saintjules
Member
I bet you it was a scheduled tweet, lol.Hmmmmm
I bet you it was a scheduled tweet, lol.Hmmmmm
i mean theres more leaks from Sony than MSIMO it's a great achievement for Sony to keep the secrets for so long. It reminds me on apple at the early 2010's. Today, an iPhone is completely uncovered weeks before the keynote. In case of Samsung there even was a leak of a banner from the Samsung website they normally wanted to upload the same day after the offical reveal of the S20. Content: Buy a S20+ or s20 Ultra and get the Galaxy Buds+ for free. As this banner was leaked there wasn't even known there will be another Galaxy Buds.
(If it's not pure marketing from Apple and Samsung)
Cerny talked about audio RT because it's new thing, technology in games, what's wrong with that? how it's misunderstanding? do you think he's gonna spil the beans about RT on his first interview? you might say ps5 lacks BC because cerny didn't talk about it or Ryan didn't mention it at CES.
and you still doubt it?like what he's have to tell you to make you believe it?
wee don't even know if that leak is real and even it's real that don't disprove anything about ps5 just because there's RT in xsex leak.
yes it doesn't have RT because Ryan didn't mentions it but later he says that they will share more features about ps5 in coming months by then ps5 probably have RT by that time if he mentions it because Cerny mentioning is not enough for you,
it's hard to tell that you're trolling? or really have flawed logic?
key word: I see, next time send email to sony and ask that they will talk about what you want them to make a list or something.
here i can prove it:
![]()
![]()
Xbox Series X specs - what's inside the next-generation console?
This is why Microsoft believes that Xbox Series X specs will deliver the "most immersive console experience ever"www.gamesradar.com
Damn, Geoff, don't do this. Smelling a PS5 delay into 2021 incoming. Would certainly fit with not going to E3, not revealing PS5 right now and Corona virus uncertainties.
Damn, Geoff, don't do this. Smelling a PS5 delay into 2021 incoming. Would certainly fit with not going to E3, not revealing PS5 right now and Corona virus uncertainties.
And that was just from RedGamingTech. Wait til you see the rest!The other day i search "PS5" in youtube, and the results are 99.9% hot garbage. Hideous characters, mediocre content, clickbait and fanboys. Not recommended.
Its actually 1950 mhz on my system with rare jumps to 2000 mhz but yeah, always add another 200 mhz.What is "normal mode"? NVIDIA boost isn't the same as AMD boost.
If you look at official specs from nvidia, take the boost clock, add another >200mhz, and that's your sustained average clocks. For whatever reason, nvidia does the opposite of AMD and undersells their Tf vs AMD's over inflated number. NVIDIA shows 1710 boost clock and 10tf for 2080 when in reality it sits at >2000mhz and ~12Tf.
Yup. AMD advertises max theoretical power while NVIDIA low balls by quite a bit.
Damn, Geoff, don't do this. Smelling a PS5 delay into 2021 incoming. Would certainly fit with not going to E3, not revealing PS5 right now and Corona virus uncertainties.
Money well spent.
That's alot of money's
Money well spent.
The most suprising part is knowing that Ted Price is still working with all that money in the bank.
Well, he could at least take a sabbatical year around the world, plenty of money for that.The most suprising part is knowing that Ted Price is still working with all that money in the bank.
Zenimax 300m cash take it or leave it![]()
Slightly off-topic. Seems there's clarification regarding Sony TVs to support HDMI 2.1. Looks like some of the 2020 models will support the feature.
![]()
Sony details HDMI 2.1 features in its 2020 OLED & LCD TVs
HDMI 2.1 matters if you're planning to invest in PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series Xwww.flatpanelshd.com
No surprise, 2.0 is outdated and doesn't make sense to use this in new / current models.
So who was the idiot that started the GCN rumor again? After Microsoft saying specifically that they are using RDNA?
Probably the same idiots who keep referring back to the debunked github leak.
Money well spent.
