-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
New screens from RE4 PS2
- Thread starter Elios83
- Start date
fiddlestick
Banned
xbox 1.5 indeed.
DieNgamers
Member
Gamecube 0.8 imo.^^
Attack You
Member
Man, what? Fuck it, the GC version's getting traded in. I hear the PS2 version comes with free Japanese talismans to ward off Mikami's floating head.
Looks good!
And the El Gigante looks good too:
Maybe it's a bit inferior on the technical side compared to the GC version, but the overall impression isn't affected by that IMHO.
Hmmm, maybe I'll get the PS2 version even though I've played through the GC version thrice.
BTW, where are the GC - PS2 comparison pics?
And the El Gigante looks good too:
Maybe it's a bit inferior on the technical side compared to the GC version, but the overall impression isn't affected by that IMHO.
Hmmm, maybe I'll get the PS2 version even though I've played through the GC version thrice.
BTW, where are the GC - PS2 comparison pics?
Do you really think most people will notice any of those differences when playing on their own TVs? VERY doubtful...Jacobi said:
This DOES look worse than the GC version, especially the villagers. You have to be blind to ignore the difference. Enviroments are Ok though.
For a game often touted as the best looking title this gen, I'd say you need to give the PS2 a little more credit. The GC is a more powerful machine, afterall...
El Gigante is clearly less detailed, though.
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
Shitty video captures, but it looks very simillar to the same kind of captures of GC version.
Attack You
Member
I've really only been waiting to see PS2 pics with lots of characters on screen (aside from cut scenes). I guess that's that, barring reports of slowdown.
The thing is, most people that will play this game will be unable to see a difference. The E3 trailer for the PS2 version looks shockingly close in motion. I can see the differences, but I don't think a lot of other folks will be able to.Jacobi said:
I should do very well.
I don't plan on buying it, of course, but I hope it garners this amazing game even more attention. It deserves sales...
typhonsentra
Banned
El Gigante looks pretty blocky though. I'm surprised by everyone who's so impressed by these shots though. What exactly were you expecting?
Alcibiades
Member
and this after your non-stop campaign against the graphics in the GCN version...dark10x said:
:lol
typhonsentra
Banned
Wha?
Edit: 27 post, 28 views. Wow!
GoutPatrol
Forgotten in his cell
So that's the new lazer gun, huh?
That does look pretty sweet.
But I don't think I would buy the same game twice.
That does look pretty sweet.
But I don't think I would buy the same game twice.
It happens sometimes....don't worry...the server will eventually correct itself and those 28 views will be something like 100+ (edit: 600+ actually :lol)typhonsentra said:
Wha?
Edit: 27 post, 28 views. Wow!
looks suprisingly close to the GC version...amazing as I thought RE4 was one of the best looking games this gen. Just goes to show how good art direction >>>> technical achievements I guess (looking at you, next gen =\)
Looks great, but i do feel RE4 is losing its graphical edge (both versions). I used to be amazed by it, i even had thoughts about it being the best looking game created, but not now, its not as impressive as it used to imo. Especially in 480p
But hats off to Cpacom, they almost got it to look as good as the GC version, now just imagine of they ported to Xbox, id love to see what they can pull of with the hardware.
But hats off to Cpacom, they almost got it to look as good as the GC version, now just imagine of they ported to Xbox, id love to see what they can pull of with the hardware.
dark10x said:
Not only that, I bet that the vast majority of the people buying this on the PS2 have never even played the GC version, so even if the PS2 version doesn't look quite as good as the Cube one, as long as it looks good on its own, then that's perfectly fine. So what if there's a few less polys here and there, and a few textures look slightly different, most people aren't going to be playing the two games side-by-side looking for differences. Most people are going to be experiencing this game for the first time and if it looks good and runs well, then that's all that really should matter.
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
I'd actually like to see him lit with something like a torch or a lighting. In GC screens he does seem lit with something to a greater degree than in PS2 screens, which could also be a deficiency of the port. He is also closer to a camera on GC screen which lets you see more detail on him (especially if they use some kind of LOD system on him)
When you see all the next gen footage, it's not a surprise. Also, first time you see anything, you are more awed than on repeated viewings, where you start to see inconsistencies and faults a lot more.
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
I don't think that's really lighting, that's just stronger contrast/gamma on his capturing device than it is on the other one. You can see all the same kind of highlights on PS2 screens, they are just more muted due to lower contrast/gamma.
Leatherface
Member
Not bad at all!
Now some of you stubborn bastards can finally play the best game this gen.
Now some of you stubborn bastards can finally play the best game this gen.
DieNgamers
Member
The 2nd pic looks much better to me (even as a quick capture)...There isn't missing very much, though... but theres something in the GC version which makes me feel it looks better.
Of Course we have to wait for the running game. That are only screenshots.
Of Course we have to wait for the running game. That are only screenshots.
