-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
new Super Princess Peach pics
- Thread starter neo2046
- Start date
Dragona Akehi
Retired
Xellos said:
I like the way you think. Definately up the "warioland" alley. The latest Nintendo Dream scans (I think it is) showed you selecting a weapon/emotion via touchscreen. I dunno why everyone is up in arms.
This game is going to be rox0r.
kryt0nian said:
What's wrong with paying full price for a beautiful 2D platformer? Not Castlevania pretty, perhaps, but pretty none-the-goddamn-less.
evilromero
Member
I could agree with that. But Mario Bros. is so far away.Ruzbeh said:Please. If you're going to troll, get it right! This game looks like a buttload of fun.
Hell, it looks a lot more fun than the new Super Mario Bros.
greenhouse
Member
krypt0nian said:
apparently they spent all the budget on working out new and interesting gameplay mechanisms, and didn't have any left for 3d 500,000 polygon models of whores.
Jesus Nintendo, what were you thinking?
Given the popularity of SMBUSA gameplay in Japan and the way Nintendo's development teams keep tossing elements of it into recent games (Donkey Kong "94", Mario vs. Donkey Kong, etc.), I'm still wondering if this is going to be more of a "standard" Mario platformer or a SMB2/USA/DDP platformer.
D
Deleted member 284
Unconfirmed Member
Dragona Akehi said:
Remember when Dragona smacked the shit outta everyone claiming that CV
S Looked worse than the GBA games and they were wishing for SotN graphics.yeah...don't make her do it again.
krypt0nian
Banned
Ruzbeh said:Please. If you're going to troll, get it right! This game looks like a buttload of fun.
Hell, it looks a lot more fun than the new Super Mario Bros.
Yes Nintendo fans calling troll when someone dares to question anything. Fuck off.
Seriously, are they charging full price for this game?
D
Deleted member 284
Unconfirmed Member
I have trouble with this line of questionning when 2k games is going to be charging more for the PSP version's of the Texas Hold 'Em games (29.99) compared to the Xbox/PS2 versions (19.99)krypt0nian said:
Yes kryp. Nintendo will be charging 29.99 for this game.
Mama Smurf
My penis is still intact.
krypt0nian said:
Seriously, what the fuck?
krypt0nian
Banned
olubode said:
I couldn't care less what another company is charging for a shitty poker game.
Thanks for the $ confirmation though.
Akai said:
That's not what I meant, and I think you know it.
Pretty game that suck aren't any good either. But that's no excuse for such a lazy effort as this. If it could have been done on SNES, then what's the point in doing it at all?
Castlevania is what 2d on DS should Look like. Viewtiful Joe is another example.
This is just lame. Like Lunar.
talking head
Member
bummyhead said:
yeah they probably shouldn't even bothered with making warioware, as it could have easily been done on the nes.
Mallrat83 said:
Dont be obtuse.
If a developer is making a game for any given system, they should ask themsselves if it could be done on and older system, and if so, do something to set it apart.
This game is a GBA game. It probably aways was a GBA game that nintendo swtiched over midway into development. The GBA is a current platform, so there is no reason not to release this game for GBA instead.
Now Polarium is another lazy POS grpahically, but it gets a pass because it could not have been done on GBA regardless of how shitty it looks.
Listen to yourself. If Sony made a game like this for the PSP you sure as hell wouldn't be so accepting.
C- Warrior
Banned
...I'd hit it.
Oh wait, it's not one of 'those' types of threads.
In anycase I'm getting a big bondage vibe when I saw the first set of screens.
But I'm just a bad man.
Oh wait, it's not one of 'those' types of threads.
In anycase I'm getting a big bondage vibe when I saw the first set of screens.
But I'm just a bad man.