The IPs they own aren't exactly system sellers. Obviously, it's a payment for the talented team but usual studio acquisitions take IPs into account and Insomniac is best served doing IPs owned by others like Ratchet and Clank and Spiderman.I thought it's low
Github leak was never debunked; Matt and Klee just said "disregard it", but failed to provide any context. Further GPU benchmarks still show the same chip with slightly tuned settings with successive steppings, which have if anything validated at least a chunk of the leak (i.e Oberon as a chip is still pertinent to PS5).
I keep trying to tell you that people can safely disregard parts of the leak as being potentially illogical, but it's not 0% relevant to PS5. Don't know why that's so difficult to understand.
They were already making 1st party games for PS, I guess maybe some companies were sniffing around thinking about possibly snatching the studio up. Sony wasn't taking any chances of losing them.agree. well spent money. one more Spider Man and they going to rake the profit out of them. and still they have Ratchet and Clank, Resistence series.
They were already making 1st party games for PS, I guess maybe some companies were sniffing around thinking about possibly snatching the studio up. Sony wasn't taking any chances of losing them.
Good to hear!I noticed on their site they are doing a lot of VR games these days. Maybe that's it.
Stadia.Damn, Geoff, don't do this. Smelling a PS5 delay into 2021 incoming. Would certainly fit with not going to E3, not revealing PS5 right now and Corona virus uncertainties.
Yes it has. Everything about it has already been proven either incorrect (No RT) or extremely unlikely. (Dual-GPU setup).
MS using GCN has just as much chance.
[
Jeez, dude, you haven't even been paying attention. The no RT part was explained in RT not being enabled for regression tests (the RT blocks were disabled). The dual-GPU stuff is not even hinted in the Github leak; that is what other people have speculated to try and boost up the performance. But even in that case, again, disabled blocks. Oberon likely has a chunk of CUs (like the 48 CUs listed in a chip graphic drawn and posted a while ago) disabled likely due to bugs (a recent Oberon stepping fixed a bug related to memory bandwidth). PS4 GPU data also had a chunk of its CUs disabled for testing PS4 compatibility, no reason PS5 wouldn't be the same.
Plenty of people have spoken about both of these things in depth (including myself); you are trying really hard at this point to willfully ignore it when most of the people referencing Github leak aren't even 100% buying every single thing it mentioned (we don't need to, because successive GPU benchmarks have shown further Oberon progression).
So no, it hasn't been debunked whatsoever. Certain parts of it are unrealistic (retail GPU @ 2GHz for example), but other parts of it are still valid and Oberon itself is very much related to PS5.
Yes it has. Everything about it has already been proven either incorrect (No RT) or extremely unlikely. (Dual-GPU setup).
MS using GCN has just as much chance.
Certain parts of it are unrealistic (retail GPU @ 2GHz for example), but other parts of it are still valid and Oberon itself is very much related to PS5.
You can't just not enable RT, it's either their or it's not and it wasn't. We're talking hardware here not software.
And yes the leak mentions two GPU's, and it's proven to not be an upgrade. Maybe they're each the BC1 and BC2 leak.
There is no mention of total CU count.
It also has ties to Arden which was once thought to be Xbox related. And what was the excuse for that again? Oh that's right, maybe an intern wrote it up.
Now don't also forget these tests were run after Sony already had the hardware in their hands. IE. DEBUNKED!
36 CUs was listed as "full chip" Arden being in ps5 chip results was an error from the script used. It's real. Better to say it's all out of context, outdated or whatever but it isn't fake or disproven at all.
Why would they launch a site that says it's coming this holiday after all that stuff is out?Damn, Geoff, don't do this. Smelling a PS5 delay into 2021 incoming. Would certainly fit with not going to E3, not revealing PS5 right now and Corona virus uncertainties.
Has the 'retail GPU' part been leaked/confirmed? And is that consistent with what we know of the original PS4 APU heat/power draw and the PS3 RSX heat/power draw in the original PS3? The reason I ask is that I thought the RSX was based on a Nvidia Quadro card's heat/power draw. Would Sony be buying at a level where they would be getting Radeon Pro level GPU silicon inside the APU? Or are they definitely getting 'retail'?
You can't just not enable RT, it's either their or it's not and it wasn't. We're talking hardware here not software.
