graphics?

:lol

 

[TheDiave]

That shot reminds me of the back of Sugar Ray's album, "floored." Anybody else with that album see the similarity? :lol

 

[Zer0]

Do you have a video, or impressions of that demo? I remember those being renders that DC fans jumped on when the PS2 screens were released to show how underpowered the PS2 was compared to what Sony claimed. I can't remember any video of that.

these were CONCEPTUAL RENDERS that some moroons took as realtime on ps2,never was a demo,its just a excuse for sangreal to spill his shit

 

[Agent Icebeezy]

Why not, man! That's from Monolith/SEGA! I mean, that's potential enough by name!

You know you want to. Complete the goal: Every XBX360 launch game in your hands on day 1

No, it's every game I want on launch day. Sega hasn't given me reason to take faith into that game. Otherwise, I would consider. I'll take a chance on any game. Fool me once, shame on you. I don't get fooled twice. That is my approach to gaming

 

[sangreal]

these were CONCEPTUAL RENDERS that some moroons took as realtime on ps2,never was a demo,its just a excuse for sangreal to spill his shit

My god, can't you people read?

Ignoring the fact that I posted it as a joke, and admitted they are conceptual renders, WTF is the difference in the context that I posted it?

 

[Zer0]

My god, can't you people read?

Ignoring the fact that I posted it as a joke, and admitted they are conceptual renders, WTF is the difference in the context that I posted it?

the difference is that getaway never meant to look as these screens,only ps2 fanboys (first) and ps2 hataz (later) believed on that purpose

 

[sangreal]

the difference is that getaway never meant to look as these screens,only ps2 fanboys (first) and ps2 hataz (later) believed on that purpose

Perhaps, but that has nothing to do with my post. I wasn't comparing the Getaway and the Render. I was comparing the Render and the PS3 demo and it was meant to be tongue-in-cheek.

 

[Diablos]

Eh... nothing too impressive.

 

[CloudNL]

Those Saint's Row screens are just horrible.
Nothing cool about them.

 

[TigerKnee]

Now THIS is Next Gen!

 

[FightyF]

Why is it this thread labelled "360 screens" when they came off a PC?

 

[Barnimal]

360 not next gen enough for ya? lets remind you again what this gen looks like. nearing the END of its lifetime...

:lol

 

[Doom_Bringer]

360 not next gen enough for ya? lets remind you again what this gen looks like. nearing the END of its lifetime...

:lol

that's a multiplatform game by a studio that really isn't known for graphics...

 

[Barnimal]

thats an excuse.

 

[Barnimal]

how about the best of the best then?