Zeus Molecules
illegal immigrants are stealing our air
That cover is such a powerful statement wow
Many were aspiring models/actresses. They would still have trouble getting people to believe it wasn't consential. Again, we have people TODAY still accusing them of lying.Well I would hope they did their "JOB" and ivestigate performing a rape kit and see his DNA was all over me. If they couldn't do that then I do not know what to say. You have to let it be known no way 35 - 40? women have this happen and he get away with it
Oh you sweet summer child.Well I would hope they did their "JOB" and ivestigate performing a rape kit and see his DNA was all over me
Not sure what you're even on about, but I'd tread carefully.well I get it but you have to be careful. am I wrong to assume these things happen at night? If a famous actor says i want to help you with your career meet me here at 8:00-9:00 pm would it be wrong to question why you guys can't meet in the day time? Am I wrong to make this assumption?
And to think Cosby almost got away with this.
I heard many actresses have to sleep with well-known producers and directors to star in films, shows and plays. I know it isn't the same thing, but there's still plenty of disgusting stuff that people in power are getting away with.
isn't that just an actor though. I mean the bill cosby show is a guy acting a good dad loving husband.
It does seem that the practice is still going, regardless of gender. Whatever happened to those bryan singer accusations?
agree with this on so many levels. Was just saying this to a co-worker the other day. This needs to be a priority ... mental health studies need to be taking more seriously
On the flip side of this coin, that boy was dropped by his lawyers like a bag of boiling hot potatoes. Credibility issues started to roll in after it was discovered the the boy had already claimed in 2003 in a sworn deposition that Singer (and the others he was suing) was never involved in the mansion parties and sexual and physical assaults that he was accusing him of in his filing. But there was already a small thread on that months ago, to not derail this thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=864212&highlight=bryan+singer
The reality is we have a hard time in the worl but specifically this country having the tough conversations on topics that need to be dicussed. Everyone like to get emotional, point fingers, and make no progress at all. Going to be hard to make real change in the world.
exactly! It's a big reason why I object to the popular use of terms such as "insane", "psychopath" etc. Because when most throw them around it seems like they actually mean: "this is such an extreme and unlikely abnormality that there's no point trying to understand or predict it, and it could never happen to me or anyone I know!"
And that attitude is not only non-constructive it's ignorant and dangerous. It spits in the face of future victims and simultaneously encourages people's natural irrational prejudices, which are almost always misguided, thereby creating even more innocent victims. It's burying your head in the sand, just like people in the middle ages must have thought that certain bacterial infections where a sign of being cursed by the devil.
It's easy to rationalize shitty behavior if you want it bad enough. In his mind he probably thought that by taking them out, bringing them to hotels, and "letting" them be with a famous person he was doing them a favour.
I'm not too familiar with Cosby's public persona, he's usually ranting about the way young black men dress and act in public. He isn't talking about the importance of consent, so he might not feel that hypocritical. I don't think it's psychopathic, I think it's pretty naturally human. Cosby is obviously an extreme case, but I think you can compare it to how you can morally justify eating meat or speeding in your car. As long as you create a list of reasons why what you're doing is not so bad, or is natural it's easy to not feel guilty about it.
exactly! It's a big reason why I object to the popular use of terms such as "insane", "psychopath" etc. Because when most throw them around it seems like they actually mean: "this is such an extreme and unlikely abnormality that there's no point trying to understand or predict it, and it could never happen to me or anyone I know!"
And that attitude is not only non-constructive it's ignorant and dangerous. It spits in the face of future victims and simultaneously encourages people's natural irrational prejudices, which are almost always misguided, thereby creating even more innocent victims. It's burying your head in the sand, just like people in the middle ages must have thought that certain bacterial infections where a sign of being cursed by the devil.
Those are just labels to classify a set of symptoms and assign a diagnosis.
There are many, many very smart and skilled people around the world doing this research. The fact is that the mechanics of how a brain operates on a physical level is tricky and not a 100% complete picture, and thats to say nothing of the mind and the possible illusion that is a sense of self. Its only a more recent development that neuroscience and studies of the mind are working more in sync.
At this point psychologists could profile Cosby and neurologists could map the physical charqcteristics of his brain functions but the knowledge isnt there yet to link the two sets of data in a comprehensive way to get the hard answers you are looking for.
Yeah happened to me with Firefox. Try Chrome.Under the pictures is a link to "Read her story", when I click the stories don't show up. Is this happening to anyone else?
Oh, I think you do know what he's on about... :\Not sure what you're even on about, but I'd tread carefully.
Rationalizing your evil is not mutually exclusive with being a psychopath. I'm not a psychiatrist but I'm still very convinced that he's 100% psychopathic.It's easy to rationalize shitty behavior if you want it bad enough. In his mind he probably thought that by taking them out, bringing them to hotels, and "letting" them be with a famous person he was doing them a favour.