And yes the leak mentions two GPU's, and it's proven to not be an upgrade. Maybe they're each the BC1 and BC2 leak.
There is no mention of total CU count.
It also has ties to Arden which was once thought to be Xbox related. And what was the excuse for that again? Oh that's right, maybe an intern wrote it up.
Now don't also forget these tests were run after Sony already had the hardware in their hands. IE. DEBUNKED!
No no, I was just saying that even if Oberon (more likely a future stepping of Oberon) is the final chip, it very likely won't hit 2GHz in the retail model because that could balloon the power dissipation. And 2GHz is way beyond Navi's sweetspot for watts/performance, drawing tons more heat at that range for relatively poor (or at least tepid) gains in performance.
If you've never done diagnostics testing on hardware, then you should at least know that certain parts of the hardware can be tested or not tested depending on what one wants to test. That's kind of what I was alluding to when mentioning the RT not being enabled; it simply wasn't be tested for in the regression tests.
...although, even with not providing that explanation, you are still wrong. If CUs can be enabled or disabled, then yes, RT cores can also be disabled or enabled. This should be plainly obvious.
No, Arden is still mainly thought to be XSX-related. There's a chance it could be related to Oberon but there haven't been any other GPU benchmarks datamined for Arden IIRC, just Oberon (out of the two). Of course no total CU count was mentioned, that's why I mentioned that there could be a chunk of CUs on Oberon that are not functional on prior steppings, could be related to bugs in the silicon. A semi-recent Oberon stepping fixed a silicon bug to up the bandwidth. And again, PS4 Pro's GPU during tests had a block of CUs disabled for PS4 regression testing.
What hardware? What are you even referring to anymore? I think you have a conspiracy that anyone who pays any interest to the Github leak either thinks PS5 will be 9.2TF @ 2Ghz or less than 9TF with the clock lowered. Well, talk to the people who reference to the leak in that capacity; I've said my piece plenty of times by now, I don't think either of scenarios are going to happen. Just dig through my post history on my personal speculations for most probable scenario regarding PS5 performance and what factors can lead to them. I'm not gonna type it all up again.
Champions League returns on th 18th feb.
Sony is a huge sponsor.
Im betting some PS5 info in that week will drop.
BROOOOOOOO!!!!It wasn't just the E3 reveal video for scarlett. It's AMD's press release on their official blog where they commit to it while labeling it next gen RDNA. It's also the official Series X reveal post. Microsoft is doubling and tripling down. Cerny's first example was regarding audio ray tracing, no big deal, likely a misunderstanding. He then clarifies hardware acceleratio on a follow-up. I now think the issue is dead. Then the AMD GitHub leak where it doesn't appear at all for ps5 chip, but does for Xbox series x chip. Now I'm rethinking what Cerny said and now have doubts. Then comes CES, they put up a slide showing it. I again think the issue is put to bed, only to then bizarrely learn that of all features on the slide, the guy on stage literally talks about everything on the slide, except hardware based ray tracing.
Consider that to mention every other feature on that slide, he had to skip past hardware ray tracing twice. I found that extremely odd. Why do they seem so reluctant to talk about one of the most hyped new graphics features coming into next gen? Do I expect to see it in every game? No, it's too demanding. Now I've left open the possibility that they may have it, but I have legitimate reason to doubt it now. Phil, again, has further confirmed hardware accelerated ray tracing via interviews also.
So, long story short, I see one side projecting confidence whereas I see the other being evasive on the issue. Maybe I'm wrong, and I will gladly eat crow. But I'm going to need to see it in a released title to believe it.
And, make no mistake, just because I believe Xbox really has it, doesn't mean that they, too, don't need to prove it from where I'm sitting. Both need to prove they have the real deal, or they shouldn't claim that they do. That's how I see it. So hopefully that's a complete enough answer on my thought process. It'll be the last time I address it, though, till we get more verifiable information on both consoles, but Sony have not portrayed the same degree of confidence where ray tracing is concerned. If we are being honest, there has been a clear difference between how the two sides have been marketing the feature.
Another 20 pages of github incoming.