M labeled cards for nvidia are designed for laptops and are way underpowered.
This is CNET specs from last article:
I was a PC gamer a long time ago. I was talking about notebooks inself. Held two, one with G (Samsung) and other with both G and M (HP) in their gpu ID.
Dunno as well. I don't know in what place CNET found that, but the article was up.
Those are not facts! Look at Nvidia Turing. GTX 1660ti and lower models have the same Turing arch without ray tracing cores. They didn't need to make 2 different archs to make a GPU with and without RT cores. They just stripped the RT, tensor cores and here you go! But somehow AMD haven't thought longterm and they need to overhaul their arch just to add RT solution?
www.freepatentsonline.com
Here's a hoot. First people were insisting PS5 only had software RT when it was unclear in the first Wired article, then when Cerny addressed that directly and said it was hardware in the second one, it's this. How would you even make RT only applicable to shadows, makes no sense.
And that's before I noticed the username
I'd argue it's far more likely to get the exact same 400mm2 APU for both Sony and MS (yeah, this means console wars will be dead), with slightly different clocks/cooling systems.
Here's a hoot. First people were insisting PS5 only had software RT when it was unclear in the first Wired article, then when Cerny addressed that directly and said it was hardware in the second one, it's this. How would you even make RT only applicable to shadows, makes no sense.
And that's before I noticed the username
nVidia uses discrete pipelines, while AMD's RT solution seems to be more intertwined with the CUs:
Agreed. I think the smart part refers to the BC above all. Then gratuitous NAND DRAM, and (imo) hybrid/shader-based RT. I was going back over the leak to refresh my memory. I put some findings in this quote to prevent clutter.
Sony and MS don't just work with finished chip designs from AMD which they then just glue together into an APU. They share blueprints. Sony has their own engineering team that works with AMD to make a custom chip based on AMD's blueprints. They can literally make a RDNA and RDNA2 hybrid which is not a full RDNA2 design but borrows elements that are implemented into their custom solution. Yeah, that means it could borrow the RT design parts and implement them into their design. So it doesn't have to be a full RDNA2. If there would be compatibility issues then it wouldn't be called RDNA2. It clearly fallows the RDNA design. How hard it is to understand this part?Well they did patent the specific RT design which goes into detail of the entire GPU and not just adding cores to an old unit.
TEXTURE PROCESSOR BASED RAY TRACING ACCELERATION METHOD AND SYSTEM
Complete Patent Searching Database and Patent Data Analytics Services.
Maybe, crazy thought here.. maybe, their current design just doesn't support Ray Tracing?
At this point and IMO I don't even care, but both ZhugeEX and Nibel receive this material.
Here's a hoot. First people were insisting PS5 only had software RT when it was unclear in the first Wired article, then when Cerny addressed that directly and said it was hardware in the second one, it's this. How would you even make RT only applicable to shadows, makes no sense.
And that's before I noticed the username
Doesnt need HBM3, enough would be 256 bit bus vs 320 bit bus. In this case, they saved 16mm² but with faster memory achieve higher BW.
Can you link us with this post?
wccftech.com
I have printscreen on my computer, but I remember be posting on twitter as well. Will post here.
www.t3.com
June 2020 is my prediction, unless they do it in during CES which would be surprising. They may want to beat Microsoft to the punch.
Thats why this second article will make them salt. Maybe some info in next days. Who knows... More info about Scarlet is good for the thread anw.We'd never hear the end of the fanboy drama if the Xbox was more powerful than the PS5
We are already getting plenty of drama from Xbox fanatics just at the mere suggestion of a PS5 on par with Xbox. Shouts of "the RT is just software!!" everywhere.We'd never hear the end of the fanboy drama if the Xbox was more powerful than the PS5
We'd never hear the end of the fanboy drama if the Xbox was more powerful than the PS5
Not true. RT reflections are much more expensive than RT AO or shadows.
Agree with a lot of it, but turing GPU's use very few RT cores (even 2080ti). If AMD found a way to accelerate RT operations on shader units, then RT performance on next xbox and playstation should easily surpass even 2080ti RT performance.
It was never leaked, rather skimmed off a api server. Sooooo
Yeah this was old ? Anything new other than the soc rumor by komachi that came up today?