I'm not too familiar with Cosby's public persona, he's usually ranting about the way young black men dress and act in public. He isn't talking about the importance of consent, so he might not feel that hypocritical. I don't think it's psychopathic, I think it's pretty naturally human. Cosby is obviously an extreme case, but I think you can compare it to how you can morally justify eating meat or speeding in your car. As long as you create a list of reasons why what you're doing is not so bad, or is natural it's easy to not feel guilty about it.
People who might have known:
Camille Cosby
Other members of the Cosby family
Robert "I Spy" Culp
Sidney Poitier
Hugh Hefner
Richard Pryor
Other famous contemporary comedians or jazz musicians
Actors on the Cosby Show in general
Phylicia Rashad (maybe Debbie Allen? Ahmad Rashad?) in particular
Whoopi Goldberg (I'm just putting her on the list out of spite)
More people know than are willing to admit, I'm sure.
So there are zero criminal cases against him right now?
People who might have known:
Camille Cosby
Other members of the Cosby family
Robert "I Spy" Culp
Sidney Poitier
Hugh Hefner
Richard Pryor
Other famous contemporary comedians or jazz musicians
Actors on the Cosby Show in general
Phylicia Rashad (maybe Debbie Allen? Ahmad Rashad?) in particular
Whoopi Goldberg (I'm just putting her on the list out of spite)
More people know than are willing to admit, I'm sure.
The DDOS attack on the NYM is over, so the link in the OP should be readable again.
Still won't load for me. Not on Mobile. Not on wired. Who would DDOS them over this? Rape aficionados?
What set Cosby off?
Who was the first victim?
Why do this to people?
Still won't load for me. Not on Mobile. Not on wired. Who would DDOS them over this? Rape aficionados?
So whats stopping Cosby from reading all this and then packing all his shit up and fleeing to some country with no extradition treaty?
Apparently it's unrelated.Still won't load for me. Not on Mobile. Not on wired. Who would DDOS them over this? Rape aficionados?
Apparently it's unrelated.
http://gawker.com/new-york-magazine-taken-offline-by-hacker-who-hates-new-1720342481
http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/27/9047765/new-york-magazine-bill-cosby-rape-story-ddos-attackPrint distribution of New York has been unaffected by the attack.
Statute (not "statue") of limitations laws exist because they recognize that merely beginning court proceedings against someone is itself prejudicial; it's painful for all involved, it's costly for both the state and people, and more importantly, the likelihood of securing a conviction is extremely low unless the jury behaves in a prejudiced way. The kind of evidence needed to secure a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt in any serious crime vanishes the longer the time horizon goes. DNA is not available; already unreliable eyewitness accounts (not whatsoever saying anything about the victims, but rather corroborating witnesses) become even more unreliable, key actors move away or die, dates become fuzzy, etc. Which puts the jury in an unenviable position of deciding whether a likely guilty man should go free, or if they ought to "stretch" to convict. The system is engineered to make it hard to make people go to jail because it's much worse to have innocent people to go to jail than guilty ones walk.
There may well be grounds for dropping statute of limitations in the case sexual assault, as many jurisdictions do in murder and other serious crimes, but the logic has to be stronger than "Here is a guilty guy. We're mad we can't prosecute him. Time to find a way to throw him in jail."
Well I would hope they did their "JOB" and ivestigate performing a rape kit and see his DNA was all over me. If they couldn't do that then I do not know what to say. You have to let it be known no way 35 - 40? women have this happen and he get away with it
Yeah let's just shit on the reputations of people who might have known nothing at all. I'll bet Malcolm Jamal Warner held them down while the CEO of Jello pudding watched.
But it was such a huge part of how he presented himself to the world. Not just on that show, but on countless others. The man also did lots of work with young children. I don't buy into the notion that people live on a one dimensional moral scale, and I don't think there was a man or woman that ever lived whose life and personality could be accurately summed up in a single sentence. We all contain within us multiple contradictions, some more (and harsher) than others obviously.
And since there must be at least some level of genetic tendency to develop certain undesirable personality traits, by learning more about how this manifests we should be able to improve the rate of diagnosis at an early enough age to prevent some of these people from reaching the point where they can hide it from society. It's the only way to put a stop to this.
People who might have known:
Camille Cosby
Other members of the Cosby family
Robert "I Spy" Culp
Sidney Poitier
Hugh Hefner
Richard Pryor
Other famous contemporary comedians or jazz musicians
Actors on the Cosby Show in general
Phylicia Rashad (maybe Debbie Allen? Ahmad Rashad?) in particular
Whoopi Goldberg (I'm just putting her on the list out of spite)
More people know than are willing to admit, I'm sure.